Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on September 2, 2005
Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi394
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Medical Technology Assessment, Arnhem, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Background: In this study, the potential impact of a new national guideline for adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer (introduced in The Netherlands in 1998) was assessed, as well as the modifications of this guideline, issued in 2001. Both the change in total number of patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the changed clinical management of these patients were analysed. Patients and methods: Percentages of patients who would be eligible for adjuvant therapy in 1994, 1998 and 2001 were estimated, based on clinical data from 127 patients, who were operated on in 1994. Ten-year overall survival rates were used as a measure of effectiveness, based on the two most recent EBCTCG meta-analyses. Actual resource costs were calculated. With a decision analytic model, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (1998 versus 1994, and 2001 versus 1998) were calculated. Results: The introduction of the 1998 guideline resulted in a relative increase of 80% in the total number of patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, compared with 1994 (from 40% to 72% of all patients with primary breast cancer). With an estimated absolute increase of 10-year overall survival of 2%, the 1998 guideline was found to have an expected incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about \euro4837 per life-year gained. Conclusions: Introduction of the new guideline considerably affected the number of patients eligible for adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. The associated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is well within the range of values that are generally considered acceptable.
Received October 31, 2004
Revised May 3, 2005
Accepted July 15, 2005
Original article
Cost-effectiveness of new guidelines for adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with primary breast cancer
2 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Arnhem, The Netherlands
3 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Pathology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
4 Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
5 Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Department of Pathology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
6 Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
7 Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Surgery, Arnhem, The Netherlands
8 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
M. J. Bolster, E-mail: M.Bolster{at}CHIR.umcn.nl
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. S. Mandelblatt, J. Cullen, W. F. Lawrence, A. L. Stanton, B. Yi, L. Kwan, and P. A. Ganz Economic Evaluation Alongside a Clinical Trial of Psycho-Educational Interventions to Improve Adjustment to Survivorship Among Patients With Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1684 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Hillner and T. J. Smith Do the Large Benefits Justify the Large Costs of Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trastuzumab? J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 611 - 613. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
