Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on December 12, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2007 18(3):529-534; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl420
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
hematologic malignancies |
Cost-effectiveness of postremission intensive therapy in patients with acute leukemia
1 Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital
2 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University
3 Information Service Center, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital
4 Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital
5 Institute of Physiology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University; Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
* Correspondence to: Dr H.-C. Hsu, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Taipei-Veterans General Hospital, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei, Taiwan 11217, Republic of China. Tel: +886-2-2871-2121 ext. 3865; Fax: +886-2-6610-9119; E-mail: hchsu{at}vghtpe.gov.tw
Background: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of high-dose arabinoside (HiDAC)-based and allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT)-based therapy in patients with acute leukemia.
Patients and methods: We analyzed the outcome, cost and cost-effectiveness of 106 patients treated from January 1994 to January 2002 [94 acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/12 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)]. Forty-two young patients at either intermediate or unknown cytogenetic risk received postremission intensive therapy (24 HiDAC-based/18 alloSCT-based therapy).
Results: After a median follow-up of 50 months, the estimated 7-year overall survival for the HiDAC-based group showed a tendency to be higher than the alloSCT-based group (48% versus 28%, P = 0.1452). The HiDAC-based group spent a significantly lower total cost ($US51 857 versus 75 474, P = 0.004) than the alloSCT-based group. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that the mean cost per year of life saved for the HiDAC-based group is considerably less expensive than the alloSCT-based group ($US11 224 versus 21 564). The reduced total cost for the HiDAC-based group originated from lower cost in room fees, medication, laboratory and procedure, but not in blood transfusion and professional manpower fees.
Conclusion: For the postremission therapy in young AML patients at either intermediate or unknown cytogenetic risk, cost-effectiveness of HiDAC-based therapy compares favorably with that of alloSCT-based therapy, which deserves further clinical trials.
Key words: acute myelogenous leukemia, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, cost-effectiveness, high-dose arabinoside, postremission therapy
Received for publication July 10, 2006. Revision received September 16, 2006. Accepted for publication October 12, 2006.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Ann Oncol:
- in this issue
Ann Oncol 2007 18: 405.[Extract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
U. Creutzig, M. Zimmermann, G. Kaspers, and D. Reinhardt Postremission Management of Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in Children and Adolescents with and without Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in European and U.S. Study Groups ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 609 - 615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
