<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Annals of Oncology - recent issues</title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Oncology - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1569-8041</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0923-7534</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1755?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1757?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1763?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1771?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1787?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1794?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1803?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1813?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1818?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1824?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1829?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1836?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1842?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1848?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1854?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1860?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1867?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1874?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1881?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1886?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1898?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1899?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1900?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii5?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii20?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii47?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii70?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii79?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii89?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii131?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii135?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1613?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1615?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1619?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1631?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1639?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1647?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1653?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1660?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1667?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1674?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1682?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1688?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1697?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1703?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1714?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1722?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1728?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1736?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1741?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1747?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1747-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1748?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1751?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1752?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1753?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1755?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1755?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp511</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1755</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1755</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1757?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Where is the future of endometrial cancer therapy?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1757?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McMeekin, D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp493</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Where is the future of endometrial cancer therapy?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1761</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1757</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1763?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast carcinoma--rare types: review of the literature]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1763?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Invasive breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease in its presentation, pathological classification and clinical course. However, there are more than a dozen variants which are less common but still very well defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. The rarity of many of these neoplasms does not allow large or randomized studies to define the optimal treatment. Many of the descriptions of these cancers are from case reports and small series. Our review brings updated information on 16 epithelial subtypes as classified by the WHO system with a very concise histopathology description and parameters helpful in the clinic. The aim of our review is to provide a tool for breast cancer caregivers which will enable a better understanding of the disease and its optimal approach to therapy. This may also stand as a clinical framework for a future understanding of these rarer breast cancers when gene analysis work is reported.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yerushalmi, R., Hayes, M. M., Gelmon, K. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp245</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast carcinoma--rare types: review of the literature]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1770</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1763</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1771?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1771?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) include a rapidly expanding repertoire of medical, surgical and supportive care measures.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> To provide timely and evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with MBC, an international expert panel reviewed and discussed the evidence available from clinical trials regarding diagnostic, therapeutic and supportive measures with emphasis on their impact on the quality of life and overall survival of patients with MBC.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, use of targeted therapies and bisphosphonates, surgical treatment and supportive care measures in the management of patients with MBC were formulated.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The present consensus manuscript updates evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of MBC depending on disease-associated and biological variables.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beslija, S., Bonneterre, J., Burstein, H. J., Cocquyt, V., Gnant, M., Heinemann, V., Jassem, J., Kostler, W. J., Krainer, M., Menard, S., Petit, T., Petruzelka, L., Possinger, K., Schmid, P., Stadtmauer, E., Stockler, M., Van Belle, S., Vogel, C., Wilcken, N., Wiltschke, C., Zielinski, C. C., Zwierzina, H., for the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp261</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1785</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1771</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1787?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A feasibility study of sequential doublet chemotherapy comprising carboplatin-doxorubicin and carboplatin-paclitaxel for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1787?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Platinum compounds, taxanes and anthracyclines provide the major effective drug classes in the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 52 women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma were treated with four cycles of carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 and doxorubicin (50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) for four cycles before or after four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel (175 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) with each cycle administered at 21-day intervals.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Thirty-seven patients (71.2%) completed all planned treatment. Excluding six patients who did not complete treatment for non-drug-related causes, 80.4% completed all planned treatment. Three hundred and seventy-one treatment cycles were administered and 303 (81.7%) occurred on time. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 haematological toxic effects, particularly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, were the predominant cause of treatment delays and dose reductions. A low incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity and no cardiac toxicity were observed. The overall response rates for patients with evaluable disease were 82.1% and 66.7% for endometrial and carcinosarcoma, respectively. At a median follow-up of 21 months, the median progression-free survival for the endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma cohorts were 15.3 and 12.0 months, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This regimen is generally well tolerated with encouraging efficacy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ang, J. E., Shah, R. N., Everard, M., Keyzor, C., Coombes, I., Jenkins, A., Thomas, K., A'Hern, R., Jones, R. L., Blake, P., Gabra, H., Hall, G., Gore, M. E., Kaye, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A feasibility study of sequential doublet chemotherapy comprising carboplatin-doxorubicin and carboplatin-paclitaxel for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1793</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1787</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1794?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II randomized study of trabectedin given as two different every 3 weeks dose schedules (1.5 mg/m2 24 h or 1.3 mg/m2 3 h) to patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, advanced ovarian cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1794?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial evaluated the optimal regimen of trabectedin administered every 3 weeks in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients previously treated with less than two or two previous chemotherapy lines were randomized to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 24 h (arm A, <I>n</I> = 54) or 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 3 h (arm B, <I>n</I> = 53). Objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST was the primary efficacy end point. Toxic effects were graded according to the National Cancer Institute&mdash;Common Toxicity Criteria v. 2.0.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> ORR was 38.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.9% to 53.1%; arm A] and 35.8% (95% CI 23.1% to 50.2%; arm B) (intention-to-treat primary analysis). Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI 5.3&ndash;8.6 months; arm A) and 6.8 months (95% CI 4.6&ndash;7.4 months; arm B). Frequent severe adverse events were nausea/vomiting (24%, arm A; 15%, arm B) and fatigue (15%, arm A; 10%, arm B). Common severe laboratory abnormalities were transient, noncumulative neutropenia (55%, arm A; 37%, arm B) and transaminase increases (alanine aminotransferase, 55%, arm A; 59%, arm B).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both every-3-weeks trabectedin regimes, 1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 24 h and 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 3 h, were active and reasonably well tolerated in AOC platinum-sensitive patients. Trabectedin every-3-weeks has promising activity and deserves to be further evaluated in relapsed AOC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del Campo, J. M., Roszak, A., Bidzinski, M., Ciuleanu, T. E., Hogberg, T., Wojtukiewicz, M. Z., Poveda, A., Boman, K., Westermann, A. M., Lebedinsky, C., on behalf of the Yondelis Ovarian Cancer Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II randomized study of trabectedin given as two different every 3 weeks dose schedules (1.5 mg/m2 24 h or 1.3 mg/m2 3 h) to patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, advanced ovarian cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1802</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1794</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gynecologic tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1803?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcomes in a phase III, randomized study of sunitinib versus interferon-{alpha} as first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a European population]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1803?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of sunitinib versus interferon-alpha (IFN-) treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> In all, 304 mRCC patients (European cohort) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off) or IFN- (9 million units s.c. injection three times/week). The following questionnaires were completed (days 1 and 28 per cycle): Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index and the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D self-report questionnaire (EQ-5D). Results correspond to an ongoing trial with progression-free survival time as primary end point, and patients were still being followed up. Data were analyzed using repeated measures mixed effects models (MEMs) that allow the inclusion of initial differences and uncompleted repeated measures, with the assumption of data missing at random. Six-cycle results were included.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Results consistently showed that patients in sunitinib group experienced statistically significantly milder kidney-related symptoms, better cancer-specific HRQoL and general health status (in social utility scores) during the study period as measured by these patient-reported outcome end points. No statistical differences between groups were found on the FACT-G physical well-being subscale or the EQ-5D VAS values.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Results from MEM showed the sunitinib's benefit on HRQoL compared with IFN-.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellano, D., del Muro, X. G., Perez-Gracia, J. L., Gonzalez-Larriba, J. L., Abrio, M. V., Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., Guzman, C., Cerezo, S. D., Grande, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:10 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcomes in a phase III, randomized study of sunitinib versus interferon-{alpha} as first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a European population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1812</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1803</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1813?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gefitinib treatment in hormone-resistant and hormone receptor-negative advanced breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1813?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Acquired and <I>de novo</I> endocrine resistance in breast cancer (BC) may be associated with overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Gefinitib is an orally active selective EGFR inhibitor which might benefit advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients either with acquired hormone resistance or with hormone receptor (HR)-negative tumors.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A two-arm multicenter phase II trial of oral gefitinib 500 mg/day was planned in two groups of 45 patients with ABC for whom chemotherapy was not currently indicated. Group 1 had hormone-resistant BC defined as HR-positive BC with progression after treatment with tamoxifen and an aromatase inhibitor. Group 2 had HR-negative BC. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks. The primary end point was the clinical benefit rate (CBR).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Forty patients with hormone-resistant BC had a CBR of 0%. Two of 25 HR-negative BC patients showed stable disease (less than a 50% reduction and less than a 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions and the appearance of no new lesions) at 24 weeks resulting in a CBR of 7.7% (95% CI 0.9% to 25.1%). Enrollment ceased due to the low CBR. Toxicity resulted in treatment interruption (46%), dose reduction (20%) and withdrawal (11%) of patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> At a dose of 500 mg/day, gefitinib monotherapy resulted in a low CBR and no tumor response was identified.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green, M. D., Francis, P. A., Gebski, V., Harvey, V., Karapetis, C., Chan, A., Snyder, R., Fong, A., Basser, R., Forbes, J. F., on behalf of the Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gefitinib treatment in hormone-resistant and hormone receptor-negative advanced breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1817</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1813</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1818?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High prevalence of retinoblastoma protein loss in triple-negative breast cancers and its association with a good prognosis in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1818?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease, nevertheless exhibiting a high response rate to chemotherapy. Since the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) loss confers a high sensitivity to chemotherapy regimens, we evaluated the prevalence of pRb loss in TNBCs and its relevance on the clinical outcome of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods</b>: pRb status was prospectively evaluated by immunocytochemistry in 518 consecutive patients with complete receptor information. The predictive value of pRb status in TNBCs was determined according to the adjuvant therapeutic treatments.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-three tumors were identified as TNBCs. The prevalence of pRb loss was significantly higher in TNBCs than in the other cancer subtypes. All patients with TNBCs lacking pRb and treated with systemic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) were disease free at a medium follow-up time of 109 months, whereas the clinical outcome of those expressing pRb was significantly poorer (<I>P</I> = 0.008). Analysis of disease-free survival including the established anatomo-clinical prognostic parameters indicated pRb loss as the only significant predictive factor.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b>: pRb loss is much more frequent in TNBCs than in the other breast cancer subtypes. Patients with TNBCs lacking pRb had a very favorable clinical outcome if treated with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trere, D., Brighenti, E., Donati, G., Ceccarelli, C., Santini, D., Taffurelli, M., Montanaro, L., Derenzini, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp209</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High prevalence of retinoblastoma protein loss in triple-negative breast cancers and its association with a good prognosis in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1823</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1818</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1824?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating tumor cells in metastatic inflammatory breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1824?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are an independent prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of baseline CTCs in metastatic IBC patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This retrospective study included 42 metastatic IBC and 107 metastatic non-IBC patients treated with first- or second-line chemotherapy from January 2004 to December 2007 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. CTCs were detected and enumerated before patients started chemotherapy using the CellSearch<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> system.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Ten (23.8%) IBC patients versus 48 (44.9%) non-IBC patients had baseline CTCs &ge;5 per 7.5 ml of peripheral blood. IBC patients had a lower mean &plusmn; SEM CTCs than non-IBC patients (7.6 &plusmn; 2.9 versus 34.2 &plusmn; 9.1; <I>P</I> = 0.02). The estimated median overall survival was 26.5 versus 18.3 months (<I>P</I> = 0.68) in IBC patients and 37.4 versus 18.3 months (<I>P</I> = 0.016) in non-IBC patients with CTCs &lt;5 and CTCs &ge;5, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Metastatic IBC patients had a lower prevalence and fewer CTCs in comparison to metastatic non-IBC patients. Survival of metastatic IBC patients with &lt;5 CTCs was not significantly better than that of patients with &ge;5 CTCs. Further research is warranted with prospective assessment of CTCs in IBC patients and their biological characterization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mego, M., De Giorgi, U., Hsu, L., Ueno, N. T., Valero, V., Jackson, S., Andreopoulou, E., Kau, S.-W., Reuben, J. M., Cristofanilli, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp207</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating tumor cells in metastatic inflammatory breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1828</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1824</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1829?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I study of apoptosis gene modulation with oblimersen within preoperative chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1829?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Expression of the Bcl-2 protein confers resistance to chemotherapy-mediated apoptotic signals in patients with breast cancer. We investigated effects of Bcl-2 down-regulation by the Bcl-2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide oblimersen in breast tumor biopsies. Oblimersen targets Bcl-2 messenger RNA (mRNA), down-regulates Bcl-2 protein translation and enhances antitumor effects of subtherapeutic chemotherapy doses. Within a phase I trial, we administered escalating doses of oblimersen (3, 5 or 7 mg/kg/day) as continuous infusion on days 1&ndash;7 in combination with standard-dose docetaxel (Taxotere), Adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) on day 5 as preoperative chemotherapy in 28 patients with T2&ndash;4 tumors. Effects of oblimersen were evaluated in tumor biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) 4 days after start of oblimersen and before TAC treatment by quantitative microfluidic real-time PCR. Read-outs consisted in measurement of Bcl-2 mRNA modulations and of 18 putative predictive markers. Two of 13 patients showed a diminution of Bcl-2 transcripts after 4 days of treatment with oblimersen 5 mg/kg/day. PBMCs could not be evaluated as a surrogate tissue because no qualified RNA could be isolated. Nevertheless, we demonstrated feasibility to process clinical samples and to obtain good quality RNA from tumor biopsies and indicated the potential of oblimersen to lower Bcl-2 mRNA in breast cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rom, J., von Minckwitz, G., Marme, F., Ataseven, B., Kozian, D., Sievert, M., Schlehe, B., Schuetz, F., Scharf, A., Kaufmann, M., Sohn, C., Schneeweiss, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp208</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I study of apoptosis gene modulation with oblimersen within preoperative chemotherapy in patients with primary breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1835</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1829</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1836?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disseminated tumor cells and the risk of locoregional recurrence in nonmetastatic breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1836?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In early breast cancer patients, bone marrow (BM)-disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) were associated with distant metastasis and locoregional recurrence. Our aim was to determine whether BM DTC detection could be related to specific locoregional dissemination of cancer cells, according to radiotherapy volumes.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> The relationship between locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and DTC detection was evaluated according to the various locoregional volumes irradiated after surgery.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> BM DTCs were detected in 94 of 621 stage I&ndash;III breast cancer patients (15%) and were not associated with axillary node status. Eighteen patients (2.9%) experienced locoregional recurrence (median follow-up 56 months), of whom eight (44%) were initially BM DTC positive. BM DTC detection was the only prognostic factor for LRFS [<I>P</I> = 0.0005, odds ratio = 5.2 (2.0&ndash;13.1), multivariate analysis]. In BM DTC-positive patients, a longer LRFS was observed in those who were given adjuvant hormone therapy (<I>P</I> = 0.03) and radiotherapy to supraclavicular nodes (SCNs)/internal mammary nodes (IMNs) (<I>P</I> = 0.055) (multivariate analysis; interaction test: <I>P</I> = 0.028).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The presence of DTC in BM may be associated with a different pattern of locoregional cancer cell dissemination and influences LRFS. The possible reseeding of the primary cancer area by DTC could be prevented by systemic hormone therapy but also by SCN/IMN irradiation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bidard, F.-C., Kirova, Y. M., Vincent-Salomon, A., Alran, S., de Rycke, Y., Sigal-Zafrani, B., Sastre-Garau, X., Mignot, L., Fourquet, A., Pierga, J.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disseminated tumor cells and the risk of locoregional recurrence in nonmetastatic breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1841</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1836</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1842?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1842?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Bevacizumab significantly improves survival when added to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Bevacizumab Expanded Access Trial (BEAT) evaluated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab plus first-line chemotherapy in a general cohort of patients with mCRC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with unresectable mCRC received chemotherapy (physician's choice) plus bevacizumab [5 mg/kg every 2 weeks (5-fluorouracil regimens) or 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks (capecitabine regimens)]. The primary end point was safety, including prospective data collection in patients receiving unanticipated surgery during the study. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The final analysis comprised 1914 assessable patients (male 58%; median age 59 years). Chemotherapy included 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) + oxaliplatin (29%), irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV (26%), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (18%) and monotherapy (16%). Serious/grade 3&ndash;5 adverse events of interest for bevacizumab included bleeding (3%), gastrointestinal perforation (2%), arterial thromboembolism (1%), hypertension (5.3%), proteinuria (1%) and wound-healing complications (1%). Sixty-day mortality was 3%. Median PFS was 10.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.4&ndash;11.3 months] and median OS reached 22.7 months (95% CI 21.7&ndash;23.8 months).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The BEAT study shows that the efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in routine clinical practice is consistent with results observed in prospective randomised clinical trials and another large observational study in the United States (BRiTE study).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Van Cutsem, E., Rivera, F., Berry, S., Kretzschmar, A., Michael, M., DiBartolomeo, M., Mazier, M.-A., Canon, J.-L., Georgoulias, V., Peeters, M., Bridgewater, J., Cunningham, D., on behalf of the First BEAT investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp233</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1847</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1842</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1848?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of mid- and post-ABVD PET imaging in Hodgkin's lymphoma: the importance of involved-field radiotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1848?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Although positron emission tomography (PET) response to chemotherapy (CT) has prognostic significance in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), it is unclear whether patients with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-<scp>D</scp>-glucose (FDG)&ndash;PET positivity during and/or after CT can be rendered disease free with consolidative involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Patients with HL treated with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD)-based CT and radiotherapy (RT) at our institution from January 2000 to March 2007 were eligible. All patients had either a post-treatment PET or PET&ndash;CT before initiation of RT or a negative midtreatment PET or PET&ndash;CT. The primary end point was failure-free survival (FFS) for patients with and without residual FDG avidity after ABVD. The treatment outcome of patients with interim PET positivity during CT was also reported.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Seventy-three patients were included in this study. Twenty patients (out of 46) were PET positive on interim PET, and 13 patients (out of 73) were PET positive at the conclusion of CT. At a median follow-up of 3.4 years for surviving patients, the 2-year FFSs for patients PET-negative versus PET-positive disease after ABVD were 95% and 69%, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). On bivariable Cox regression, post-ABVD positivity (hazard ratio 4.8, <I>P</I> = 0.05) was predictive of disease recurrence after controlling for bulky disease. Of the 20 patients with interim PET positivity, three recurred, with a 2-year FFS of 85%. Among the 13 patients with interim PET positivity, but became PET negative at the completion of CT, the 2-year FFS was 92%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Sixty-nine per cent of patients with residual FDG avidity after ABVD were free of disease after consolidative RT, indicating a majority of patients with persistent lymphoma can be cured by sterilizing this PET-positive disease.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sher, D. J., Mauch, P. M., Van Den Abbeele, A., LaCasce, A. S., Czerminski, J., Ng, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of mid- and post-ABVD PET imaging in Hodgkin's lymphoma: the importance of involved-field radiotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1853</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1848</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignacies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1854?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma--correlation with excision repair cross-complementing-1 polymorphisms]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1854?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a platinum-sensitive cancer and excision repair cross-complementing group 1 <I>(ERCC1)</I> polymorphisms have been shown to predict survival in several cancers following platinum therapy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This multicenter study evaluated the activity of oxaliplatin and prolonged infusion of gemcitabine (&lsquo;GEMOX&rsquo; regimen) in recurrent NPC. Baseline blood samples were genotyped for the presence of <I>ERCC1-118</I> gene polymorphisms.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: Forty-two patients were recruited, of whom most (61%) had metastatic disease. Of the 40 patients evaluated for response, the respective overall response and disease control rates were 56.1% and 90.2%. At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the respective median overall survival and time to progression were 19.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.8&ndash;22 months] and 9 months (95% CI = 7.3&ndash;10 months). Grade 3&ndash;4 toxic effects were uncommon. The distribution of <I>ERCC1-118</I> genotypes from 29 patients was C/C (<I>n</I> = 17, 40.5%), C/T (<I>n</I> = 10, 23.8%) and T/T (<I>n</I> = 2, 4.8%). No differences in survival or response rates were found between genotypes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> GEMOX is active in the treatment of recurrent NPC. Detection of single-nucleotide gene polymorphisms from genomic DNA in peripheral blood is feasible in NPC and further studies are warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, B. B. Y., Hui, E. P., Wong, S. C. C., Tung, S. Y., Yuen, K. K., King, A., Chan, S. L., Leung, S. F., Kam, M. K., Yu, B. K. H., Zee, B., Chan, A. T. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:11 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma--correlation with excision repair cross-complementing-1 polymorphisms]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1859</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1854</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>head and neck cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1860?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A phase II study of palonosetron combined with dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1860?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This is a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of palonosetron, in combination with dexamethasone.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> We randomized 233 patients to receive palonosetron as a single i.v. bolus dose of 0.075, 0.25, or 0.75 mg before administration of HEC. Dexamethasone (12&ndash;16 mg i.v. on day 1, 8 mg i.v. on day 2, and 4&ndash;8 mg i.v. on day 3) was administered for prophylactic antiemesis. Pharmacokinetics of palonosetron was analyzed in 24 patients.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In this study, all patients were given &ge;50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin, which was considered to be HEC. No significant differences in complete response (CR: no emesis and no rescue medication) rates were found in the first 24 h between the 0.075-, 0.25-, and 0.75-mg groups (77.6%, 81.8%, and 79.5%, respectively). In the 120-h period of overall observation, CR rates increased in a dose-dependent manner. In the 0.75-mg group, we observed a significantly longer time to treatment failure than in the 0.075-mg group (median time &gt;120 versus 82.0 h, <I>P</I> = 0.038). Palonosetron was tolerated well and did not show any dose-related increase in adverse effects.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Palonosetron at doses of 0.25 and 0.75 mg was shown to be effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with high CR rates of patients treated with HEC in Japan. All tested doses of palonosetron were tolerated well.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maemondo, M., Masuda, N., Sekine, I., Kubota, K., Segawa, Y., Shibuya, M., Imamura, F., Katakami, N., Hida, T., Takeo, S., for the PALO Japanese Cooperative Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A phase II study of palonosetron combined with dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1866</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1860</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>supportive care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1867?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial of the oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1867?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Casopitant mesylate is a novel, oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist with demonstrated antiemetic efficacy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase II trial to evaluate three casopitant doses as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose cisplatin. The aim of the study was to detect a dose response.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 493 patients with solid tumors receiving a first cycle of cisplatin &ge;70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomly assigned among six treatment arms. The primary analysis compared a control arm [ondansetron/dexamethasone (Ond/Dex)] with three investigational treatments (Ond/Dex plus oral casopitant 50, 100, or 150 mg administered daily for 3 days). Two exploratory arms were included: one evaluating a single oral casopitant dose of 150 mg added to standard Ond/Dex and another with 3-day oral aprepitant-based therapy (Ond/Dex plus aprepitant 125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2&ndash;3).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The complete response (CR) rate (defined as no vomiting, retching, rescue therapy, or premature discontinuation) was significantly increased in each casopitant arm relative to control over the 120-h evaluation period: 76% (50 mg), 86% (100 mg), 77% (150 mg), and 60% with control (<I>P</I> = 0.0036). The CR rate for the single oral dose regimen was similar to the CR rate reported for the 3-day regimens. No differences were observed in the incidence of nausea or significant nausea among groups in the primary analysis. The most common adverse events related to treatment included headache (<I>n</I> = 10) and hiccups (<I>n</I> = 14).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> All doses of oral casopitant as a 3-day regimen (and likely as a 150-mg single oral dose) in combination with Ond/Dex provided significant improvement in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roila, F., Rolski, J., Ramlau, R., Dediu, M., Russo, M. W., Bandekar, R. R., Grunberg, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial of the oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1873</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1867</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>supportive care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1874?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A phase II dose-ranging study of palonosetron in Japanese patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, including anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1874?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The 5-HT<SUB>3</SUB> receptor antagonists (RAs) help maintain the standard of care, in various combinations with other agents, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Palonosetron is a new generation 5-HT<SUB>3</SUB> RA with indication not only acute but also delayed nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). This study was carried out to determine the optimal dosage of palonosetron in combination with dexamethasone in patients in Japan.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of palonosetron in patients receiving MEC combined with dexamethasone. Patients received single doses of 0.075, 0.25, or 0.75 mg of palonosetron before MEC. Dexamethasone was infused before palonosetron, at 20 mg for the patients receiving paclitaxel (Taxol) and 8 mg for the patients not receiving paclitaxel. The primary end point was complete response (CR: no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) in the acute phase (0&ndash;24 h).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In total, 204 patients (88 men, 116 women; 96 with paclitaxel, 108 without paclitaxel) were assessable for efficacy. No dose&ndash;response relationship was observed regarding the CR rate in the acute phase. CR rates increased dose dependently for delayed (24&ndash;120 h) and overall (0&ndash;120 h) phases in patients receiving anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide combination (AC/EC, <I>n</I> = 80); however, the difference in CR rates among doses was not statistically significant. The most commonly reported adverse events related to palonosetron were constipation and headache, confirming the class safety profile.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This study indicates a statistically nonsignificant trend for the dose&ndash;response relationship for antiemetic protection in the delayed and overall phases in AC/EC patients (the regimen currently considered to be more emetogenic than MEC).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Segawa, Y., Aogi, K., Inoue, K., Sano, M., Sekine, I., Tokuda, Y., Isobe, H., Ogura, T., Tsuboi, M., Atagi, S., for the PALO Japanese Cooperative Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp243</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A phase II dose-ranging study of palonosetron in Japanese patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, including anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1880</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1874</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>supportive care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1881?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Glycemic index, glycemic load and renal cell carcinoma risk]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1881?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been related to refined cereals and starchy foods, but the association has not been studied in terms of glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL). To provide information on this issue, we analyzed data from an Italian multicentric case&ndash;control study.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Cases were 767 patients with histologically confirmed, incident RCC. Controls were 1534 subjects admitted to the same hospitals as cases for a wide spectrum of acute, non-neoplastic conditions, unrelated to known risk factors for RCC. Information on dietary habits was derived through a food-frequency questionnaire. Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for GI and GL intake were adjusted for major relevant covariates.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Compared with the lowest quintile, the ORs for the highest quintile were 1.43 (95% CI 1.05&ndash;1.95) for GI and 2.56 (95% CI 1.78&ndash;3.70) for GL, with significant trends in risk. Compared with the lowest quintile, the risk of RCC for all subsequent levels of GL was higher in never drinkers than in ever drinkers.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> We found direct relations between dietary levels of GI and GL and RCC risk. This can be related to mechanisms linked to insulin resistance and sensitivity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galeone, C., Pelucchi, C., Maso, L. D., Negri, E., Talamini, R., Montella, M., Ramazzotti, V., Bellocco, R., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Glycemic index, glycemic load and renal cell carcinoma risk]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1885</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1881</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1886?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1886?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Imatinib (IM) is active in advanced chordoma. The evidence of upstream and/or downstream mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activation prompted us to combine an mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus, to IM in IM-resistant advanced chordoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Since July 2007, 10 progressive advanced chordoma patients with secondary resistance to IM, and biochemical and/or immunohistochemical evidence of upstream and/or downstream mTOR effector activation, started IM (400 mg/day) plus sirolimus (2 mg/day) on a named basis.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The mean treatment duration was 9 months. Of nine patients assessable for response, at 3 months, we had one RECIST partial response (PR), seven stable disease (SD) and one progressive disease (PD). According to Choi criteria applied even to magnetic resonance imaging, we had seven PR (&ge;10% decrease in size in four cases), one SD and one PD. Seven patients had a positron emission tomography response. The clinical benefit [RECIST complete response + PR + SD &ge;6 months] was 89%. Pretreatment mTOR effectors analysis carried out in nine cases was positive in all patients (AKT activation in six patients, S6Sp6 expression/activation in seven). Post-treatment biopsy in one responsive patient confirmed S6 switch off.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In addition to PDGFRB, mTOR pathway can be activated in chordomas and the combination of IM plus rapalogs may be effective in IM-resistant chordomas.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacchiotti, S., Marrari, A., Tamborini, E., Palassini, E., Virdis, E., Messina, A., Crippa, F., Morosi, C., Gronchi, A., Pilotti, S., Casali, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp210</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1894</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1886</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>sarcomas</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1895?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A dendritic cell tumor in an HIV-infected patient: case report]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1895?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roca, B., Resino, E., Roca, M., Vera, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp409</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A dendritic cell tumor in an HIV-infected patient: case report]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1896</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1895</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fulvestrant in advanced male breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de la Haba Rodriguez, J. R., Porras Quintela, I., Pulido Cortijo, G., Berciano Guerrero, M., Aranda, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp413</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fulvestrant in advanced male breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1897</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1898?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Successful PDGFR-{alpha}/{beta} targeting with imatinib in uterine sarcoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1898?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trojan, A., Montemurro, M., Kamel, M., Kristiansen, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp431</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Successful PDGFR-{alpha}/{beta} targeting with imatinib in uterine sarcoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1899</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1898</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1899?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Essential thrombocythemia transforming into acute biphenotypic leukemia in a patient on hydroxyurea monotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1899?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandhu, G., Ranade, A., Siddiqi, S., Balderacchi, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp422</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Essential thrombocythemia transforming into acute biphenotypic leukemia in a patient on hydroxyurea monotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1900</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1899</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1900?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Successful salvage high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in HIV-related germ-cell tumor]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1900?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hentrich, M., Schiel, X., Niedermeier, A., Lutz, L., Rupec, R., Stief, C., Bogner, J., Karthaus, M., Gerl, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp448</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Successful salvage high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in HIV-related germ-cell tumor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1901</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1900</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nasal septum perforation in a breast cancer patient treated with bevacizumab]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/11/1901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marin, A. P., Sanchez, A. R., Arranz, E. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:01:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp451</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nasal septum perforation in a breast cancer patient treated with bevacizumab]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>11</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1902</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[plenary session]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[plenary session]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii4</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii5?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session A: lung cancer and head and neck cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii5?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp437</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session A: lung cancer and head and neck cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii19</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii5</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii20?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session B: supportive and palliative care]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii20?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp438</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session B: supportive and palliative care]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii46</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii20</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii47?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session C: translational research. molecular oncology. pharmacology and biotheraby]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii47?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:48 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp439</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session C: translational research. molecular oncology. pharmacology and biotheraby]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii56</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii47</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session D: gastrointestinal cancer (colon-rectal excluded)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp440</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session D: gastrointestinal cancer (colon-rectal excluded)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii69</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii70?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session E: melanoma, sarcoma, rare cancer, brain tumours]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii70?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp441</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session E: melanoma, sarcoma, rare cancer, brain tumours]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii78</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii70</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii79?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session F: genitourinary and gynaecologic cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii79?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp442</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session F: genitourinary and gynaecologic cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii88</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii79</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii89?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session G: breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii89?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:49 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp443</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session G: breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii89</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii107?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session H: oncoematology]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii107?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp444</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session H: oncoematology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii112</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii113?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session L: gastrointestinal cancer-colon-rectal]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii113?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp445</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session L: gastrointestinal cancer-colon-rectal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii130</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii113</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii131?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[session N: nursing in oncology]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii131?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:50 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp446</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[session N: nursing in oncology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii134</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii131</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii135?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[author index]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/suppl_8/viii135?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:31:51 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp476</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[author index]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>Supplement 8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>viii148</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>viii135</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>abstracts</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1613?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1613?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp465</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[in this issue]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1613</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1613</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>in this issue</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1615?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The role of VEGF in triple-negative breast cancer: where do we go from here?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1615?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dent, S. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp410</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The role of VEGF in triple-negative breast cancer: where do we go from here?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1617</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1615</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1619?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer and thrombosis: implications of published guidelines for clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1619?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cancer is a frequent finding in patients with thrombosis, and thrombosis is much more prevalent in patients with cancer, with important clinical consequences. Thrombosis is the second most common cause of death in cancer patients. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer is also associated with a high rate of recurrence, bleeding, a requirement for long-term anticoagulation, and worsened quality of life. Risk factors for cancer-associated VTE include particular cancer types, chemotherapy (with or without antiangiogenic agents), the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents, the presence of central venous catheters, and surgery. Novel risk factors include platelet and leukocyte counts and tissue factor. A risk model for identifying cancer patients at highest risk for VTE has recently been developed. Anticoagulant therapy is safe and efficacious for prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. Available anticoagulants include warfarin, heparin, and low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). LMWHs represent the preferred therapeutic option for VTE prophylaxis and treatment. Their use may be associated with improved survival in cancer, although this issue requires further study. Despite the significant burden imposed by VTE and the availability of effective anticoagulant therapies, many oncology patients do not receive appropriate VTE prophylaxis as recommended by practice guidelines. Improved adherence to guidelines could substantially reduce morbidity, decrease resource use, enhance quality of life, and improve survival in these patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khorana, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer and thrombosis: implications of published guidelines for clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1630</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1619</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1631?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1631?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Radical hysterectomy combined with a pelvic lymphadenectomy or chemoradiation are traditionally the mainstays of treatment of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages Ia2&ndash;IIa cervical cancer. The quality of radical surgery for cervical cancer influences local tumor control and survival. Hence, it is important to optimize and ensure the quality of surgical care for cervical cancer patients. In this paper, we discuss factors that are related to outcome after radical hysterectomy and propose a set of quality indicators that can be used to audit and improve the quality of surgical care for cervical cancer patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verleye, L., Vergote, I., Reed, N., Ottevanger, P. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[2009 - Review Articles]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1638</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1631</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1639?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1639?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacking expression of steroid receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, having chemotherapy as the only therapeutic option, is characterised by early relapses and poor outcome. We investigated intratumoural (i.t.) levels of the pro-angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and survival in patients with TNBC compared with non-TNBC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> VEGF levels were determined by an enzyme immunosorbent assay in a retrospective series consisting of 679 consecutive primary breast cancer patients.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Eighty-seven patients (13%) were classified as TNBC and had significantly higher VEGF levels; median value in TNBC was 8.2 pg/&micro;g DNA compared with 2.7 pg/&micro;g DNA in non-TNBC (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Patients with TNBC had statistically significant shorter recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.8; <I>P</I> = 0.0023], breast cancer-corrected survival (HR = 2.2; <I>P</I> = 0.004) and overall survival (HR = 1.8; <I>P</I> = 0.005) compared with non-TNBC. Patients with TNBC relapsed earlier than non-TNBC; mean time from diagnosis to first relapse was 18.8 and 30.7 months, respectively. The time between first relapse and death was also shorter in TNBC: 7.5 months versus 17.5 months in non-TNBC (<I>P</I> = 0.087).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results show that TNBC have higher i.t. VEGF levels compared with non-TNBC. Ongoing clinical trials will answer if therapy directed towards angiogenesis may be an alternative way to improve outcome in this poor prognosis group.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linderholm, B. K., Hellborg, H., Johansson, U., Elmberger, G., Skoog, L., Lehtio, J., Lewensohn, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1646</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1639</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1647?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discussion about switch strategy in the adjuvant hormonal therapy of breast cancer: psychological aspects of physician-patient communication]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1647?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> A survey of oncologists was conducted in Italy to evaluate the potential problems of physician&ndash;patient discussion about hormonal switch in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> A questionnaire, including both closed and open-ended questions, was administered to 70 oncologists. Fifty-one of them returned completely filled questionnaires.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Forty-seven percent of the physicians reported difficulties in proposing the hormonal switch, and 60% stated that they found it difficult to make the therapeutic change acceptable to patients. The oncologist's barriers to propose the switch were related mostly to scientific and economic issues, such as the lack of certain advantages of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen (28%), their costs (14%) and their side-effects (34%). On the other hand, according to physicians, the patient's barriers to accept the therapeutic change were mainly due to psychological&ndash;relational factors, in particular the anxiety produced by the change (40%) and the bad patient&ndash;physician communication experienced in the past (26%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Patient&ndash;physician communication difficulties about switch strategy in the adjuvant hormonal treatment of breast cancer are, at least in part, related to psychological and relational factors. It is likely that training programs, improving doctor's communication skills, can overcome these problems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costantini, A., Picardi, A., Zilli, M., Cairoli, F., Torta, R., Marchetti, P., Baile, W., Iacobelli, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discussion about switch strategy in the adjuvant hormonal therapy of breast cancer: psychological aspects of physician-patient communication]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1652</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1647</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1653?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast cancer in young women (YBC): prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and risk of secondary malignancies across diverse racial groups]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1653?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Despite significant differences in age of onset and incidence of breast cancer between Caucasian (CA), African-American (AA) and Korean (KO) women, little is known about differences in BRCA1/2 mutations in these populations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and the association between BRCA1/2 mutation status and secondary malignancies among young women with breast cancer in these three racially diverse groups.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Patients presenting to our breast cancer follow-up clinics selected solely on having a known breast cancer diagnosis at a young age (YBC defined as age &lt;45 years at diagnosis) were invited to participate in this study. A total of 333 eligible women, 166 CA, 66 AA and 101 KO underwent complete sequencing of BRCA1/2 genes. Family history (FH) was classified as negative, moderate or strong. BRCA1/2 status was classified as wild type (WT), variant of uncertain significance (VUS) or deleterious (DEL).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> DEL across these three racially diverse populations of YBC were nearly identical: CA 17%, AA 14% and KO 14%. The type of DEL differed with AA having more frequent mutations in BRCA2, compared with CA and KO. VUS were predominantly in BRCA2 and AA had markedly higher frequency of VUS (38%) compared with CA (10%) and KO (12%). At 10-year follow-up from the time of initial diagnosis of breast cancer, the risk of secondary malignancies was similar among WT (14%) and VUS (16%), but markedly higher among DEL (39%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In these YBC, the frequency of DEL in BRCA1/2 is remarkably similar among the racially diverse groups at 14%&ndash;17%. VUS is more common in AA, but aligns closely with WT in risk of second cancers, age of onset and FH.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haffty, B. G., Choi, D. H., Goyal, S., Silber, A., Ranieri, K., Matloff, E., Lee, M. H., Nissenblatt, M., Toppmeyer, D., Moran, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast cancer in young women (YBC): prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and risk of secondary malignancies across diverse racial groups]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1659</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1653</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>breast cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1660?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[MTHFR polymorphisms and 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1660?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase is a pivotal enzyme in folate metabolism and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) cytotoxicity. Two common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), <I>MTHFR</I> 677C&gt;T (rs1801133) and 1298A&gt;C (rs1801131), reduce enzyme activity. Initially, these SNPs were claimed to predict clinical efficacy, but further studies have yielded contradictory results. We tested whether these two polymorphisms are determinants of clinical outcome in a large patient group with a long follow-up time.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We included 331 patients who had been treated with adjuvant 5-FU/leucovorin chemotherapy after intended curative resection between 1997 and 2003. Clinical data, including relapse rates, overall survival, and tumor stage, were collected. DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed tumor tissue and analyzed for the <I>MTHFR</I> 677C&gt;T and 1298A&gt;C SNPs with real-time PCR.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The <I>MTHFR</I> 677C&gt;T and 1298A&gt;C polymorphisms were not associated with survival or relapse-free survival (<I>P</I> &gt; 0.2). The 677 <I>CC</I> genotype was associated to toxicity (odds ratio = 1.83, <I>P</I> = 0.01).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The <I>MTHFR</I> 677C&gt;T and 1298A&gt;C polymorphisms probably do not predict efficacy of adjuvant 5-FU treatment in colorectal cancer after complete resection; however, the 677C&gt;T polymorphism may be associated with lower toxicity in 5-FU treatment. Implementation of SNP analysis for these polymorphisms for individualized treatment is premature.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afzal, S., Jensen, S. A., Vainer, B., Vogel, U., Matsen, J. P., Sorensen, J. B., Andersen, P. K., Poulsen, H. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[MTHFR polymorphisms and 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1666</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1660</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1667?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cetuximab plus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil alone in first-line metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a randomized phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1667?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This study assessed the activity of the mAb cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> For a maximum of six 29-day cycles, patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, day 1, plus 5-FU 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, days 1&ndash;5 (CF), either alone or in combination with cetuximab (CET&ndash;CF; 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> initial dose followed by 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly thereafter). The primary end point was tumor response. Tumor material was obtained for analysis of <I>KRAS</I> mutation status.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Sixty-two eligible patients were included, 32 receiving CET&ndash;CF and 30 CF. Cetuximab did not exacerbate grade 3/4 toxicity, except for rash (6% versus 0%) and diarrhea (16% versus 0%). The overall response rate according to RECIST criteria was 19% and 13% and the disease control rate 75% and 57% for the CET&ndash;CF and CF arms, respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.9 and 3.6 months and median overall survival 9.5 and 5.5 months for CET&ndash;CF and CF, respectively. No <I>KRAS</I> codon 12/13 tumor mutations were identified in 37 evaluated samples.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Cetuximab can be safely combined with CF chemotherapy and may increase the efficacy of standard CF chemotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenzen, S., Schuster, T., Porschen, R., Al-Batran, S.-E., Hofheinz, R., Thuss-Patience, P., Moehler, M., Grabowski, P., Arnold, D., Greten, T., Muller, L., Rothling, N., Peschel, C., Langer, R., Lordick, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cetuximab plus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil alone in first-line metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a randomized phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1673</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1667</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>gastrointestinal tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1674?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy alone or with chemotherapy and EGFR inhibitors]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1674?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Treatment options are scarce in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. RAD001, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has shown phase I efficacy in NSCLC.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Stage IIIb or IV NSCLC patients, with two or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens, one platinum based (stratum 1) or both chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (stratum 2), received RAD001 10 mg/day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objective was overall response rate (ORR). Analyses of markers associated with the mTOR pathway were carried out on archival tumor from a subgroup using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and direct mutation sequencing.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Eighty-five patients were enrolled, 42 in stratum 1 and 43 in stratum. ORR was 4.7% (7.1% stratum 1; 2.3% stratum 2). Overall disease control rate was 47.1%. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 (stratum 1) and 2.7 months (stratum 2). Common &ge;grade 3 events were fatigue, dyspnea, stomatitis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Pneumonitis, probably or possibly related, mainly grade 1/2, occurred in 25%. Cox regression analysis of IHC scores found that only phospho AKT (pAKT) was a significant independent predictor of worse PFS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> RAD001 10 mg/day was well tolerated, showing modest clinical activity in pretreated NSCLC. Evaluation of RAD001 plus standard therapy for metastatic NSCLC continues.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soria, J.-C., Shepherd, F. A., Douillard, J.-Y., Wolf, J., Giaccone, G., Crino, L., Cappuzzo, F., Sharma, S., Gross, S. H., Dimitrijevic, S., Di Scala, L., Gardner, H., Nogova, L., Papadimitrakopoulou, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:38 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy alone or with chemotherapy and EGFR inhibitors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1681</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1674</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>lung cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1682?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cytokines and angiogenic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon-{alpha}: association of pretreatment serum levels with survival]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1682?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To correlate serum cytokine and angiogenic factor (CAF) levels with overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with interferon- (IFN-).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Serum CAF levels were measured in 103 patients treated on a randomized trial with IFN- 0.5 million units (MU) twice daily or 5 MU daily. Concentrations of 17 analytes were determined by multiplex bead immunoassays [vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF<SUB>A</SUB>) and several cytokines] or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (basic fibroblast growth factor). We used proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of CAF levels and clinical factors on OS.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Pretreatment serum interleukin (IL) 5, IL-12 p40, VEGF<SUB>A</SUB>, and IL-6 levels and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk grouping independently correlated with OS, with hazard ratios of 2.33, 2.00, 2.07, 1.82, and 0.39, respectively (concordance index = 0.69 for the combined model versus 0.60 for the CAF model versus 0.52 for the clinical model). Based on an index derived from these five risk factors (RFs), patients with 0&ndash;2 RF had a median OS time of 32 months versus 9 months for patients with 3&ndash;5 RF (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Serum CAF profiling contributes to prognostic evaluation in mRCC and helps to identify a subset of patients with 20% 5-year OS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montero, A. J., Diaz-Montero, C. M., Millikan, R. E., Liu, J., Do, K.-A., Hodges, S., Jonasch, E., McIntyre, B. W., Hwu, P., Tannir, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cytokines and angiogenic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon-{alpha}: association of pretreatment serum levels with survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1687</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1682</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>urogenital tumors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1688?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increased quantity of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells is an independent predictor for improved clinical outcome in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1688?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis, requiring risk-stratified management in affected patients. Recently, tumor microenvironment including regulatory T cells (Tregs) has been implicated as a prognostic marker in certain types of lymphoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We collected 64 NKTCL cases and numerically quantified the amount of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive Tregs by automated slide scanning and image analysis program after immunohistochemical staining using anti-FOXP3 antibody.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Patients were able to be classified into two end groups by their level of Tregs. Twenty-eight (44%) patients had Tregs &lt;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup>, while 36 (56%) had Tregs &ge;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup> within the tumor. The decreased number of Tregs (&lt;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup>) was more common in patients with poor performance status or in those presented in non-upper aerodigestive tract. However, the level of Tregs was not associated with other prognostic factors, including stage, lactate dehydrogenase level, International Prognostic Index, and NKTCL Prognostic Index. Importantly, patients with increased numbers of Tregs (&ge;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup>) showed prolonged overall and progression-free survival (<I>P</I> = 0.0005 and <I>P</I> = 0.0079, respectively). The number of FOXP3-positive Tregs was an independent prognostic factor (<I>P</I> = 0.001) by multivariate analysis.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Increased quantity of tumor-infiltrating Tregs predicted improved clinical outcome in NKTCL patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, W. Y., Jeon, Y. K., Kim, T. M., Kim, J. E., Kim, Y. A., Lee, S.-H., Kim, D.-W., Heo, D. S., Kim, C.-W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increased quantity of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells is an independent predictor for improved clinical outcome in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1696</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1688</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignacies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1697?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation, revision and extension of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) in a population-based setting]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1697?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to validate the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) in a population-based cohort and to study the relevance of revision and extension of the FLIPI.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Data of 353 unselected patients, 1993&ndash;2002, in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, were collected. Follow-up was completed up to 1 January 2006. Multiple imputations for missing covariates were used. Validity was assessed by comparing observed to predicted survival of the original model and of a revised model with other prognostic variables.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The original FLIPI stratified our cohort into three different risk groups based on stage, Hb, lactate dehydrogenase, nodal involvement and age. The discrimination between risk groups was not as good as in the original cohort. A model including age in three categories (&le;60/61&ndash;70/&gt;70 years) and presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (yes/no) resulted in a better prognostic index. The 5-year overall survival rates were 79%, 59% and 28% in the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups for the extended FLIPI compared with 81%, 66% and 47% for the original FLIPI, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The performance of the FLIPI was validated in a population-based setting, but could significantly be improved by a more refined coding of age and by including the presence of CVD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van de Schans, S. A. M., Steyerberg, E. W., Nijziel, M. R., Creemers, G.-J., Janssen-Heijnen, M. L., van Spronsen, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation, revision and extension of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) in a population-based setting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1702</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1697</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>hematologic malignancies</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1703?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combination of sunitinib, cetuximab and irradiation in an orthotopic head and neck cancer model]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1703?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Recent preclinical and clinical studies indicate beneficial effects from combining radiotherapy with either anti-angiogenic drugs or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting agent. To investigate the effect of combining these approaches, we evaluated <I>in vivo</I> the antitumor efficacy of the anti-angiogenic compound sunitinib, an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits among others vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors-1, -2 and -3, cetuximab, a mAb targeting the EGFR, and irradiation (RT) given alone and in combination.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Investigations were carried out using a VEGF-secreting human head and neck tumor cell line, CAL33, with a high EGFR content, growing as orthotopic xenografts in nude mice. Three days after tumor cell injection, sunitinib (20 mg/kg, p.o.), cetuximab (1 mg/kg, i.p.), both 5 days/week seven doses, and RT (6 Gy, 3 days/week, four doses) were administered alone and in combination during 9 days.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Concomitant administration of drugs produced a marked and significant supra-additive decrease, and the addition of RT completely abolished tumor growth. The drug association markedly reduced tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) and the number of the vessels, but enhanced cell differentiation.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The efficacy of this combination of sunitinib, cetuximab and RT may be of clinical importance in the management of head and neck cancer patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bozec, A., Sudaka, A., Toussan, N., Fischel, J.-L., Etienne-Grimaldi, M.-C., Milano, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combination of sunitinib, cetuximab and irradiation in an orthotopic head and neck cancer model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1707</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1703</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>head and neck cancer</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1708?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medical oncology patients' preferences with regard to health care: development of a patient-driven questionnaire]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1708?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To improve quality of care for cancer patients, it is important to have an insight on the patient's view on health care and on their specific wishes, needs and preferences, without restriction and without influence of researchers and health care providers. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire assessing medical oncology patients&rsquo; preferences for health care based on their own input.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Items were generated using 10 focus group interviews with 51 cancer patients. A preliminary questionnaire was handed out to 681 patients of seven Dutch departments of medical oncology. Explorative factor analysis was carried out on the 386 returned questionnaires (response 57%).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Focus group interviews resulted in a preliminary questionnaire containing 136 items. Explorative factor analysis resulted in a definitive questionnaire containing 123 items (21 scales and eight single items). Patients rated expertise, safety, performance and attitude of physicians and nurses as the most important issues in cancer care.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This questionnaire may be used to assess preferences of cancer patients and to come to a tailored approach of health care that meets patients&rsquo; wishes and needs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wessels, H., de Graeff, A., Wynia, K., Sixma, H. J., de Heus, M., Schipper, M., Woltjer, G. T. G. J., Teunissen, S. C. C. M., Voest, E. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medical oncology patients' preferences with regard to health care: development of a patient-driven questionnaire]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1713</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1708</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life supportive care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1714?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1714?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), (i) to examine the proportion of variance in hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes attributable to patients versus center, country, and region and (ii) to develop predictive models of treatment response.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Retrospective study with a minimum of three visits at 1-month intervals. Three hundred and seven centers in 13 European countries contributed 2192 anemic ESA-treated cancer patients. Treatment response criteria included: Hb&ge;1 g/dl, Hb&ge;1 g/dl within 8 weeks, hematopoietic response (Hb&ge;2 g/dl or Hb &ge; 12 g/dl), Hb&ge;2 g/dl, and Hb between 12 and 13 g/dl.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Hb increased from 9.54 &plusmn; 0.95 g/dl (baseline) to 10.88 &plusmn; 1.49 g/dl (visit 3). Hb change from visits 1 to 2 (index of relative immediacy of response to ESA) averaged 0.81 &plusmn; 1.17 g/dl. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to center was 11.8%&ndash;34.3%, country 2.9%&ndash;20.7%, and region 0.0%&ndash;7.6%. Immediacy of response to ESA was the most prevalent predictor of treatment response, followed by diagnosis of hematological malignancy and age &lt;70 years.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b>. Hb outcomes are determined significantly by the treating center and less so by country or region. The remaining majority variance was attributable to patient-related factors. Immediacy of response to ESA is the single most important predictor of treatment. When used according to guidelines, ESAs are effective in managing anemia in cancer patients and improving treatment outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aapro, M., Ludwig, H., Bokemeyer, C., MacDonald, K., Soubeyran, P., Turner, M., Albrecht, T., Abraham, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1721</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1714</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life supportive care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1722?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Empirically derived psychosocial states among adolescents diagnosed with cancer during the acute and extended phase of survival]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1722?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To, during the acute and extended phase of survival, identify psychosocial states among adolescents diagnosed with cancer and to analyse these in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics and self-reported depression.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and two subscales, Vitality and Mental Health, in the SF-36 4&ndash;8 weeks (T1) (<I>n</I> = 61), 6 (T2) (<I>n</I> = 57), 12 (T3) (<I>n</I> = 50), and 18 (T4) months (<I>n</I> = 48) after diagnosis. I-State as Object of Analysis was used to identify a finite set of states based on three dimensions. Cluster analysis was carried out using Ward's method.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Five states were obtained: psychosocial dysfunction (state A) and poor (B), incomplete (C), good (D), and excellent (E) psychosocial function. At T1, more adolescents than expected by chance were in states A (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and C (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) and fewer in states D (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and E (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). At T4, more adolescents than expected by chance were in state E (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) and fewer in state C (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Female gender and being in late adolescence when diagnosed is related to worse psychosocial function.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The findings provide support for subgroups of adolescents whose level of vitality, mental health, and anxiety differ during the acute and extended phase of survival of cancer. Clinical interventions tailored to the level of impairment as determined by the clusters may result in better psychosocial outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mattsson, E., El-Khouri, B., Ljungman, G., von Essen, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Empirically derived psychosocial states among adolescents diagnosed with cancer during the acute and extended phase of survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1727</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1722</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>quality of life supportive care</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1728?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Natural history and clinical outcome of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 1503 patients treated at a single institution]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1728?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The study evaluates clinical presentation and outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) on a large series of patients homogeneously managed.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A cohort of 1503 DTC followed according to a standardized protocol entered the study. Main outcome measures were clinical presentation at the diagnosis, survival, morbidity and prognostic risk factors.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Median age at diagnosis was 46 years. Papillary cancer and low pathological tumor&ndash;node&ndash;metastasis stages represented &gt;80% of cases. Cancer specific survival at 5, 10 and 15 years was 98.6%, 94.7% and 87.4%; 10-year disease-free and progression-free survivals were 96.8% and 17.1%, respectively. Cancer-specific mortality rate was 2.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7% to 3.4%], recurrence rate was 0.6 % while morbidity rate was 12.6% (95% CI 11% to 14%). Response to radioiodine treatment is the strongest predictor of a good outcome in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 211, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001). Other independent predictor variables are sex, age, histology and distant metastases for survival and metastases for morbidity.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> A rigorous initial therapeutic approach leads to a better survival and a very low morbidity. Patients who do not respond to radioiodine treatment have a worse prognosis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sciuto, R., Romano, L., Rea, S., Marandino, F., Sperduti, I., Maini, C. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Natural history and clinical outcome of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 1503 patients treated at a single institution]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1735</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1728</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>oncology practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1736?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dietary glycemic load and hepatocellular carcinoma with or without chronic hepatitis infection]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1736?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the major risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The association of diabetes mellitus with HCC suggests that dietary glycemic load (GL) may influence HCC risk. We have examined the association between dietary GL and HCC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We conducted a hospital-based case&ndash;control study in Italy in 1999&ndash;2002, including 185 HCC cases and 412 controls who answered a validated food frequency questionnaire and provided blood samples. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using unconditional multiple logistic regression.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We observed a positive association between GL and HCC overall, with an OR of 3.02 (95% CI 1.49&ndash;6.12) for the highest quintile of GL compared with the lowest and a significant trend. The OR among HCC cases with evidence of chronic infection with HBV and/or HCV was 3.25 (95% CI 1.46&ndash;7.22), while the OR among those with no evidence of infection was 2.45 (95% CI 0.69&ndash;8.64), with no significant trend. The association was not explained by the presence of cirrhosis or diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> High dietary GL is associated with increased risk for HCC. The positive association was most pronounced among HCC cases with HBV and/or HCV markers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rossi, M., Lipworth, L., Maso, L. D., Talamini, R., Montella, M., Polesel, J., McLaughlin, J. K., Parpinel, M., Franceschi, S., Lagiou, P., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dietary glycemic load and hepatocellular carcinoma with or without chronic hepatitis infection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1740</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1736</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1741?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Glycemic load in relation to hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis infection]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1741?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Chronic infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are of paramount etiologic importance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but other factors are likely to be important. The association of diabetes mellitus and obesity with HCC raises the possibility that dietary glycemic load (GL) may interact with chronic hepatitis infection in the causation of HCC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We conducted a case&ndash;control study of 333 HCC patients and 360 controls in Athens, Greece. Third-generation assays were used to determine chronic HBV and HCV infection and information from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to estimate dietary GL.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> After adjustment for possible confounding factors through multiple logistic regression, we found a nonsignificant positive association between GL and HCC, which was exclusively accounted for by a positive association between GL and HCC cases with chronic infection with hepatitis B and/or C. For the latter group of patients, the odds ratio at the highest compared with the lowest GL quintile was 1.95 (95% confidence interval 1.09&ndash;3.48). The association was strengthened after exclusion of subjects with diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our results indicate that, among patients with chronic infection with HBV and/or HCV, reduction of dietary GL could reduce risk or delay development of HCC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lagiou, P., Rossi, M., Tzonou, A., Georgila, C., Trichopoulos, D., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Glycemic load in relation to hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis infection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1745</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1741</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>epidemiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1747?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antitumoral effect of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid against visceral metastases in an adrenocortical cancer patient]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1747?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boudou-Rouquette, P., Alexandre, J., Soubrane, O., Bertagna, X., Goldwasser, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp378</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antitumoral effect of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid against visceral metastases in an adrenocortical cancer patient]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1747</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1747</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1747-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gemcitabine and pemetrexed combination: the key role of the sequence of drugs administration]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1747-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Pas, T. M., Toffalorio, F., Catania, C., Noberasco, C., Spitaleri, G., Spaggiari, L., De Braud, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp385</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gemcitabine and pemetrexed combination: the key role of the sequence of drugs administration]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1748</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1747</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1748?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metachronous gastric cancer following complete remission of gastric MALT lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1748?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ono, S., Kato, M., Takagi, K., Kodaira, J., Kubota, K., Matsuno, Y., Komatsu, Y., Asaka, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp389</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metachronous gastric cancer following complete remission of gastric MALT lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1749</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1748</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1749?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does the expert panel at the St Gallen meeting provide an unbiased opinion about the management of women with early breast cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1749?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hietanen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp399</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does the expert panel at the St Gallen meeting provide an unbiased opinion about the management of women with early breast cancer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1751</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1749</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1751?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reply to Does the expert panel at the St Gallen meeting provide an unbiased opinion about the management of women with early breast cancer?]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1751?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coates, A. S., Goldhirsch, A., Gelber, R. D., Ingle, J. N., Thuerlimann, B., Senn, H.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp400</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reply to Does the expert panel at the St Gallen meeting provide an unbiased opinion about the management of women with early breast cancer?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1752</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1751</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1752?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aging and the management of cancer pain]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1752?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gagliese, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp404</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aging and the management of cancer pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1752</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1752</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>letters to the editors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1753?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health-related quality of life in disease-free survivors of breast cancer with the general population]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/20/10/1753?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahn, S. H., Park, B. W., Noh, D. Y., Nam, S. J., Lee, E. S., Lee, M. K., Kim, S. H., Lee, K. M., Park, S. M., Yun, Y. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:19:39 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp007</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health-related quality of life in disease-free survivors of breast cancer with the general population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>10</prism:number>
<prism:volume>20</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1754</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1753</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>erratum</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>