Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on June 26, 2006
Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl105
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 INSERM U151, Institut Louis Bugnard, Toulouse, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Background: There is a need for novel antitumor agents that demonstrate efficacy in currently refractory tumors without adding to the toxicity of therapy. The somatostatin analogs, which have demonstrated antineoplastic activities in experimental tumor models, and good tolerability and safety profiles are attractive candidates.
Materials and Methods: Data from preclinical studies provide evidence for direct and indirect mechanisms by which somatostatin analogs exert antitumor effects.
Results: Direct antitumor activities, mediated through somatostatin receptors (sst1-sst5) expressed in tumor cells, include blockade of autocrine/paracrine growth-promoting hormone and growth factor production, inhibition of growth factor-mediated mitogenic signals and induction of apoptosis. Indirect antitumor effects include inhibition of growth-promoting hormone and growth factor secretion, and antiangiogenic actions. Many human tumors express more than one somatostatin receptor subtype, with sst2 being predominant. Somatostatin analogs such as octreotide and lanreotide, which present a high affinity for sst2, are in current clinical use to alleviate symptoms in patients with endocrine tumors, and radiolabeled somatostatin analogs have been developed for diagnosis and radiotherapy.
Conclusions: While the rationale exists for the use of somatostatin analogs as antitumor agents, studies are ongoing to identify analogs with activity across the range of receptor subtypes to maximize the potential of such treatment.
Received July 20, 2005
Revised March 31, 2006
Accepted April 4, 2006
review
Rationale for the use of somatostatin analogs as antitumor agents
C. Susini 1 *
and
L. Buscail 1
C. Susini, E-mail: Christiane.Susini{at}toulouse.inserm.fr
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Barbieri, A. Pattarozzi, M. Gatti, C. Porcile, A. Bajetto, A. Ferrari, M. D. Culler, and T. Florio Somatostatin Receptors 1, 2, and 5 Cooperate in the Somatostatin Inhibition of C6 Glioma Cell Proliferation in Vitro via a Phosphotyrosine Phosphatase-{eta}-Dependent Inhibition of Extracellularly Regulated Kinase-1/2 Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4736 - 4746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Torrisani, N. Hanoun, H. Laurell, F. Lopez, J.-J. Maoret, A. Souque, C. Susini, P. Cordelier, and L. Buscail Identification of an Upstream Promoter of the Human Somatostatin Receptor, hSSTR2, Which Is Controlled by Epigenetic Modifications Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 3137 - 3147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Halfdanarson, K. G. Rabe, J. Rubin, and G. M. Petersen Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival Ann. Onc., May 30, 2008; (2008) mdn351v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Moreno, A. Akcakanat, M. F Munsell, A. Soni, J. C Yao, and F. Meric-Bernstam Antitumor activity of rapamycin and octreotide as single agents or in combination in neuroendocrine tumors Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2008; 15(1): 257 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Asnacios, F. Courbon, P. Rochaix, E. Bauvin, V. Cances-Lauwers, C. Susini, S. Schulz, A. Boneu, R. Guimbaud, and L. Buscail Indium-111-Pentetreotide Scintigraphy and Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 2 Expression: New Prognostic Factors for Malignant Well-Differentiated Endocrine Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 963 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Nolan, H. A. Schmid, and A. Levy Octreotide and the Novel Multireceptor Ligand Somatostatin Receptor Agonist Pasireotide (SOM230) Block the Adrenalectomy-Induced Increase in Mitotic Activity in Male Rat Anterior Pituitary Endocrinology, June 1, 2007; 148(6): 2821 - 2827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



