Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on July 27, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2007 18(1):198-199; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl170
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
letters to the editor |
Reply to Conclusions regarding relative costutility of alternative strategies for use of aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer are premature by Delea et al.
Institute of Medicine Haukeland University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Bergen, Norway
* (E-mail: per.lonning@helse-bergen.no)
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The letter by Delea et al. [1] raises several interesting questions with respect to costutility assessment. In principle, such analyses may be conducted in two different ways: we may calculate utilities based on actual data from the literature, which is the most common practice, or we may do what I did [2], i.e. assume a certain long-term effect and see whether that should provide a reasonable costutility estimate. For reasons to be explained below, I believe the second option is of particular value when assessing