Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on June 3, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(8):1268-1275; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi256
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/8/1268    most recent
mdi256v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frasci, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frasci, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

A 2-month cisplatin–epirubicin–paclitaxel (PET) weekly combination as primary systemic therapy for large operable breast cancer: a phase II study

G. Frasci*, G. D'Aiuto, P. Comella, R. Thomas, G. Botti, M. Di Bonito, M. D'Aiuto, G. Romano, M. R. Rubulotta, G. Comella On behalf of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG), Italy

Divisions of Medical Oncology A, Surgical, Oncology, Pathology, Radiology, National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy

* Correspondence to: Dr G. Frasci, Division of Medical Oncology A, National Tumor Institute, via Mariano Semmola 80131, Naples, Italy. Telephone: +39-081-5903225; Fax: +39-81-5903821; Email: giuseppe.frasci{at}libero.it

Purpose: The present study aimed to define the antitumor activity of eight cisplatin–epirubicin–paclitaxel (PET) weekly cycles with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in patients with large operable breast cancer.

Methods: Operable breast cancer (T2–3 N0–1; T >3 cm) patients received eight preoperative weekly cycles of cisplatin 30 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 120 mg/m2, with G-CSF (5 µg/kg, days 3–5) support.

Results: Sixty-three patients (T2/T3=30/33; N0/N+=8/55) were enrolled. Thirty-one clinical complete (49%) and 30 partial (48%) responses were recorded, giving a 97% response rate (95% confidence interval 89% to 100%). Breast-sparing surgery was performed in 32/63 (51%) patients. At pathological assessment, 28 patients (45%) showed absence of invasive residual disease in breast and 34 (55%) had negative axilla. In 20 women (32%) both breast and axilla were found to be disease-free. At a 23-month median follow-up (range 4–63), only eight relapses and two deaths had occurred, with the 4-year projected relapse-free and overall survival being 59% and 95%, respectively. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 24% and 5% of patients, respectively. Emesis, diarrhea and mucositis were the main non-hematological toxicities; however, only nine (14%) patients experienced one or more episodes of severe non-hematological toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy was frequent, but never severe.

Conclusions: A 2-month weekly treatment with PET represents a well tolerated and highly effective approach in large operable breast cancer patients. In spite of the short duration of chemotherapy, one-third of patients achieved a complete eradication of the tumor in both breast and axilla.

Key words: cisplatin, epirubicin, operable breast cancer, paclitaxel, primary chemotherapy, weekly administration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
R. S. Mehta
Dose-Dense and/or Metronomic Schedules of Specific Chemotherapies Consolidate the Chemosensitivity of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Step Toward Reversing Triple-Negative Paradox
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3286 - 3288.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.