Skip Navigation



Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on April 6, 2006

Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl057
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/6/990    most recent
mdl057v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Theodore, C.
Right arrow Articles by Laplanche, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Theodore, C.
Right arrow Articles by Laplanche, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
Received August 30, 2005
Revised January 10, 2006
Accepted February 20, 2006

original article

A phase II monocentric study of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine (GEMOX) in patients with advanced/metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract

C. Theodore 1 *, F. Bidault 1, N. Bouvet-Forteau 1, M. Abdelatif 1, K. Fizazi 1, M. di Palma 1, P. Wibault 1, R. de Crevoisier 1, and A. Laplanche 1

1 Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
C. Theodore, E-mail: theodore{at}igr.fr


   Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the activity and the safety of the gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combination as first-line treatment in advanced/metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract.

Materials and methods: Patients with metastatic or unresectable TCC, PS ≤2, creatinine ≤1.5 upper limit of normal range (UNL) and measurable disease according to RECIST criteria were treated with a combination of gemcitabine (1500 mg/m2) followed by oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) on day 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

Results: A total of 123 cycles were administered to 30 patients (median 4, range 1-8). Three complete responses (CR) and 11 partial responses (PR) were observed. Overall response rate (ORR) was 47% (95% CI 28% to 66%). Median overall survival (OS) was 15 months (95% CI 8-31). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia were reported in three and one patient, respectively; grade 3 anaemia in three patients; grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in two and one patient, respectively; grade 1, 2 and 3 peripheral neuropathy in 14, 11 and two patients, respectively; grade 2 and 3 fatigue in 13 and seven patients respectively.

Conclusions: The GEMOX combination is active in advanced/metastatic TCC with minimal toxicity and needs to be evaluated in a selected population of unfit patients and compared with other non-cisplatin-containing regimens.

Keywords: urothelial tract carcinoma; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; oxaliplatin.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyHome page
G. Sonpavde, A. A. Elfiky, and J. E. Rosenberg
Review: Novel agents for advanced bladder cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, July 1, 2009; 1(1): 37 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
C. Sweeney, D. F. Bajorin, and C. N. Sternberg
Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: What Have We Learned and What's New on the Horizon?
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 200 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J Carles, E Esteban, M Climent, A Font, J. Gonzalez-Larriba, A Berrocal, I Garcia-Ribas, X Marfa, X Fabregat, J Albanell, et al.
Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin combination: a multicenter phase II trial in unfit patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 1359 - 1362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.