Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on March 10, 2009
Annals of Oncology 2009 20(7):1249-1256; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn774
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/7/1249    most recent
mdn774v2
mdn774v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tan, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Abratt, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tan, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Abratt, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

lung cancer

Global Lung Oncology Branch trial 3 (GLOB3): final results of a randomised multinational phase III study alternating oral and i.v. vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

E. H. Tan1,*, J. Rolski2, T. Grodzki3, C. P. Schneider4, U. Gatzemeier5, P. Zatloukal6, E. Aitini7, G. Carteni8, H. Riska9, Y. H. Tsai10 and R. Abratt11

1 Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
2 Department of Medical Oncology, Centre of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie, Memorial Institute, Crakow
3 Department of Chemotherapy, The Regional Hospital for Lung Diseases, Szczecin-Zdunowo, Poland
4 Central Hospital Bad Berka, Bad Berka
5 Department of Pneumo-Oncology, Hospital Grosshansdorf, Centre of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery, Grosshansdorf, Germany
6 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Postgraduate Medical School and Faculty Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic
7 Oncology and Haematology Operative Unit, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantova
8 Medical Oncology Operative Unit, Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
9 Helsinki University Central Hospital, Meilahden Sairaala Haartmaninkaku, Helsinki, Finland
10 Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkuo, Taoyuan, Taiwan
11 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa

* Correspondence to: Dr E. H. Tan, Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Center, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Singapore. Tel: +8165-64368171; Fax: +8165-62772759; E-mail: tanenghuat123{at}gmail.com

Background: The study compared the efficacy of a first-line treatment with day 1 i.v. vinorelbine (NVBiv) and day 8 oral vinorelbine (NVBo) versus docetaxel (DCT) in a cisplatin-based combination in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, in terms of time to treatment failure (TTF), overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tolerance and quality of life (QoL).

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 with NVBiv 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and NVBo 80 mg/m2 on day 8 every 3 weeks, after a first cycle of NVBiv 25 mg/m2 on day 1 and NVBo 60 mg/m2 on day 8 (arm A) or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and DCT 75 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (arm B), for a maximum of six cycles in both arms.

Results: From 2 February 2004 to 1 January 2006, 390 patients were entered in a randomised study and 381 were treated. The patient characteristics are as follows (arms A/B): metastatic (%) 80.5/84.8; patients with three or more organs involved (%) 45.3/40.8; median age 59.4/62.1 years; male 139/146; squamous (%) 34.2/33.5; adenocarcinoma (%) 41.6/39.3; median TTF (arms A/B in months) [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 3.2 (3.0–4.2), 4.1 (3.4–4.5) (P = 0.19); overall response (arms A/B) (95% CI): 27.4% (21.2% to 34.2%), 27.2% (21.0% to 34.2%); median PFS (arms A/B in months) (95% CI): 4.9 (4.4–5.9), 5.1 (4.3–6.1) (P = 0.99) and median OS (arms A/B in months) (95% CI): 9.9 (8.4–11.6), 9.8 (8.8–11.5) (P = 0.58). The median survival for squamous histology was 8.87/9.82 months and for adenocarcinoma 11.73/11.60 months for arms A and B, respectively. Main haematological toxicity was grade 3–4 neutropenia: 24.4% (arm A) and 28.8% (arm B). QoL as measured by the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale was similar in both arms.

Conclusions: Both arms provided similar efficacy in terms of response, time-related parameters and QoL, with an acceptable tolerance profile. In the current Global Lung Oncology Branch trial 3, NVBo was shown to be effective as a substitute for the i.v. formulation. This can relieve the burden of the i.v. injection on day 8 and can optimise the hospital's resources and improve patient convenience.

Key words: advanced NSCLC, chemotherapy, navelbine oral, platinum based, phase trial study

Received for publication July 2, 2008. Revision received November 13, 2008. Accepted for publication November 18, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Bennouna, H. Senellart, and J.-Y. Douillard
Non-small-cell lung cancer: should histology guide chemotherapy treatment?
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2009; 20(9): 1608 - 1609.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.