<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Annals of Oncology - recent issues</title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Oncology - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1569-8041</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0923-7534</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1151?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1153?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1163?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1170?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1178?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1210?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1216?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1223?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1230?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1236?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1249?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1257?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1264?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1270?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1275?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1281?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1281-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1282?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1283?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1285?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1285-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii7?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii17?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii29?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii115?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/971?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/973?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/985?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/993?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1001?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1008?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1013?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1026?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1032?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1037?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1042?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1048?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1057?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1062?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1068?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1074?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1080?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1086?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1094?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1100?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1105?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1121?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1127?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1136?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1143?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1144?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1146?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1147?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1148?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1149-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1150?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1151?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1151?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp339</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1151</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1151</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1153?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The use of sedation to relieve cancer patients' suffering at the end of life: addressing critical issues]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1153?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cherny, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp302</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The use of sedation to relieve cancer patients' suffering at the end of life: addressing critical issues]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1155</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1153</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What is the role of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Most breast tumors depend on female sex hormones for development and growth, thus being amenable to endocrine therapies. In the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, advanced breast cancer, conventional wisdom dictates the use of endocrine therapy for patients with good prognostic features, whereas chemotherapy is recommended for the treatment of visceral crisis. There is, however, considerable uncertainty regarding the best initial strategy for patients with poor prognostic features other than visceral crisis, such as small-volume visceral involvement and a short disease-free interval after adjuvant therapy. In this article, we examine the role of chemotherapy in ER-positive, advanced breast cancer. Our review of the literature suggests that, in the absence of visceral crisis, endocrine agents should always be considered a major option for the initial treatment of ER-positive, metastatic breast cancer due to their proven efficacy and favorable toxicity profile. Although certain chemotherapy agents can induce higher response rates and more rapid responses, which are desirable effects in particular situations, the up-front use of chemotherapy does not seem to influence the overall outcome of the disease. In the subset of patients with epidermal growth factor type 2-positive disease, on the other hand, current data still do not support the use of endocrine agents alone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrios, C. H., Sampaio, C., Vinholes, J., Caponero, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn756</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What is the role of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1162</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1163?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Palliative sedation therapy does not hasten death: results from a prospective multicenter study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1163?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Palliative sedation therapy (PST) is indicated for and used to control refractory symptoms in cancer patients undergoing palliative care. We aimed to evaluate whether PST has a detrimental effect on survival in terminally ill patients.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> This multicenter, observational, prospective, nonrandomized population-based study evaluated overall survival in two cohorts of hospice patients, one submitted to palliative sedation (A) and the other managed as per routine hospice practice (B). Cohorts were matched for age class, gender, reason for hospice admission, and Karnofsky performance status.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Of the 518 patients enrolled, 267 formed cohort A and 251 cohort B. In total, 25.1% of patients admitted to the participating hospices received PST. Mean and median duration of sedation was 4 (standard deviation 6.0) and 2 days (range 0&ndash;43), respectively. Median survival of arm A was 12 days [90% confidence interval (CI) 10&ndash;14], while that of arm B was 9 days (90% CI 8&ndash;10) (log rank = 0.95, <I>P</I> = 0.330) (unadjusted hazard ratio = 0.92, 90% CI 0.80&ndash;1.06).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> PST does not shorten life when used to relieve refractory symptoms and does not need the doctrine of double effect to justify its use from an ethical point of view.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maltoni, M., Pittureri, C., Scarpi, E., Piccinini, L., Martini, F., Turci, P., Montanari, L., Nanni, O., Amadori, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Palliative sedation therapy does not hasten death: results from a prospective multicenter study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1169</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1163</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life/supportive care/palliative care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1170?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comprehensive clinical follow-up of late effects in childhood cancer survivors shows the need for early and well-timed intervention]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1170?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Due to recent advances in treatment, nearly 80% of childhood cancer patients become long-term survivors. Studies on the late effects of survivors are under way worldwide. However, data on Asian survivors remain limited.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Data on 241 survivors at the Long-term Follow-up Clinic in Severance Hospital, South Korea, were collected and late effects were confirmed by oncologists.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The median follow-up from diagnosis was 7.8 years. Late effects were identified in 59.8% of survivors and 23.2% had two or more late effects. Grade 3 or higher late effects were present in 10.8%. The most common late effects involved endocrine system (29.0%). Late effects were present in 95.7% of brain tumor survivors and 36.0% of Wilms' tumor survivors. Chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and radiotherapy were significant factors associated with the number and severity of late effects (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Brain tumor survivors had more severe late effects (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), whereas Wilms' tumor survivors had fewer and milder late effects (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The observation that over 50% of cancer survivors suffered from late effects during the short follow-up period and that a high frequency of endocrine late effects was present indicates the need for early and well-timed intervention of the survivors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Han, J. W., Kwon, S. Y., Won, S. C., Shin, Y. J., Ko, J. H., Lyu, C. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn778</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comprehensive clinical follow-up of late effects in childhood cancer survivors shows the need for early and well-timed intervention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1177</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1170</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life/supportive care/palliative care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1178?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A risk score to predict disease-free survival in patients not achieving a pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1178?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We aimed to predict disease-free survival (DFS) in patients who failed to achieve a pathologic complete remission (pCR) after preoperative chemotherapy (PC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Data from 577 patients treated with PC and operated at the European Institute of Oncology (EIO) were used to develop a nomogram using Cox proportional hazards regression model based on both categorical (pT, positive nodes, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, vascular invasion) and continuous histological variables (estrogen receptors and Ki-67 expression) at surgery. The nomogram was tested on a second patient cohort (343 patients) treated in other institutions and subsequently operated at the EIO.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The nomogram for DFS based on both categorical and continuous variables had good discrimination in the training and the validation sets (concordance indices 0.73, 0.67).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The use of a nomogram based on the degree of selected histopathological variables can predict DFS and might help in the adjuvant therapeutic algorithm design.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colleoni, M., Bagnardi, V., Rotmensz, N., Dellapasqua, S., Viale, G., Pruneri, G., Veronesi, P., Torrisi, R., Luini, A., Intra, M., Galimberti, V., Montagna, E., Goldhirsch, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn747</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A risk score to predict disease-free survival in patients not achieving a pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1184</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1178</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1185?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preoperative weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel with G-CSF support in triple-negative large operable breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1185?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Findings from our previously published phase II study showed a high pathologic complete remission (pCR) rate in patients with triple-negative large operable breast cancer after the administration of eight cisplatin&ndash;epirubicin&ndash;paclitaxel (PET) weekly cycles. The safety and efficacy data of the initial population were updated, with inclusion of additional experience with the same therapy.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Patients with triple-negative large operable breast cancer (T2&ndash;T3 N0&ndash;1; T &gt; 3 cm) received eight preoperative weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, epirubicin 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, paclitaxel (Taxol) 120 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 &micro;g/kg days 3&ndash;5) support.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Overall 74 consecutive patients (T2/T3 = 35/39; N0/N+ = 26/48) were treated, from May 1999 to May 2008. At pathological assessment, 46 women (62%; 95% confidence interval 50&ndash;73) showed pCR in both breast and axilla. At a 41-month median follow-up (range 3&ndash;119), 13 events (nine distant metastases) had occurred, 5-year projected disease-free survival (DFS) and distant disease-free survival being 76% and 84%, respectively. Five-year DFS was 90% and 56% in pCRs and non-pCRs, respectively. Severe neutropenia and anemia occurred in 23 (31%) and eight (10.8%) patients, respectively. Severe non-hematological toxicity was recorded in &lt;20% of patients. Peripheral neuropathy was quite frequent but never severe.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Eight weekly PET cycles are a highly effective primary treatment in women with triple-negative large operable breast cancer. This approach results in a very promising long-term DFS in this poor prognosis population. This triplet regimen is worthy of evaluation in phase III trials.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frasci, G., Comella, P., Rinaldo, M., Iodice, G., Di Bonito, M., D'Aiuto, M., Petrillo, A., Lastoria, S., Siani, C., Comella, G., D'Aiuto, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn748</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preoperative weekly cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel with G-CSF support in triple-negative large operable breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1185</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1193?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1193?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) allows for <I>in vivo</I> testing of treatment effects on tumor and its microenvironment. Aim of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of PCT on tumor biomarker expression and to evaluate the prognostic role of treatment-induced variation of these biomarkers (molecular response).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Two hundred and twenty-one stage II&ndash;III breast cancer patients were included. The following parameters were evaluated at baseline and on surgical specimens after PCT: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki-67, p53, human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), and apoptosis.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> A pathological complete response was observed in 8.8% of the patients. PCT induced a significant reduction in the expression of ER, PgR, Ki-67, and apoptosis. As by multivariable model, Ki-67 &ge;15% and nodal positivity after preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) were significant predictors of worse disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 3.79, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001 and HR 2.31, <I>P</I> = 0.037, respectively]. Ki-67 &ge;15% after PCT was also a significant predictor of overall survival (HR 3.75, <I>P</I> = 0.013). On the basis of these two parameters, patients were classified into three groups: (i) low risk (negative nodes and Ki-67 &lt;15%), (ii) intermediate risk (nodal positivity or Ki-67 &ge;15%), and (iii) high risk (nodal positivity and Ki-67 &ge;15%). As compared with the low-risk group, the HRs for recurrence were 3.1 and 9.3 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively (<I>P</I> = 0.0001); the HRs for death were 2.4 and 6.5 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively (<I>P</I> = 0.042).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Ki-67 and nodal status have been used to generate a simple and easily reproducible prognostic model, able to discriminate patients with worse prognosis among the heterogeneous group of women with residual disease after PCT.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guarneri, V., Piacentini, F., Ficarra, G., Frassoldati, A., D'Amico, R., Giovannelli, S., Maiorana, A., Jovic, G., Conte, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn761</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1198</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1193</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of organised versus opportunistic mammography screening]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Detailed comparison of effectiveness between organised and opportunistic mammography screening operating in the same country has seldom been carried out.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Prognostic indicators, as defined in the European Guidelines, were used to evaluate screening effectiveness in Switzerland. Matching of screening programmes&rsquo; records with population-based cancer registries enabled to compare indicators of effectiveness by screening and detection modality (organised versus opportunistic screening, unscreened, interval cancers). Comparisons of prognostic profile were also drawn with two Swiss regions uncovered by service screening of low and high prevalence of opportunistic screening, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Opportunistic and organised screening yielded overall little difference in prognostic profile. Both screening types led to substantial stage shifting. Breast cancer prognostic indicators were systematically more favourable in Swiss regions covered by a programme. In regions without a screening programme, the higher the prevalence of opportunistic screening, the better was the prognostic profile.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Organised screening appeared as effective as opportunistic screening. Mammography screening has strongly influenced the stage distribution of breast cancer in Switzerland, and a favourable impact on mortality is anticipated. Extension of organised mammography screening to the whole of Switzerland can be expected to further improve breast cancer prognosis in a cost-effective way.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bulliard, J.-L., Ducros, C., Jemelin, C., Arzel, B., Fioretta, G., Levi, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn770</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of organised versus opportunistic mammography screening]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1202</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of exemestane and tamoxifen on bone health within the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicentre (TEAM) trial: results of a German, 12-month, prospective, randomised substudy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1203?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with aromatase inhibitors may be associated with increased bone loss.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Two hundred patients were randomised to receive exemestane or tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 6 and 12 months treatment.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> One hundred and sixty-one patients were assessable. Tamoxifen treatment resulted in a 0.5% increase from baseline in BMD at the spine, which was maintained at 12 months. Exemestane-treated patients experienced a 2.6% decrease from baseline in BMD at the spine at 6 months and a further 0.2% decrease at 12 months. There were significant differences in the changes in BMD between tamoxifen and exemestane at 6 and 12 months (<I>P</I> = 0.0026 and <I>P</I> = 0.0008, respectively). The mean changes in BMD from baseline at the total hip were also significantly different between exemestane and tamoxifen at 6 and 12 months (<I>P</I> = 0.0009 and <I>P</I> = 0.04, respectively). There was no difference between tamoxifen and exemestane in mean changes in BMD from baseline at the femoral neck.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Exemestane treatment resulted in an increase in bone loss at 6 months; bone loss stabilised after 6- to 12-month treatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hadji, P., Ziller, M., Kieback, D. G., Dornoff, W., Tessen, H. W., Menschik, T., Kuck, J., Melchert, F., Hasenburg, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn762</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of exemestane and tamoxifen on bone health within the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multicentre (TEAM) trial: results of a German, 12-month, prospective, randomised substudy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1209</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1210?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC), docetaxel, and alternating AC and docetaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG9802)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1210?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This randomized, multicenter, phase III trial compared doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC), single-agent docetaxel (D), and an alternating regimen of AC and docetaxel (AC&ndash;D) as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with MBC resistant to endocrine therapy were entered in a randomized study to receive either six cycles of AC (doxorubicin 40 mg/m<sup>2</sup> plus cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), D (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), or alternating treatment with AC&ndash;D (i.e. three cycles of AC and three cycles of D). Treatment was administered every 3 weeks.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> A total of 441 patients were entered in a randomized study. Response rates were 30% for AC, 41% for D, and 35% for AC&ndash;D. The median times to treatment failure (TTFs) were 6.4, 6.4, and 6.7 months (one-sided log-rank test, <I>P</I> = 0.13 for AC versus D, <I>P</I> = 0.14 for AC versus AC&ndash;D) and median overall survival (OS) was 22.6, 25.7, and 25.0 months (<I>P</I> = 0.09 for AC versus D, <I>P</I> = 0.13 for AC versus AC&ndash;D) in the AC, D, and AC&ndash;D, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> There was no difference in the TTF among the three arms. However, there was a trend toward a better response and better OS in the D than in the AC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katsumata, N., Watanabe, T., Minami, H., Aogi, K., Tabei, T., Sano, M., Masuda, N., Andoh, J., Ikeda, T., Shibata, T., Takashima, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn781</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC), docetaxel, and alternating AC and docetaxel as front-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG9802)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1210</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MGMT and MLH1 promoter methylation versus APC, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in colorectal cancer: indications for distinct pathways and sequence of events]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To study how caretaker gene silencing relates to gatekeeper mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC), we investigated whether O<sup>6</sup>-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (<I>MGMT</I>) and Human Mut-L Homologue 1 (<I>MLH1</I>) promoter hypermethylation are associated with <I>APC</I>, <I>KRAS</I> and <I>BRAF</I> mutations among 734 CRC patients.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> We compared <I>MGMT</I> hypermethylation with G:C &gt; A:T mutations in <I>APC</I> and <I>KRAS</I> and with the occurrence of such mutations in CpG or non-CpG dinucleotides in <I>APC</I>. We also compared <I>MLH1</I> hypermethylation with truncating <I>APC</I> mutations and activating <I>KRAS</I> and <I>BRAF</I> mutations.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Only 10% of the tumors showed both <I>MGMT</I> and <I>MLH1</I> hypermethylation. <I>MGMT</I> hypermethylation occurred more frequently in tumors with G:C &gt; A:T <I>KRAS</I> mutations (55%) compared with those without these mutations (38%, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). No such difference was observed for G:C &gt; A:T mutations in <I>APC</I>, regardless of whether mutations occurred in CpG or non-CpG dinucleotides. <I>MLH1</I> hypermethylation was less common in tumors with <I>APC</I> mutations (<I>P</I> = 0.006) or <I>KRAS</I> mutations (<I>P</I> = 0.001), but was positively associated with <I>BRAF</I> mutations (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> <I>MGMT</I> hypermethylation is associated with G:C &gt; A:T mutations in <I>KRAS</I>, but not in <I>APC</I>, suggesting that <I>MGMT</I> hypermethylation may succeed <I>APC</I> mutations but precedes <I>KRAS</I> mutations in colorectal carcinogenesis. <I>MLH1</I>-hypermethylated tumors harbor fewer <I>APC</I> and <I>KRAS</I> mutations and more <I>BRAF</I> mutations, suggesting that they develop distinctly from an <I>MGMT</I> methylator pathway.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Vogel, S., Weijenberg, M. P., Herman, J. G., Wouters, K. A. D., de Goeij, A. F. P. M., van den Brandt, P. A., de Bruine, A. P., van Engeland, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn782</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MGMT and MLH1 promoter methylation versus APC, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in colorectal cancer: indications for distinct pathways and sequence of events]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1222</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1223?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1223?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We demonstrated that circulating tumor cell (CTC) number at baseline and follow-up is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This analysis was undertaken to explore whether patient and treatment characteristics impact the prognostic value of CTCs.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> CTCs were enumerated with immunomagnetic separation from the blood of 430 patients with mCRC at baseline and on therapy. Patients were stratified into unfavorable and favorable prognostic groups based on CTC levels of &ge;3 or &lt;3 CTCs/7.5 ml, respectively. Subgroups were analyzed by line of treatment, liver involvement, receipt of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or bevacizumab, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Seventy-one percent of deaths have occurred. Median follow-up for living patients is 25.8 months. For all patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for unfavorable compared with favorable baseline CTCs is shorter (4.4 versus 7.8 m, <I>P</I> = 0.004 for PFS; 9.4 versus 20.6 m, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001 for OS). In all patient subgroups, unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior OS (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). In patients receiving first- or second-line therapy (<I>P</I> = 0.003), irinotecan (<I>P</I> = 0.0001), having liver involvement (<I>P</I> = 0.002), &ge;65 years (<I>P</I> = 0.0007), and ECOG PS of zero (<I>P</I> = 0.04), unfavorable baseline CTC was associated with inferior PFS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Baseline CTC count is an important prognostic factor within specific subgroups defined by treatment or patient characteristics.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cohen, S. J., Punt, C. J. A., Iannotti, N., Saidman, B. H., Sabbath, K. D., Gabrail, N. Y., Picus, J., Morse, M. A., Mitchell, E., Miller, M. C., Doyle, G. V., Tissing, H., Terstappen, L. W. M. M., Meropol, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn786</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1229</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1223</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1230?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PLA2 (group IIA phospholipase A2) as a prognostic determinant in stage II colorectal carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1230?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Approximately 30% of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are diagnosed with stage II disease. Adjuvant therapy is not widely recommended. However, it is well established that a subgroup of patients with stage II are at high risk for recurrence within their lifetime and should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy. The present work was designed to assess the value of group IIA phospholipase A2 (PLA2) as a predictor of disease outcome in stage II CRC patients with long-term follow-up.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> The present study comprises a series of 116 patients who underwent bowel resection for stage II CRC during 1981&ndash;1990 at Turku University Hospital. Archival paraffin-embedded CRC tissue samples were used to prepare tissue microarray blocks for immunohistochemical staining with PLA2.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-five percent of all tumors were positive for PLA2. There was no significant correlation between PLA2 expression and age, sex, depth of invasion and lymph node status. In Kaplan&ndash;Meier survival analysis, there was a significant (<I>P</I> = 0.010) difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with negative tumors (longer DFS) and those with positive tumors. The same was true with disease-specific survival (DSS), patients with PLA2-negative tumors living significantly longer (<I>P</I> = 0.025). In multivariate (Cox) survival analysis, however, PLA2 was not an independent predictor of DFS or DSS. In subgroup analysis, the right-sided tumors with negative PLA2 staining had remarkably better prognosis (<I>P</I> = 0.010) than PLA2-positive left-sided tumors.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Quantification of PLA2 expression seems to provide valuable prognostic information in stage II CRC, particularly in selecting the patients at high risk for recurrent disease who might benefit from adjuvant therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buhmeida, A., Bendardaf, R., Hilska, M., Laine, J., Collan, Y., Laato, M., Syrjanen, K., Pyrhonen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn783</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PLA2 (group IIA phospholipase A2) as a prognostic determinant in stage II colorectal carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1235</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1230</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1236?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I trial of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone plus systemic oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1236?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The purpose of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of systemic oxaliplatin (oxal), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) that could be administered with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (Dex) in the adjuvant setting after hepatic resection.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Thirty-five patients with resected liver metastases were entered into a phase I trial using HAI FUDR/Dex with escalating doses of oxal and 5-FU.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The initial dose of HAI FUDR was fixed at 0.12 mg/kg <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> pump volume divided by pump flow rate plus Dex infused over the first 2 weeks of a 5-week cycle. Systemic chemotherapy was delivered on days 15 and 29 with the doses of oxal escalated from 85 to 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and the 5-FU 48-h continuous infusion doses from 1000 to 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. The LV dose was fixed at 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. Dose-limiting toxic effects were diarrhea, 8.5%, and elevated bilirubin, 8.5%. With a median follow-up of 43 months, the 4-year survival and progression-free survival were 88% and 50%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Adjuvant therapy after liver resection with HAI FUDR/Dex plus systemic oxal at 85 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and 5-FU by continuous infusion at 2000 g/m<sup>2</sup> with LV at 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> is feasible and appears effective. Randomized studies comparing this regimen to systemic FOLFOX are suggested.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kemeny, N., Capanu, M., D'Angelica, M., Jarnagin, W., Haviland, D., Dematteo, R., Fong, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn769</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I trial of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone plus systemic oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with resected liver metastases from colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1236</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II trial of docetaxel-irinotecan combination in advanced esophageal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Preclinical evidence suggests synergy between docetaxel and irinotecan, two drugs active in esophagogastric cancer. We previously demonstrated the safety of docetaxel 35 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and irinotecan 50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Patients who had unresectable/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero to two, and normal bilirubin were eligible. Tumor assessment was carried out every three cycles.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We enrolled 29 chemotherapy-naive (CN) and 15 chemotherapy-exposed (CE) eligible patients. Principal toxic effects were diarrhea, neutropenia, and hyperglycemia. There were no toxic deaths. There was one early death, from myocardial infarction. Among 26 CN and assessable patients, there were seven (26.9%) with a partial response (PR) and one (3.8%) with a complete response (CR). There were two PRs and one CR among the patients with CE disease. Median time to progression for CN patients was 4.0 months and for CE patients 3.5 months. Median survival for CN eligible patients was 9.0 months and for CE patients 11.4 months.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Docetaxel&ndash;irinotecan combination given on a weekly <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 2 of 3 schedule is promising in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burtness, B., Gibson, M., Egleston, B., Mehra, R., Thomas, L., Sipples, R., Quintanilla, M., Lacy, J., Watkins, S., Murren, J. R., Forastiere, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn787</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II trial of docetaxel-irinotecan combination in advanced esophageal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1248</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1249?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Global Lung Oncology Branch trial 3 (GLOB3): final results of a randomised multinational phase III study alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1249?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The study compared the efficacy of a first-line treatment with day 1 i.v. vinorelbine (NVBiv) and day 8 oral vinorelbine (NVBo) versus docetaxel (DCT) in a cisplatin-based combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, in terms of time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tolerance and quality of life (QoL).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> with NVBiv 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 and NVBo 80 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 8 every 3 weeks, after a first cycle of NVBiv 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 and NVBo 60 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 8 (arm A) or cisplatin 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and DCT 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 every 3 weeks (arm B), for a maximum of six cycles in both arms.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> From 2 February 2004 to 1 January 2006, 390 patients were entered in a randomised study and 381 were treated. The patient characteristics are as follows (arms A/B): metastatic (%) 80.5/84.8; patients with three or more organs involved (%) 45.3/40.8; median age 59.4/62.1 years; male 139/146; squamous (%) 34.2/33.5; adenocarcinoma (%) 41.6/39.3; median TTF (arms A/B in months) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 3.2 (3.0&ndash;4.2), 4.1 (3.4&ndash;4.5) (<I>P</I> = 0.19); overall response (arms A/B) (95% CI): 27.4% (21.2% to 34.2%), 27.2% (21.0% to 34.2%); median PFS (arms A/B in months) (95% CI): 4.9 (4.4&ndash;5.9), 5.1 (4.3&ndash;6.1) (<I>P</I> = 0.99) and median OS (arms A/B in months) (95% CI): 9.9 (8.4&ndash;11.6), 9.8 (8.8&ndash;11.5) (<I>P</I> = 0.58). The median survival for squamous histology was 8.87/9.82 months and for adenocarcinoma 11.73/11.60 months for arms A and B, respectively. Main haematological toxicity was grade 3&ndash;4 neutropenia: 24.4% (arm A) and 28.8% (arm B). QoL as measured by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale was similar in both arms.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both arms provided similar efficacy in terms of response, time-related parameters and QoL, with an acceptable tolerance profile. In the current Global Lung Oncology Branch trial 3, NVBo was shown to be effective as a substitute for the i.v. formulation. This can relieve the burden of the i.v. injection on day 8 and can optimise the hospital's resources and improve patient convenience.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tan, E. H., Rolski, J., Grodzki, T., Schneider, C. P., Gatzemeier, U., Zatloukal, P., Aitini, E., Carteni, G., Riska, H., Tsai, Y. H., Abratt, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn774</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Global Lung Oncology Branch trial 3 (GLOB3): final results of a randomised multinational phase III study alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1249</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>lung cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1257?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The NER proteins are differentially expressed in ever smokers and in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1257?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The expression levels of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1), replication protein A (RPA) and xeroderma pigmentosum group F (XPF) nucleotide excision repair proteins may be important in the response to platin-based therapy in lung cancer patients. It is not known whether ERCC1, RPA and XPF expression levels differ between ever smokers (ES) and never smokers (NS).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> ERCC1, RPA and XPF expression levels were immunohistochemically evaluated in 125 patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma (AC) and carefully reviewed smoking status.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> ERCC1 was correlated with XPF (<I>P</I> = 0.001), but not with RPA (<I>P</I> = 0.11). In the univariate analysis, ERCC1 and XPF levels were higher in NS compared with ES (<I>P</I> = 0.004 and <I>P</I> = 0.003, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the smoking status was predictive of the ERCC1 level [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03&ndash;6.2] after adjustment for variables linked to the smoking status, including age and the presence of bronchioloalveolar (BAC) features. The smoking status was also predictive of both RPA (OR 6.7, 95% CI 1.5&ndash;33.3) and XPF levels (OR 12.5, 95% CI 2.9&ndash;50) after adjusting for age, sex and BAC features.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In patients with resected lung AC, ERCC1, RPA and XPF expression levels are higher in NS compared with ES.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Planchard, D., Domont, J., Taranchon, E., Monnet, I., Tredaniel, J., Caliandro, R., Validire, P., Besse, B., Soria, J.-C., Fouret, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn785</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The NER proteins are differentially expressed in ever smokers and in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1263</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>lung cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1264?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Docetaxel plus oblimersen sodium (Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide): an EORTC multicenter, randomized phase II study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1264?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This randomized, phase II study assessed the activity of oblimersen sodium, a Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide, administered before docetaxel (Taxotere) to patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Chemotherapy-naive patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression and testosterone &le;0.5 ng/ml received docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 or oblimersen 7 mg/kg/day continuous i.v. infusion on days 1&ndash;7 with docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 5 every 3 weeks for &le;12 cycles. Primary end points were confirmed PSA response (Bubley criteria) and major toxic events.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Confirmed PSA response was observed in 46% and 37% of 57 and 54 patients treated with docetaxel and docetaxel&ndash;oblimersen, respectively. Partial response (RECIST) was achieved in 18% and 24%, respectively. Oblimersen added to docetaxel was associated with an increase in the incidence of grade &ge;3 fatigue, mucositis, and thrombocytopenia. Major toxic events were reported in 22.8% and 40.7% of patients with docetaxel and docetaxel&ndash;oblimersen, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The primary end points of the study were not met: a rate of confirmed PSA response &gt;30% and a major toxic event rate &lt;45% were not observed with docetaxel&ndash;oblimersen.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sternberg, C. N., Dumez, H., Van Poppel, H., Skoneczna, I., Sella, A., Daugaard, G., Gil, T., Graham, J., Carpentier, P., Calabro, F., Collette, L., Lacombe, D., for the EORTC Genitourinary Tract Cancer Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn784</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Docetaxel plus oblimersen sodium (Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide): an EORTC multicenter, randomized phase II study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1269</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1264</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1270?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[FDG-PET for assessment of early treatment response after four cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma has a high negative predictive value]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1270?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> As positron emission tomography (PET) seems to be a powerful prognostic marker in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), we analysed the prognostic value of PET after four cycles of combination therapy with bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone (BEACOPP) in patients with advanced-stage HL.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> From January 2004 to March 2007, 50 patients with newly diagnosed HL in clinical stages IIB with large mediastinal mass or extranodal disease, III and IV were treated according to the HD15 protocol of the German Hodgkin Study Group. All patients received a PET scan after four cycles of BEACOPP (PET-4).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Of the overall group, 14 of 50 patients had a positive PET-4 while 36 had a negative PET-4. At a median observation time of 25 months, 2 of the 14 patients with a positive PET-4 had progressed or relapsed, while there was no progression or relapse in PET-4-negative patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our results indicate a very good negative predictive value of PET-4 in advanced-stage HL patients treated with BEACOPP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markova, J., Kobe, C., Skopalova, M., Klaskova, K., Dedeckova, K., Plutschow, A., Eich, H. T., Dietlein, M., Engert, A., Kozak, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn768</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[FDG-PET for assessment of early treatment response after four cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma has a high negative predictive value]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1274</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1270</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1275?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II study of 3-AP Triapine in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1275?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Treatment options for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are limited with response rates to cytotoxic chemotherapy of ~30% and median survival of 6 months.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> In a multicentre phase II study, 32 patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC received 3-AP Triapine (3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, 96 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, daily for 4 days every 14 days (one cycle). Eligibility criteria required Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of zero to two with a life expectancy of &gt;3 months; one prior chemotherapy regimen was allowed.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Thirty patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Median age was 57 years (range 36&ndash;79) and median ECOG PS was one (range 0&ndash;2). Thirteen patients had previously been treated with chemotherapy. A total of 130 cycles were administered with a median number of cycles of 3.5 (range 1&ndash;8). Mild anaemia (40%), nausea (22%) and fatigue (22%) were commonly reported with G3 and G4 neutropenia documented in 22% and 22%, respectively. Overall response rate was 5.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 28.7%). One patient achieved a partial response, eight had stable disease and 21 progressive disease. Median time to disease progression was 3.9 months.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> 3-AP Triapine as a single agent, at this dose and schedule, is well tolerated but has only minor activity in the treatment of advanced HNSCC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nutting, C. M., van Herpen, C. M. L., Miah, A. B., Bhide, S. A., Machiels, J.-P., Buter, J., Kelly, C., de Raucourt, D., Harrington, K. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn775</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II study of 3-AP Triapine in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1275</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>head and neck cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1281?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Travel warning with capecitabine]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1281?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, M., Choo, S.-P., Tan, E.-H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp278</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Travel warning with capecitabine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1281</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1281-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tamoxifen contraindicated in women with hereditary angioedema?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1281-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rousset-Jablonski, C., Thalabard, J.-C., Gompel, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp295</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tamoxifen contraindicated in women with hereditary angioedema?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1282</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1281</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1282?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and breast cancer. Does adjuvant therapy for breast cancer improve platelet counts in ITP?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1282?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khasraw, M., Baron-Hay, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp305</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and breast cancer. Does adjuvant therapy for breast cancer improve platelet counts in ITP?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1283</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1282</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1283?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Successful treatment of ifosfamide-induced hyponatremia with AVP receptor antagonist without interruption of hydration for prevention of hemorrhagic cystitis]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1283?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glezerman, I. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp312</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Successful treatment of ifosfamide-induced hyponatremia with AVP receptor antagonist without interruption of hydration for prevention of hemorrhagic cystitis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1285</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1283</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1285?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[BRCA2 splice site mutations in an Italian breast/ovarian cancer family]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1285?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diez, O., Gutierrez-Enriquez, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp316</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[BRCA2 splice site mutations in an Italian breast/ovarian cancer family]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1285</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1285-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to BRCA2 splice site mutations in an Italian breast/ovarian cancer family]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/7/1285-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pensabene, M., Spagnoletti, I., Capuano, I., Condello, C., Pepe, S., Contegiacomo, A., Lombardi, G., Bevilacqua, G., Caligo, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp321</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to BRCA2 splice site mutations in an Italian breast/ovarian cancer family]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1286</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1285</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 10th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2008]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This article summarizes the expert discussion on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which took place during the 10th World Gastrointestinal Cancer Congress (WGICC) in Barcelona, June 2008. A multidisciplinary approach to a patient with HCC is essential, to guarantee optimal diagnosis and staging, planning of surgical options and selection of embolisation strategies or systemic therapies. In many patients, the underlying cirrhosis represents a challenge and determines therapeutic options. There is now robust evidence in favour of systemic therapy with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC with preserved liver function. Those involved in the care for patients with HCC should be encouraged to participate in well-designed clinical trials, to increase evidence-based knowledge and to make further progress.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verslype, C., Van Cutsem, E., Dicato, M., Arber, N., Berlin, J. D., Cunningham, D., De Gramont, A., Diaz-Rubio, E., Ducreux, M., Gruenberger, T., Haller, D., Haustermans, K., Hoff, P., Kerr, D., Labianca, R., Moore, M., Nordlinger, B., Ohtsu, A., Rougier, P., Scheithauer, W., Schmoll, H.-J., Sobrero, A., Tabernero, J., van de Velde, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp281</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 10th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii6</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>symposium article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii7?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[oral presentations]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii7?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp282</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[oral presentations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii16</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii7</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii17?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[poster discussions]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii17?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp283</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[poster discussions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii28</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii17</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii29?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[posters]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii29?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp284</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[posters]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii114</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii29</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii115?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Faculty Disclosure]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii115?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp327</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Faculty Disclosure]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii116</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii115</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii117?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[author index]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_7/vii117?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp285</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[author index]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>vii127</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>vii117</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/971?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/971?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp299</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>971</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>971</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/973?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging early breast cancer: minimizing the trade-off by maximizing the accuracy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/973?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gadd, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp306</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging early breast cancer: minimizing the trade-off by maximizing the accuracy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>975</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>973</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High-resolution lymphoscintigraphy is essential for recognition of the significance of internal mammary nodes in breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) of internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in breast cancer is controversial. Most centers rarely identify IMN on lymphoscintigraphy but others report up to 45% of cases. Controversy relates to the technique of lymphatic mapping, safety of IMN SNB, the significance of positive IMN, and potential to impact survival.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Assessment of drainage rates from two unrelated nuclear medicine departments&rsquo; databases. Review of related literature.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> High-resolution lymphoscintigraphy results in IMN drainage in one-third of breast cancers. There is a learning curve for the technique. In 1754 consecutive cases, internal mammary drainage occurred in 53% of medial tumors, 37% midline tumors and 24% of lateral tumors (overall 34%). Extended radical mastectomy series also demonstrate the (approximately) 1/3 ratio when comparing IMN positivity rates to axillary node positivity rates (18.8% : 48.3%) and in node-positive patients (31% : 100%). The management altering potential of IMN assessment and potential survival impact are discussed.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> IMN mapping gives information that alters management in up to one-third of cases. These rates of IMN drainage are reproducible and reflect lymphatic density and anatomy of the breast. A priority need exists to establish a collaborative clinical trial to clarify the value of IMN assessment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spillane, A. J., Noushi, F., Cooper, R. A., Gebski, V., Uren, R. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn725</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High-resolution lymphoscintigraphy is essential for recognition of the significance of internal mammary nodes in breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>984</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/985?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combination of surgery and chemotherapy and the role of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases: recommendations from an expert panel]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/985?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The past 5 years have seen the clear recognition that the administration of chemotherapy to patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases can increase the number of patients who can undergo potentially curative secondary liver resection. Coupled with this, recent data have emerged that show that perioperative chemotherapy confers a disease-free survival advantage over surgery alone in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with initially resectable liver disease. The purpose of this paper is to build on the existing knowledge and review the issues surrounding the use of chemotherapy &plusmn; targeted agents combined with surgery in the treatment of CRC patients with liver metastases, with a view to providing clinical recommendations. An international panel of 21 experts in colorectal oncology comprising liver surgeons and medical oncologists reviewed the available evidence. In a major change to clinical practice, the panel's recommendation was that the majority of patients with CRC liver metastases should be treated up front with chemotherapy, irrespective of the initial resectability status of their metastases.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nordlinger, B., Van Cutsem, E., Gruenberger, T., Glimelius, B., Poston, G., Rougier, P., Sobrero, A., Ychou, M., on behalf of the European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn735</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combination of surgery and chemotherapy and the role of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases: recommendations from an expert panel]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>992</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>985</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/993?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of biologic therapy and chemotherapy in hormone receptor- and HER2-positive breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/993?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To review the efficacy of chemotherapy and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy when used in addition to hormonal therapy for the optimal management of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> Literature published from January 2003 to March 2008 was reviewed to assess the use of chemotherapy and biologic therapy in addition to hormonal agents.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) demonstrated greater effectiveness in the adjuvant setting than tamoxifen for the management of ER+ and HER2+ breast cancer. Evidence of cross talk between HER2- and ER-signaling pathways suggests that combined treatment with HER2 blockade and hormonal therapy may offer clinical advantages beyond those provided by hormonal therapy alone in ER+/HER2+ disease. Combined therapy with trastuzumab plus an aromatase AI significantly improves progression-free survival, response rates, and clinical benefits when compared with AI monotherapy in postmenopausal women. Several large studies demonstrated that trastuzumab significantly improves disease-free and overall survival when given in combination with, or following, chemotherapy, regardless of hormone receptor status.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> HER2-targeted therapy maybe combined with AIs for the treatment of ER+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. HER2-targeted therapy in combination with AIs for treatment of ER+/HER2+ early breast cancer needs to be prospectively evaluated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buzdar, A. U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn739</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of biologic therapy and chemotherapy in hormone receptor- and HER2-positive breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>999</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>993</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1001?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sentinel node biopsy compared with complete axillary dissection for staging early breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes: results of randomized trial]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1001?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary dissection in breast cancer patients with negative SLNs. Evidence of a similar efficacy, in terms of survival and regional control, of this strategy as compared with axillary resection is based on few clinical trials. In 1998, we started a randomized study comparing the two strategies, and we present here its results.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Patients were randomly assigned to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection [axillary lymph node dissection (ALND arm)] or to SLNB plus axillary resection if SLNs contained metastases (SLNB arm). Main end points were overall survival (OS) and axillary recurrence.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> One hundred and fifteen patients were assigned to the ALND arm and 110 to the SLNB arm. A positive SLN was found in 27 patients in the ALND arm and in 31 in the SLNB arm. Overall accuracy of SLNB was 93.0%. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 77.1% and 91.1%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 5.5 years, no axillary recurrence was observed in the SLNB arm. OS and event-free survival were not statistically different between the two arms.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The SLNB procedure does not appear inferior to conventional ALND for the subset of patients here considered.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canavese, G., Catturich, A., Vecchio, C., Tomei, D., Gipponi, M., Villa, G., Carli, F., Bruzzi, P., Dozin, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn746</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sentinel node biopsy compared with complete axillary dissection for staging early breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes: results of randomized trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1007</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1001</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1008?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unavoidable mastectomy for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after conservative surgery: patient outcome]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1008?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In the case of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence (IBTR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), a second conservative surgical approach maybe considered in some motivated patients whereas in others mastectomy is unavoidable.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> From 1997 to 2004, 282 patients presented at the European Institute of Oncology with an operable invasive IBTR after BCS. One hundred and sixty-one (57%) underwent a second conservative surgery, whereas 121 patients (43%) were given a mastectomy and represent the study population. We investigated the prognosis and determined predictive factors of outcome.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Median time from primary breast cancer to IBTR was 41 months (range 5&ndash;213). Recurrences were T2&ndash;T4 and/or multifocal in 83 cases (68.6%). With a median follow-up of 5 years after mastectomy, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 73.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.0% to 81.6%] and 50.4% (95% CI 40.9% to 59.8%), respectively. At the multivariate analysis, early onset of IBTR, presence of vascular invasion and Ki67 &ge;20 of the recurrent tumour were found to significantly affect both DFS and OS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In women who need mastectomy for IBTR, early onset of the relapse, high proliferation index and presence of vascular invasion represent the worst prognostic factors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Botteri, E., Rotmensz, N., Sangalli, C., Toesca, A., Peradze, N., De Oliveira Filho, H. R., Sagona, A., Intra, M., Veronesi, P., Galimberti, V., Luini, A., Veronesi, U., Gentilini, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Editors Choice]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn732</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unavoidable mastectomy for ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after conservative surgery: patient outcome]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1012</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1008</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1013?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chemokine receptors in advanced breast cancer: differential expression in metastatic disease sites with diagnostic and therapeutic implications]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1013?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We investigated the expression of CXCR4, CCR7, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2-neu in human metastatic breast cancers to determine whether these biological biomarkers were preferentially expressed in any organ-specific metastases.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> CXCR4, CCR7, ER, PR and HER2-neu expression levels were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining using paraffin-embedded tissue sections of metastatic breast cancers (<I>n</I> = 41) obtained by either diagnostic biopsy or surgical resection.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The metastatic sites included the following: bone (<I>n</I> = 15), brain (<I>n</I> = 14), lung (<I>n</I> = 6), liver (<I>n</I> = 2), and omental metastases (<I>n</I> = 2). CXCR4 was expressed in 41% of cases, CCR7 expression was demonstrated in 10%, and HER2-neu overexpression was present in 27%. CXCR4 was more likely to be expressed in bone metastases than visceral metastases (67% versus 26%, <I>P</I> = 0.020). Visceral sites demonstrated a lower rate of CXCR4 positivity (33% and 23%, respectively, for lung and brain metastases). Similarly, CCR7 was more likely to be found in bone metastases than visceral sites (27% versus 0%, <I>P</I> = 0.037).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> These results indicate that CXCR4 can contribute to the homing of breast cancer cells to the bone. This finding might have important clinical implications since patients with metastatic bone disease may achieve the highest benefit from a CXCR4-targeted therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cabioglu, N., Sahin, A. A., Morandi, P., Meric-Bernstam, F., Islam, R., Lin, H. Y., Bucana, C. D., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Hortobagyi, G. N., Cristofanilli, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn740</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chemokine receptors in advanced breast cancer: differential expression in metastatic disease sites with diagnostic and therapeutic implications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1019</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1013</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Kallikrein 10 (KLK10) methylation as a novel prognostic biomarker in early breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We evaluated the prognostic significance of <I>KLK10</I> exon 3 methylation in patients with early-stage breast cancer since it has been shown to have a significant impact on biological characteristics of breast tumors.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Using methylation-specific PCR, we evaluated the specificity of <I>KLK10</I> methylation in 10 breast tumors and matching normal tissues, 10 breast fibroadenomas, 11 normal breast tissues and in a testing group of 35 patients. The prognostic significance of <I>KLK10</I> methylation was validated in an independent cohort of 93 patients.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> <I>KLK10</I> was not methylated in normal breast tissues and fibroadenomas while it was in 5 of 10 breast tumors and in 1 of 10 matching normal tissues. In the testing group of 35 patients, <I>KLK10</I> methylation was detected in 70.0% of patients who relapsed (<I>P</I> = 0.001) and in 77.8% of patients who died (<I>P</I> = 0.025). In the independent cohort, 53 of 93 (57.0%) patients were found positive for <I>KLK10</I> methylation. During the follow-up period, 24 of 93 (25.8%) patients relapsed and 19 of 93 (20.4%) died. Disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS) were significantly associated with <I>KLK10</I> methylation (<I>P</I> = 0.0025 and <I>P</I> = 0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that <I>KLK10</I> methylation was an independent prognostic factor for DFI and OS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> <I>KLK10</I> exon 3 methylation provides important prognostic information in early breast cancer patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kioulafa, M., Kaklamanis, L., Stathopoulos, E., Mavroudis, D., Georgoulias, V., Lianidou, E. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn733</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Kallikrein 10 (KLK10) methylation as a novel prognostic biomarker in early breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1025</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1026?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Single-agent lapatinib for HER2-overexpressing advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed on first- or second-line trastuzumab-containing regimens]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1026?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lapatinib in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed during prior trastuzumab therapy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Women with stage IIIB/IV HER2-overexpressing breast cancer were treated with single-agent lapatinib 1250 or 1500 mg once daily after protocol amendment. Tumor response according to RECIST was assessed every 8 weeks. HER2 expression was assessed in tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry and FISH.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Seventy-eight patients were enrolled in the study. Investigator and independent review response rates [complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)] were 7.7% and 5.1%, and clinical benefit rates (CR, PR, or stable disease for &ge;24 weeks) were 14.1% and 9.0%, respectively. Median time to progression was 15.3 weeks by independent review, and median overall survival was 79 weeks. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash (47%), diarrhea (46%), nausea (31%), and fatigue (18%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Single-agent lapatinib has clinical activity with manageable toxic effects in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer that progressed on trastuzumab-containing therapy. Studies of lapatinib-based combination regimens with chemotherapy and other targeted therapies in metastatic and earlier stages of breast cancer are warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blackwell, K. L., Pegram, M. D., Tan-Chiu, E., Schwartzberg, L. S., Arbushites, M. C., Maltzman, J. D., Forster, J. K., Rubin, S. D., Stein, S. H., Burstein, H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn759</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Single-agent lapatinib for HER2-overexpressing advanced or metastatic breast cancer that progressed on first- or second-line trastuzumab-containing regimens]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1031</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1026</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1032?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of histological grade in clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective study of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1032?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This study was to investigate the prognostic significance of clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with clear-cell carcinoma (CCC) of the ovary.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Two hundred and one patients with CCC of the ovary were registered in the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group. The Korean Gynecologic Pathology Study Group reviewed the pathological slides centrally, using a universal grading system. The prognostic significances of clinicopathologic factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Most of the patients were diagnosed at an early stage (stage I, 61.3%), and the overall 5-year survival rate was 57%. Early-stage disease showed a favorable prognosis, but advanced diseases showed poor prognosis. Stage of disease was the only significant prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). However, universal grade and residual tumor also showed prognostic significance on the forward stepwise likelihood ratio test. There was no survival difference observed between patients treated with paclitaxel-based and those treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The stage, residual tumor, and universal grade were significant prognostic factors in patients with CCC of the ovary. The universal grading system is applicable in determining prognosis of CCC of the ovary. Further clinical trials for optimal chemotherapy are in need.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryu, S.-Y., Park, S.-I., Nam, B.-H., Kim, I., Yoo, C. W., Nam, J.-H., Lee, K. H., Cho, C.-H., Kim, J.-H., Park, S. Y., Kim, B.-G., Kang, S.-B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn764</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of histological grade in clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective study of Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1036</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1032</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1037?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The prognostic value of DNA ploidy in a total population of uterine sarcomas]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1037?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The diagnosis of uterine sarcoma is associated with poor outcome for the patient and there is a need for reliable prognostic markers. Most previous studies on the prognostic value of DNA ploidy include few uterine sarcomas and report conflicting results.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> We examined the prognostic value of DNA ploidy and its association with clinicopathological parameters and crude survival in a total population of 354 sarcoma.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In univariate analyses, we observed significantly better crude survival for endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) and adenosarcoma (AS) patients with diploid as compared with nondiploid tumors, but not for patients with leiomyosarcomas (LMS). In Cox multivariate analyses, DNA ploidy was the only significant predictor of survival for patients with AS. In LMS, mitotic index (MI), tumor size, tumor extent and tumor margins, whereas for ESS, MI, tumor extent and tumor necrosis obtained independent significance of survival. DNA ploidy was a significant predictor of survival for LMS patients in Cox regression analyses when excluding MI.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> DNA ploidy might be useful as a prognostic marker in patients with LMS and AS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kildal, W., Abeler, V. M., Kristensen, G. B., Jenstad, M., Thoresen, S. O., Danielsen, H. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn765</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The prognostic value of DNA ploidy in a total population of uterine sarcomas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1041</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1037</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1042?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan D1,D3 combined with LV5-FU) or other irinotecan-based regimens in oxaliplatin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1042?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy is commonly used in metastatic colorectal cancers after first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. No standard schedule of irinotecan has been established in this situation.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Metastatic colorectal cancer patients included in the OPTIMOX1 phase III study received first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX). No second line was defined in the protocol, but data concerning second line were prospectively registered. Inclusion criterion was patients receiving an irinotecan-based second-line chemotherapy. Second-line progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response were evaluated according to type of irinotecan-based regimen administered.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> A total of 342 patients received irinotecan-based chemotherapy as second-line chemotherapy: FOLFIRI-3 [<I>n</I> = 109, irinotecan 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> days 1 and 3 combined with leucovorin (LV) 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1 and 46-h continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>], FOLFIRI-1 (<I>n</I> = 112, irinotecan 180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1 combined with LV 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and 46-h continuous 5-FU 2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) and other various irinotecan-based regimens (<I>n</I> = 121). Median second-line PFS was 3.0 months (FOLFIRI-3: 3.7 months; FOLFIRI-1: 3.0 months; other regimens: 2.3 months). In multivariate analysis, FOLFIRI-3 regimen (relative risk 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.28&ndash;0.68, <I>P</I> = 0.0003) and lactate deshydrogenase level at inclusion (<I>P</I> = 0.0006) in OPTIMOX1 were associated with a longer second-line PFS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In unselected patients pretreated with oxaliplatin, PFS in second line appeared to be improved by FOLFIRI-3 regimen.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bidard, F.-C., Tournigand, C., Andre, T., Mabro, M., Figer, A., Cervantes, A., Lledo, G., Bengrine-Lefevre, L., Maindrault-Goebel, F., Louvet, C., de Gramont, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn730</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of FOLFIRI-3 (irinotecan D1,D3 combined with LV5-FU) or other irinotecan-based regimens in oxaliplatin-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the GERCOR OPTIMOX1 study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1047</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1042</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1048?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[DNA copy number profiles of primary tumors as predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1048?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is biologically a heterogeneous disease, which may affect response to drug therapy. We investigated the correlation of genome-wide DNA copy number profiles of primary tumors with response to systemic chemotherapy in advanced CRC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> DNA was isolated from formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumors of 32 patients with advanced CRC, which were selected based on either a good response (<I>n</I> = 16) or a poor response (<I>n</I> = 16) to first-line combination therapy with capecitabine and irinotecan. High-resolution DNA copy number profiles were obtained by means of 30 K oligonucleotide-based array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of the aCGH data revealed two clusters of 19 and 13 tumors, respectively, and cluster membership showed a significant correlation with response status (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.03). The nonresponders had fewer chromosomal alterations compared with the responders, in particular less losses were found (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.03). Most prominent differences between the two groups were losses of regions 18p11.32&ndash;q11.2 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.02) and 18q12.1&ndash;q23 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.03), which were more frequently observed in responders.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Differences in DNA copy number profiles of primary CRCs are associated with response to systemic combination chemotherapy with capecitabine and irinotecan. Responders overall had more chromosomal alterations, especially loss of chromosome 18.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Postma, C., Koopman, M., Buffart, T. E., Eijk, P. P., Carvalho, B., Peters, G. J., Ylstra, B., van Krieken, J. H., Punt, C. J. A., Meijer, G. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn738</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[DNA copy number profiles of primary tumors as predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1056</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1048</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1057?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early prediction of response to first-line chemotherapy by sequential [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1057?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To evaluate [<sup>18</sup>F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-<scp>D</scp>-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), for early evaluation of response to palliative chemotherapy and for prediction of long-term outcome, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> In a randomized trial, patients with mCRC received irinotecan-based combination chemotherapy. FDG&ndash;PET was carried out before treatment and after two cycles in 51 patients at two centers. Visual changes in tumor FDG uptake and changes measured semi-automatically, as standard uptake values (SUVs), were compared with radiological response after four and eight cycles.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The mean baseline SUV for all tumor lesions per patient was higher in nonresponders than in responders (mean 7.4 versus 5.6, <I>P</I> = 0.02). There was a strong correlation between metabolic response (changes in SUV) and objective response (<I>r</I> = 0.57, <I>P</I> = 0.00001), with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 76%. There was no significant correlation between metabolic response and time to progression (<I>P</I> = 0.5) or overall survival (<I>P</I> = 0.1).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Although metabolic response assessed by FDG&ndash;PET reflects radiological tumor volume changes, the sensitivity and specificity are too low to support the routine use of PET in mCRC. Furthermore, PET failed to reflect long-term outcome and can, thus, not be used as surrogate end point for hard endpoint benefit.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bystrom, P., Berglund, A., Garske, U., Jacobsson, H., Sundin, A., Nygren, P., Frodin, J.-E., Glimelius, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn744</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early prediction of response to first-line chemotherapy by sequential [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1061</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1057</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1062?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pemetrexed in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional phase II study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1062?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This clinical trial assessed the efficacy of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin (PEMOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Forty-four patients with untreated AGC were enrolled to evaluate response rate (RR). Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) with vitamin supplementation and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 21 days for six cycles or until disease progression occurred.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Median age was 62 years (range 26&ndash;76). The majority of patients (93%) had metastatic disease. Sixteen of the 44 patients achieved confirmed response [RR 36%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 52%]; four complete responses and 12 partial responses (complete and partial responses according to the RECIST guidelines are the confirmed-responses observed in the study population). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.3&ndash;7.5) and median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 7.7&ndash;17.2). A total of 220 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia in 41% of patients (19% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia in 11% of patients (4% of cycles). Treatment delays or dose reductions for toxicity occurred in 10% and 5% of cycles, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> PEMOX is active and well tolerated in AGC. RR, TTP, and survival were comparable to those achieved in studies using different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)&ndash;oxaliplatin combinations, without the inconvenience of prolonged 5-FU schedules.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Celio, L., Sternberg, C. N., Labianca, R., La Torre, I., Amoroso, V., Barone, C., Pinotti, G., Cascinu, S., Di Costanzo, F., Cetto, G. L., Bajetta, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn766</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pemetrexed in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional phase II study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1067</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1062</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1068?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A randomized, phase II trial of two dose schedules of carboplatin/paclitaxel/cetuximab in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1068?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of weekly cetuximab combined with two different schedules of paclitaxel/carboplatin for stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> A total of 168 patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomized to arm A, cetuximab (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1 followed by weekly 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) + paclitaxel (Taxol) (225 mg/m<sup>2</sup>)/carboplatin (AUC6) day 1 every 3 weeks or arm B, same cetuximab regimen plus paclitaxel (100 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks and carboplatin (AUC6) day 1 every 4 weeks. Treatment continued for a four-cycle maximum. Patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease after four cycles could receive cetuximab 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/week until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Median PFS was 4.7 and 4.3 months for arms A and B, respectively (6-month PFS, 27.3% versus 30.9%). Median overall survival was 11.4 versus 9.8 months for arms A and B, respectively; estimated 1-year survival, 47.7% versus 39.3%; and objective response rate, 29.6% versus 25%. The regimen was well tolerated with rash and hematologic toxicity being most common.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study did not meet the prespecified benchmark of 35% 6-month PFS rate; both combination schedules of cetuximab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin were feasible and equivalent for treating advanced NSCLC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Socinski, M. A., Saleh, M. N., Trent, D. F., Dobbs, T. W., Zehngebot, L. M., Levine, M. A., Bordoni, R., Stella, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn745</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A randomized, phase II trial of two dose schedules of carboplatin/paclitaxel/cetuximab in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1073</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1068</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>lung cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1074?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A phase II trial of cisplatin (C), gemcitabine (G) and gefitinib for advanced urothelial tract carcinoma: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90102]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1074?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This phase II trial (Cancer and Leukemia Group B 90102) sought to determine the efficacy of cisplatin, standard infusion of gemcitabine and gefitinib in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Eligible patients had previously untreated measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of zero to two and creatinine clearance &gt;50 ml/min. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8 given every 3 weeks concurrent with gefitinib 500 mg/day orally for six cycles. Maintenance gefitinib 500 mg/day was continued for responding or stable disease.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-four of 58 patients were assessable. Twelve patients (22%) had node-only disease, and 25 (46%) had an ECOG performance status of zero. There were 23 objective responses for an overall response rate of 42.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29.2% to 56.8%]. The median survival time was 15.1 months (95% CI 11.1&ndash;21.7 months) and the median time to progression was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.6&ndash;9.2 months).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine and gefitinib is well tolerated and active in advanced transitional cell carcinoma. The addition of gefitinib does not appear to improve response rate or survival in comparison to historical controls of cisplatin and gemcitabine alone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philips, G. K., Halabi, S., Sanford, B. L., Bajorin, D., Small, E. J., for the Cancer and Leukemia Group B]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn749</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A phase II trial of cisplatin (C), gemcitabine (G) and gefitinib for advanced urothelial tract carcinoma: results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90102]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1079</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1074</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1080?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hepatosplenic gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma: clinicopathological features and treatment]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1080?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare peripheral T-cell lymphoma; treatment with standard anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens has been disappointing, and an optimal treatment strategy for this patient population has not yet been determined.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> We identified 15 cases of pathologically confirmed HSTCL in the institution's database. Clinical characteristics and treatment results were reviewed.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Complete responses (CRs) were achieved in 7 of 14 patients who received chemotherapy. Achievement of CR was followed by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in three patients. Median duration of CR was 8 months (range 2 to 32+ months) with four patients currently alive and in CR at 5, 8, 12, and 32 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (range 2 to 36+ months). Patients who achieved a CR had a median OS of 13 months, compared with 7.5 months in patients who did not achieve a CR. Risk factors associated with worse outcome included male gender, failure to achieve a CR, history of immunocompromise, and absence of a T-cell receptor gene rearrangement in the gamma chain.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> A better understanding of the pathophysiology of HSTCL and new therapeutic strategies are needed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Falchook, G. S., Vega, F., Dang, N. H., Samaniego, F., Rodriguez, M. A., Champlin, R. E., Hosing, C., Verstovsek, S., Pro, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn751</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hepatosplenic gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma: clinicopathological features and treatment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1085</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1080</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1086?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term outcome following Helicobacter pylori eradication in a retrospective study of 105 patients with localized gastric marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT type]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1086?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Treatment aimed at eradicating <I>Helicobacter pylori</I> infection results in lymphoma remission in most localized gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. The aim of this survey is to investigate the long-term effect of this therapeutic approach in a large series of patients.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> One hundred and five patients with localized gastric MALT lymphoma were initially treated only with <I>H. pylori</I> eradication regimens. Lymphoma responses were graded using the Wotherspoon score.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> <I>Helicobacter pylori</I>, detected by histology in 81% of cases, was eradicated in all positive patients. Histological regression of the lymphoma was achieved in 78 of 102 assessable patients [76%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 67% to 84%] with complete remission (score 0&ndash;2) in 66 and partial remission (score 3) in 12. At a median follow-up time of 6.3 years, histological remission was consistently confirmed in 33 of 74 assessable patients, while 25 had score fluctuations (from 0 to 4) and 13 presented a lymphoma relapse (score 5). Only one patient had a distant progression. Transformation to a large-cell lymphoma was seen in two cases. The 5- and 10-year overall survival is 92% (95% CI: 84% to 96%) and 83% (95% CI: 70% to 91%), respectively. Only one patient died of lymphoma after transformation to a high-grade lymphoma.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> <I>Helicobacter pylori</I> eradication resulted in complete lymphoma remission in the majority of cases. Long-term clinical disease control was achieved in most patients. A watch and wait policy appears to be safe in patients with minimal residual disease or histological-only local relapse.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stathis, A., Chini, C., Bertoni, F., Proserpio, I., Capella, C., Mazzucchelli, L., Pedrinis, E., Cavalli, F., Pinotti, G., Zucca, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn760</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term outcome following Helicobacter pylori eradication in a retrospective study of 105 patients with localized gastric marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT type]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1093</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1086</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1094?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The regulatory BCL2 promoter polymorphism (-938C>A) is associated with relapse and survival of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1094?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Expression of the antiapoptotic and antiproliferative protein B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) has been repeatedly shown to be associated with better locoregional control and patients&rsquo; survival in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A regulatory (&ndash;938C&gt;A) single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the inhibitory P2 <I>BCL2</I> gene promoter generates significantly different <I>BCL2</I> promoter activities and has been associated with outcome in different malignancies. The aim of the present study was to analyze the possible influence of the (&ndash;938C&gt;A) SNP on survival of patients suffering from OSCC.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> One hundred and thirty-three patients with primary OSCC were retrospectively investigated. Bcl-2 expression of tumor cells was demonstrated by means of immunohistochemistry. Both the Bcl-2 expression and the (&ndash;938C&gt;A) genotypes were correlated with the patients&rsquo; survival.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The (&ndash;938C&gt;A) SNP was significantly related to Bcl-2 expression (<I>P</I> = 0.008). Kaplan&ndash;Meier curves revealed a significant association of the &ndash;938 SNP with relapse-free (<I>P</I> = 0.0283) and overall survival (<I>P</I> = 0.0247). Multiple Cox regression identified the <I>BCL2</I> (&ndash;938CC) genotype as an independent prognostic factor for relapse [hazard ratio (HR) 1.898, <I>P</I> = 0.021] as well as for death in OSCC patients (HR 1.897, <I>P</I> = 0.013).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The (&ndash;938C&gt;A) SNP represents a potential novel prognostic marker in patients with OSCC that could help to identify a group of patients at high risk for relapse and death.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lehnerdt, G. F., Franz, P., Bankfalvi, A., Grehl, S., Kelava, A., Nuckel, H., Lang, S., Schmid, K. W., Siffert, W., Bachmann, H. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn763</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The regulatory BCL2 promoter polymorphism (-938C>A) is associated with relapse and survival of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1099</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1094</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>head and neck cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1100?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prediction of fatal intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute myeloid leukemia]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1100?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the second leading cause of mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the prognostic factors for ICH in AML patients are still under investigation.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 841 AML patients admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine from January 1995 to December 2007 were enrolled in this study.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> There were 51 patients with ICH, median age of 51 (range 17&ndash;86), including 12 patients diagnosed as acute promyelocytic leukemia. Forty-three patients were refractory/relapsed status. ICH was localized in the supratentorium (44 cases), basal ganglion (9), cerebellum (5), and brainstem (4). Twenty-one patients had multiple sites. Thirty-eight patients had intraparenchymal hemorrhage, 16 subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), 10 subdural hemorrhage, and one epidural hemorrhage (EDH). Hemorrhage ruptured into the ventricles in 13 patients. Thirty-four patients (67%) died of ICH within 30 days of diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed four independent prognostic factors, prolonged prothrombin time international normalized ratio &gt;1.5 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), brainstem hemorrhage (<I>P</I> = 0.001), SAH (<I>P</I> = 0.017), and EDH (<I>P</I> = 0.014). Other clinico-laboratory data had no impact on 30-day survival.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> ICH has high morbidity and mortality in AML. Early detection and aggressive correction coagulopathy may prevent the catastrophic event. Prompt image study for locations and types of ICH can predict outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, C.-Y., Tai, C.-H., Tsay, W., Chen, P.-Y., Tien, H.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn755</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prediction of fatal intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute myeloid leukemia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1104</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1100</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life/supportive care/palliative care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1105?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A risk model for severe anemia to select cancer patients for primary prophylaxis with epoetin {alpha}: a prospective randomized controlled trial of the ELYPSE study group]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1105?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Epoetin (EPO) administration reduces the need for transfusion. Identifying patients at high risk of anemia requiring red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is needed. This multicentric phase III trial tested epoetin  (EPO) administration according to our risk model on the basis of three clinical parameters: hemoglobin (Hb) &lt;12 g/dl, lymphocytes &le;700/&micro;l, and/or performance status (PS) &gt;1.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients &ge;18 years with chemotherapy-treated solid or hematologic tumors were randomized to 150 UI/kg/TIW s.c. EPO (arm 1) or no EPO (arm 2) and stratified on Hb level at day 0, lymphocyte count, and PS. The primary end point was transfusion rate; secondary end points included overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> From September 2000 to January 2005, 218 patients (median age 64 years, 42.7% males) with principally breast cancer, sarcoma, or lung carcinoma were included. In total, 93% patients had PS &gt;1 and 35% had &le;700/&micro;l lymphocytes. Baseline Hb levels were 10.1 g/dl (range 6.9&ndash;11.9). Two hundred and thirteen patients were assessable for the primary end point: 36% received RBC in arm 1 and 58% in arm 2 (<I>P</I> = 0.0012). Median OS was 7.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 5&ndash;12] and 6 (95% CI: 5&ndash;8) months in arms 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was significantly worse for patients with three prognostic factors (3.6 months) compared with two factors (8.3 months) (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). No difference in toxicity (47% versus 41%) or thrombovascular events (4.5% versus 3.7%) was observed.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Patients at high risk for RBC transfusion according to the ELYPSE model could be given prophylactic EPO with significantly reduced RBC transfusions and no significant impact on side-effects, progression-free survival, and OS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray-Coquard, I., Dussart, S., Goillot, C., Mayeur, D., Debourdeau, P., Ghesquieres, H., Bachelot, T., Le Cesne, A., Anglaret, B., Agostini, C., Guastalla, J.-P., Lancry, L., Biron, P., Desseigne, F., Blay, J.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-05-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn750</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A risk model for severe anemia to select cancer patients for primary prophylaxis with epoetin {alpha}: a prospective randomized controlled trial of the ELYPSE study group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1112</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1105</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life/supportive care/palliative care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time-dependent association of total serum cholesterol and cancer incidence in a cohort of 172 210 men and women: a prospective 19-year follow-up study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/6/1113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The relationship between serum cholesterol and cancer incidence remains controversial.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We inve