Skip Navigation



Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on May 2, 2006

Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl084
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/7/1128    most recent
mdl084v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soo, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goh, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soo, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Goh, B. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
Received January 12, 2006
Revised March 15, 2006
Accepted March 17, 2006

original article

A multicentre randomised phase II study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer

R. A. Soo 1, L. Z. Wang 2, L. S. Tham 1, W. P. Yong 1, M. Boyer 3, H. L. Lim 1, H. S. Lee 4, M. Millward 3, S. Liang 5, P. Beale 3, S. C. Lee 1, and B. C. Goh 2 *

1 Cancer Therapeutics Research Group, Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore
2 Cancer Therapeutics Research Group, Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore; Department of Pharmacology, National University Hospital, Singapore
3 Cancer Therapeutics Research Group, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
4 Department of Pharmacology, National University Hospital, Singapore
5 Clinical Trials & Epidemiology Research Unit, Ministry of Health, Singapore

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
B. C. Goh, E-mail: gohbc{at}nuh.com.sg


   Abstract

Background: Intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) levels can be optimised by administering gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate infusion.

Patients and methods: Patients with chemonaive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised to receive gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate gemcitabine 750 mg/m2 over 75 min (arm A) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 over 30 min (arm B) on days 1 and 8 every three week cycle. Carboplatin at AUC of 5 was administered in both treatment arms on day 1 of each cycle. End points were activity, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of plasma and intracellular gemcitabine.

Results: 76 patients were randomised. Response rate was 34% in arm A and 42% in arm B. Toxicity and quality of life scores were similar for both treatment arms. Mean plasma Cmaxgemcitabine and mean dFdCTP AUC in arm A was 20.8 µM ± 17.2 µM and 35 079 ± 18 216 µM*min respectively and in arm B, 41.2 ± 13.9 µM and 32 249 ± 11 267 µM*min respectively. dFdCTP saturation was reached in Arm B but not in Arm A.

Conclusion: The saturability of dFdCTP accumulation in Arm A suggests optimal delivery of gemcitabine is achieved using fixed rate infusion compared to 30-min infusion. Fixed dose rate gemcitabine is active and feasible, supporting the concept of fixed dosing rate of gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC. However, this entails a longer infusion time with associated higher costs involved.

Keywords: gemcitabine; non-small cell lung cancer; pharmacokinetics.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L.-S. Tham, L. Wang, R. A. Soo, S.-C. Lee, H.-S. Lee, W.-P. Yong, B.-C. Goh, and N. H.G. Holford
A Pharmacodynamic Model for the Time Course of Tumor Shrinkage by Gemcitabine + Carboplatin in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4213 - 4218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. A. Veltkamp, J. H. Beijnen, and J. H.M. Schellens
Prolonged Versus Standard Gemcitabine Infusion: Translation of Molecular Pharmacology to New Treatment Strategy
Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 261 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Gandhi
Questions About Gemcitabine Dose Rate: Answered or Unanswered?
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2007; 25(36): 5691 - 5694.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Grimison, P. Galettis, S. Manners, M. Jelinek, E. Metharom, P. L. de Souza, W. Liauw, and M. J. Links
Randomized Crossover Study Evaluating the Effect of Gemcitabine Infusion Dose Rate: Evidence of Auto-Induction of Gemcitabine Accumulation
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2007; 25(36): 5704 - 5709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.