Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on September 17, 2007
Annals of Oncology 2007 18(11):1882-1886; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm355
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/11/1882    most recent
mdm355v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nourissat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chauvin, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nourissat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Chauvin, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 European Society for Medical Oncology

supportive care

Estimation of the risk for nutritional state degradation in patients with cancer: development of a screening tool based on results from a cross-sectional survey

A. Nourissat1,*, D. Mille1, G. Delaroche1, J. P. Jacquin1, J. M. Vergnon2, P. Fournel1,2, P. Seffert2, J. Porcheron2, P. Michaud1, Y. Merrouche1 and F. Chauvin1

1 Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
2 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Saint Etienne, France

* Correspondence to: Dr A. Nourissat, Département de Santé Publique, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, 108 bis avenue Albert Raimond, 42270 Saint Priest en Jarez, France. Tel: +33-4-77-12-74-46; Fax: +33-4-77-12-74-60; E-mail: alice.nourissat{at}icloire.fr.

Background: In routine practice, the evaluation of the nutritional status of patients with cancer is not always performed although there is frequent modification as disease progresses. The validated screening and evaluation tools currently available are time-consuming and costly. In this study we analysed factors that could be used to identify patients likely to need nutritional surveillance or intervention.

Patients and methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out for 2 weeks in June 2006 on 477 patients with cancer.

Results: 30.2% of the patients had lost more than 10% of their body weight since the start of the illness. After adjustment, the factors significantly associated with weight loss were: depressive state (OR = 3.49; P = 0.002), digestive or ENT tumours (OR = 3.20; P = <0.001), chemotherapy (OR = 2.66; P = 0.011), male gender (OR = 2.30; P = 0.001) and professional status (OR = 2.08; P = 0.02). Using a logistic model, we calculated the risk of weight loss as a function of the presence of the identified predictive factors.

Conclusion: We report a simple screening tool, which will not replace the available evaluation methods but will enable targeting of the patients most likely, after a specific evaluation, to benefit from nutritional intervention. This remains to be validated in further prospective studies.

Key words: cancers, cross-sectional study, nutritional status assessment, risk factors, weight loss

Received for publication March 20, 2007. Revision received June 12, 2007. Accepted for publication June 12, 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.