Skip Navigation



Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on September 2, 2005

Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi394
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/12/1874    most recent
mdi394v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kievit, W.
Right arrow Articles by Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kievit, W.
Right arrow Articles by Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology
Received October 31, 2004
Revised May 3, 2005
Accepted July 15, 2005

Original article

Cost-effectiveness of new guidelines for adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with primary breast cancer

W. Kievit 1, M. J. Bolster 2*, G. J. van der Wilt 1, P. Bult 3, F. B. J. M. Thunnissen 4, J. Meijer 5, L. J. A. Strobbe 6, J. H. G. Klinkenbijl 7, T. Wobbes 2, E. M. M. Adang 1, L. V. A. M. Beex 8, and V. C. G. Tjan-Heijnen 8

1 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Medical Technology Assessment, Arnhem, The Netherlands
2 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Arnhem, The Netherlands
3 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Pathology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
4 Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
5 Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Department of Pathology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
6 Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
7 Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen, Department of Surgery, Arnhem, The Netherlands
8 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Arnhem, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. J. Bolster, E-mail: M.Bolster{at}CHIR.umcn.nl


   Abstract

Background: In this study, the potential impact of a new national guideline for adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer (introduced in The Netherlands in 1998) was assessed, as well as the modifications of this guideline, issued in 2001. Both the change in total number of patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, as well as the cost-effectiveness of the changed clinical management of these patients were analysed.

Patients and methods: Percentages of patients who would be eligible for adjuvant therapy in 1994, 1998 and 2001 were estimated, based on clinical data from 127 patients, who were operated on in 1994. Ten-year overall survival rates were used as a measure of effectiveness, based on the two most recent EBCTCG meta-analyses. Actual resource costs were calculated. With a decision analytic model, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (1998 versus 1994, and 2001 versus 1998) were calculated.

Results: The introduction of the 1998 guideline resulted in a relative increase of 80% in the total number of patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, compared with 1994 (from 40% to 72% of all patients with primary breast cancer). With an estimated absolute increase of 10-year overall survival of 2%, the 1998 guideline was found to have an expected incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of about \euro4837 per life-year gained.

Conclusions: Introduction of the new guideline considerably affected the number of patients eligible for adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. The associated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is well within the range of values that are generally considered acceptable.

Keywords: adjuvant therapy; breast cancer; cost-effectiveness; guidelines.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. S. Mandelblatt, J. Cullen, W. F. Lawrence, A. L. Stanton, B. Yi, L. Kwan, and P. A. Ganz
Economic Evaluation Alongside a Clinical Trial of Psycho-Educational Interventions to Improve Adjustment to Survivorship Among Patients With Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 26(10): 1684 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. E. Hillner and T. J. Smith
Do the Large Benefits Justify the Large Costs of Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trastuzumab?
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 611 - 613.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.