Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on January 27, 2009
Annals of Oncology 2009 20(6):1001-1007; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdn746
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/6/1001    most recent
mdn746v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canavese, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dozin, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canavese, G.
Right arrow Articles by Dozin, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

breast cancer

Sentinel node biopsy compared with complete axillary dissection for staging early breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes: results of randomized trial

G. Canavese1, A. Catturich1, C. Vecchio1, D. Tomei1, M. Gipponi2, G. Villa3, F. Carli4, P. Bruzzi5 and B. Dozin5,*

1 Surgical Senology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute
2 Department of General Surgery
3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, A.O.U San Martino
4 Department of Anatomy and Cytohistology Unit
5 Department of Clinical Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy

* Correspondence to: Dr B. Dozin, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Research Institute, Largo Rosanna Bensi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy. Tel: +39-010-5737492; Fax: +39-010-354103; E-mail: beatrice.dozin{at}istge.it

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary dissection in breast cancer patients with negative SLNs. Evidence of a similar efficacy, in terms of survival and regional control, of this strategy as compared with axillary resection is based on few clinical trials. In 1998, we started a randomized study comparing the two strategies, and we present here its results.

Materials and methods: Patients were randomly assigned to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection [axillary lymph node dissection (ALND arm)] or to SLNB plus axillary resection if SLNs contained metastases (SLNB arm). Main end points were overall survival (OS) and axillary recurrence.

Results: One hundred and fifteen patients were assigned to the ALND arm and 110 to the SLNB arm. A positive SLN was found in 27 patients in the ALND arm and in 31 in the SLNB arm. Overall accuracy of SLNB was 93.0%. Sensitivity and negative predictive values were 77.1% and 91.1%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 5.5 years, no axillary recurrence was observed in the SLNB arm. OS and event-free survival were not statistically different between the two arms.

Conclusions: The SLNB procedure does not appear inferior to conventional ALND for the subset of patients here considered.

Key words: axillary lymph node dissection, breast cancer, overall survival, randomized clinical trial, regional node recurrence, sentinel lymph node biopsy

Received for publication August 4, 2008. Revision received November 5, 2008. Accepted for publication November 6, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Gadd
Sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging early breast cancer: minimizing the trade-off by maximizing the accuracy
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2009; 20(6): 973 - 975.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.