<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Annals of Oncology - recent issues</title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Oncology - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1569-8041</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0923-7534</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/827?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/829?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/831?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/835?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/847?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/853?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/861?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/871?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/877?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/883?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/891?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/898?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/909?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/915?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/920?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/927?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/935?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/939?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/946?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/951?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/958?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/964?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/970?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/977?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/984?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/990?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1003?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1009?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1019?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1019-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1020?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1021?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1022?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1024?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1025?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1027?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1030?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/605?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/623?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/631?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/641?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/649?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/655?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/660?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/669?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/675?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/682?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/688?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/696?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/706?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/711?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/717?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/729?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/734?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/739?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/746?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/752?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/763?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/769?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/774?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/780?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/787?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/793?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/801?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/807?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/814?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/821?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/822?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/824?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/825?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/405?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/409?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/420?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/433?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/448?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/454?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/473?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/481?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/487?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/496?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/501?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/508?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/516?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/520?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/527?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/533?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/538?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/545?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/553?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/566?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/570?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/577?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/583?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/590?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/595?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/595-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/597?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/599?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/3/601?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/827?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/827?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn184</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>827</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>827</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/829?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predicting response of molecular targeted therapies: a still possible challenge?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/829?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Labianca, R., Garassino, M., Torri, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn016</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predicting response of molecular targeted therapies: a still possible challenge?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>830</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>829</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/831?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developing innovative models for North-South cooperation in clinical research--experience from the INDOX Cancer Research Network]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/831?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, R., Raina, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developing innovative models for North-South cooperation in clinical research--experience from the INDOX Cancer Research Network]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>833</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>831</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/835?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: an intriguing model for antigen-driven lymphomagenesis and microbial-targeted therapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/835?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas constitute one half of malignancies arising in the orbit and the ocular adnexae. Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type lymphoma is the most common histological category in this anatomic region. The incidence of ocular adnexal lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-type (OAML) is increasing and recent studies offered new relevant insights in molecular, pathogenetic and therapeutic issues on these neoplasms. A pathogenetic model of antigen-driven lymphoproliferation similar to that reported for <I>Helicobacter pylori</I>-related gastric MALT lymphomas has been hypothesized for OAML. This notion is supported by the association between OAML and <I>Chlamydophila psittaci</I> infection, an association that is of likely pathogenetic relevance and may influence both the biological behavior and the therapeutic management of these neoplasms. However, this association displays evident geographical variability indicating that other etiopathogenic agents could be involved. These recent acquisitions coupled with the occurrence of chromosomal translocations and other genetic alterations, as well as additional risk factors like autoimmune disorders have contributed to render OAML an exciting challenge for a broad group of physicians and scientists. OAML is an indolent and rarely lethal malignancy that, in selected patients, can be managed with observation alone. Lymphomatous lesions are frequently responsible for symptoms affecting patient's quality of life, requiring, therefore, immediate treatment. Several therapeutic strategies are available, often associated with relevant side-effects. However, the therapeutic choice in OAML is not supported by consolidated evidence due to the lack of prospective trials. In this review, we analyze the most relevant biological, molecular, pathological and clinical features of OAML and propose some therapeutic guidelines for patients affected by this malignancy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferreri, A. J. M., Dolcetti, R., Du, M.-Q., Doglioni, C., Giordano Resti, A., Politi, L. S., De Conciliis, C., Radford, J., Bertoni, F., Zucca, E., Cavalli, F., Ponzoni, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm513</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: an intriguing model for antigen-driven lymphomagenesis and microbial-targeted therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>846</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>835</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/847?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/847?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC) delivers higher local drug concentration to unresectable liver tumors with fewer significant systemic side-effects. It has been shown to produce better response rates than systemic chemotherapy and remains an important treatment option in patients with advanced, inoperable primary or maetastatic hepatic tumors. Traditionally, catheters for HAIC were inserted surgically under general anesthesia. The advancement and expansion of interventional radiology have made it possible for catheter-port systems to be inserted percutnaeously under local anesthesia with no significant increase in morbidity. A comprehensive review of the literature, techniques and complications of percutanoeus placement of catheter-port systems for HAIC is presented in this article.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ganeshan, A., Upponi, S., Hon, L.-q., Warakaulle, D., Uberoi, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm528</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>851</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>847</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/853?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/853?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> A randomized phase III trial in high-risk breast cancer patients was conducted, to further explore the impact of dose-density in the adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. The safety analysis is presented.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> From October 2000 until June 2005, 1121 node-positive patients were randomized to sequential dose-dense epirubicin 110 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and paclitaxel (Taxol&reg;, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA) 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (group A), or concurrent epirubicin 83 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and paclitaxel 187 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (group B), both followed by three cycles of &lsquo;intensified&rsquo; combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given prophylactically with the dose-dense treatments.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Median dose intensity of epirubicin and paclitaxel was double in group A, as designed, with significantly less cycles administered at full dose (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Median cumulative dose of all drugs and total treatment duration, however, were identical between groups. Severe taxane-related toxic effects were more frequent in group A, while severe thrombocytopenia was low and present only in group A. There were no differences in the rates of other hematological toxic effects, including febrile neutropenia. The rates of secondary malignancies were low.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Both regimens as used in the present study are well tolerated and safe. The rates of severe taxane-related toxic effects and thrombocytopenia, although low overall, are significantly increased with the dose-dense sequential regimen.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fountzilas, G., Dafni, U., Gogas, H., Linardou, H., Kalofonos, H. P., Briasoulis, E., Pectasides, D., Samantas, E., Bafaloukos, D., Stathopoulos, G. P., Karina, M., Papadimitriou, C., Skarlos, D., Pisanidis, N., Papakostas, P., Markopoulos, C., Tzorakoeleftherakis, E., Dimitrakakis, K., Makrantonakis, P., Xiros, N., Polichronis, A., Varthalitis, I., Karanikiotis, C., Dimopoulos, A. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm539</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in patients with high-risk breast cancer: safety analysis of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group randomized phase III trial HE 10/00]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>860</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>853</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/861?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/861?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This paper evaluates the prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression of various molecular markers in high-risk breast cancer (HRBC) patients with &gt;9 involved lymph nodes, who received different chemotherapy dose-intensification strategies within a prospective randomized WSG AM-01 trial.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Paraffin-embedded tumors from 236 patients, who were randomly assigned to dose-dense conventional chemotherapy with four cycles of E<SUB>90</SUB>C<SUB>600</SUB> followed by three cycles of C<SUB>600</SUB>M<SUB>40</SUB>F<SUB>600</SUB> every 2 weeks (DD) or a rapidly cycled tandem high-dose regimen with two cycles of E<SUB>90</SUB>C<SUB>600</SUB> every 2 weeks followed by two cycles of E<SUB>90</SUB>C<SUB>3000</SUB>Thiotepa<SUB>400</SUB> every 3 weeks (HD), were available for retrospective central pathological review (116 HD/120 DD). Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), MIB-1, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Her-2/neu was evaluated immunohistochemically using tissue microarrays. Results were correlated with follow-up data and treatment effects by proportional hazard Cox regression models (including interaction analysis).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> After a median follow-up of 61.7 months, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) as well as overall survival (OS) rates for the 236 patients were significantly better in the HD arm: EFS: 62% versus 41% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.43&ndash;0.85, <I>P</I> = 0.004]; OS: 76% versus 61% (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.39&ndash;0.87, <I>P</I> = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, HD, tumor size &lt;3 cm, positive PR, negative MIB-1 staining, and grade 1/2 were associated with favorable outcome. Interaction analysis showed that regarding predictive effects, triple negative (ER/PR/Her-2/neu) and G3 tumors derived most benefit from HD.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Tandem HD improves both EFS and OS in HRBC. This therapy effect may be partly attributable to superior efficacy in the subgroup of triple-negative tumors and/or G3 with their poor prognostic marker profile.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gluz, O., Nitz, U. A., Harbeck, N., Ting, E., Kates, R., Herr, A., Lindemann, W., Jackisch, C., Berdel, W. E., Kirchner, H., Metzner, B., Werner, F., Schutt, G., Frick, M., Poremba, C., Diallo-Danebrock, R., Mohrmann, S., On behalf of the West German Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm551</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>870</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>861</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/871?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A phase I/II study of bortezomib and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/871?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Proteasome inhibitors are a novel class of compounds entering clinical trials as a method to increase tumour sensitivity to standard chemotherapy. This phase I/II trial was carried out to evaluate the combination of capecitabine and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in anthracycline and/or taxane-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 35 patients were treated with bortezomib (1.0&ndash;1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1, 4, 8 and 11) and capecitabine (1500&ndash;2500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1&ndash;14) in 3-week intervals for up to eight cycles.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were bortezomib 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and capecitabine 2500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. The treatment was generally well tolerated and associated with toxic effects that were consistent with the known side-effects of the individual agents. The intent-to-treat overall response rate was 15% and an additional 27% of patients had stable disease (SD). In the 20 patients treated at the MTD, the response rate was 15% and 40% had SD. Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9&ndash;4.4] and 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6&ndash;14.6), respectively. Median duration of response was 4.4 months.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The combination of bortezomib and capecitabine is well tolerated and has moderate antitumour activity in heavily pretreated patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schmid, P., Kuhnhardt, D., Kiewe, P., Lehenbauer-Dehm, S., Schippinger, W., Greil, R., Lange, W., Preiss, J., Niederle, N., Brossart, P., Freier, W., Kummel, S., Van de Velde, H., Regierer, A., Possinger, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm569</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A phase I/II study of bortezomib and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxanes and/or anthracyclines]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>876</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>871</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/877?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intent-to-treat analysis of the placebo-controlled trial of letrozole for extended adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer: NCIC CTG MA.17]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/877?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> MA.17 evaluated letrozole or placebo after 5 years of tamoxifen and showed significant improvement in disease-free survival (DFS) for letrozole [hazard ratio (HR) 0.57, <I>P</I> = 0.00008]. The trial was unblinded and placebo patients were offered letrozole.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> An intent-to-treat analysis of all outcomes, before and after unblinding, on the basis of the original randomization was carried out.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In all, 5187 patients were randomly allocated to the study at baseline and, at unblinding, 1579 (66%) of 2383 placebo patients accepted letrozole. At median follow-up of 64 months (range 16&ndash;95), 399 recurrences or contralateral breast cancers (CLBCs) (164 letrozole and 235 placebo) occurred. Four-year DFS was 94.3% (letrozole) and 91.4% (placebo) [HR 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55&ndash;0.83, <I>P</I> = 0.0001] and showed superiority for letrozole in both node-positive and -negative patients. Corresponding 4-year distant DFS was 96.3% and 94.9% (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62&ndash;1.03, <I>P</I> = 0.082). Four-year overall survival was 95.1% for both groups. The annual rate of CLBC was 0.28% for letrozole and 0.46% for placebo patients (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39&ndash;0.97, <I>P</I> = 0.033).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Patients originally randomly assigned to receive letrozole within 3 months of stopping tamoxifen did better than placebo patients in DFS and CLBC, despite 66% of placebo patients taking letrozole after unblinding.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ingle, J. N., Tu, D., Pater, J. L., Muss, H. B., Martino, S., Robert, N. J., Piccart, M. J., Castiglione, M., Shepherd, L. E., Pritchard, K. I., Livingston, R. B., Davidson, N. E., Norton, L., Perez, E. A., Abrams, J. S., Cameron, D. A., Palmer, M. J., Goss, P. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm566</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intent-to-treat analysis of the placebo-controlled trial of letrozole for extended adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer: NCIC CTG MA.17]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>882</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>877</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/883?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluation of serum HER2 extracellular domain in early breast cancer patients: correlation with clinicopathological parameters and survival]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/883?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We explored the correlation between serum human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) extracellular domain (ECD) and tissue HER2 status, their relationship with clinicopathological parameters and their impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in early breast cancer patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This prospective trial included patients with stage I&ndash;III breast cancer. Serum HER2 ECD levels were measured by two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays before surgical treatment. Tissue HER2 status was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in all tumors; FISH assay was utilized in HER2 2+ tumors by IHC.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> From May 2000 to July 2005, 256 consecutive stage I&ndash;III breast cancer patients were included in this study. High serum HER2 ECD levels (&ge;15 ng/ml) were reported in 23 patients (9.0%) and HER2-positive status in tumor tissue was observed in 42 patients (16.4%) with a concordance of 87.1%. High HER2 ECD levels were significantly associated with high histological grade (<I>P</I> = 0.003), stage III (<I>P</I> = 0.008), lymph node involvment (<I>P</I> = 0.035) and negativity of both estrogen (<I>P</I> = 0.016) and progesterone (<I>P</I> = 0.007) receptors. At multivariate analysis, high serum HER2 ECD levels were a significant independent prognostic factor of worse DFS (<I>P</I> = 0.009).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> A statistically significant association was observed between high serum HER2 ECD levels and worse DFS in early breast cancer patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ludovini, V., Gori, S., Colozza, M., Pistola, L., Rulli, E., Floriani, I., Pacifico, E., Tofanetti, F. R., Sidoni, A., Basurto, C., Rulli, A., Crino, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm585</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluation of serum HER2 extracellular domain in early breast cancer patients: correlation with clinicopathological parameters and survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>890</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>883</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/891?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Variation of circulating tumor cell levels during treatment of metastatic breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/891?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) detection in advanced breast cancer patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We tested 80 patients for CTC levels before starting a new treatment and after 4, 8 weeks, at the first clinical evaluation and every 2 months thereafter. CTCs were detected using the CellSearch System<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP>.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: Forty-nine patients had &ge;5 CTCs at baseline. At the multivariate analysis, baseline number of CTCs was significantly associated with progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2&ndash;5.4]. The risk of progression for patients with CTCs &ge;5 at last available blood draw was five times the risk of patients with 0&ndash;4 CTCs at the same time point (HR 5.3; 95% CI 2.8&ndash;10.4). Patients with rising or persistent &ge;5 CTCs at last available blood draw showed a statistically significant higher risk of progression with respect to patients with &lt;5 CTCs at both blood draws (HR 6.4; 95% CI 2.8&ndash;14.6).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> CTCs basal value is a predictive indicator of prognosis and changes in CTC levels during therapy may indicate a clinical response. Testing CTC levels during targeted treatments might substitute other measurement parameters for response evaluation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nole, F., Munzone, E., Zorzino, L., Minchella, I., Salvatici, M., Botteri, E., Medici, M., Verri, E., Adamoli, L., Rotmensz, N., Goldhirsch, A., Sandri, M. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm558</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Variation of circulating tumor cell levels during treatment of metastatic breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>897</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>891</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/898?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does body mass index affect progression-free or overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer? Results from SCOTROC I trial]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/898?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Previous studies have indicated an association between obesity and poor survival in several tumour types, including ovarian cancer. We sought to test the hypothesis that obesity reduces survival in a large, well-characterised and relatively homogeneous cohort of ovarian cancer patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 1067 patients participating in the Scottish Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer I trial was assessed. All patients received first-line carboplatin/taxane chemotherapy. The dose of carboplatin was determined by a measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR), ensuring accurate dosing in all categories of BMI and the dose of taxane was not capped. Patients were assigned to one of four categories: underweight (BMI &lt; 18.5), ideal weight (BMI 18.5&ndash;24.9), overweight (BMI 25&ndash;29.9) or obese (BMI &ge; 30).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> There were neither statistically significant differences in PFS or OS between these four groups nor were there any differences in taxane or carboplatin dose intensity. Furthermore, there was no association between BMI and tumour stage or grade at presentation, or completeness of debulking surgery.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Obese patients with epithelial ovarian cancer do not have a poorer prognosis, provided that they receive optimal doses of chemotherapy based on measured GFR and actual body weight.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrett, S. V., Paul, J., Hay, A., Vasey, P. A., Kaye, S. B., Glasspool, R. M., On behalf of the Scottish Gynaecological Cancer Trials Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm606</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does body mass index affect progression-free or overall survival in patients with ovarian cancer? Results from SCOTROC I trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>902</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>898</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours (NF-PETs) are an aggressive gastroenteropancreatic neoplasm. The present study assessed survival, value of World Health Organisation (WHO) classification and prognostic utility of clinicopathological parameters at diagnosis.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> From 1990 to 2004, 180 patients with NF-PETs were entered in a prospective database, and predictors of prognosis were tested in uni- and multivariate models.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> There were 25 (14%) benign lesions, 38 (21%) neoplasms of uncertain behaviour, 100 well-differentiated carcinomas (56%) and 17 poorly differentiated carcinomas (9%). Radical resection was possible in 93 cases (51.6%). Overall 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were 67%, 49.3% and 32.8%, respectively, and were significantly higher in radically resected patients (93%, 80.8% and 65.2%, respectively; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.00001). By multivariate analysis, poor differentiation [hazard ratio (HR) 7.3; <I>P</I> = 0.0001], nodal metastases (HR 3.05; <I>P</I> = 0.02), liver metastases (HR 3.29; <I>P</I> = 0.003), K<SUB>i</SUB>-67 &gt;5% (HR 2.5; <I>P</I> = 0.012) and weight loss (HR 3.06; <I>P</I> = 0.001) were significantly associated with mortality.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study confirms the good long-term survival of patients with NF-PETs and the prognostic value of WHO classification, liver metastases, poor differentiation, Ki-67, nodal metastases and weight loss. These latter two parameters have a prognostic value similar to that of liver metastases and Ki-67.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bettini, R., Boninsegna, L., Mantovani, W., Capelli, P., Bassi, C., Pederzoli, P., Delle Fave, G. F., Panzuto, F., Scarpa, A., Falconi, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm552</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic factors at diagnosis and value of WHO classification in a mono-institutional series of 180 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumours]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>908</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/909?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/909?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To compare irinotecan with the Nordic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) bolus schedule [irinotecan 180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, 5-FU 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and FA 60 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 and 2 (FLIRI)] or the Lv5FU2 schedule [irinotecan 180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, FA 200 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> and infused 5-FU 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 and 2 (Lv5FU2-IRI)] due to uncertainties about how to administrate 5-FU with irinotecan.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients (<I>n</I> = 567) with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive FLIRI or Lv5FU2-IRI. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Patient characteristics were well balanced. PFS did not differ between groups (median 9 months, <I>P</I> = 0.22). Overall survival (OS) was also similar (median 19 months, <I>P</I> = 0.9). Fewer objective responses were seen in the FLIRI group (35% versus 49%, <I>P</I> = 0.001) but the metastatic resection rate did not differ (4% versus 6%, <I>P</I> = 0.3). Grade 3/4 neutropenia (11% versus 5%, <I>P</I> = 0.01) and grade 2 alopecia (18% versus 9%, <I>P</I> = 0.002) were more common in the FLIRI group. The 60-day mortality was 2.4% versus 2.1%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Irinotecan with the bolus Nordic schedule (FLIRI) is a convenient treatment with PFS and OS comparable to irinotecan with the Lv5FU2 schedule. Neutropenia and alopecia are more prevalent, but both regimens are equally well tolerated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glimelius, B., Sorbye, H., Balteskard, L., Bystrom, P., Pfeiffer, P., Tveit, K., Heikkila, R., Keldsen, N., Albertsson, M., Starkhammar, H., Garmo, H., Berglund, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm588</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A randomized phase III multicenter trial comparing irinotecan in combination with the Nordic bolus 5-FU and folinic acid schedule or the bolus/infused de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>914</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>909</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/915?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase protein expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with or without 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/915?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Low tumour expression levels of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) have been linked with improved outcome for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). It is unclear whether this occurs because such tumours have better prognosis or they are more sensitive to 5-FU treatment.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Associations between TS, DPD and TP levels, determined by tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry, and survival was evaluated in 945 CRC patients according to treatment status.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Low TS and DPD expression associated with worse prognosis in stage II [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.09&ndash;2.63) and HR = 1.92 (95% CI 1.23&ndash;2.94), respectively] and stage III CRC patients treated by surgery alone [HR = 1.39 (95% CI 0.92&ndash;2.13) and HR = 1.49 (95% CI 1.02&ndash;2.17), respectively]. Low TS, DPD and TP associated with trends for better outcome in stage III patients treated with 5-FU [HR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.49&ndash;1.33), HR = 0.70 (95% CI 0.42&ndash;1.15) and HR = 0.66 (95% CI 0.39&ndash;1.12), respectively].</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Low TS and DPD expression are prognostic for worse outcome in CRC patients treated by surgery alone, whereas low TS, DPD and TP expression are prognostic for better outcome in patients treated with 5-FU chemotherapy. These results provide indirect evidence that low TS, DPD and TP protein expression are predictive of good response to 5-FU chemotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soong, R., Shah, N., Salto-Tellez, M., Tai, B. C., Soo, R. A., Han, H. C., Ng, S. S., Tan, W. L., Zeps, N., Joseph, D., Diasio, R. B., Iacopetta, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm599</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase protein expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with or without 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>919</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>915</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/920?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EORTC study 40015]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/920?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA), in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and the benefit of adding celecoxib (C) to irinotecan/fluoropyrimidine regimens compared with placebo (P).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients were randomly assigned to receive FOLFIRI: irinotecan (180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> i.v. on days 1, 15 and 22); FA (200 mg/m<sup>2</sup> i.v. on days 1, 2, 15, 16, 29 and 30); 5-FU (400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> i.v. bolus, then 22-h, 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> infusion) or CAPIRI: irinotecan (250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> i.v. infusion on days 1 and 22); capecitabine p.o. (1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> b.i.d. on days 1&ndash;15 and 22&ndash;36). Patients were additionally randomly assigned to receive either placebo or celecoxib (800 mg: 2 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 200 mg b.i.d.).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The trial was closed following eight deaths unrelated to disease progression in the 85 enrolled (629 planned) patients. Response rates were 22% for CAPIRI + C, 48% for CAPIRI + P, 32% for FOLFIRI + C and 46% for FOLFIRI + P. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were shorter for CAPIRI versus FOLFIRI (PFS 5.9 versus 9.6 months and OS 14.8 versus 19.9 months) and celecoxib versus placebo (PFS 6.9 versus 7.8 months and OS 18.3 versus 19.9 months).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Due to the small sample size following early termination, no definitive conclusions can be drawn in relation to the noninferiority of CAPIRI compared with FOLFIRI.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kohne, C.-H., De Greve, J., Hartmann, J. T., Lang, I., Vergauwe, P., Becker, K., Braumann, D., Joosens, E., Muller, L., Janssens, J., Bokemeyer, C., Reimer, P., Link, H., Spath-Schwalbe, E., Wilke, H.-J., Bleiberg, H., Van Den Brande, J., Debois, M., Bethe, U., Van Cutsem, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm544</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Irinotecan combined with infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid or capecitabine plus celecoxib or placebo in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. EORTC study 40015]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>926</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>920</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/927?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Blood pressure rise following angiogenesis inhibition by bevacizumab. A crucial role for microcirculation]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/927?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Arterial hypertension (HT) has been reported in all studies involving bevacizumab, an antiangiogenic agent designed to target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The mechanism underlying bevacizumab-related HT is not yet clearly understood. As far as endothelial dysfunction and microvascular rarefaction are hallmarks in all forms of HT, we tested the hypothesis that anti-VEGF therapy could alter the microcirculation in nontumor tissues and, thus, result in an increase in blood pressure (BP).</p>
<p>We used intravital video microscopy to measure dermal capillary densities in the dorsum of the fingers. Microvascular endothelial function was assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry combined with iontophoresis of pilocarpine (acetylcholine analogue). All measurements were carried out in 18 patients before and after a 6-month treatment with bevacizumab (mean cumulative dose: 3.16 &plusmn; 0.90 g).</p>
<p>Mean BP was increased after 6 months of therapy compared with baseline, from 129 &plusmn; 13/75 &plusmn; 7 mmHg to 145 &plusmn; 17/82 &plusmn; 7 mmHg for systolic BP and diastolic BP, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001). Compared with the baseline, mean dermal capillary density at 6 months was significantly lower (75 &plusmn; 12 versus 83 &plusmn; 13/mm<sup>2</sup>; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001), as well as pilocarpine-induced vasodilation (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05).</p>
<p>Thus, bevacizumab treatment resulted in endothelial dysfunction and capillary rarefaction; both changes are closely associated and could be responsible for the rise in BP observed in most patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mourad, J.-J., des Guetz, G., Debbabi, H., Levy, B. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm550</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Blood pressure rise following angiogenesis inhibition by bevacizumab. A crucial role for microcirculation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>934</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>927</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/935?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological variables]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/935?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The CellSearch System is a technique to detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with cancer. Few data have been published concerning the role of CTCs detection by this method in colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to correlate the presence of CTCs with the commonest clinical and morphological variables.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Blood samples were collected from 97 patients and 30 healthy volunteers. Quantification of CTCs in 7.5 ml of blood was carried out with the CellSearch System. The results were expressed as number of CTCs/7.5 ml and the cut-off of &ge;2 CTCs/7.5 ml was chosen to define the test as positive.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Positive CTCs were detected in 34 of 94 patients (36.2%). Correlation was not found among positive CTCs and location of primary tumor, increased carcinoembryonic antigen level, increased lactate dehydrogenase level or grade of differentiation. Only stage correlated with positive CTCs (20.7% in stage II, 24.1% in stage III and 60.7% in stage IV, <I>P</I> = 0.005).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> CTCs detection by CellSearch is a highly reproducible method that correlates with stage but not with other clinical and morphological variables in patients with colorectal cancer. Colon cancer tumor cells are detectable in all stages. Further studies are warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sastre, J., Maestro, M. L., Puente, J., Veganzones, S., Alfonso, R., Rafael, S., Garcia-Saenz, J. A., Vidaurreta, M., Martin, M., Arroyo, M., Sanz-Casla, M. T., Diaz-Rubio, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm583</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer: correlation with clinical and pathological variables]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>938</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>935</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/939?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A randomized phase III trial comparing standard and high-dose pemetrexed as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/939?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This phase III randomized trial compared pemetrexed 500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (P500) with pemetrexed 900 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (P900) to determine whether higher dosing benefits non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients as second-line therapy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive i.v. P500 or P900 every 3 week.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Accrual was terminated with 588/600 patients enrolled because an interim analysis indicated a low probability of improved survival and numerically greater toxicity on the P900 arm. P900 patients were permitted to continue treatment at P500. No statistical difference was observed between the treatment arms (P500 versus P900) for median survival {6.7 versus 6.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.0132 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.837&ndash;1.226]}, progression-free survival [2.6 versus 2.8 months, HR = 0.9681 (95% CI 0.817&ndash;1.147)], or best overall tumor response [7.1% versus 4.3% (<I>P</I> = 0.1616)]. The incidence of drug-related grade 3/4 toxicity was typically &lt;5% on both treatment arms, but was numerically higher on the P900 arm for most toxicity categories.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> P900 did not improve any efficacy measure over P500. P500 i.v. every 3 week remains the standard pemetrexed dose for second-line treatment of platinum-pretreated advanced NSCLC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cullen, M. H., Zatloukal, P., Sorenson, S., Novello, S., Fischer, J. R., Joy, A. A., Zereu, M., Peterson, P., Visseren-Grul, C. M., Iscoe, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A randomized phase III trial comparing standard and high-dose pemetrexed as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>945</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>939</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>lung cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/946?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II study of bortezomib in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial tract transitional cell carcinoma: CALGB 90207]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/946?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> There is no standard second-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Response rates to second-line chemotherapy for advanced UC are low and response duration is short. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with preclinical activity against UC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Treatment consisted of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> i.v. twice weekly for two consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week break. The primary end point was objective response rate (complete response + partial response) by Reponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Secondary end points included safety, toxicity, and progression-free and overall survival.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In all, 25 patients with advanced UC previously treated with combination chemotherapy were enrolled in a multi-institutional single-arm trial from December 2003 through April 2005. Only 29% of patients had node-only metastases. Grade 3/4 drug-related toxic effects included thrombocytopenia (4%), anemia (8%), lymphopenia (8%), sensory neuropathy (6%), hyperglycemia (4%), hypernatremia (4%), fatigue (4%), neuropathic pain (6%), dehydration (4%), and vomiting (4%). No objective responses were observed [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0&ndash;12]. The median time to progression was 1.4 months (95% CI = 1.1&ndash;2.0 months), and the median survival time was 5.7 months (95% CI = 3.6&ndash;8.4 months). There were no treatment-related deaths.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Although bortezomib is well tolerated, it does not have antitumor activity as second-line therapy in UC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosenberg, J. E., Halabi, S., Sanford, B. L., Himelstein, A. L., Atkins, J. N., Hohl, R. J., Millard, F., Bajorin, D. F., Small, E. J., For the Cancer and Leukemia Group B]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm600</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II study of bortezomib in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial tract transitional cell carcinoma: CALGB 90207]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>950</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>946</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/951?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Late computed tomography scan response improvement and gallium scintigraphy evaluation as on-treatment prognostic parameters to tailor treatment intensity in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. A prospective phase II study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/951?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Tailoring treatment intensity is critical in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). Ongoing prognostic parameters may be an useful adjunct to pretreatment stratification. We used the kinetics of computed tomography (CT) scan response and residual gallium (Ga)-67 uptake to better stratify risk.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Patients received 4&ndash;8 adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine courses according to stage. Disease was reassessed evaluating late computed tomography scan response improvement (CTRI) and Ga-67 uptake. Patients received no further treatment, radiotherapy (RT) or additional chemotherapy + RT according to the presence of none (low risk), one (intermediate risk) and both parameters (high risk). Patients with bulky mediastinum received RT anyhow.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Among 102 assessable patients, 35 showed late CTRI and 9 residual Ga-67 uptake. In 30 patients with bulky mediastinum, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better when neither parameter was present (100% versus 69%; <I>P</I> = 0.02). In 72 patients without bulky mediastinum, treatment was tailored according to risk assignment. Relapses occurred in 5 of 47 low-risk and 3 of 21 intermediate-risk patients, with no differences between the two groups, and in 3 of 4 high-risk patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study shows that two on-treatment parameters, late CTRI and residual Ga-67 uptake, can predict PFS in HL and identify patients in which RT can be spared without apparently affecting the outcome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Re, A., Ferrari, S., Frata, P., Pizzocaro, C., Crippa, C., Tucci, A., Facchetti, F., Grazioli, L., Magrini, S.M., Rossi, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm596</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Late computed tomography scan response improvement and gallium scintigraphy evaluation as on-treatment prognostic parameters to tailor treatment intensity in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. A prospective phase II study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>957</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>951</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/958?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intensive chemotherapy (high-dose CHOP/ESHAP regimen) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/958?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Aim:</b> To analyze toxicity, response and outcome of a phase II trial with intensive chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for young patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Forty-one patients [30 males and 11 females, median age 47 years] consecutively diagnosed with PTCL received three courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day, adriamycin 90 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day, vincristine and prednisone alternating with three courses of etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine and prednisone. Responders were submitted to ASCT.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Sixty-eight percent of patients received the planned treatment. After chemotherapy, 20 patients reached complete response (CR), 4 partial response and 17 failed. ASCT was carried out in 17 of 24 candidates due to lack of mobilization (three cases), toxicity (two), early relapse and patient decision (one each). CR rate after treatment was 51%. With a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 5 of 21 CR patients relapsed and 2 died in CR due to secondary neoplasms. Four-year progression-free survival was 30%. Twenty-two patients have died, with a 4-year overall survival of 39%. International Prognostic Index was the main variable predicting survival. No differences were seen among the 24 candidates according to whether or not they underwent ASCT.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This intensive regimen resulted in moderate CR rate, with manageable toxicity in PTCL. The contribution of ASCT in preventing relapse is debatable. Novel strategies to increase CR warrant investigation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mercadal, S., Briones, J., Xicoy, B., Pedro, C., Escoda, L., Estany, C., Camos, M., Colomo, L., Espinosa, I., Martinez, S., Ribera, J.M., Martino, R., Gutierrez-Garcia, G., Montserrat, E., Lopez-Guillermo, A., On behalf of the Grup per l'Estudi dels Limfomes de Catalunya I Balears (GELCAB)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intensive chemotherapy (high-dose CHOP/ESHAP regimen) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>963</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>958</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/964?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/964?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Vorinostat has demonstrated activity in refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. In a phase I trial, an encouraging activity in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was noted.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We carried out a phase II trial (NCT00097929) of oral vorinostat 300 mg b.i.d. (14 days/3 weeks or 3 days/week) in patients with measurable, relapsed DLBCL who had received two or more systemic therapies. Response rate and duration (DOR), time to progression (TTP) and safety were assessed.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Eighteen patients were enrolled (median age: 66 years; median prior therapies: 2). Seven received 300 mg b.i.d. 14 days/3 weeks, but four had grade 3 or 4 toxicity (dose-limiting toxicity, DLT). The schedule was amended to 300 mg b.i.d. 3 days/week), and none had DLT. One achieved a complete response (TtR = 85 days; DOR = &gt;468 days) and one had stable disease (301 days). Sixteen discontinued for progressive disease; median TTP was 44 days. Median number of cycles was 2 (1 to &gt;19). Common drug-related adverse experiences (AEs; mostly grade 1/2) were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, anemia and vomiting. Three patients had dose reduction; none discontinued for drug-related AEs. Drug-related AE &ge;grade 3 included thrombocytopenia (16.7%) and asthenia (11.1%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Vorinostat was well tolerated at 300 mg b.i.d. 3 days/week or 200 mg b.i.d. 14 days/3 weeks but had limited activity against relapsed DLBCL.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crump, M., Coiffier, B., Jacobsen, E. D., Sun, L., Ricker, J. L., Xie, H., Frankel, S. R., Randolph, S. S., Cheson, B. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>969</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>964</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/970?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of serial determinations of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the follow-up of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/970?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Early recognition of disease progression in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is an important decision point concerning intensive therapies. In a screen program searching for dynamic prognostic determinants, we have identified lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a most suitable follow-up parameter.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> LDH levels were serially determined in 221 patients with <I>de novo</I> MDS (median age 70 years, range 24&ndash;94). The increase in LDH was correlated with survival and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolution.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Confirming previous data, an elevated LDH at diagnosis was found to be associated with an increased probability of AML evolution and decreased probability of survival (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). In the follow-up, we found that in patients who progressed (to higher IPSS category or AML), LDH levels were significantly higher in the two 3-month period preceding progression compared with the initial two 3-month period (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.005). In a subgroup of patients, the increase in LDH was accompanied or followed by other signs of disease progression, such as occurrence of thrombocytopenia or appearance of circulating blasts. In multivariate analyses, the LDH increase was found to be an independent prognostic variable.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> LDH is an interesting follow-up parameter in MDS, which may assist in early recognition of disease progression and thus help in risk stratification and patient selection for interventional therapies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wimazal, F., Sperr, W. R., Kundi, M., Vales, A., Fonatsch, C., Thalhammer-Scherrer, R., Schwarzinger, I., Valent, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm595</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of serial determinations of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in the follow-up of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>976</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>970</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/977?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A randomized phase II study of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) given daily x 5 days every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/977?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Ixabepilone is a tubulin-polymerizing agent with potential activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients were eligible who had incurable, measurable SCCHN and less than two prior regimens for metastatic/recurrent disease. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of less than or equal to one and adequate renal/hepatic/hematological function were required. Patients were randomly assigned to receive ixabepilone 6 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 5 days every 21 days (arm A) or 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (arm B). Each arm accrued taxane-naive and -exposed strata in a two-stage design. The primary end point was response. Eighty-five eligible patients entered; there was one response in a taxane-exposed patient among 32 patients on arm A. Five of 35 taxane-naive patients on arm B had partial responses (14%). No taxane-exposed patient on arm B responded. Common grades 3 and 4 toxic effects were fatigue, neutropenia, and sensory/motor neuropathy. Median survival for arm A taxane-naive and taxane-exposed patients is 5.6 and 6.5 months; for arm B, taxane-naive and taxane-exposed patients is 7.8 and 6.5 months. Weekly ixabepilone 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup> is active in taxane-naive patients with SCCHN. A high incidence of motor and sensory grade 3 neuropathy resulted at this dose and schedule. Further development of ixabepilone in previously treated head and neck cancer is not warranted on the basis of these data.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burtness, B. A., Manola, J., Axelrod, R., Argiris, A., Forastiere, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm591</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A randomized phase II study of ixabepilone (BMS-247550) given daily x 5 days every 3 weeks or weekly in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>983</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>977</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>head and neck cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/984?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aspergillus galactomannan testing in patients with long-term neutropenia: implications for clinical management]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/984?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We carried out a prospective study on galactomannan enzyme immuno assay (GEI) (Platelia<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> <I>Aspergillus</I> EIA, Bio-Rad) testing for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in serum and broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) in 200 patients with hematological malignancies and profound neutropenia. The incidence of proven and probable IA was 6% and 5.5%, respectively. In patients with fever or pneumonia, a single-positive GEI test result (galactomannan index &ge; 0.5) had excellent specificity (100%). Sensitivity was relatively low (40%) at onset of fever, but increased to 94.7% after 6 days of fever. In patients with infiltrates in chest X-ray or computed tomography scan (<I>n</I> = 48), GEI testing in BAL had a favorable diagnostic accuracy as compared with GEI testing in serum (sensitivity100% versus 71%). Our findings indicate that antifungal therapy should be started immediately at onset of fever in neutropenic patients with positive GEI tests. In patients with fever refractory to broad-spectrum antibiotics (&ge;6 days of fever), the high diagnostic accuracy makes GEI testing a valuable diagnostic tool and questions the common strategy to carry out antifungal treatment irrespective of diagnostic testing in this situation. Our data also show that GEI testing in BAL can be useful for early diagnosis of IA in patients with hematological malignancies and pulmonary infiltrates.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penack, O., Rempf, P., Graf, B., Blau, I. W., Thiel, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm571</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aspergillus galactomannan testing in patients with long-term neutropenia: implications for clinical management]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>989</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>984</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>supportive Care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/990?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Optimisation of circulating biomarkers of cell death for routine clinical use]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/990?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> M30<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> and M65<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays detect circulating cytokeratin 18 fragments released during caspase-dependent or total cell death, respectively, and have potential as biomarkers in epithelial cancers. While these assays have been validated, their robustness for routine clinical use is unknown.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> M30 and M65 were measured in matched serum and plasma samples from 31 lung cancer patients and 18 controls.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Time allowable between sample acquisition and processing is critical for assays in clinical use. A 4-h delay in processing at room temperature increased M30 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001), an effect minimised by incubation on ice. M30 and M65 in serum were resistant to processing variations including delays. Serum and plasma measurements correlated well although M30 but not M65 was lower in serum (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0005). Less variation between duplicate assays was observed in serum. Prolonged storage (&ndash;80&deg;C) led to increased M30 (12%, 6 months; 34%, 1 year). Sample dilution in the supplied assay diluent proved non-linear, whereas dilution in donor serum or porcine plasma restored linearity up to a ratio of 1 : 6.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> We present recommendations that improve the reliability of these assays for clinical use and recommend serum as the preferred matrix with data more resistant to variations in collection.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greystoke, A., Cummings, J., Ward, T., Simpson, K., Renehan, A., Butt, F., Moore, D., Gietema, J., Blackhall, F., Ranson, M., Hughes, A., Dive, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Optimisation of circulating biomarkers of cell death for routine clinical use]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>995</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>990</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>phase I and pharmacokinetics</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cigarette smoking and site-specific cancer mortality: testing uncertain associations using extended follow-up of the original Whitehall study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The relation between cigarette smoking and several malignancies is still unclear. We examined the association of cigarette smoking with death attributed to 15 cancer sites, 7 of which are regarded as having an uncertain relation with tobacco.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> The original Whitehall study is a prospective cohort of 17 363 London-based male government employees (age 40&ndash;69 years) who were examined in the late 1960s and then followed up for a maximum of 38 years.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Following adjustment for demographic characteristics, risk factors, and prevalent disease, established positive cigarette smoking&mdash;cancer gradients were confirmed for carcinoma of the lung, stomach, pancreas, bladder, upper aero-digestive (including oesophagus), and liver, and for myeloid leukaemia. Among the cancers of uncertain relation with smoking, mortality rates for malignancy of the colon, rectum and prostate and for lymphatic leukaemia were elevated in current and/or former smokers. There was essentially no apparent relation between smoking and mortality from carcinoma of the brain or from lymphoma.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In this study, cigarette smoking appears to be a risk factor for several malignancies of previously unclear association with tobacco use.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Batty, G. D., Kivimaki, M., Gray, L., Davey Smith, G., Marmot, M. G., Shipley, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm578</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cigarette smoking and site-specific cancer mortality: testing uncertain associations using extended follow-up of the original Whitehall study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1002</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1003?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Alcohol consumption and renal cell cancer risk in two Italian case-control studies]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1003?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> There is some evidence that alcohol consumption is inversely associated with renal cell cancer (RCC), but the issue is still unclear.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We investigated the relation using data from two Italian multicentric case&ndash;control studies conducted from 1985 to 2004, including a total of 1115 incident, histologically confirmed cases and 2582 controls hospitalised with acute, non-neoplastic conditions.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Compared with non-drinkers, the multivariate odds ratios (ORs) of RCC were 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73&ndash;1.04] for &le;4 drinks per day, 0.76 (95% CI 0.59&ndash;0.99) for &gt;4 to &le;8 drinks per day and 0.70 (95% CI 0.50&ndash;0.97) for &gt;8 drinks per day of alcoholic beverages, with a significant inverse trend in risk (<I>P</I> value = 0.01). The ORs were 0.85 (95% CI 0.71&ndash;1.02) for wine, 0.84 (95% CI 0.68&ndash;1.03) for beer and 0.86 (95% CI 0.70&ndash;1.05) for spirits consumption, as compared with abstainers. No trend in risk of RCC emerged with duration (<I>P</I> value = 0.94) and age at starting alcohol consumption (<I>P</I> value = 0.81). Results were consistent in men and women, as well as in strata of age, smoking and body mass index.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> This pooled analysis found an inverse association between alcohol drinking and RCC. Risks continued to decrease even above eight drinks per day (i.e. &gt;100 g/day) of alcohol intake, with no apparent levelling in risk.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pelucchi, C., Galeone, C., Montella, M., Polesel, J., Crispo, A., Talamini, R., Negri, E., Ramazzotti, V., Grimaldi, M., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm590</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Alcohol consumption and renal cell cancer risk in two Italian case-control studies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1008</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1003</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1009?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Changes in breast cancer incidence and mortality in middle-aged and elderly women in 28 countries with Caucasian majority populations]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1009?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Mammography screening and menopause hormone therapy is essentially offered to women 50&ndash;69 years old.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> In 28 European ancestry countries, we quantified changes in breast cancer incidence and mortality using a joinpoint regression analysis from 1960 until last year of available data.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Since 1960, increases in incidence often in the order of 2%&ndash;3% per year occurred in all countries, mainly in women 50&ndash;69 years old whose incidence in eight countries surpassed the incidence in women 70 years old and more. In 10 countries, a decrease in incidence in women &ge;70 years was noticeable in the last years of observation, but the magnitude of this decrease was far from matching the magnitude of the increases observed in the 50&ndash;69 age-group. In the beginning of years 2000s, a persistent decrease in mortality of ~2% per year was observed in women 50&ndash;69 years old in most countries and parallel declines in mortality were observed in women 70 years or more.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In years 2000s, in a number of countries, the incidence of breast cancer has become greater in middle-aged women than in older women. If trends remain unchanged, the same phenomenon is likely to happen in other countries.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hery, C., Ferlay, J., Boniol, M., Autier, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm593</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Changes in breast cancer incidence and mortality in middle-aged and elderly women in 28 countries with Caucasian majority populations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1018</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1009</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1019?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prolonged neutropenia after dose-dense chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1019?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ishiguro, H., Kitano, T., Yoshibayashi, H., Toi, M., Ueno, T., Yasuda, H., Yanagihara, K., Garbo, C. L., Fukushima, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prolonged neutropenia after dose-dense chemotherapy with pegfilgrastim]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1019</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1019</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1019-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to Letter to the editor, by Ishiguro et al. (Ann Oncol)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1019-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piedbois, P., Serin, D., Priou, F., Laplaige, P., Berdah, J.-F., Grenier, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to Letter to the editor, by Ishiguro et al. (Ann Oncol)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1020</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1019</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1020?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ErbB/HER receptor family in breast cancer--the more we search the more we learn]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1020?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karamouzis, M. V., Konstantinopoulos, P. A., Papavassiliou, A. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ErbB/HER receptor family in breast cancer--the more we search the more we learn]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1021</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1020</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1021?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Factors influencing the decision to take or reject opioids for cancer pain: are we on target?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1021?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Apolone, G., Corli, O., Greco, M. T., Zagonel, V., on behalf of the CPOR SG Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Factors influencing the decision to take or reject opioids for cancer pain: are we on target?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1022</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1021</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1022?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proton MR spectroscopy for monitoring early treatment response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1022?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baek, H.-M., Chen, J.-H., Nalcioglu, O., Su, M.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn121</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proton MR spectroscopy for monitoring early treatment response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1024</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1022</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1024?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MR imaging features of invasive breast cancer correlated with hormonal receptors: does progesterone receptor matter?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1024?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen, J. H., Nalcioglu, O., Su, M. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn120</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MR imaging features of invasive breast cancer correlated with hormonal receptors: does progesterone receptor matter?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1026</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1024</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1025?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hepatosplenic gammadelta T-cell lymphoma successfully treated with a combination of alemtuzumab and cladribine]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1025?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaeger, G., Bauer, F., Brezinschek, R., Beham-Schmid, C., Mannhalter, C., Neumeister, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn119</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hepatosplenic gammadelta T-cell lymphoma successfully treated with a combination of alemtuzumab and cladribine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1026</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1025</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1027?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Volume 18, Supplement 2, ESMO Clinical Recommendations]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1027?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn158</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Volume 18, Supplement 2, ESMO Clinical Recommendations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1029</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1027</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>corrigendum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1030?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Burden of cervical cancer in Europe: estimates for 2004]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/5/1030?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-28</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn159</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Burden of cervical cancer in Europe: estimates for 2004]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1030</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1030</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>corrigendum</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>603</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/605?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Favorable trends in cancer mortality in the European Union but no room for complacency]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/605?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boyle, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm598</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Favorable trends in cancer mortality in the European Union but no room for complacency]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>606</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>605</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/607?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emerging therapeutic options for breast cancer chemotherapy during pregnancy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/607?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Breast cancer is the commonest solid tumor observed during pregnancy. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is feasible during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy, but few data are available on recent and highly active drugs taxanes, vinorelbine and anti-HER-2 agents in this setting.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We carried out a comprehensive review of reports documenting the use of taxanes, vinorelbine, trastuzumab and lapatinib during pregnancy in the English literature, in order to evaluate their safety profile in pregnant patients.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-four pregnancies are described, in which no grade 3&ndash;4 maternal toxicity nor malformation in the offspring was reported. Whereas only one report studied the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel (Taxol) during pregnancy, several preclinical reports indicate that the placental P-glycoprotein could prevent the transplacental transfer of taxanes and vinorelbine. The use of trastuzumab was associated with the occurrence of anhydramnios in three of six cases.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The administration of recent drugs taxanes and vinorelbine seems feasible during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy, with a favorable toxicity profile. In contrast, anti-HER-2 agents may obscure the normal development of the fetal kidney, and should be avoided during pregnancy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mir, O., Berveiller, P., Ropert, S., Goffinet, F., Pons, G., Treluyer, J.-M., Goldwasser, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm460</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emerging therapeutic options for breast cancer chemotherapy during pregnancy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>613</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>607</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/614?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/614?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Breast cancer is a major cause of suffering and death and is of significant concern to many women. Early detection of breast cancer by systematic mammography screening can find lesions for which treatment is more effective and generally more favourable for quality of life. The potential harm caused by mammography includes the creation of unnecessary anxiety and morbidity, inappropriate economic cost and the use of ionising radiation. It is for this reason that the strongest possible emphasis on quality control and quality assurance is required. Development of the <I>European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis</I> has been an initiative within the Europe Against Cancer Programme. The fourth edition of the multidisciplinary guidelines was published in 2006 and comprises ~400 pages divided into 12 chapters prepared by &gt;200 authors and contributors. The multidisciplinary editorial board has prepared a summary document to provide an overview of the fundamental points and principles that should support any quality screening or diagnostic service. This document includes a summary table of key performance indicators and is presented here in order to make these principles and standards known to a wider scientific community.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perry, N., Broeders, M., de Wolf, C., Tornberg, S., Holland, R., von Karsa, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm481</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition--summary document]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>622</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>614</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/623?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer and cancer-therapy related cognitive dysfunction: an international perspective from the Venice cognitive workshop]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/623?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A subset of survivors has cognitive impairment after cancer treatment. This is generally subtle, but may be sustained. In October 2006, the second international cognitive workshop was held in Venice. The workshop included neuropsychologists, clinical and experimental psychologists, medical oncologists, imaging experts, and patient advocates. The main developments since the first Cognitive Workshop in 2003 have been the following. (i) studies evaluating cognitive function in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancers other than breast cancer, and in patients receiving hormonal therapy for cancer. (ii) The publication of longitudinal prospective studies which have shown that some patients already exhibit cognitive impairment on neuropsychological testing before receiving chemotherapy, and some patients have deterioration in cognitive functioning from pre- to postchemotherapy. (iii) Studies of the underlying mechanisms of cognitive impairment both in patients and in animal models. (iv) Use of structural and functional imaging techniques to study changes in brain morphology and activation patterns associated with chemotherapy. (v) At present cognitive research in cancer is limited by methodological challenges and the lack of standardization in neuropsychological studies. The current workshop addressed many of these issues and established an international task force to provide guidelines for future research and information on how best to manage these symptoms.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vardy, J., Wefel, J. S., Ahles, T., Tannock, I. F., Schagen, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer and cancer-therapy related cognitive dysfunction: an international perspective from the Venice cognitive workshop]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>629</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>623</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/631?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer mortality in the European Union, 1970-2003, with a joinpoint analysis]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/631?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Cancer mortality peaked in the European Union (EU) in the late 1980s and declined thereafter.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> We analyzed EU cancer mortality data provided by the World Health Organization in 1970&ndash;2003, using joinpoint analysis.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Overall, cancer mortality levelled off in men since 1988 and declined in 1993&ndash;2003 (annual percent change, APC = &ndash;1.3%). In women, a steady decline has been observed since the early 1970s. The decline in male cancer mortality has been driven by lung cancer, which levelled off since the late 1980s and declined thereafter (APC = 2.7% in 1997&ndash;2003). Recent decreases were also observed for other tobacco-related cancers, as oral cavity/pharynx, esophagus, larynx and bladder, as well as for colorectal (APC = &ndash;0.9% in 1992&ndash;2003) and prostate cancers (APC = &ndash;1.0% in 1994&ndash;2003). In women, breast cancer mortality levelled off since the early 1990s and declined thereafter (APC = &ndash;1.0% in 1998&ndash;2003). Female mortality declined through the period 1970&ndash;2003 for colorectal and uterine cancer, while it increased over the last three decades for lung cancer (APC = 4.6% in 2001&ndash;2003). In both sexes, mortality declined in 1970&ndash;2003 for stomach cancer and for a few cancers amenable to treatment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This update analysis of the mortality from cancer in the EU shows favorable patterns over recent years in both sexes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bosetti, C., Bertuccio, P., Levi, F., Lucchini, F., Negri, E., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm597</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer mortality in the European Union, 1970-2003, with a joinpoint analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>640</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>631</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/641?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Weight change and cancer risk in a cohort of more than 65 000 adults in Austria]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/641?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To investigate relations between weight loss or weight gain and the incidence of cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Weight change was assessed in a population-based cohort of &gt;65 000 Austrian adults (28 711 men and 36 938 women) for a period of 7 years, after which participants were followed for incident cancers over 8 years on average. Incident cancers (other than nonmelanoma skin cancers) were ascertained by a population-based cancer registry (<I>n</I> = 3128). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard rate ratios (HRs) stratified by age and adjusted for smoking, occupational group, blood glucose and body mass index at baseline.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In both men and women, neither weight loss nor weight gain was clearly associated with the incidence of all cancers combined. Weight loss (&gt;0.10 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/year) was inversely associated with colon cancer in men [HR 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29&ndash;0.87], while high weight gain (&ge;0.50 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/year) was inversely associated with prostate cancer (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24&ndash;0.76). Among women, high weight gain was positively associated with ovarian cancer (HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.05&ndash;5.85).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> These findings indicate that recent weight change may influence the incidence of several types of cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rapp, K., Klenk, J., Ulmer, H., Concin, H., Diem, G., Oberaigner, W., Schroeder, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm549</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Weight change and cancer risk in a cohort of more than 65 000 adults in Austria]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>648</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>641</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/649?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Proliferation accurately identifies the high-risk patients among small, low-grade, lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/649?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The proliferation factor mitotic activity index (MAI) is the strongest prognosticator in lymph node-negative invasive breast cancer patients under age 71. The question remains, whether this also holds for &lsquo;favourable prognosis&rsquo; subgroups.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> The study was a multicentre prospective analysis of the MAI for recurrence-free survival and overall cancer-related survival of grade, MAI, and other prognosticators in 853 long-term follow-up, T1&ndash;3N0M0 breast cancer patients under 71 years.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In all tumours together (<I>N</I> = 853), in grade 3 (<I>n</I> = 269), in tumours &lt;1 cm all grades (<I>n</I> = 84), 1&ndash;2 cm, grades 1 + 2 (<I>n</I> = 300), and 2&ndash;3 cm, grades 1 + 2 (<I>n</I> = 124), the MAI is prognostically superior. Other features [grade, estrogen receptor (ER), diameter, and age] did not enhance its prognostic value except in grades 1 + 2 tumours 2&ndash;3 cm diameter with MAI &lt;10, where ER has an additional prognostic value.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In women &lt;71 years with T1&ndash;3N0M0 small or low-grade invasive breast cancer usually not receiving systemic treatment, MAI &ge;10 accurately identifies those at high risk. These high-risk patients should be considered for adjuvant systemic therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baak, J. P. A., van Diest, P. J., Janssen, E. A. M., Gudlaugsson, E., Voorhorst, F. J., van der Wall, E., Vermorken, J. B., other collaborators of the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm535</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Proliferation accurately identifies the high-risk patients among small, low-grade, lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>654</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>649</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/655?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The impact of a false-positive MRI on the choice for mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers is limited]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/655?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess the false-positive rate of breast cancer surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in <I>BRCA</I> mutation carriers and the impact of an abnormal mammography or breast MRI on the patients&rsquo; decision for prophylactic mastectomy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 196 <I>BRCA</I> mutation carriers were included with a median follow-up of 2 years (range 1&ndash;9) with annual mammography and MRI. Preference for prophylactic mastectomy was registered at first surveillance after the mutation carriership was revealed.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In all, 41% (81 of 196) of the women had at least one positive MRI or mammography. Malignancy was detected in 17 women: 11 at surveillance, 4 at an intended prophylactic mastectomy and 2 had an interval cancer. Imaging by mammography and MRI had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 90%. The probability that a positive MRI result is false positive was 83%. In the group with a prior preference for mastectomy with and without a false&ndash;positive imaging, prophylactic mastectomy was carried out in 89% and 66%, respectively (<I>P</I> = 0.06), in the group with prior preference for surveillance these percentages were 15% and 11%, respectively (<I>P</I> = 0.47).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Although the rate of false-positive MRI results is high, the impact on the choice for prophylactic mastectomy is limited and is determined by the woman&rsquo;s preference before the establishment of a <I>BRCA</I> mutation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoogerbrugge, N., Kamm, Y. J. L., Bult, P., Landsbergen, K. M., Bongers, E. M. H. F., Brunner, H. G., Bonenkamp, H. J., de Hullu, J. A., Ligtenberg, M. J. L., Boetes, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm537</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The impact of a false-positive MRI on the choice for mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers is limited]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>659</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>655</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/660?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[p27 and Skp2 immunoreactivity and its clinical significance with endocrine and chemo-endocrine treatments in node-negative early breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/660?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Low p27 and high Skp2 immunoreactivity are associated with a poor prognosis and other poor prognostic features including resistant phenotypes and antiestrogen drug resistance. We investigated these proteins in two International Breast Cancer Study Group trials studying node-negative early breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Trial VIII compared chemotherapy followed by goserelin with either modality alone in premenopausal patients. Trial IX compared chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen with tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal patients. Central Pathology Office assessed p27 and Skp2 expression in the primary tumor by immunohistochemistry among 1631 (60%) trial patients.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> p27 and Skp2 were inversely related; 13% of tumors expressed low p27 and high Skp2. Low p27 and high Skp2 were associated with unfavorable prognostic factors including larger size and higher grade tumors, absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression and high Ki-67 (each <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Low p27 and high Skp2 were not associated with disease-free survival (<I>P</I> = 0.42 and <I>P</I> = 0.48, respectively). The relative effects of chemo-endocrine versus endocrine therapy were similar regardless of p27 or Skp2.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> We confirm the association of low p27 and high Skp2 with other poor prognostic features, but found no predictive or prognostic value, and therefore do not recommend routine determination of p27 and Skp2 for node-negative breast cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravaioli, A., Monti, F., Regan, M. M., Maffini, F., Mastropasqua, M. G., Spataro, V., Castiglione-Gertsch, M., Panzini, I., Gianni, L., Goldhirsch, A., Coates, A., Price, K. N., Gusterson, B. A., Viale, G., On behalf of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (see Appendix 1 for list of participants)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm547</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[p27 and Skp2 immunoreactivity and its clinical significance with endocrine and chemo-endocrine treatments in node-negative early breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>668</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>660</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/669?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MAPK overexpression is associated with anthracycline resistance and increased risk for recurrence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/669?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Triple-negative breast cancer is estimated to account for 15%&ndash;20% of all patients with breast cancer and is considered as a prognostically unfavorable subset. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of various molecular factors in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Tumor specimens from 109 patients with receptor-negative (estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) breast cancer were analyzed for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) expression by immunohistochemistry. The prognostic significance of these molecular factors, in addition to various prognostic variables, was investigated.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifteen (13.8%), 38 (34.9%) and 33 patients (30.3%) had positive staining for EGFR, MAPK and PI3K, respectively. MAPK was associated with anthracycline resistance (<I>P</I> = 0.008) and lower MAPK score was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival (<I>P</I> = 0.029). Survival following relapse was significantly worse for those with a higher MAPK score (<I>P</I> = 0.03).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> MAPK is a significant prognostic and predictive factor in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Furthermore, the level of staining among those with a positive MAPK expression may play a prognostic role at different stages of relapse. Further translational research is required to elucidate molecular mechanisms of tumor proliferation in this subset of patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eralp, Y., Derin, D., Ozluk, Y., Yavuz, E., Guney, N., Saip, P., Muslumanoglu, M., Igci, A., Kucucuk, S., Dincer, M., Aydiner, A., Topuz, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MAPK overexpression is associated with anthracycline resistance and increased risk for recurrence in patients with triple-negative breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>674</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>669</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/675?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preoperative CA 15-3 and CEA serum levels as predictor for breast cancer outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/675?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To investigate the association between tumor markers [cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] and clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes in breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> A total of 740 patients with stages I&ndash;III breast cancer had preoperative CA 15-3 and CEA concentrations measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate associations between marker concentration and clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Among 740 patients, elevated preoperative levels of CA 15-3 and CEA were identified in 92 (12.4%) and 79 (10.7%) patients, respectively. Tumor size (&gt;5 cm), node metastases (&ge;4), and advanced stage (&ge;III) were associated with higher preoperative levels. Elevated CA 15-3 and CEA levels were associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS, <I>P</I> = 0.0014, <I>P</I> = 0.0001, respectively) and overall survival (OS, <I>P</I> = 0.018, <I>P</I> = 0.015) even in stage-matched analysis. Patients with normal levels of both CA 15-3 and CEA showed better DFS and OS than those with elevated group. In multivariate analysis, age (&lt;35 years), tumor size (&gt;2 cm), node metastases, estrogen receptor expression, and elevated CA 15-3 and CEA preoperative values were independent prognostic factors for DFS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> High preoperative CA 15-3 and CEA levels may reflect tumor burden and are associated with advanced disease and poor outcome. Measuring preoperative levels of CA 15-3 and CEA can be helpful for predicting outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Park, B.-W., Oh, J.-W., Kim, J.-H., Park, S. H., Kim, K.-S., Kim, J. H., Lee, K. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm538</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preoperative CA 15-3 and CEA serum levels as predictor for breast cancer outcomes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>681</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>675</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/682?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metastases to the breast: role of fine needle cytology samples. Our experience with nine cases in 2 years]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/682?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The increased survival due to the introduction of effective antineoplastic regimens has caused a modification of the natural history of numerous malignancies. Follow-up of neoplastic patients often includes the evaluation of masses in various body sites by fine needle cytology (FNC) in order to rule out cancer recurrence. Besides primary neoplasms, the breast can host a number of metastases: these rarely do have a typical presentation, so FNC is requested for their cytomorphological assessment.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This report describes nine consecutive cases in which a cytopathological diagnosis of metastasis to the breast was carried out on FNC samples.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Primary sites were identified on cytomorphological and immunocytochemical bases and were represented by the ovary (three cases), melanoma (two cases), endocervix (one case), endometrium (one case), lung (one case) and prostate (one case).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The cytopathological diagnosis of metastatic neoplasms to the breast is not always straightforward, especially in the absence of a clinical history of cancer. The usage of improved cytopathological criteria combined with immunocytochemistry may be of great diagnostic help in the identification of breast metastases.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fulciniti, F., Losito, S., Botti, G., Di Mattia, D., La Mura, A., Pisano, C., Pignata, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm546</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metastases to the breast: role of fine needle cytology samples. Our experience with nine cases in 2 years]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>687</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>682</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/688?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why i.p. therapy cannot yet be considered as a standard of care for the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/688?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical announcement recommended i.p. therapy for women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer. Its basis was a summary of eight randomised controlled trials and two systematic reviews, which appear to indicate benefit of i.p. therapy. However, the systematic reviews that inform the recommendations have been inappropriately presented and interpreted. The systematic reviews inappropriately pooled results from &lsquo;confounded&rsquo; trials in which different drugs and different doses of drugs were given in the control and i.p. treatment arms. Therefore, it is not possible to assess which component of treatment is responsible for improving outcome. In addition, none of the trials use a control arm of the internationally accepted standard of care. Using just the unconfounded trials, indirect comparisons show that the magnitude of benefit observed when i.p. regimens are compared with older i.v. regimens [hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60&ndash;0.92, <I>P</I> = 0.006] is smaller than the magnitude of benefit achieved with modern day standard of i.v. treatment compared with the same i.v. regimen used as control in the unconfounded i.p. trials (HR for OS 0.68; 95% CI 0.58&ndash;0.80, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). A further difficulty is that the reviews cannot recommend an i.p. regimen for standard use. Drug-related toxicity and catheter complications that occur with i.p. therapy are considerable. The NCI recommendations have major implications for the treatment of women with ovarian cancer and for the next generation of clinical trials. We do not believe that the body of evidence currently available supports the recommendation that i.p. therapy should form part of routine care. The choice of treatment of women with newly diagnosed, optimally debulked, ovarian cancer, where therapy has the best chance of influencing OS, is too important to be left with this uncertainty. A clinical trial that investigates a practical and acceptable regimen which gives some or all chemotherapy by the i.p. route and compares this with standard i.v. chemotherapy should be a priority for those who wish to promote its use.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swart, A. M. C., Burdett, S., Ledermann, J., Mook, P., Parmar, M. K. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm518</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why i.p. therapy cannot yet be considered as a standard of care for the first-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>695</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>688</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/696?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estrogen-dependent cell signaling and apoptosis in BRCA1-blocked BG1 ovarian cancer cells in response to plumbagin and other chemotherapeutic agents]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/19/4/696?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Cellular response to chemotherapeutic drugs in the absence of BRCA1 either completely or partially had drawn less attention. The present study evaluated whether there is a differential inhibition of cell growth by selected compounds with respect to BRCA1 status in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ovarian cancer cells.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> The BG1 ovarian cancer cells used in the experiments were antisensely blocked with BRCA1 gene. Growth inhibition and apoptotic induction were analyzed to evaluate the cytotoxic effects. Small interfering RNA (SiRNA) transfection, western blot analysis, RT&ndash;PCR analysis and molecular modeling were carried out to analyze the estrogen-dependent action of plumbagin.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Although we found that all the compounds studied induce apoptosis, the induction was in the order of plumbagin &gt; doxorubicin &gt; tamoxifen &gt; cisplatin. Plumbagin can bind to the active site of ER-. Plumbagin, however, induced ER- 46 kDa truncated isoform, which was found abundantly preempted in the cytoplasm compared with a 66-kDa full-length isoform. The truncated isoform is known to inhibit classical ER- signaling pathways. SiRNA-transfected cells for ER- exhibited lower cytotoxicity upon plumbagin treatment than the control-transfected cells.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Taken together, this study indicates that plumbagin has chemotherapeutic potential in BRCA1-mutated/defective ER-positive cancers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thasni, K. A., Rakesh, S., Rojini, G., Ratheeshkumar, T., Srinivas, G., Priya, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdm557</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estrogen-dependent cell signaling and apoptosis in BRCA1-blocked BG1 ovarian cancer cells in response to plumbagin and other chemotherapeutic agents]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>19</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>705</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>696</pri