Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (57)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brufman, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brufman, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 8:155-162, 1997
© 1997 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancer*

G. Brufman1, E. Colajori2,, N. Ghilezan3, M. Lassus2,4, M. Martoni5, N. Perevodchikova6, C. Tosello7, D. Viaro2, C. Zielinski8 and the Epirubicin High Dose (HEPI 010) Study Group

1Hadassah Medical Centre Ein Karem Jerusalem, Israel
2Pharmacia and Upjohn S.p.A. Milan, Italy
3Insitutal Oncologic Cluj, Rumania
4 Current address. Ciba-Geigy Basel, Switzerland
5Ospedale St Orsola-Malpighi Bologna, Italy
6Scientific Centre of Oncology Academy of Medical Science Moscow, Russia
7Praca Amadeu Amaral Sao Paulo, Brasil
8University of Wien Wien, Austria

Correspondence to: E. Colajori, MD Pharmacia & Upjohn S.p.A. Via Robert Koch 1.2 20152 Milan Italy

PURPOSE:: A phase III study was performed in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to evaluate the effect on response rate and survival of a doubling of the epirubicin dose intensity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Four hundred fifty-six patients were randomised to receive either epirubicin 100 mg/m2 or 50 mg/m2 in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (FEC 100 vs. FEC 50) i.v., every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles (eight in case of CR).

RESULTS:: Of 456 patients, 390 were evaluable for efficacy. Objective response (CR + PR) was seen in 57% (FEC 100) vs. 41% (FEC 50) of the evaluable patients (P = 0.003). The CR rate was higher in the FEC 100 arm (12% vs. 7%, P = 0.07). FEC 100 produced significantly higher response rates in patients with visceral localisation (50% vs. 34%, P = 0.011) and in patients with more than two metastatic organ sites (64% vs. 37%, P = 0.001). Median time to progression (7.6 vs. 7 months) and overall survival (18 months vs. 17 months) were similar. Myelosuppression was the principal toxic effect, with grade IV neutropenia observed in 57% of the patients treated with FEC 100 vs. 9% of those on FEC 50. Grade IV infection or febrile neutropenia were observed in 8% (FEC 100) vs. 0.4% (FEC 50), but the incidence of septic death was the same in the two arms (two patients each). Cardiac toxicity was similar in the two treatment groups, with 5% vs. 3% of the patients taken off study due to cardiac events, primarily due to a decline in LVEF. Only three patients (two in FEC 100) experienced congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSION:: This trial shows that FEC with epirubicin at 100 mg/m2 can be administered for repeated cycles without bone marrow support with increased, though acceptable, toxicity and with a significant increase of antitumor effect (especially in visceral and/or high-burden disease), but no increased survival.

dose intensification, epirubicin, metastatic breast cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Mauri, N. P. Polyzos, G. Salanti, N. Pavlidis, and J. P. A. Ioannidis
Multiple-Treatments Meta-analysis of Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapies in Advanced Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 17, 2008; 100(24): 1780 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Bruzzi, L. Del Mastro, M. P. Sormani, L. Bastholt, M. Danova, C. Focan, G. Fountzilas, J. Paul, R. Rosso, and M. Venturini
Objective Response to Chemotherapy As a Potential Surrogate End Point of Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 23(22): 5117 - 5125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Ejlertsen, H. T. Mouridsen, S. T. Langkjer, J. Andersen, J. Sjostrom, and M. Kjaer
Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2313 - 2320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E. Baldini, G. Gardin, P. G. Giannessi, G. Evangelista, M. Roncella, T. Prochilo, P. Collecchi, R. Rosso, R. Lionetto, P. Bruzzi, et al.
Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2003; 14(2): 227 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E. Heidemann, H. Stoeger, R. Souchon, W.-D. Hirschmann, H. Bodenstein, C. Oberhoff, J. T. Fischer, M. Schulze, M. Clemens, R. Andreesen, et al.
Is first-line single-agent mitoxantrone in the treatment of high-risk metastatic breast cancer patients as effective as combination chemotherapy? No difference in survival but higher quality of life were found in a multicenter randomized trial
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2002; 13(11): 1717 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
L. B. Michaud and K. L. Jones
Recent Advances in the Systemic Management of Metastatic Breast Cancer
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 2002; 15(1): 52 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. Del Mastro, M. Venturini, R. Lionetto, F. Carnino, D. Guarneri, L. Gallo, A. Contu, P. Pronzato, L. Vesentini, M. Bergaglio, et al.
Accelerated-Intensified Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil (CEF) Compared With Standard CEF in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group
J. Clin. Oncol., April 15, 2001; 19(8): 2213 - 2221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. P. Ackland, A. Anton, G. P. Breitbach, E. Colajori, J. M. Tursi, C. Delfino, A. Efremidis, A. Ezzat, A. Fittipaldo, K. Kolaric, et al.
Dose-Intensive Epirubicin-Based Chemotherapy Is Superior to an Intensive Intravenous Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Regimen in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Multinational Study
J. Clin. Oncol., February 15, 2001; 19(4): 943 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
Benefit of a High-Dose Epirubicin Regimen in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients With Poor Prognostic Factors: 5-Year Follow-Up Results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 Randomized Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2001; 19(3): 602 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
Epirubicin-Based Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Role of Dose-Intensity and Duration of Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol., September 17, 2000; 18(17): 3115 - 3124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. W. Hu, G. D. Long, K. E. Stockerl-Goldstein, L. J. Johnston, N. J. Chao, R. S. Negrin, and K. G. Blume
A Feasibility Study of Multiple Cycle Therapy with Melphalan, Thiotepa, and Paclitaxel followed by Mitoxantrone, Thiotepa, and Paclitaxel with Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Support for Metastatic Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 1999; 5(11): 3411 - 3418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.