Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on January 30, 2006
Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Medicina Interna, Oncologia e Gastroenterologia, Università di Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background: It is still unclear the actual contribute of dose intensity (DI), dose size (DS) and dose density (DD) in the conventional chemotherapy of large, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Methods: A prospective, randomized trial compared the cyclic schedule of ProMECE-CytaBOM chemotherapy (cyc-PC, 6 cycles) with a modified version of it, which administered the same drugs sequentially (seq-PC), with the same planned cumulative DI and an 83% DD, within the same time frame (113 days), but with three times higher DS of all the drugs except vincristine. Results: Fifty-six patients received cyc-PC and 52 seq-PC. The actual mean cumulative DI was 0.79 ± 0.15 with cyc-PC, 0.78 ± 0.17 with seq-PC. Response was complete in 59% and 52%, partial in 20% and 21%, null in 5% and 6%, respectively. There were four toxic deaths (two per arm). Relapses occurred in 36% and 37%, respectively. Toxicity was similar in both arms. Overall, failure-free, progression-free and disease-free survival (median follow-up: 54 months) were statistically indifferent. Conclusions: The very similar DI actually delivered in both arm seems to be the main common determinant of the indifferent results recorded. Increasing DS - at least within the limits clinically attainable without stem cell rescue - does not improve results.
Received November 4, 2005
Revised December 10, 2005
Accepted December 21, 2005
original article
The role of dose size in a chemotherapy regimen (ProMECE-CytaBOM) for the first-line treatment of large B-cell lymphomas: A randomized trial by the Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi (GISL)
P. G. Gobbi 1 *,
C. Broglia 1,
F. Valentino 1,
C. Mammi 2,
M. Lombardo 3,
F. Merli 4,
S. Luminari 2,
G. Polimeno 5,
A. Riezzo 6,
P. Lambelet 7,
A. Rovati 8,
G. R. Corazza 1,
and
M. Federico 2
2 Sez. di Oncologia, Università di Modena e Reggio E., Policlinico di Modena
3 Dip. di Oncologia, Ospedale S. Spirito, Pescara
4 Serv. di Ematologia, Arcispedale ‘S. Maria Nuova’, Reggio Emilia
5 Serv. di Ematologia, Div. di Medicina, Ospedale ‘Miulli’, Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA)
6 Div. di Ematologia, Ospedale ‘S. Nicola Pellegrino’, Trani (BA)
7 Div. di Medicina, Ospedale di Viareggio (PI)
8 Sez. di Ematologia, Medina I, Ospedale Maggiore, Lodi, Italy
P. G. Gobbi, E-mail: gobbipg{at}smatteo.pv.it
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bari, L. Marcheselli, S. Sacchi, R. Marcheselli, S. Pozzi, P. Ferri, E. Balleari, P. Musto, S. Neri, M. A. Aloe Spiriti, et al. Prognostic models for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era: a never-ending story Ann. Onc., November 17, 2009; (2009) mdp531v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sacchi, L. Marcheselli, A. Bari, R. Marcheselli, S. Pozzi, P. G. Gobbi, F. Angrilli, M. Brugiatelli, P. Musto, and M. Federico Second malignancies after treatment of diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a GISL cohort study Haematologica, September 1, 2008; 93(9): 1335 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

