Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2008 19(2):374-379; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm572
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jimeno, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hidalgo, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jimeno, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hidalgo, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 European Society for Medical Oncology. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

phase I and pharmacokinetics

Phase I study of troxacitabine administered by continuous infusion in subjects with advanced solid malignancies

A. Jimeno, W. A. Messersmith, C. K. Lee, W. W. Ma, D. Laheru, R. C. Donehower, S. D. Baker and M. Hidalgo*

The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

* Correspondence to: Dr M. Hidalgo, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans Street, Room 1M89, Baltimore, 21231 MD, USA. Tel: +1-410-502-3543; Fax: +1-410-614-9006; E-mail: mhidalg1{at}jhmi.edu

Background: Troxacitabine is a novel L-nucleoside analogue. Preclinical studies showed improved activity with infusions of at least 3 days compared with bolus regimens, especially at concentrations >20 ng/ml. This phase I study tested the feasibility of achieving a troxacitabine steady-state concentration of 20 ng/ml for at least 72 h in patients with solid tumors.

Patients and methods: Patients with solid tumors received troxacitabine as a progressively longer infusion on days 1–4 of a 28-day cycle. The initial length of infusion and infusion rate were 48 h and 3 mg/m2/day.

Results: Twenty-one patients were treated at infusion lengths that increased from 48 to 72 h and then 96 h. The infusion rate was decreased from 3 to 1.88 mg/m2/day due to toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of grade 4 neutropenia (three) and grade 3 constipation (one). The maximum tolerated dose of continuous infusion troxacitabine in patients with solid tumors is 7.5 mg/m2 administered over 96 h. This dose level resulted in steady-state drug concentration of at least 20 ng/ml for 72 h.

Conclusions: Administration of troxacitabine by continuous infusion achieved the prospectively defined target plasma concentration. Pharmacokinetics (PK) modeling coupled with real-time PK assessment was an efficient approach to conduct hypothesis-driven phase I trials.

Key words: continuous infusion, PK modeling, troxacitabine

Received for publication September 12, 2007. Revision received October 20, 2007. Revision received November 26, 2007. Accepted for publication November 27, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.