Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2007 18(8):1388-1394; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm180
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirohi, B
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirohi, B
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, G
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 European Society for Medical Oncology

hematologic malignancies

An open, randomized, controlled, phase II, single centre, two-period cross-over study to compare the quality of life and toxicity experienced on PEG interferon with interferon-{alpha}2b in patients with multiple myeloma maintained on a steady dose of interferon-{alpha}2b

B Sirohi, R Powles*, D Lawrence, J Treleaven, S Kulkarni, A Leary, C Rudin, C Horton and G Morgan

Leukaemia and Myeloma Units, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Surrey SM2 5PT and Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, UK

* Correspondence to: Prof. R. Powles, Parkside Cancer Centre, 49 Parkside, Wimbledon SW19 5NB, UK. Tel: +44-20-8944-7979; Fax: +44-20-8605-9103; E-mail: myeloma{at}clara.co.uk

Purpose: To compare the effects of pegylated interferon-{alpha}2b (P-IFN) and interferon-{alpha}2b (IFN) on quality of life (QoL) and toxicity in patients with multiple myeloma maintained on a steady dose of IFN.

Patients and methods: Consenting, eligible myeloma patients on IFN maintenance therapy for at least 6 weeks were randomly (1:1) allocated to receive P-IFN for 3 months followed by IFN for 3 months, or to continue with IFN for 3 months followed by P-IFN for 3 months (cross-over design). Patients were assessed for toxicity and QoL. Dose of P-IFN was equivalent to IFN.

Results: The study enrolled 60 patients. At enrolment, 35 patients were in complete remission, 20 in partial remission and 5 were minimal responders. P-IFN was associated with significantly better global QoL score (mean difference 8.4; P = 0.0002). There was a significant improvement in functional scales—physical (P = 0.03), emotional (P = 0.04), social (P = 0.0008) with P-IFN. Fatigue (P = 0.0003), pain (P = 0.02) and appetite loss (P = 0.003) symptom scales were less in patients while on P-IFN. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment arms in QoL as measured by QLQ-MY24.

Conclusion: These data suggest that patients on P-IFN have a better QoL. Dose escalation studies are warranted to investigate potential impact on survival.

Key words: maintenance therapy, myeloma, pegylated interferon, quality of life

Received for publication December 22, 2006. Revision received March 30, 2007. Accepted for publication April 4, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
haematolHome page
A. J. Vangsted, T. W. Klausen, P. Gimsing, N. F. Andersen, N. Abildgaard, H. Gregersen, and U. Vogel
A polymorphism in NFKB1 is associated with improved effect of interferon-{alpha} maintenance treatment of patients with multiple myeloma after high-dose treatment with stem cell support
Haematologica, September 1, 2009; 94(9): 1274 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.