Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on September 28, 2007
Annals of Oncology 2008 19(3):420-432; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm442
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/420    most recent
mdm442v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow E-letters: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thürlimann, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M.
Right arrow Articles by Thürlimann, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow 2008 - Review Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

reviews

Guidance on the use of bisphosphonates in solid tumours: recommendations of an international expert panel

M. Aapro1,*, P. A. Abrahamsson2, J. J. Body3, R. E. Coleman4, R. Colomer5, L. Costa6, L. Crinò7, L. Dirix8, M. Gnant9, J. Gralow10, P. Hadji11, G. N. Hortobagyi12, W. Jonat13, A. Lipton14, A. Monnier15, A. H. G. Paterson16, R. Rizzoli17, F. Saad18 and B. Thürlimann19

1 Institut Multidisciplinaire d'Oncologie, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
2 Malmö University Hospital, Department of Urology, Malmö, Sweden
3 CHU Brugmann & Institut J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
4 Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK
5 MD Anderson International, Madrid, Spain
6 Hospital de Santa Maria, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
7 Department of Medical Oncology, Perugia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
8 AZ Sint-Augustinus Cancer Center, Wilrijk, Belgium
9 Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
10 University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
11 Department of Gynaecology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
12 Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
13 Gynaecology and Obstetrics Clinic, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
14 Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA
15 Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier A. Boulloche, Montbéliard Cedex, France
16 Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta, Canada
17 Service of Bone Diseases, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
18 Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
19 Senologie-Zentrum Ostschweiz, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland

* Correspondence to: Dr M. Aapro, IMO Clinique de Genolier, Route du Muids 1, 1272 Genolier, Switzerland. Tel: +41-22-366-91-34; Fax: +41-22-366-91-31; E-mail: maapro{at}genolier.net

Bisphosphonates (BP) prevent, reduce, and delay cancer-related skeletal complications in patients, and have substantially decreased the prevalence of such events since their introduction. Today, a broad range of BP with differences in potency, efficacy, dosing, and administration as well as approved indications is available. In addition, results of clinical trials investigating the efficacy of BP in cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) have been recently published. The purpose of this paper is to review the current evidence on the use of BP in solid tumours and provide clinical recommendations. An interdisciplinary expert panel of clinical oncologists and of specialists in metabolic bone diseases assessed the widespread evidence and information on the efficacy of BP in the metastatic and nonmetastatic setting, as well as ongoing research on the adjuvant use of BP. Based on available evidence, the panel recommends amino-bisphosphonates for patients with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer and zoledronic acid for patients with other solid tumours as primary disease. Dosing of BP should follow approved indications with adjustments if necessary. While i.v. administration is most often preferable, oral administration (clodronate, IBA) may be considered for breast cancer patients who cannot or do not need to attend regular hospital care. Early-stage cancer patients at risk of developing CTIBL should be considered for preventative BP treatment. The strongest evidence in this setting is now available for ZOL. Overall, BP are well-tolerated, and most common adverse events are influenza-like syndrome, arthralgia, and when used orally, gastrointestinal symptoms. The dose of BP may need to be adapted to renal function and initial creatinine clearance calculation is mandatory according to the panel for use of any BP. Subsequent monitoring is recommended for ZOL and PAM, as described by the regulatory authority guidelines. Patients scheduled to receive BP (mainly every 3–4 weeks i.v.) should have a dental examination and be advised on appropriate measures for reducing the risk of jaw osteonecrosis. BP are well established as supportive therapy to reduce the frequency and severity of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from different cancers.

Key words: bisphosphonates, bone, cancer, CTIBL, metastases, SRE

Received for publication August 6, 2007. Accepted for publication August 9, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Medical OncologyHome page
M. Gnant, P. Blaha, P. Dubsky, R. Exner, F. Fitzal, E. Sporn, P. Panhofer, A. Dal Borgo, S. Bigenzahn, G. Steger, et al.
Review: Adjuvant bisphosphonates in endocrine-responsive breast cancer: what is their place in therapy?
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, November 1, 2009; 1(3): 123 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Beslija, J. Bonneterre, H. J. Burstein, V. Cocquyt, M. Gnant, V. Heinemann, J. Jassem, W. J. Kostler, M. Krainer, S. Menard, et al.
Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1771 - 1785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Pozzi, S. Vallet, S. Mukherjee, D. Cirstea, N. Vaghela, L. Santo, E. Rosen, H. Ikeda, Y. Okawa, T. Kiziltepe, et al.
High-Dose Zoledronic Acid Impacts Bone Remodeling with Effects on Osteoblastic Lineage and Bone Mechanical Properties
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 15(18): 5829 - 5839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. L. Bedard, J.-J. Body, and M. J. Piccart-Gebhart
Sowing the Soil for Cure? Results of the ABCSG-12 Trial Open a New Chapter in the Evolving Adjuvant Bisphosphonate Story in Early Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2009; 27(25): 4043 - 4046.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
E. Terpos, O. Sezer, P. I. Croucher, R. Garcia-Sanz, M. Boccadoro, J. San Miguel, J. Ashcroft, J. Blade, M. Cavo, M. Delforge, et al.
The use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: recommendations of an expert panel on behalf of the European Myeloma Network
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2009; 20(8): 1303 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
V. Guarneri and P. Conte
Metastatic Breast Cancer: Therapeutic Options According to Molecular Subtypes and Prior Adjuvant Therapy
Oncologist, July 1, 2009; 14(7): 645 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. H. Lee, E. L. Rosen, and D. A. Mankoff
The Role of Radiotracer Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Breast Cancer: Part 2--Response to Therapy, Other Indications, and Future Directions
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(5): 738 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
K. Okamoto, J. Tsurutani, M. Terashima, I. Okamoto, and K. Nakagawa
Zoledronic acid-induced regression of multiple metastases at nonskeletal sites
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 796 - 797.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. I. Ripamonti, M. Maniezzo, T. Campa, E. Fagnoni, C. Brunelli, G. Saibene, C. Bareggi, L. Ascani, and E. Cislaghi
Decreased occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw after implementation of dental preventive measures in solid tumour patients with bone metastases treated with bisphosphonates. The experience of the National Cancer Institute of Milan
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 137 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. J. Gradishar, J. R. Bellon, M. A. Gadd, H. A. D'Alessandro, and K. Braaten
Case 30-2008 -- A 47-Year-Old Woman with a Mass in the Breast and a Solitary Lesion in the Spine
N. Engl. J. Med., September 25, 2008; 359(13): 1382 - 1391.
[Full Text] [PDF]

E-letters:

Read all E-letters

Balance in bisphosphonate guidance
Eugene V McCloskey
Annals of Oncology, 2 Jan 2008 [Full text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.