Skip Navigation



Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on May 25, 2006

Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl101
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow CME/CE:
Take the course for this article:
Annals of Oncology course: part 4 iss...
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/8/1328    most recent
mdl101v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bleiberg, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grivegnée, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bleiberg, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grivegnée, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
Received October 27, 2005
Revised March 23, 2006
Accepted March 30, 2006

original article

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using sigmoidoscopy followed by colonoscopy: a feasibility and efficacy study on a cancer institute based population

H. Bleiberg 1 *, P. Autier 2, F. Huet 2, A. M. Schrauwen 2, E. Staquet 2, T. Delaunoit 1, A. Hendlisz 1, C. Wyns 1, J. M. Panzer 1, B. Caucheteur 1, P. Eisendrath 1, and A. Grivegnée 2

1 Gastroenterology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
2 Epidemiology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
H. Bleiberg, E-mail: harry.bleiberg{at}bordet.be


   Abstract

Background: Advanced distal neoplasia found at sigmoidoscopy could be the marker for more proximal lesions.

Patients and methods: In the setting of a screening clinic, subjects underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy. If no significant lesion was found, sigmoidoscopy was planned after 5 years. If an advanced neoplasia was found, colonoscopy was performed just after the first sigmoidoscopy and at 1, 3 and 5 years. If a non-advanced neoplasia was found, sigmoidoscopy was performed at 1, 3 and 5 years and followed by colonoscopy if advanced lesion was found.

Results: At first screening 1704/1912 (88%) subjects had a negative sigmoidoscopy, 104 (5.4%) had an advanced neoplasia, 96 (6%) had a non-advanced neoplasia and eight (0.4%) had invasive colorectal cancer (CRC). At follow-up examinations at 1, 3 and 5 years, among 170 subjects with advanced and non-advanced neoplasia, one developed invasive CRC and 47 (31.6%), advanced neoplasia. At 5 years, among 718 first negative sigmoidoscopies, 572 (80%) were confirmed negative and 97 (14%) had advanced neoplasia. Colorectal cancer status at 5 years could be checked for interval cancers in 97% of subjects and no CRC was diagnosed in subjects who did not attend sigmoidoscopy at 5 years. Comparison of the incidence of invasive CRC to the data of registries of the Netherlands and Luxembourg suggested that the incidence of CRC was decreased by 36%-46%. Seven of the nine CRCs were Duke's A and the two others were Duke's B and C.

Conclusions: Screening with sigmoidoscopy followed by colonoscopy in case of positive sigmoidoscopy leads to substantial decreases in the incidence of CRC. Most CRCs found are at an early, curable stage of their development.

Keywords: screening; colorectal cancer; sigmoidoscopy.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
F Ruthotto, F Papendorf, G Wegener, G Unger, B Dlugosch, F Korangy, M. Manns, and T. Greten
Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1518 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.