Skip Navigation



Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on October 23, 2006

Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl384
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/2/275    most recent
mdl384v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Luijk, I. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Luijk, I. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
Received April 12, 2006
Revised August 12, 2006
Accepted September 11, 2006

original article

Phase II study of bleomycin, vindesine, mitomycin C and cisplatin (BEMP) in recurrent or disseminated squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix

I. F. van Luijk 1, C. Coens 2, M. E. L. van der Burg 3, A. Kobierska 4, M. Namer 5, C. Lhomme 6, P. Zola 7, G. Zanetta 8, and J. B. Vermorken 9 *, For the Gynecological Cancer Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer

1 EORTC Datacenter, Brussels, Belgium; Present address: Medical Center Haaglanden, Lijnbaan 32, 2512 VA Den Haag, The Netherlands
2 EORTC Datacenter, Brussels, Belgium
3 Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
4 Medical University, Gdansk, Poland
5 Centre Antoine Laccasagne, Nice
6 Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
7 Clinica Universita de Torino, Torino
8 Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy
9 Department of Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. B. Vermorken, E-mail: jan.b.vermorken{at}uza.be


   Abstract

Objective: We carried out a phase II trial with BEMP [bleomycin, vindesine (Eldisine®), mitomycin C and cisplatin] in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with the specific aim to assess whether BEMP was of particular interest when certain disease sites were involved.

Patients and methods: Eligible patients received four cycles of E 3 mg/m2, day 1 + 8; P 50 mg/m2, day 1; B 15 mg/day (continuous infusion), day 2-4 and M 8 mg/m2, day 5 (on alternate cycles), every 3 weeks during an induction phase. Thereafter, those without progression continued with MEP every 4 weeks in a maintenance phase. MEP consisted of E 3 mg/m2, day 1 + 8, M 6 mg/m2 (on alternate cycles) and P 50 mg/m2, both on day 1. All drugs were given i.v. Both response evaluation and toxicity grading were assessed according to World Health Organization criteria.

Results: Of the 161 eligible patients, 143 were assessable for survival, 148 for toxicity and 131 for response. Overall response rate was 45% [complete (CR) 14.5%, partial response (PR) 30.5%]. Most responsive disease sites were lung, lymph nodes and skin metastases (>60% response, CR rate >25%). Median duration of response was 7.6 months. Survival was significantly better in patients with only distant metastases: 12.9 months versus 8.6 months in those with other disease sites involved (P = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, patients with a good performance status yielded a better prognosis (P = 0.0017), as did the patients with only metastatic disease compared with those who had pelvic disease also or solely (P = 0.045). There were two toxic deaths and 21% of patients stopped treatment because of excessive toxicity.

Conclusions: Patients with a good performance status and only distant metastases seem optimal candidates to receive the BEMP regimen. This benefit should be balanced against the expected serious toxic effects.

Keywords: BEMP; cervical cancer; chemotherapy; metastatic; recurrent.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Mountzios, M. A. Dimopoulos, A. Bamias, G. Vourli, H. Kalofonos, G. Aravantinos, G. Fountzilas, and C. A. Papadimitriou
Randomized multicenter phase II trial of cisplatin and ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2009; 20(8): 1362 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.