<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Annals of Oncology - Advance Access</title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Annals of Oncology - RSS feed of articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1569-8041</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Annals of Oncology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0923-7534</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp242v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp238v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp234v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp211v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp210v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp063v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp237v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp236v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp235v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp232v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp230v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp195v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp068v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp231v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp209v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp207v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp200v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp198v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp196v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp202v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp197v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp069v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp067v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp066v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp065v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp062v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp060v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp058v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp053v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp193v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp070v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp056v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp194v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp071v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp054v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp322v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp059v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp052v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp110v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp064v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdn792v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp301v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp015v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp010v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp044v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp051v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp032v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp029v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp057v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp049v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp043v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp036v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp047v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp033v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp030v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp025v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp023v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp027v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp024v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp016v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp002v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp046v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp045v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp012v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp011v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp009v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp006v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp004v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdn796v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdn791v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp008v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp005v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdn797v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp034v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp233v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp028v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp037v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp031v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp038v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp001v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp003v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp242v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase I/II clinical study of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) as palliation for painful malignant vertebral compression fractures (PMVCF): JIVROSG-0202]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp242v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), a new treatment modality for painful malignant vertebral compression fractures (PMVCF) using interventional radiology techniques, were evaluated prospectively.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> After confirming the absence of safety issues in phase 1, a total of 33 cases were registered up to and including phase 2. Safety and efficacy were evaluated by National Cancer Institute&mdash;Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 week after PVP. Based on VAS score decreases, efficacy was classified into significantly effective (SE; &ge;5 or reached 0&ndash;2), moderately effective (ME; 2&ndash;4), or ineffective (NE; &lt;2 or increase).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Procedures were completed in all 33 patients (42 vertebrae). Thirty days after PVP, two patients died of primary disease progression, but no major adverse reactions (&gt;grade 2) were observed. Response rate was 70% (95% confidence interval 54% to 83%) [61% (<I>n</I> = 20) with SE, 9% (<I>n</I> = 3) with ME, and 30% (<I>n</I> = 10) with NE] and increased to 83% at week 4. Median time to response was 1 day (mean 2.4). Median pain-mitigated survival period was 73 days.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> For PMVCF, PVP is a safe and effective treatment modality with immediate onset of action.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kobayashi, T., Arai, Y., Takeuchi, Y., Nakajima, Y., Shioyama, Y., Sone, M., Tanigawa, N., Matsui, O., Kadoya, M., Inaba, Y., Japan Interventional Radiology in Oncology Study Group (JIVROSG)]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp242</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase I/II clinical study of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) as palliation for painful malignant vertebral compression fractures (PMVCF): JIVROSG-0202]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp238v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Primary follicular and marginal-zone lymphoma of the breast: clinical features, prognostic factors and outcome: a study by the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp238v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Primary breast lymphoma (PBL) of low-grade histology is a rare disease. This multicentric retrospective study was carried out to determine clinical features, prognosis and relapse.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with histologically proven, previously untreated follicular or marginal-zone PBL (MZL PBL) diagnosed from 1980 to 2003 were included in the study. Major end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and potential prognostic factors.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We collected data on 60 cases of PBL [36 follicular and 24 marginal-zone lymphoma (MZL)]. Stage was I<SUB>E</SUB> or II<SUB>E</SUB> in 57 patients and IVE in three patients due to bilateral breast involvement. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT), alone or in combination, were used as first-line treatments in 67%, 42% and 52% of patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 98%, with a 93% complete response rate. Five-year PFS were 56% for MZL and 49% for follicular PBL (<I>P</I> = 0.62). Relapses were mostly in distant sites (18 of 23 cases); no patients relapsed within RT fields.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our data showed an indolent behaviour of MZL PBL, comparable to other primary extranodal MZL. Conversely, patients with follicular PBL had inferior PFS and OS when compared with limited-stage nodal follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, suggesting an adverse prognostic role of primary breast localisation in this histological subgroup.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinelli, G., Ryan, G., Seymour, J. F., Nassi, L., Steffanoni, S., Alietti, A., Calabrese, L., Pruneri, G., Santoro, L., Kuper-Hommel, M., Tsang, R., Zinzani, P. L., Taghian, A., Zucca, E., Cavalli, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp238</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Primary follicular and marginal-zone lymphoma of the breast: clinical features, prognostic factors and outcome: a study by the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp234v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp234v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Analysis of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC) is increasingly being conducted in core needle biopsies (CNBs) taken at diagnosis but the concordance with the excisional biopsy (EB) is poorly documented.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients with EBC presenting to The Royal Marsden Hospital from June 2005 to September 2007 who had CNB and subsequent EB were included. ER and PgR were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and graded from 0 to 8 (Allred score). HER2 was determined by IHC and scored from 0 to 3+. FISH analysis was carried out in HER2 2+ cases and in discordant cases.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In all, 336 pairs of samples were compared. ER was positive in 253 CNBs (75%) for 255 EBs (76%) and was discordant in six patients (1.8%). PgR was positive in 221 CNBs (66%) and 227 (67.6%) EBs being discordant in 52 cases (15%). HER2 was positive in 41 (12.4%) of the 331 CNBs in which it was determined compared with 44 (13.3%) EBs and discordant in four cases (1.2%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> CNB can be used with confidence for ER and HER2 determination. For PgR, due to a substantial discordance between CNB and EB, results from CNB should be used with caution.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnedos, M., Nerurkar, A., Osin, P., A'Hern, R., Smith, I. E., Dowsett, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp234</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and excisional biopsy (EB) for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 status in early breast cancer (EBC)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp211v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High-dose CHOP plus etoposide (MegaCHOEP) in T-cell lymphoma: a comparative analysis of patients treated within trials of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp211v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> T-cell lymphomas (T-NHL) generally carry a poor prognosis. High-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are increasingly used to treat younger patients.</p>
<p><b>Design and methods:</b> We treated patients &lt;61 years with high-risk aggressive lymphoma with four to six courses of dose-escalated CHOP plus etoposide (MegaCHOEP) necessitating repeated ASCT. Outcomes of patients with mature T-NHL (excluding anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma) and aggressive B-NHL were compared using multivariate Cox regression analysis.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Compared with 84.4% of B-NHL patients, 66.7% of T-NHL patients were able to receive all treatments; the rates of progressive disease were 27.3% in T-NHL and 16.3% in B-NHL patients. At 3 years, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival were significantly worse for T-NHL [25.9% confidence interval (CI) 10.4% to 41.4% and 44.5% CI 26.5% to 62.5%) than for B-NHL patients (60.1% CI 52.1% to 68.1%; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001 and 63.4% CI 55.4% to 71.4%; <I>P</I> = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, T-NHL was a strongly significant adverse risk factor for EFS (relative risk 2.2, <I>P</I> = 0.001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> MegaCHOEP for T-NHL patients was no better than other high-dose regimens and was unable to address the major problems of HDT/ASCT: neither early progressions nor early relapses were reduced. This study sheds some doubt on expectations that HDT/ASCT will significantly improve outcomes for patients with T-NHL.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nickelsen, M., Ziepert, M., Zeynalova, S., Glass, B., Metzner, B., Leithaeuser, M., Mueller-Hermelink, H.K., Pfreundschuh, M., Schmitz, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp211</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High-dose CHOP plus etoposide (MegaCHOEP) in T-cell lymphoma: a comparative analysis of patients treated within trials of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (DSHNHL)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp210v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp210v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Imatinib (IM) is active in advanced chordoma. The evidence of upstream and/or downstream mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activation prompted us to combine an mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus, to IM in IM-resistant advanced chordoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Since July 2007, 10 progressive advanced chordoma patients with secondary resistance to IM, and biochemical and/or immunohistochemical evidence of upstream and/or downstream mTOR effector activation, started IM (400 mg/day) plus sirolimus (2 mg/day) on a named basis.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The mean treatment duration was 9 months. Of nine patients assessable for response, at 3 months, we had one RECIST partial response (PR), seven stable disease (SD) and one progressive disease (PD). According to Choi criteria applied even to magnetic resonance imaging, we had seven PR (&ge;10% decrease in size in four cases), one SD and one PD. Seven patients had a positron emission tomography response. The clinical benefit [RECIST complete response + PR + SD &ge;6 months] was 89%. Pretreatment mTOR effectors analysis carried out in nine cases was positive in all patients (AKT activation in six patients, S6Sp6 expression/activation in seven). Post-treatment biopsy in one responsive patient confirmed S6 switch off.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> In addition to PDGFRB, mTOR pathway can be activated in chordomas and the combination of IM plus rapalogs may be effective in IM-resistant chordomas.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacchiotti, S., Marrari, A., Tamborini, E., Palassini, E., Virdis, E., Messina, A., Crippa, F., Morosi, C., Gronchi, A., Pilotti, S., Casali, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp210</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp063v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp063v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), (i) to examine the proportion of variance in hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes attributable to patients versus center, country, and region and (ii) to develop predictive models of treatment response.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Retrospective study with a minimum of three visits at 1-month intervals. Three hundred and seven centers in 13 European countries contributed 2192 anemic ESA-treated cancer patients. Treatment response criteria included: Hb&ge;1 g/dl, Hb&ge;1 g/dl within 8 weeks, hematopoietic response (Hb&ge;2 g/dl or Hb &ge; 12 g/dl), Hb&ge;2 g/dl, and Hb between 12 and 13 g/dl.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Hb increased from 9.54 &plusmn; 0.95 g/dl (baseline) to 10.88 &plusmn; 1.49 g/dl (visit 3). Hb change from visits 1 to 2 (index of relative immediacy of response to ESA) averaged 0.81 &plusmn; 1.17 g/dl. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to center was 11.8%&ndash;34.3%, country 2.9%&ndash;20.7%, and region 0.0%&ndash;7.6%. Immediacy of response to ESA was the most prevalent predictor of treatment response, followed by diagnosis of hematological malignancy and age &lt;70 years.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b>. Hb outcomes are determined significantly by the treating center and less so by country or region. The remaining majority variance was attributable to patient-related factors. Immediacy of response to ESA is the single most important predictor of treatment. When used according to guidelines, ESAs are effective in managing anemia in cancer patients and improving treatment outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aapro, M., Ludwig, H., Bokemeyer, C., MacDonald, K., Soubeyran, P., Turner, M., Albrecht, T., Abraham, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp237v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rituximab versus observation after high-dose consolidative first-line chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp237v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This study compared the induction regimens doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin and prednisone (ACVBP) before high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A second randomisation compared rituximab with observation post-ASCT.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Four hundred and seventy-six patients &lt;60 years old with newly diagnosed CD20+ DLBCL were randomised to induction with ACE or ACVBP. Three hundred and thirty responders received HDT followed by ASCT. After ASCT, 269 patients were re-randomised to receive either maintenance rituximab or observation alone. Randomisation was stratified by the quality of response to ASCT. The primary end point of this study was event-free survival (EFS).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> At a median of 4 years&rsquo; follow-up from the second randomisation, there was a trend (<I>P</I> = 0.1) towards increased EFS for patients who received rituximab compared with observation.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The type of induction therapy (ACVBP or ACE) did not significantly affect overall survival at a median 51 months&rsquo; follow-up.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haioun, C., Mounier, N., Emile, J. F., Ranta, D., Coiffier, B., Tilly, H., Recher, C., Ferme, C., Gabarre, J., Herbrecht, R., Morchhauser, F., Gisselbrecht, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp237</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rituximab versus observation after high-dose consolidative first-line chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp236v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A randomized phase III study comparing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with FOLFIRI in patients following complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp236v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Studies indicate that adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA) in colorectal cancer patients with completely resectable liver-limited metastases (LMCRC) offers clinical benefit over surgery alone. This phase III trial compared FOLFIRI with simplified 5-FU/FA in this setting.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> LMCRC patients were randomized to receive every 14 days, FA, 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> infused over 2 h, followed by 5-FU as a 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> i.v. bolus, followed by continuous 5-FU infusion, 2400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 46 h (LV5FUs) with or without irinotecan: 180 mg/m<sup>2</sup> infusion (FOLFIRI). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and safety.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Treated patients (<I>n</I> = 306) were balanced for critical prognostic factors in each arm. Median DFS in patients receiving LV5FUs was 21.6 versus 24.7 months for FOLFIRI [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, log-rank <I>P</I> = 0.44]. No significant differences were found in OS. A trend was observed for improved DFS in patients receiving FOLFIRI within 42 days of surgery (HR 0.75, <I>P</I> = 0.17). Grade 3/4 toxic effects were more common in patients treated with FOLFIRI versus LV5FUs (47% versus 30%) with neutropenia being most common (23% versus 7%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> FOLFIRI in the adjuvant treatment of LMCRC showed no significant improvement in DFS compared with LV5FUs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ychou, M., Hohenberger, W., Thezenas, S., Navarro, M., Maurel, J., Bokemeyer, C., Shacham-Shmueli, E., Rivera, F., Kwok-Keung Choi, C., Santoro, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp236</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A randomized phase III study comparing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid with FOLFIRI in patients following complete resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp235v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early and short-term acenocumarine or dalteparin for the prevention of central vein catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients: a randomized controlled study based on serial venographies]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp235v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We evaluated efficacy and safety of early and short-term prophylaxis with acenocumarine or dalteparin in the prevention of non-occlusive or occlusive central vein catheter-related thrombosis (CVCrT).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Consecutive cancer patients scheduled for chemotherapy randomly received: acenocumarine 1 mg/day for 3 days before and 8 days after central vein catheter (CVC) insertion; dalteparin 5000 IU 2 h before and daily for 8 days after CVC insertion; no anticoagulant treatment (NT). All patients underwent venography on days 8 and 30, some of them on days 90, 150 and 210 after CVC.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> A total of 450 patients were randomized, 348 underwent at least two venography. Both acenocumarine and dalteparin reduced venography-detected CVCrT rate [21.9% acenocumarine versus 52.6% NT, odds ratio (OR) 0.3, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01; 40% dalteparin versus 52.6% NT, OR 0.6, <I>P</I> = 0.05]. Acenocumarine was more effective than dalteparin (OR 0.4, <I>P</I> = 0.01). The rate of occlusive CVCrT was not different in the three groups (0.9% acenocumarine, 3.3% dalteparin, 1.8% NT; <I>P</I> = 0.40). Most CVCrTs (95.6%) were observed on day 8 after CVC insertion and were non-occlusive.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In this study of early and short-term prophylaxis, acenocumarine was more effective than dalteparin on non-occlusive and asymptomatic CVCrT events. The first days following CVC insertion represent the highest risk for CVCrT.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Cicco, M., Matovic, M., Balestreri, L., Steffan, A., Pacenzia, R., Malafronte, M., Fantin, D., Bertuzzi, C. A., Fabiani, F., Morassut, S., Bidoli, E., Veronesi, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp235</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early and short-term acenocumarine or dalteparin for the prevention of central vein catheter-related thrombosis in cancer patients: a randomized controlled study based on serial venographies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp232v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acute leukemia and myelodysplasia after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: durable remissions after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp232v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Although secondary acute leukemias and myelodysplasia are the known complications of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, the treatment outcome of these secondary malignancies is presently unclear. We examined the clinical and pathological features as well as the treatment results of a series of patients with acute leukemia/myelodysplasia arising after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients referred to our institution during a 5-year period for treatment of acute leukemia/myelodysplasia and who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer are included. Leukemia-free survival for the whole group and for patients who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was estimated.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifteen women (14 with acute leukemia and one with myelodysplasia) were identified. Seven of 15 patients had received an anthracycline, cyclophosphamide and a taxane. Ten patients developed acute leukemia/myelodysplasia with a latency period of 2 years or less from initiation of chemotherapy. Although mixed-lineage leukemia (<I>MLL</I>) rearrangement was the commonest chromosomal abnormality (8 of 15 patients), various other chromosomal abnormalities were also detected. Twelve of 15 patients underwent HSCT (11 allogeneic and one autologous). Eleven of these 12 patients who underwent HSCT were in remission at a median follow-up of 20.4 months (range 4.4&ndash;53.3 months).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Durable remissions can be achieved in patients who develop acute leukemia/myelodysplasia secondary to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer and are able to undergo allogeneic HSCT. Our results indicate that HSCT should be an early consideration in the management of such patients who are suitable candidates for the procedure.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pullarkat, V., Slovak, M. L., Dagis, A., Bedell, V., Somlo, G., Nakamura, R., Stein, A. S., O'Donnell, M. R., Nademanee, A., Teotico, A. L., Bhatia, S., Forman, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-29</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp232</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acute leukemia and myelodysplasia after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: durable remissions after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp230v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Retrospective and prospective studies of hepatitis B virus reactivation in malignant lymphoma with occult HBV carrier]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp230v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In surface antigen of hepatitis B virus (HBsAg)-positive carrier for anticancer treatment of malignant lymphoma, it is well recognized that reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) occasionally occurs. However, there have been only a few studies of HBV reactivation in serum HBsAg-negative and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAb)-positive occult HBV carriers. We looked at both retrospective and prospective studies to determine the prevalence, clinical course and risk factor of HBV reactivation during chemotherapy in lymphoma patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Forty-eight of 127 (37.8%) lymphoma patients were HBsAg negative and HBcAb positive, and 24 of these patients were then given liver function tests and HBsAg tests monthly and serum HBV DNA every 3 months.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> HBV reactivation was observed in two patients (4.1%) who had received intensive chemotherapy including steroid and rituximab. Immediate administration of entecavir therapy after elevation of HBV DNA level was conducted, and this resulted in reduction of it and improvement of liver function test.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Rituximab plus steroid-containing regimens may increase the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive lymphoma patients. More ambitious prospective studies are required to establish clinically useful or cost-effective follow-up methods for control of HBV reactivation in lymphoma patients with occult HBV infection.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fukushima, N., Mizuta, T., Tanaka, M., Yokoo, M., Ide, M., Hisatomi, T., Kuwahara, N., Tomimasu, R., Tsuneyoshi, N., Funai, N., Sueoka, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp230</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Retrospective and prospective studies of hepatitis B virus reactivation in malignant lymphoma with occult HBV carrier]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp195v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A phase II study of palonosetron combined with dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp195v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This is a randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of palonosetron, in combination with dexamethasone.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> We randomized 233 patients to receive palonosetron as a single i.v. bolus dose of 0.075, 0.25, or 0.75 mg before administration of HEC. Dexamethasone (12&ndash;16 mg i.v. on day 1, 8 mg i.v. on day 2, and 4&ndash;8 mg i.v. on day 3) was administered for prophylactic antiemesis. Pharmacokinetics of palonosetron was analyzed in 24 patients.</p>
<p><b>Result:</b> In this study, all patients were given &ge;50 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cisplatin, which was considered to be HEC. No significant differences in complete response (CR: no emesis and no rescue medication) rates were found in the first 24 h between the 0.075-, 0.25-, and 0.75-mg groups (77.6%, 81.8%, and 79.5%, respectively). In the 120-h period of overall observation, CR rates increased in a dose-dependent manner. In the 0.75-mg group, we observed a significantly longer time to treatment failure than in the 0.075-mg group (median time &gt;120 versus 82.0 h, <I>P</I> = 0.038). Palonosetron was tolerated well and did not show any dose-related increase in adverse effects.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Palonosetron at doses of 0.25 and 0.75 mg was shown to be effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with high CR rates of patients treated with HEC in Japan. All tested doses of palonosetron were tolerated well.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maemondo, M., Masuda, N., Sekine, I., Kubota, K., Segawa, Y., Shibuya, M., Imamura, F., Katakami, N., Hida, T., Takeo, S., for the PALO Japanese Cooperative Study Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp195</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A phase II study of palonosetron combined with dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp068v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cancer and thrombosis: implications of published guidelines for clinical practice]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp068v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Cancer is a frequent finding in patients with thrombosis, and thrombosis is much more prevalent in patients with cancer, with important clinical consequences. Thrombosis is the second most common cause of death in cancer patients. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer is also associated with a high rate of recurrence, bleeding, a requirement for long-term anticoagulation, and worsened quality of life. Risk factors for cancer-associated VTE include particular cancer types, chemotherapy (with or without antiangiogenic agents), the use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents, the presence of central venous catheters, and surgery. Novel risk factors include platelet and leukocyte counts and tissue factor. A risk model for identifying cancer patients at highest risk for VTE has recently been developed. Anticoagulant therapy is safe and efficacious for prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. Available anticoagulants include warfarin, heparin, and low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). LMWHs represent the preferred therapeutic option for VTE prophylaxis and treatment. Their use may be associated with improved survival in cancer, although this issue requires further study. Despite the significant burden imposed by VTE and the availability of effective anticoagulant therapies, many oncology patients do not receive appropriate VTE prophylaxis as recommended by practice guidelines. Improved adherence to guidelines could substantially reduce morbidity, decrease resource use, enhance quality of life, and improve survival in these patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Khorana, A. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-26</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cancer and thrombosis: implications of published guidelines for clinical practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp231v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Docetaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients: results of the phase II GINECO trial CAPYTTOLE]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp231v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This phase II study evaluated the clinical benefit of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and docetaxel (Taxotere) as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> MBC patients were enrolled to receive six cycles of PLD 35 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (day 1) and docetaxel 40 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (days 1 and 15), every 28 days (group A). Because of unacceptable toxic effects, doses were modified to PLD 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (day 1) and docetaxel 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (day 2), every 3 weeks (group B). The primary end point was clinical benefit.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Sixty-seven patients were included (group A, 53; group B, 14). In both groups, the median number of cycles delivered was 4 and the overall dose intensity was 82% for docetaxel and 71% for PLD. In group A, main toxic effects were hematologic, palmar&ndash;plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), and stomatitis. In group B, higher rates of grade 3&ndash;4 PPE, febrile neutropenia, and hematologic toxic effects were reported. The rate of clinical benefit was 47%. Among patients with a measurable disease, 49% achieved a partial response, 27% had a stable disease, and 13% progressed, according to RECIST criteria.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The combination of PLD and docetaxel delivered at planned doses in this study yields unacceptable toxicity and should not be used routinely in patients with MBC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de la Fouchardiere, C., Largillier, R., Goubely, Y., Hardy-Bessard, A.-C., Slama, B., Cretin, J., Orfeuvre, H., Paraiso, D., Bachelot, T., Pujade-Lauraine, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp231</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Docetaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer patients: results of the phase II GINECO trial CAPYTTOLE]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp209v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High prevalence of retinoblastoma protein loss in triple-negative breast cancers and its association with a good prognosis in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp209v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease, nevertheless exhibiting a high response rate to chemotherapy. Since the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) loss confers a high sensitivity to chemotherapy regimens, we evaluated the prevalence of pRb loss in TNBCs and its relevance on the clinical outcome of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods</b>: pRb status was prospectively evaluated by immunocytochemistry in 518 consecutive patients with complete receptor information. The predictive value of pRb status in TNBCs was determined according to the adjuvant therapeutic treatments.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-three tumors were identified as TNBCs. The prevalence of pRb loss was significantly higher in TNBCs than in the other cancer subtypes. All patients with TNBCs lacking pRb and treated with systemic chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) were disease free at a medium follow-up time of 109 months, whereas the clinical outcome of those expressing pRb was significantly poorer (<I>P</I> = 0.008). Analysis of disease-free survival including the established anatomo-clinical prognostic parameters indicated pRb loss as the only significant predictive factor.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions</b>: pRb loss is much more frequent in TNBCs than in the other breast cancer subtypes. Patients with TNBCs lacking pRb had a very favorable clinical outcome if treated with conventional adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trere, D., Brighenti, E., Donati, G., Ceccarelli, C., Santini, D., Taffurelli, M., Montanaro, L., Derenzini, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp209</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High prevalence of retinoblastoma protein loss in triple-negative breast cancers and its association with a good prognosis in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp207v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating tumor cells in metastatic inflammatory breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp207v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are an independent prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of baseline CTCs in metastatic IBC patients.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This retrospective study included 42 metastatic IBC and 107 metastatic non-IBC patients treated with first- or second-line chemotherapy from January 2004 to December 2007 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. CTCs were detected and enumerated before patients started chemotherapy using the CellSearch<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> system.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Ten (23.8%) IBC patients versus 48 (44.9%) non-IBC patients had baseline CTCs &ge;5 per 7.5 ml of peripheral blood. IBC patients had a lower mean &plusmn; SEM CTCs than non-IBC patients (7.6 &plusmn; 2.9 versus 34.2 &plusmn; 9.1; <I>P</I> = 0.02). The estimated median overall survival was 26.5 versus 18.3 months (<I>P</I> = 0.68) in IBC patients and 37.4 versus 18.3 months (<I>P</I> = 0.016) in non-IBC patients with CTCs &lt;5 and CTCs &ge;5, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Metastatic IBC patients had a lower prevalence and fewer CTCs in comparison to metastatic non-IBC patients. Survival of metastatic IBC patients with &lt;5 CTCs was not significantly better than that of patients with &ge;5 CTCs. Further research is warranted with prospective assessment of CTCs in IBC patients and their biological characterization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mego, M., De Giorgi, U., Hsu, L., Ueno, N., Valero, V., Jackson, S., Andreopoulou, E., Kau, S.-W., Reuben, J. M., Cristofanilli, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp207</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating tumor cells in metastatic inflammatory breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp200v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Disseminated tumor cells and the risk of locoregional recurrence in nonmetastatic breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp200v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In early breast cancer patients, bone marrow (BM)-disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) were associated with distant metastasis and locoregional recurrence. Our aim was to determine whether BM DTC detection could be related to specific locoregional dissemination of cancer cells, according to radiotherapy volumes.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> The relationship between locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and DTC detection was evaluated according to the various locoregional volumes irradiated after surgery.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> BM DTCs were detected in 94 of 621 stage I&ndash;III breast cancer patients (15%) and were not associated with axillary node status. Eighteen patients (2.9%) experienced locoregional recurrence (median follow-up 56 months), of whom eight (44%) were initially BM DTC positive. BM DTC detection was the only prognostic factor for LRFS [<I>P</I> = 0.0005, odds ratio = 5.2 (2.0&ndash;13.1), multivariate analysis]. In BM DTC-positive patients, a longer LRFS was observed in those who were given adjuvant hormone therapy (<I>P</I> = 0.03) and radiotherapy to supraclavicular nodes (SCNs)/internal mammary nodes (IMNs) (<I>P</I> = 0.055) (multivariate analysis; interaction test: <I>P</I> = 0.028).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The presence of DTC in BM may be associated with a different pattern of locoregional cancer cell dissemination and influences LRFS. The possible reseeding of the primary cancer area by DTC could be prevented by systemic hormone therapy but also by SCN/IMN irradiation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bidard, F.-C., Kirova, Y. M., Vincent-Salomon, A., Alran, S., de Rycke, Y., Sigal-Zafrani, B., Sastre-Garau, X., Mignot, L., Fourquet, A., Pierga, J.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp200</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Disseminated tumor cells and the risk of locoregional recurrence in nonmetastatic breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp198v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase II randomized study of trabectedin given as two different every 3 weeks dose schedules (1.5 mg/m2 24 h or 1.3 mg/m2 3 h) to patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, advanced ovarian cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp198v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial evaluated the optimal regimen of trabectedin administered every 3 weeks in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed, advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Patients previously treated with less than two or two previous chemotherapy lines were randomized to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 24 h (arm A, <I>n</I> = 54) or 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 3 h (arm B, <I>n</I> = 53). Objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST was the primary efficacy end point. Toxic effects were graded according to the National Cancer Institute&mdash;Common Toxicity Criteria v. 2.0.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> ORR was 38.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.9% to 53.1%; arm A] and 35.8% (95% CI 23.1% to 50.2%; arm B) (intention-to-treat primary analysis). Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI 5.3&ndash;8.6 months; arm A) and 6.8 months (95% CI 4.6&ndash;7.4 months; arm B). Frequent severe adverse events were nausea/vomiting (24%, arm A; 15%, arm B) and fatigue (15%, arm A; 10%, arm B). Common severe laboratory abnormalities were transient, noncumulative neutropenia (55%, arm A; 37%, arm B) and transaminase increases (alanine aminotransferase, 55%, arm A; 59%, arm B).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Both every-3-weeks trabectedin regimes, 1.5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 24 h and 1.3 mg/m<sup>2</sup> 3 h, were active and reasonably well tolerated in AOC platinum-sensitive patients. Trabectedin every-3-weeks has promising activity and deserves to be further evaluated in relapsed AOC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Del Campo, J. M., Roszak, A., Bidzinski, M., Ciuleanu, T. E., Hogberg, T., Wojtukiewicz, M. Z., Poveda, A., Boman, K., Westermann, A. M., Lebedinsky, C., on behalf of the Yondelis Ovarian Cancer Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp198</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phase II randomized study of trabectedin given as two different every 3 weeks dose schedules (1.5 mg/m2 24 h or 1.3 mg/m2 3 h) to patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, advanced ovarian cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp196v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG)]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp196v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Radical hysterectomy combined with a pelvic lymphadenectomy or chemoradiation are traditionally the mainstays of treatment of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages Ia2&ndash;IIa cervical cancer. The quality of radical surgery for cervical cancer influences local tumor control and survival. Hence, it is important to optimize and ensure the quality of surgical care for cervical cancer patients. In this paper, we discuss factors that are related to outcome after radical hysterectomy and propose a set of quality indicators that can be used to audit and improve the quality of surgical care for cervical cancer patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Verleye, L., Vergote, I., Reed, N., Ottevanger, P. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-25</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp196</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp202v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gefitinib treatment in hormone-resistant and hormone receptor-negative advanced breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp202v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Acquired and <I>de novo</I> endocrine resistance in breast cancer (BC) may be associated with overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Gefinitib is an orally active selective EGFR inhibitor which might benefit advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients either with acquired hormone resistance or with hormone receptor (HR)-negative tumors.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A two-arm multicenter phase II trial of oral gefitinib 500 mg/day was planned in two groups of 45 patients with ABC for whom chemotherapy was not currently indicated. Group 1 had hormone-resistant BC defined as HR-positive BC with progression after treatment with tamoxifen and an aromatase inhibitor. Group 2 had HR-negative BC. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks. The primary end point was the clinical benefit rate (CBR).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Forty patients with hormone-resistant BC had a CBR of 0%. Two of 25 HR-negative BC patients showed stable disease (less than a 50% reduction and less than a 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions and the appearance of no new lesions) at 24 weeks resulting in a CBR of 7.7% (95% CI 0.9% to 25.1%). Enrollment ceased due to the low CBR. Toxicity resulted in treatment interruption (46%), dose reduction (20%) and withdrawal (11%) of patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> At a dose of 500 mg/day, gefitinib monotherapy resulted in a low CBR and no tumor response was identified.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green, M. D., Francis, P. A., Gebski, V., Harvey, V., Karapetis, C., Chan, A., Snyder, R., Fong, A., Basser, R., Forbes, J. F., on behalf of the Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp202</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gefitinib treatment in hormone-resistant and hormone receptor-negative advanced breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp197v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Glycemic index, glycemic load and renal cell carcinoma risk]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp197v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been related to refined cereals and starchy foods, but the association has not been studied in terms of glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL). To provide information on this issue, we analyzed data from an Italian multicentric case&ndash;control study.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Cases were 767 patients with histologically confirmed, incident RCC. Controls were 1534 subjects admitted to the same hospitals as cases for a wide spectrum of acute, non-neoplastic conditions, unrelated to known risk factors for RCC. Information on dietary habits was derived through a food-frequency questionnaire. Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for GI and GL intake were adjusted for major relevant covariates.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Compared with the lowest quintile, the ORs for the highest quintile were 1.43 (95% CI 1.05&ndash;1.95) for GI and 2.56 (95% CI 1.78&ndash;3.70) for GL, with significant trends in risk. Compared with the lowest quintile, the risk of RCC for all subsequent levels of GL was higher in never drinkers than in ever drinkers.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> We found direct relations between dietary levels of GI and GL and RCC risk. This can be related to mechanisms linked to insulin resistance and sensitivity.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galeone, C., Pelucchi, C., Maso, L. D., Negri, E., Talamini, R., Montella, M., Ramazzotti, V., Bellocco, R., Franceschi, S., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-24</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp197</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Glycemic index, glycemic load and renal cell carcinoma risk]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp069v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cetuximab plus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil alone in first-line metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a randomized phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp069v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This study assessed the activity of the mAb cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> For a maximum of six 29-day cycles, patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, day 1, plus 5-FU 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, days 1&ndash;5 (CF), either alone or in combination with cetuximab (CET&ndash;CF; 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> initial dose followed by 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> weekly thereafter). The primary end point was tumor response. Tumor material was obtained for analysis of <I>KRAS</I> mutation status.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Sixty-two eligible patients were included, 32 receiving CET&ndash;CF and 30 CF. Cetuximab did not exacerbate grade 3/4 toxicity, except for rash (6% versus 0%) and diarrhea (16% versus 0%). The overall response rate according to RECIST criteria was 19% and 13% and the disease control rate 75% and 57% for the CET&ndash;CF and CF arms, respectively. With a median follow-up of 21.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 5.9 and 3.6 months and median overall survival 9.5 and 5.5 months for CET&ndash;CF and CF, respectively. No <I>KRAS</I> codon 12/13 tumor mutations were identified in 37 evaluated samples.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Cetuximab can be safely combined with CF chemotherapy and may increase the efficacy of standard CF chemotherapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorenzen, S., Schuster, T., Porschen, R., Al-Batran, S.-E., Hofheinz, R., Thuss-Patience, P., Moehler, M., Grabowski, P., Arnold, D., Greten, T., Muller, L., Rothling, N., Peschel, C., Langer, R., Lordick, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cetuximab plus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil alone in first-line metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a randomized phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp067v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcomes in a phase III, randomized study of sunitinib versus interferon-{alpha} as first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a European population]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp067v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of sunitinib versus interferon-alpha (IFN-) treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> In all, 304 mRCC patients (European cohort) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive sunitinib (50 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off) or IFN- (9 million units s.c. injection three times/week). The following questionnaires were completed (days 1 and 28 per cycle): Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index and the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D self-report questionnaire (EQ-5D). Results correspond to an ongoing trial with progression-free survival time as primary end point, and patients were still being followed up. Data were analyzed using repeated measures mixed effects models (MEMs) that allow the inclusion of initial differences and uncompleted repeated measures, with the assumption of data missing at random. Six-cycle results were included.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Results consistently showed that patients in sunitinib group experienced statistically significantly milder kidney-related symptoms, better cancer-specific HRQoL and general health status (in social utility scores) during the study period as measured by these patient-reported outcome end points. No statistical differences between groups were found on the FACT-G physical well-being subscale or the EQ-5D VAS values.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Results from MEM showed the sunitinib's benefit on HRQoL compared with IFN-.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castellano, D., del Muro, X. G., Perez-Gracia, J. L., Gonzalez-Larriba, J. L., Abrio, M. V., Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., Guzman, C., Cerezo, S. D., Grande, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient-reported outcomes in a phase III, randomized study of sunitinib versus interferon-{alpha} as first-line systemic therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a European population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp066v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Empirically derived psychosocial states among adolescents diagnosed with cancer during the acute and extended phase of survival]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp066v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To, during the acute and extended phase of survival, identify psychosocial states among adolescents diagnosed with cancer and to analyse these in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics and self-reported depression.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and two subscales, Vitality and Mental Health, in the SF-36 4&ndash;8 weeks (T1) (<I>n</I> = 61), 6 (T2) (<I>n</I> = 57), 12 (T3) (<I>n</I> = 50), and 18 (T4) months (<I>n</I> = 48) after diagnosis. I-State as Object of Analysis was used to identify a finite set of states based on three dimensions. Cluster analysis was carried out using Ward's method.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Five states were obtained: psychosocial dysfunction (state A) and poor (B), incomplete (C), good (D), and excellent (E) psychosocial function. At T1, more adolescents than expected by chance were in states A (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and C (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01) and fewer in states D (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) and E (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). At T4, more adolescents than expected by chance were in state E (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001) and fewer in state C (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). Female gender and being in late adolescence when diagnosed is related to worse psychosocial function.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The findings provide support for subgroups of adolescents whose level of vitality, mental health, and anxiety differ during the acute and extended phase of survival of cancer. Clinical interventions tailored to the level of impairment as determined by the clusters may result in better psychosocial outcomes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mattsson, E., El-Khouri, B., Ljungman, G., von Essen, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Empirically derived psychosocial states among adolescents diagnosed with cancer during the acute and extended phase of survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp065v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma--correlation with excision repair cross-complementing-1 polymorphisms]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp065v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a platinum-sensitive cancer and excision repair cross-complementing group 1 <I>(ERCC1)</I> polymorphisms have been shown to predict survival in several cancers following platinum therapy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> This multicenter study evaluated the activity of oxaliplatin and prolonged infusion of gemcitabine (&lsquo;GEMOX&rsquo; regimen) in recurrent NPC. Baseline blood samples were genotyped for the presence of <I>ERCC1-118</I> gene polymorphisms.</p>
<p><b>Results</b>: Forty-two patients were recruited, of whom most (61%) had metastatic disease. Of the 40 patients evaluated for response, the respective overall response and disease control rates were 56.1% and 90.2%. At a median follow-up of 14.8 months, the respective median overall survival and time to progression were 19.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 12.8&ndash;22 months] and 9 months (95% CI = 7.3&ndash;10 months). Grade 3&ndash;4 toxic effects were uncommon. The distribution of <I>ERCC1-118</I> genotypes from 29 patients was C/C (<I>n</I> = 17, 40.5%), C/T (<I>n</I> = 10, 23.8%) and T/T (<I>n</I> = 2, 4.8%). No differences in survival or response rates were found between genotypes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> GEMOX is active in the treatment of recurrent NPC. Detection of single-nucleotide gene polymorphisms from genomic DNA in peripheral blood is feasible in NPC and further studies are warranted.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ma, B. B. Y., Hui, E. P., Wong, S. C. C., Tung, S. Y., Yuen, K. K., King, A., Chan, S. L., Leung, S. F., Kam, M. K., Yu, B. K. H., Zee, B., Chan, A. T. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Multicenter phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma--correlation with excision repair cross-complementing-1 polymorphisms]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp062v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp062v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacking expression of steroid receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, having chemotherapy as the only therapeutic option, is characterised by early relapses and poor outcome. We investigated intratumoural (i.t.) levels of the pro-angiogenic cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and survival in patients with TNBC compared with non-TNBC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> VEGF levels were determined by an enzyme immunosorbent assay in a retrospective series consisting of 679 consecutive primary breast cancer patients.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Eighty-seven patients (13%) were classified as TNBC and had significantly higher VEGF levels; median value in TNBC was 8.2 pg/&micro;g DNA compared with 2.7 pg/&micro;g DNA in non-TNBC (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Patients with TNBC had statistically significant shorter recurrence-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.8; <I>P</I> = 0.0023], breast cancer-corrected survival (HR = 2.2; <I>P</I> = 0.004) and overall survival (HR = 1.8; <I>P</I> = 0.005) compared with non-TNBC. Patients with TNBC relapsed earlier than non-TNBC; mean time from diagnosis to first relapse was 18.8 and 30.7 months, respectively. The time between first relapse and death was also shorter in TNBC: 7.5 months versus 17.5 months in non-TNBC (<I>P</I> = 0.087).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results show that TNBC have higher i.t. VEGF levels compared with non-TNBC. Ongoing clinical trials will answer if therapy directed towards angiogenesis may be an alternative way to improve outcome in this poor prognosis group.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linderholm, B. K., Hellborg, H., Johansson, U., Elmberger, G., Skoog, L., Lehtio, J., Lewensohn, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Significantly higher levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and shorter survival times for patients with primary operable triple-negative breast cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp060v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Efficacy of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy alone or with chemotherapy and EGFR inhibitors]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp060v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Treatment options are scarce in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. RAD001, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), has shown phase I efficacy in NSCLC.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Stage IIIb or IV NSCLC patients, with two or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens, one platinum based (stratum 1) or both chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (stratum 2), received RAD001 10 mg/day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objective was overall response rate (ORR). Analyses of markers associated with the mTOR pathway were carried out on archival tumor from a subgroup using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and direct mutation sequencing.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Eighty-five patients were enrolled, 42 in stratum 1 and 43 in stratum. ORR was 4.7% (7.1% stratum 1; 2.3% stratum 2). Overall disease control rate was 47.1%. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 (stratum 1) and 2.7 months (stratum 2). Common &ge;grade 3 events were fatigue, dyspnea, stomatitis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Pneumonitis, probably or possibly related, mainly grade 1/2, occurred in 25%. Cox regression analysis of IHC scores found that only phospho AKT (pAKT) was a significant independent predictor of worse PFS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> RAD001 10 mg/day was well tolerated, showing modest clinical activity in pretreated NSCLC. Evaluation of RAD001 plus standard therapy for metastatic NSCLC continues.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soria, J.-C., Shepherd, F. A., Douillard, J.-Y., Wolf, J., Giaccone, G., Crino, L., Cappuzzo, F., Sharma, S., Gross, S. H., Dimitrijevic, S., Di Scala, L., Gardner, H., Nogova, L., Papadimitrakopoulou, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Efficacy of everolimus (RAD001) in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy alone or with chemotherapy and EGFR inhibitors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp058v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dietary glycemic load and hepatocellular carcinoma with or without chronic hepatitis infection]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp058v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the major risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The association of diabetes mellitus with HCC suggests that dietary glycemic load (GL) may influence HCC risk. We have examined the association between dietary GL and HCC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We conducted a hospital-based case&ndash;control study in Italy in 1999&ndash;2002, including 185 HCC cases and 412 controls who answered a validated food frequency questionnaire and provided blood samples. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using unconditional multiple logistic regression.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> We observed a positive association between GL and HCC overall, with an OR of 3.02 (95% CI 1.49&ndash;6.12) for the highest quintile of GL compared with the lowest and a significant trend. The OR among HCC cases with evidence of chronic infection with HBV and/or HCV was 3.25 (95% CI 1.46&ndash;7.22), while the OR among those with no evidence of infection was 2.45 (95% CI 0.69&ndash;8.64), with no significant trend. The association was not explained by the presence of cirrhosis or diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> High dietary GL is associated with increased risk for HCC. The positive association was most pronounced among HCC cases with HBV and/or HCV markers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rossi, M., Lipworth, L., Maso, L. D., Talamini, R., Montella, M., Polesel, J., McLaughlin, J. K., Parpinel, M., Franceschi, S., Lagiou, P., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dietary glycemic load and hepatocellular carcinoma with or without chronic hepatitis infection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp053v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Validation, revision and extension of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) in a population-based setting]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp053v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to validate the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) in a population-based cohort and to study the relevance of revision and extension of the FLIPI.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Data of 353 unselected patients, 1993&ndash;2002, in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry, were collected. Follow-up was completed up to 1 January 2006. Multiple imputations for missing covariates were used. Validity was assessed by comparing observed to predicted survival of the original model and of a revised model with other prognostic variables.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The original FLIPI stratified our cohort into three different risk groups based on stage, Hb, lactate dehydrogenase, nodal involvement and age. The discrimination between risk groups was not as good as in the original cohort. A model including age in three categories (&le;60/61&ndash;70/&gt;70 years) and presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (yes/no) resulted in a better prognostic index. The 5-year overall survival rates were 79%, 59% and 28% in the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups for the extended FLIPI compared with 81%, 66% and 47% for the original FLIPI, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> The performance of the FLIPI was validated in a population-based setting, but could significantly be improved by a more refined coding of age and by including the presence of CVD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[van de Schans, S. A. M., Steyerberg, E. W., Nijziel, M. R., Creemers, G.-J., Janssen-Heijnen, M. L., van Spronsen, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-23</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Validation, revision and extension of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) in a population-based setting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp193v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A feasibility study of sequential doublet chemotherapy comprising carboplatin-doxorubicin and carboplatin-paclitaxel for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp193v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Platinum compounds, taxanes and anthracyclines provide the major effective drug classes in the treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 52 women with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma were treated with four cycles of carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 and doxorubicin (50 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) for four cycles before or after four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel (175 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) with each cycle administered at 21-day intervals.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Thirty-seven patients (71.2%) completed all planned treatment. Excluding six patients who did not complete treatment for non-drug-related causes, 80.4% completed all planned treatment. Three hundred and seventy-one treatment cycles were administered and 303 (81.7%) occurred on time. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 haematological toxic effects, particularly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, were the predominant cause of treatment delays and dose reductions. A low incidence of grade 3 neurotoxicity and no cardiac toxicity were observed. The overall response rates for patients with evaluable disease were 82.1% and 66.7% for endometrial and carcinosarcoma, respectively. At a median follow-up of 21 months, the median progression-free survival for the endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma cohorts were 15.3 and 12.0 months, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This regimen is generally well tolerated with encouraging efficacy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ang, J. E., Shah, R. N., Everard, M., Keyzor, C., Coombes, I., Jenkins, A., Thomas, K., A'Hern, R., Jones, R. L., Blake, P., Gabra, H., Hall, G., Gore, M. E., Kaye, S. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp193</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A feasibility study of sequential doublet chemotherapy comprising carboplatin-doxorubicin and carboplatin-paclitaxel for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp070v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combination of sunitinib, cetuximab and irradiation in an orthotopic head and neck cancer model]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp070v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Recent preclinical and clinical studies indicate beneficial effects from combining radiotherapy with either anti-angiogenic drugs or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting agent. To investigate the effect of combining these approaches, we evaluated <I>in vivo</I> the antitumor efficacy of the anti-angiogenic compound sunitinib, an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits among others vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors-1, -2 and -3, cetuximab, a mAb targeting the EGFR, and irradiation (RT) given alone and in combination.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Investigations were carried out using a VEGF-secreting human head and neck tumor cell line, CAL33, with a high EGFR content, growing as orthotopic xenografts in nude mice. Three days after tumor cell injection, sunitinib (20 mg/kg, p.o.), cetuximab (1 mg/kg, i.p.), both 5 days/week seven doses, and RT (6 Gy, 3 days/week, four doses) were administered alone and in combination during 9 days.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Concomitant administration of drugs produced a marked and significant supra-additive decrease, and the addition of RT completely abolished tumor growth. The drug association markedly reduced tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) and the number of the vessels, but enhanced cell differentiation.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The efficacy of this combination of sunitinib, cetuximab and RT may be of clinical importance in the management of head and neck cancer patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bozec, A., Sudaka, A., Toussan, N., Fischel, J.-L., Etienne-Grimaldi, M.-C., Milano, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combination of sunitinib, cetuximab and irradiation in an orthotopic head and neck cancer model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp056v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increased quantity of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells is an independent predictor for improved clinical outcome in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp056v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis, requiring risk-stratified management in affected patients. Recently, tumor microenvironment including regulatory T cells (Tregs) has been implicated as a prognostic marker in certain types of lymphoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We collected 64 NKTCL cases and numerically quantified the amount of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive Tregs by automated slide scanning and image analysis program after immunohistochemical staining using anti-FOXP3 antibody.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Patients were able to be classified into two end groups by their level of Tregs. Twenty-eight (44%) patients had Tregs &lt;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup>, while 36 (56%) had Tregs &ge;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup> within the tumor. The decreased number of Tregs (&lt;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup>) was more common in patients with poor performance status or in those presented in non-upper aerodigestive tract. However, the level of Tregs was not associated with other prognostic factors, including stage, lactate dehydrogenase level, International Prognostic Index, and NKTCL Prognostic Index. Importantly, patients with increased numbers of Tregs (&ge;50/0.40 mm<sup>2</sup>) showed prolonged overall and progression-free survival (<I>P</I> = 0.0005 and <I>P</I> = 0.0079, respectively). The number of FOXP3-positive Tregs was an independent prognostic factor (<I>P</I> = 0.001) by multivariate analysis.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Increased quantity of tumor-infiltrating Tregs predicted improved clinical outcome in NKTCL patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, W. Y., Jeon, Y. K., Kim, T. M., Kim, J. E., Kim, Y. A., Lee, S.-H., Kim, D.-W., Heo, D. S., Kim, C.-W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increased quantity of tumor-infiltrating FOXP3-positive regulatory T cells is an independent predictor for improved clinical outcome in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp194v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial of the oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp194v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Casopitant mesylate is a novel, oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist with demonstrated antiemetic efficacy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled phase II trial to evaluate three casopitant doses as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose cisplatin. The aim of the study was to detect a dose response.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> A total of 493 patients with solid tumors receiving a first cycle of cisplatin &ge;70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> were randomly assigned among six treatment arms. The primary analysis compared a control arm [ondansetron/dexamethasone (Ond/Dex)] with three investigational treatments (Ond/Dex plus oral casopitant 50, 100, or 150 mg administered daily for 3 days). Two exploratory arms were included: one evaluating a single oral casopitant dose of 150 mg added to standard Ond/Dex and another with 3-day oral aprepitant-based therapy (Ond/Dex plus aprepitant 125 mg day 1, 80 mg days 2&ndash;3).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The complete response (CR) rate (defined as no vomiting, retching, rescue therapy, or premature discontinuation) was significantly increased in each casopitant arm relative to control over the 120-h evaluation period: 76% (50 mg), 86% (100 mg), 77% (150 mg), and 60% with control (<I>P</I> = 0.0036). The CR rate for the single oral dose regimen was similar to the CR rate reported for the 3-day regimens. No differences were observed in the incidence of nausea or significant nausea among groups in the primary analysis. The most common adverse events related to treatment included headache (<I>n</I> = 10) and hiccups (<I>n</I> = 14).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> All doses of oral casopitant as a 3-day regimen (and likely as a 150-mg single oral dose) in combination with Ond/Dex provided significant improvement in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roila, F., Rolski, J., Ramlau, R., Dediu, M., Russo, M. W., Bandekar, R. R., Grunberg, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp194</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging trial of the oral neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp071v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of mid- and post-ABVD PET imaging in Hodgkin's lymphoma: the importance of involved-field radiotherapy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp071v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Although positron emission tomography (PET) response to chemotherapy (CT) has prognostic significance in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), it is unclear whether patients with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-<scp>D</scp>-glucose (FDG)&ndash;PET positivity during and/or after CT can be rendered disease free with consolidative involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT).</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Patients with HL treated with adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD)-based CT and radiotherapy (RT) at our institution from January 2000 to March 2007 were eligible. All patients had either a post-treatment PET or PET&ndash;CT before initiation of RT or a negative midtreatment PET or PET&ndash;CT. The primary end point was failure-free survival (FFS) for patients with and without residual FDG avidity after ABVD. The treatment outcome of patients with interim PET positivity during CT was also reported.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Seventy-three patients were included in this study. Twenty patients (out of 46) were PET positive on interim PET, and 13 patients (out of 73) were PET positive at the conclusion of CT. At a median follow-up of 3.4 years for surviving patients, the 2-year FFSs for patients PET-negative versus PET-positive disease after ABVD were 95% and 69%, respectively (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). On bivariable Cox regression, post-ABVD positivity (hazard ratio 4.8, <I>P</I> = 0.05) was predictive of disease recurrence after controlling for bulky disease. Of the 20 patients with interim PET positivity, three recurred, with a 2-year FFS of 85%. Among the 13 patients with interim PET positivity, but became PET negative at the completion of CT, the 2-year FFS was 92%.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Sixty-nine per cent of patients with residual FDG avidity after ABVD were free of disease after consolidative RT, indicating a majority of patients with persistent lymphoma can be cured by sterilizing this PET-positive disease.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sher, D.J., Mauch, P.M., Van Den Abbeele, A., LaCasce, A.S., Czerminski, J., Ng, A.K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic significance of mid- and post-ABVD PET imaging in Hodgkin's lymphoma: the importance of involved-field radiotherapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp054v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cytokines and angiogenic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon-{alpha}: association of pretreatment serum levels with survival]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp054v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To correlate serum cytokine and angiogenic factor (CAF) levels with overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with interferon- (IFN-).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Serum CAF levels were measured in 103 patients treated on a randomized trial with IFN- 0.5 million units (MU) twice daily or 5 MU daily. Concentrations of 17 analytes were determined by multiplex bead immunoassays [vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF<SUB>A</SUB>) and several cytokines] or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (basic fibroblast growth factor). We used proportional hazards models to evaluate the effect of CAF levels and clinical factors on OS.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Pretreatment serum interleukin (IL) 5, IL-12 p40, VEGF<SUB>A</SUB>, and IL-6 levels and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk grouping independently correlated with OS, with hazard ratios of 2.33, 2.00, 2.07, 1.82, and 0.39, respectively (concordance index = 0.69 for the combined model versus 0.60 for the CAF model versus 0.52 for the clinical model). Based on an index derived from these five risk factors (RFs), patients with 0&ndash;2 RF had a median OS time of 32 months versus 9 months for patients with 3&ndash;5 RF (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Serum CAF profiling contributes to prognostic evaluation in mRCC and helps to identify a subset of patients with 20% 5-year OS.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montero, A. J., Diaz-Montero, C. M., Millikan, R. E., Liu, J., Do, K.-A., Hodges, S., Jonasch, E., McIntyre, B. W., Hwu, P., Tannir, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cytokines and angiogenic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon-{alpha}: association of pretreatment serum levels with survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp322v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp322v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The 11<sup>th</sup> St Gallen (Switzerland) expert consensus meeting on the primary treatment of early breast cancer in March 2009 maintained an emphasis on targeting adjuvant systemic therapies according to subgroups defined by predictive markers. Any positive level of estrogen receptor (ER) expression is considered sufficient to justify the use of endocrine adjuvant therapy in almost all patients. Overexpression or amplification of HER2 by standard criteria is an indication for anti-HER2 therapy for all but the very lowest risk invasive tumours. The corollary is that ER and HER2 must be reliably and accurately measured. Indications for cytotoxic adjuvant therapy were refined, acknowledging the role of risk factors with the caveat that risk <I>per se</I> is not a target. Proliferation markers, including those identified in multigene array analyses, were recognised as important in this regard. The <b>threshold for indication</b> of each systemic treatment modality thus depends on different criteria which have been separately listed to clarify the therapeutic decision-making algorithm.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldhirsch, A., Ingle, J. N., Gelber, R. D., Coates, A. S., Thurlimann, B., Senn, H.-J., Panel members]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-17</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp322</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>special article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp059v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Glycemic load in relation to hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis infection]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp059v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Chronic infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are of paramount etiologic importance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but other factors are likely to be important. The association of diabetes mellitus and obesity with HCC raises the possibility that dietary glycemic load (GL) may interact with chronic hepatitis infection in the causation of HCC.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> We conducted a case&ndash;control study of 333 HCC patients and 360 controls in Athens, Greece. Third-generation assays were used to determine chronic HBV and HCV infection and information from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to estimate dietary GL.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> After adjustment for possible confounding factors through multiple logistic regression, we found a nonsignificant positive association between GL and HCC, which was exclusively accounted for by a positive association between GL and HCC cases with chronic infection with hepatitis B and/or C. For the latter group of patients, the odds ratio at the highest compared with the lowest GL quintile was 1.95 (95% confidence interval 1.09&ndash;3.48). The association was strengthened after exclusion of subjects with diabetes.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our results indicate that, among patients with chronic infection with HBV and/or HCV, reduction of dietary GL could reduce risk or delay development of HCC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lagiou, P., Rossi, M., Tzonou, A., Georgila, C., Trichopoulos, D., La Vecchia, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-15</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Glycemic load in relation to hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis infection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp052v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2008 SOR guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer: report from the working group]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp052v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> In view of the lack of recommendations on central venous catheter (CVC)-associated thrombosis in cancer patients, we established guidelines according to the well-standardized Standards, Options and Recommendations methodology.</p>
<p><b>Material and methods:</b> A literature review (1990&ndash;2007) on CVC-associated thrombosis was carried out. The guidelines were developed on the basis of the corresponding levels of evidence derived from analysis of the 36 of 175 publications selected. They were then peer reviewed by 65 independent experts.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> For the prevention of CVC-associated thrombosis, the distal tip of the CVC should be placed at the junction between the superior cava vein and right atrium; anticoagulants are not recommended. Treatment of CVC-associated thrombosis should be based on the prolonged use of low-molecular weight heparins. Maintenance of the catheter is justified if it is mandatory, functional, in the right position, and not infected, with a favorable clinical evolution under close monitoring; anticoagulant treatment should then be continued as long as the catheter is present.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Several rigorous studies do not support the use of anticoagulants for the prevention of CVC-associated thrombosis. Treatment of CVC-associated thrombosis relies on the same principles as those applied in the treatment of established thrombosis in cancer patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Debourdeau, P., Kassab Chahmi, D., Le Gal, G., Kriegel, I., Desruennes, E., Douard, M.-C., Elalamy, I., Meyer, G., Mismetti, P., Pavic, M., Scrobohaci, M.-L., Levesque, H., Renaudin, J. M., Farge, D., on behalf of the working group of the SOR]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2008 SOR guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thrombosis associated with central venous catheters in patients with cancer: report from the working group]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp110v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Favorable impact of the interleukin-4 receptor allelic variant I75 on the survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients demonstrated in a large prospective clinical trial]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp110v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Recently published data indicate that host germline variations in immune genes can influence the outcome of lymphoma patients. Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL13 are crucial immune factors and may influence the course of the disease. Both cytokines signal through the interleukin-4 receptor (IL4R). Therefore, we investigated whether polymorphisms of <I>IL4</I>, <I>IL13</I> and <I>IL4R</I> genes could predict the outcome of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> In 228 DLBCL samples of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group, the polymorphisms of <I>IL4</I> (-524CT, rs2243250), <I>IL13</I> (-1069CT, rs1800925) and <I>IL4R</I> (I75V, rs1805010; S503P, rs1805015; Q576R, rs1801275) were analyzed and the soluble interleukin-4 receptor (sIL4R) serum level was measured before the start of chemotherapy.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Patients harboring <I>IL4R</I> V75 (IL4R<SUB>I75V-AG</SUB> and IL4R<SUB>I75V-GG</SUB>) had shorter overall survival (OS) (<I>P</I> = 0.044) and event-free survival (EFS) (<I>P</I> = 0.056) periods compared with I75 carriers (IL4R<SUB>I75V-AA</SUB>). Multivariate analysis adjusted to the International Prognostic Index revealed a relative risk of 1.9 for carriers of the <I>IL4R</I> V75 (<I>P</I> = 0.011) in relation to OS. DLBCL patients homozygous for the <I>IL4R</I> I75 and low sIL4R serum levels have the most favorable OS and EFS.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> These data support the role for host germline gene variations of immunologically important factors like the <I>IL4R</I> I75V gene variation to predict the survival in DLBCL patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schoof, N., von Bonin, F., Zeynalova, S., Ziepert, M., Jung, W., Loeffler, M., Pfreundschuh, M., Trumper, L., Kube, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp110</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Favorable impact of the interleukin-4 receptor allelic variant I75 on the survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients demonstrated in a large prospective clinical trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp064v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disease in non-immunocompromised hosts: a status report and summary of an international meeting, 8-9 September 2008]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp064v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Recently novel Epstein&ndash;Barr virus (EBV) lymphoproliferative diseases (LPDs) have been identified in non-immunocompromised hosts, both in Asia and Western countries. These include aggressive T-cell and NK-cell LPDs often subsumed under the heading of chronic active Epstein&ndash;Barr virus (CAEBV) infection and EBV-driven B-cell LPDs mainly affecting the elderly.</p>
<p><b>Design:</b> To better define the pathogenesis, classification, and treatment of these disorders, participants from Asia, The Americas, Europe, and Australia presented clinical and experimental data at an international meeting.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The term systemic EBV-positive T-cell LPD, as adopted by the WHO classification, is preferred as a pathological classification over CAEBV (the favored clinical term) for those cases that are clonal. The disease has an aggressive clinical course, but may arise in the background of CAEBV. Hydroa vacciniforme (HV) and HV-like lymphoma represent a spectrum of clonal EBV-positive T-cell LPDs, which have a more protracted clinical course; spontaneous regression may occur in adult life. Severe mosquito bite allergy is a related syndrome usually of NK cell origin. Immune senescence in the elderly is associated with both reactive and neoplastic EBV-driven LPDs, including EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphomas.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> The participants proposed an international consortium to facilitate further clinical and biological studies of novel EBV-driven LPDs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cohen, J. I., Kimura, H., Nakamura, S., Ko, Y.-H., Jaffe, E. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoproliferative disease in non-immunocompromised hosts: a status report and summary of an international meeting, 8-9 September 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdn792v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[HDAC inhibitor-based therapies and haematological malignancy]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdn792v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Reversible acetylation mediated by histone deacetylase (HDAC) influences a broad repertoire of physiological processes, many of which are aberrantly controlled in tumour cells. Since HDAC inhibition prompts tumour cells to enter apoptosis, small-molecule HDAC inhibitors have been developed as a new class of mechanism-based anticancer agent, many of which have entered clinical trials. While the clinical picture is evolving and the precise utility of HDAC inhibitors remains to be determined, it is noteworthy that certain tumour types undergo a favourable response, in particular haematological malignancies. Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) has been approved for treating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in patients with progressive, persistent or recurrent disease. Here, we discuss developments in our understanding of molecular events that underlie the anticancer effects of HDAC inhibitors and relate this information to the emerging clinical picture for the application of HDAC inhibitors in haematological malignancies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stimson, L., Wood, V., Khan, O., Fotheringham, S., La Thangue, N. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdn792</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[HDAC inhibitor-based therapies and haematological malignancy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>review</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp301v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Treatment and survival in breast cancer in the Eastern Region of England]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp301v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> The reasons for variation in survival in breast cancer are multifactorial.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> From 1999 to 2003, the vital status of 9051 cases of invasive breast cancer was identified in the Eastern Region of England. Survival analysis was by Cox proportional hazards regression. Data were analysed separately for patients aged &lt;70 years and those older due to differences in treatment policies.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Overall 5-year survival was 78%. In patients aged &lt;70 years, significant differences in survival lost their formal significance after adjustment for detection mode and node status, although this remained close to statistical significance with some residual differences between relative hazards. There was significant negative ecological correlation between proportion with nodes positive or not examined and 9-year survival rates. Patients with estrogen receptor (ER) status unknown were at significantly higher risk of dying than ER-positive patients. There was a clear trend of increasing hazard of dying with increasing deprivation. Survival differences in women aged &ge;70 years were related to whether surgery was included as part of treatment.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This variation in treatment and survival may be attributed to lack of information, in particular nodal and ER status, thereby impacting on staging and prescription of adjuvant therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wishart, G. C., Greenberg, D. C., Chou, P., Brown, C. H., Duffy, S., Purushotham, A. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-07</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp301</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Treatment and survival in breast cancer in the Eastern Region of England]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp015v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preoperative chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility, treatment effect evaluation and prognostic factors, analysis of the SFRO-FFCD 9704 trial and literature review]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp015v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We explored the feasibility and the histologic assessment of treatment effect of preoperative chemoradiation in patients presenting with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Treatment consisted of concurrent radiotherapy (50 Gy within 5 weeks) and chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day, 5 days/week, weeks 1&ndash;5) and cisplatin (20 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day, days 1&ndash;5 and 29&ndash;33), followed by surgical resection of the pancreatic tumor in patients without progression.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> In all, 41 patients were enrolled; 38 (93%) received &ge;47 Gy; 30 patients (73%) received &ge;75% of the prescribed doses of chemotherapy. Among 40 assessable patients, 27 (67.5%; 95% confidence interval 50.9% to 81.4%) were successfully treated (entire dose of radiation, &ge;75% of the chemotherapy dose, no grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity). In all, 26 patients (63%) underwent surgical resection with curative intent and 21 (80.7%) had R0 resection. A total of 13 of 26 specimens (50%) presented a major pathologic response (&ge;80% of severely degenerative cancer cells), with one complete pathologic response. Operative mortality was 2.8%. The local recurrence and 2-year survival rates were 4% and 32%, respectively, for the 26 operated patients.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> This proposed preoperative scheme is feasible, does not prevent successful surgery, and provides antitumoral effect associated with major histopathological response in 50% of patients and a high R0 resection rate.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le Scodan, R., Mornex, F., Girard, N., Mercier, C., Valette, P.-J., Ychou, M., Bibeau, F., Roy, P., Scoazec, J.-Y., Partensky, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preoperative chemoradiation in potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: feasibility, treatment effect evaluation and prognostic factors, analysis of the SFRO-FFCD 9704 trial and literature review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp010v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combination chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin for patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp010v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) in patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> From September 2003 to July 2007, we enrolled patients with HCC who had more than one measurable extrahepatic metastatic lesion. Patients received oral capecitabine (2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day) with a schedule of 2 weeks on and 1 week off and cisplatin (60 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) on the first day of the 3-week cycle.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> The study cohort consisted of 32 patients with a median age of 53 years. Overall response rate was 6.3% and disease control rate was 34.4%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 2.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5&ndash;2.4] and the median overall survival (OS) time was 12.2 months (95% CI 6.5&ndash;17.8). The grade 3/4 hematologic toxic effects included thrombocytopenia (7.6%), neutropenia (4.3%) and anemia (2.1%). The grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxic effects included elevated hepatic aminotransferase (12.9%), jaundice (3.2%), mucositis (3.2%) and nausea (3.2%). There was no treatment-related mortality.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Based on the observed response rate and TTP, XP combination chemotherapy showed modest antitumor efficacy in patients with metastatic HCC as systemic first-line treatment. However, XP combination chemotherapy showed tolerable toxicity and demonstrated favorable OS time.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, J. O., Lee, K. W., Oh, D. Y., Kim, J. H., Im, S. A., Kim, T. Y., Bang, Y. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-05</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp010</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combination chemotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin for patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp044v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medical oncology patients' preferences with regard to health care: development of a patient-driven questionnaire]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp044v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To improve quality of care for cancer patients, it is important to have an insight on the patient's view on health care and on their specific wishes, needs and preferences, without restriction and without influence of researchers and health care providers. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire assessing medical oncology patients&rsquo; preferences for health care based on their own input.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Items were generated using 10 focus group interviews with 51 cancer patients. A preliminary questionnaire was handed out to 681 patients of seven Dutch departments of medical oncology. Explorative factor analysis was carried out on the 386 returned questionnaires (response 57%).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Focus group interviews resulted in a preliminary questionnaire containing 136 items. Explorative factor analysis resulted in a definitive questionnaire containing 123 items (21 scales and eight single items). Patients rated expertise, safety, performance and attitude of physicians and nurses as the most important issues in cancer care.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion:</b> This questionnaire may be used to assess preferences of cancer patients and to come to a tailored approach of health care that meets patients&rsquo; wishes and needs.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wessels, H., de Graeff, A., Wynia, K., Sixma, H. J., de Heus, M., Schipper, M., Woltjer, G. T. G. J., Teunissen, S. C. C. M., Voest, E. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-04</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medical oncology patients' preferences with regard to health care: development of a patient-driven questionnaire]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp051v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Breast cancer in young women (YBC): prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and risk of secondary malignancies across diverse racial groups]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp051v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> Despite significant differences in age of onset and incidence of breast cancer between Caucasian (CA), African-American (AA) and Korean (KO) women, little is known about differences in BRCA1/2 mutations in these populations. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and the association between BRCA1/2 mutation status and secondary malignancies among young women with breast cancer in these three racially diverse groups.</p>
<p><b>Methods:</b> Patients presenting to our breast cancer follow-up clinics selected solely on having a known breast cancer diagnosis at a young age (YBC defined as age &lt;45 years at diagnosis) were invited to participate in this study. A total of 333 eligible women, 166 CA, 66 AA and 101 KO underwent complete sequencing of BRCA1/2 genes. Family history (FH) was classified as negative, moderate or strong. BRCA1/2 status was classified as wild type (WT), variant of uncertain significance (VUS) or deleterious (DEL).</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> DEL across these three racially diverse populations of YBC were nearly identical: CA 17%, AA 14% and KO 14%. The type of DEL differed with AA having more frequent mutations in BRCA2, compared with CA and KO. VUS were predominantly in BRCA2 and AA had markedly higher frequency of VUS (38%) compared with CA (10%) and KO (12%). At 10-year follow-up from the time of initial diagnosis of breast cancer, the risk of secondary malignancies was similar among WT (14%) and VUS (16%), but markedly higher among DEL (39%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In these YBC, the frequency of DEL in BRCA1/2 is remarkably similar among the racially diverse groups at 14%&ndash;17%. VUS is more common in AA, but aligns closely with WT in risk of second cancers, age of onset and FH.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haffty, B. G., Choi, D. H., Goyal, S., Silber, A., Ranieri, K., Matloff, E., Lee, M. H., Nissenblatt, M., Toppmeyer, D., Moran, M. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Breast cancer in young women (YBC): prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations and risk of secondary malignancies across diverse racial groups]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp032v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stratified phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp032v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of single-agent cetuximab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) after failure of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> In this two-arm, open-label, phase II study patients were stratified according to their <I>epidermal growth factor receptor</I> (<I>EGFR</I>) gene amplification status. Cetuximab was administered intravenously at a dose of 400 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on week 1 followed by weekly dose of 250 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. The primary end point for this study was the response rate in both study arms separately.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Fifty-five eligible patients (28 with and 27 without EGFR amplification) tolerated cetuximab well. Three patients (5.5%) had a partial response and 16 patients (29.6%) had stable disease. The median time to progression was 1.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6&ndash;2.2 months]. Whereas the progression-free survival (PFS) was &lt;6 months in the majority (<I>n</I> = 50/55) of patients, five patients (9.2%) had a PFS on cetuximab of &gt;9 months. Median overall survival was 5.0 months (95% CI 4.2&ndash;5.9 months). No significant correlation was found between response, survival and <I>EGFR</I> amplification.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Cetuximab was well tolerated but had limited activity in this patient population with progressive HGG. A minority of patients may derive a more durable benefit but were not prospectively identified by <I>EGFR</I> gene copy number.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neyns, B., Sadones, J., Joosens, E., Bouttens, F., Verbeke, L., Baurain, J.-F., D'Hondt, L., Strauven, T., Chaskis, C., In't Veld, P., Michotte, A., De Greve, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stratified phase II trial of cetuximab in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp029v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Regional chemotherapy for unresectable primary liver cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial and assessment of DCE-MRI as a biomarker of survival]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp029v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This study reports the results of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with floxuridine (FUDR) and dexamethasone (dex) in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and investigates dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) assessment of tumor vascularity as a biomarker of outcome.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> Thirty-four unresectable patients (26 ICC and eight HCC) were treated with HAI FUDR/dex. Radiologic dynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters related to tumor perfusion were analyzed and correlated with response and survival.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Partial responses were seen in 16 patients (47.1%); time to progression and response duration were 7.4 and 11.9 months, respectively. Median follow-up and median survival were 35 and 29.5 months, respectively; 2-year survival was 67%. DCE-MRI data showed that patients with pretreatment integrated area under the concentration curve of gadolinium contrast over 180 s (AUC 180) &gt;34.2 mM&middot;s had a longer median survival than those with AUC 180 &lt;34 mM&middot;s (35.1 versus 19.1 months, <I>P</I> = 0.002). Decreased volume transfer exchange between the vascular space and extracellular extravascular space (&ndash;<I>K</I><sup>trans</sup>) and the corresponding rate constant (&ndash;<I>k</I><SUB>ep</SUB>) on the first post-treatment scan both predicted survival.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> In patients with unresectable primary liver cancer, HAI therapy can be effective and safe. Pretreatment and early post-treatment changes in tumor perfusion characteristics may predict treatment outcome.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jarnagin, W. R., Schwartz, L. H., Gultekin, D. H., Gonen, M., Haviland, D., Shia, J., D'Angelica, M., Fong, Y., DeMatteo, R., Tse, A., Blumgart, L. H., Kemeny, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-02</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Regional chemotherapy for unresectable primary liver cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial and assessment of DCE-MRI as a biomarker of survival]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp057v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discussion about switch strategy in the adjuvant hormonal therapy of breast cancer: psychological aspects of physician-patient communication]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp057v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> A survey of oncologists was conducted in Italy to evaluate the potential problems of physician&ndash;patient discussion about hormonal switch in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer.</p>
<p><b>Materials and methods:</b> A questionnaire, including both closed and open-ended questions, was administered to 70 oncologists. Fifty-one of them returned completely filled questionnaires.</p>
<p><b>Results:</b> Forty-seven percent of the physicians reported difficulties in proposing the hormonal switch, and 60% stated that they found it difficult to make the therapeutic change acceptable to patients. The oncologist's barriers to propose the switch were related mostly to scientific and economic issues, such as the lack of certain advantages of aromatase inhibitors over tamoxifen (28%), their costs (14%) and their side-effects (34%). On the other hand, according to physicians, the patient's barriers to accept the therapeutic change were mainly due to psychological&ndash;relational factors, in particular the anxiety produced by the change (40%) and the bad patient&ndash;physician communication experienced in the past (26%).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:</b> Patient&ndash;physician communication difficulties about switch strategy in the adjuvant hormonal treatment of breast cancer are, at least in part, related to psychological and relational factors. It is likely that training programs, improving doctor's communication skills, can overcome these problems.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Costantini, A., Picardi, A., Zilli, M., Cairoli, F., Torta, R., Marchetti, P., Baile, W., Iacobelli, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-06-01</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdp057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discussion about switch strategy in the adjuvant hormonal therapy of breast cancer: psychological aspects of physician-patient communication]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>European Society for Medical Oncology</dc:publisher>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>original article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp049v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phase Ib safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of daily and twice daily oral enzastaurin in combination with pemetrexed in advanced/metastatic cancer]]></title>
<link>http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/mdp049v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Background:</b> This phase Ib study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of enzastaurin either 500 mg once daily (QD) or 250 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) in combination with pemetrexed.</p>
<p><b>Patients and methods:</b> 