Skip Navigation



Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on June 9, 2008
Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn378
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/11/1962    most recent
mdn378v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tas, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tas, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The contribution of countries and world regions in productivity of oncological publication

F. Tas*

Institute of Oncology, University of Istanbul, Turkey

* Correspondence to: Dr F. Tas, Onkoloji Enstitusu, Istanbul Universitesi, Capa 34390, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel: +90-212-534 31 31; Fax: +90-212-534 80 78; E-mail: faruktas2002{at}yahoo.com

Background: To evaluate the contribution of different countries and world regions in scientific research in the field of oncological diseases.

Patients and methods: We carried out an analysis of papers published in the meeting abstracts of ASCO and ESMO and their official journals, JCO and Annals of Oncology (Ann Oncol) during the time period 2000–2006 biennially, years 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006. All meeting abstracts published in meeting abstract books and journal articles were included.

Results: North America and Europe with equal ratios were responsible for 95% and 80% of published oncological articles and meeting abstracts, respectively. These ratios showed a great difference on the basis of the journal and place of the meeting: American prefers JCO and ASCO and European favors Ann Oncol and ESMO. The number of countries contributed to the production of abstracts was two times more than that of the article production. Generally, there were relationship between the ratios of the majority of the countries in the production of articles and abstracts. However, several countries including Turkey, Korea, Spain, and Brazil have produced more abstracts; others (United States, The Netherlands, France, UK, and Switzerland) had more article production.

Conclusion: Our study shows that developed world regions achieved a higher rate of research productivity than the other world regions.

abstract, article, oncological productivity, output

Received for publication April 12, 2008. Revision received April 26, 2008. Accepted for publication May 7, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
B. Seruga, P. C. Hertz, L. W. Le, and I. F. Tannock
Global drug development in cancer: a cross-sectional study of clinical trial registries
Ann. Onc., October 8, 2009; (2009) mdp403v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.