Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on June 14, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(9):1449-1457; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi280
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/9/1449    most recent
mdi280v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demicheli, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bonadonna, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demicheli, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bonadonna, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Breast cancer recurrence dynamics following adjuvant CMF is consistent with tumor dormancy and mastectomy-driven acceleration of the metastatic process

R. Demicheli1,*, R. Miceli1, A. Moliterni1, M. Zambetti1, W. J. M. Hrushesky2, M. W. Retsky3, P. Valagussa1 and G. Bonadonna1

1 Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy 2 The University of South Carolina, Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, SC, USA 3 Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

* Correspondence to: Dr R. Demicheli, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Department Medical Oncology (c/o Pediatria), Via Venezian 1, 20137 Milan, Italy. Tel: +39-02-23903027; Fax: +39-02-23903094; Email: demicheli{at}istitutotumori.mi.it

Purpose: The aim of this study was to better understand human breast cancer biology by studying how the timing of metastasis following primary resection is affected by adjuvant CMF (cyclophoshamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy.

Patients and methods: Discrete hazards of recurrence and recurrence risk reductions for treated patients relative to controls were analyzed for all patients enrolled in two separate randomized clinical trials [study 1 (386 women): no further treatment versus 12 cycles of CMF; study 2 (459 women): six versus 12 cycles of CMF] and a historical group (396 women: surgery alone) of axillary node-positive patients undergoing mastectomy.

Results: (i) Nearly all CMF benefit occurs during the first 4 years following resection/chemotherapy. (ii) The CMF recurrence rate reduction is largely restricted to two specific spans. These temporally separate recurrence clusters occur during the first and third year of follow-up, while the second-year recurrences are weakly affected. (iii) Prolonging adjuvant treatment from 6 to 12 months partially alters this recurrence timing, without appreciably affecting the overall recurrence rate. (iv) These effects upon the dynamics of post-resection occurrence are menopausal status-independent.

Conclusions: At least two different therapeutically vulnerable proliferative events, resulting in clinical appearance of two metastasis temporally distinct clusters of post-resection cancer recurrence, apparently occur during the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Metastases that transpire outside of these temporal windows are refractory to adjuvant therapy. The dynamics of both post-treatment recurrence risk and CMF effectiveness are similar for both pre- and postmenopausal women, suggesting that post-resection mechanisms by which chemotherapy prevents metastases are similar, but of different magnitude in pre- and postmenopausal women. These findings are consistent with a metastasis model that includes tumor dormancy in specific micrometastatic phases (single cells and avascular foci) and with the acceleration of the metastatic process by the surgical resection of the primary breast cancer.

Key words: adjuvant chemotherapy, breast cancer, growth model, tumor dormancy, recurrence


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. Demicheli, M. W. Retsky, W. J. M. Hrushesky, M. Baum, and I. D. Gukas
The effects of surgery on tumor growth: a century of investigations
Ann. Onc., June 10, 2008; (2008) mdn386v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A Vincent-Salomon, F C Bidard, and J Y Pierga
Bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer: review of detection methods, prognostic impact and biological issues
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2008; 61(5): 570 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. E. Becker, R. E. Ellsworth, B. Deyarmin, H. L. Patney, R. M. Jordan, J. A. Hooke, C. D. Shriver, and D. L. Ellsworth
The Genomic Heritage of Lymph Node Metastases: Implications for Clinical Management of Patients with Breast Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2008; 15(4): 1056 - 1063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
R. Demicheli, W. J. M. Hrushesky, M. W. Retsky, G. Bonadonna, and P. Valagussa
Letter to the Editor
Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 14(4): 1519 - 1520.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.