Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on November 15, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2006 17(2):211-216; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/2/211    most recent
mdj043v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freyer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zelek, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freyer, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zelek, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Dealing with metastatic breast cancer in elderly women: results from a French study on a large cohort carried out by the ‘Observatory on Elderly Patients’

G. Freyer1,*, A.-C. Braud2,{dagger}, P. Chaibi3, M. Spielmann4, J.-P. Martin5, G. Vilela6, D. Guerin7 and L. Zelek8

1 Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, service d'oncologie, Pierre Bénite; 2 Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille; 3 Hôpital Charles Foix, Ivry sur Seine; 4 Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; 5 Clinique Saint-Jean, Lyon; 6 Chugai Pharma France, Paris La Défense Cedex; 7 A+A Healthcare Marketing Research, Lyon; 8 Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France

* Correspondence to: Dr G. Freyer, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Service Oncologie, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69495 Pierre Bénite, France. Tel: +33-4-78-86-43-16; Fax: +33-4-78-86-43-19; E-mail: gilles.freyer{at}chu-lyon.fr

Background: Treatment of elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is not clearly defined and seems to vary according to the subjective appreciation of the physician.

Patients and methods: After interviewing 107 French specialists qualified in oncology, data concerning 1009 MBC patients were collected: 500 patients were between 65 and 74 years and 509 were >75 years of age. Differences in diagnosis and treatment strategy were analyzed for both age groups to identify the physician's criteria of choice and the eventual use of the geriatric assessment among those criteria.

Results: At diagnosis, synchronous metastatic disease was more frequent in patients over 75 years old (52% versus 39%; P <0.001). Physicians indicated that treatment was based on age and on a subjective evaluation of the patient's general status. Sixty-eight per cent of younger patients and only 31% of older ones received chemotherapy (P <0.001). In the older group drug doses were lower than those usually recommended in three-quarters of cases. Only 10% of physicians considered that they under-treat patients using the FEC 50 regimen. Over 75 years of age, hormone therapy was offered to most patients, including 8% with hormone-independent tumors. Geriatric covariates were never considered. Geriatricians rarely, if ever, played a role in the therapeutic decision.

Conclusions: Inclusion of elderly patients with MBC in prospective trials is warranted to define standards of care and reduce heterogeneity in the decision-making process.

Key words: breast, decisional criteria, elderly, metastatic, survey


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JCOHome page
D. Crivellari, M. Aapro, R. Leonard, G. von Minckwitz, E. Brain, A. Goldhirsch, A. Veronesi, and H. Muss
Breast Cancer in the Elderly
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1882 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.