Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on April 13, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(6):950-957; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi190
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/6/950    most recent
mdi190v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bafaloukos, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gogas, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bafaloukos, D.
Right arrow Articles by Gogas, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Temozolomide and cisplatin versus temozolomide in patients with advanced melanoma: a randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

D. Bafaloukos1,{dagger}, D. Tsoutsos2, H. Kalofonos3, S. Chalkidou4, P. Panagiotou2, E. Linardou1, E. Briassoulis5, E. Efstathiou6, A. Polyzos7, G. Fountzilas8, C. Christodoulou9, C. Kouroussis10, T. Iconomou2 and H. Gogas7,*

1 Department of Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital, Faliro; 2 Department of Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery, General Hospital of Athens ‘G. Gennimatas,’ Athens; 3 'Rio' Hospital, University of Patras, Patras; 4 Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group, Data Office, Athens; 5 University of Ioannina, Ioannina; 6 ‘Alexandra’ Hospital, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, University of Athens, Athens; 7 First Department of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens; 8 AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki; 9 Henry Dunan Hospital, Athens; 10 General University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece

* Correspondence to: Dr H. Gogas, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, PO Box 14120, 115 10 Athens, Greece. Tel: +30-6944-68-11-59; Fax: +30-210-77-81-517; Email: hgogas{at}hol.gr

{dagger} Dr D. Bafaloukos. Email: dimmp{at}otenet.gr

Purpose:: Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that produces methyl adducts at the 0.6 position of guanine. The methyl adducts are removed by the DNA repair enzyme AGAT. As demonstrated by in vitro studies, cisplatin (CDDP) is able to down-regulate the AGAT activity, suggesting that CDDP could enhance the antitumor activity of TMZ. We designed a randomized phase II study to evaluate and compare the activity and safety profile of the combination versus single-agent TMZ in patients with advanced melanoma.

Patients and methods:: From January 2000 to April 2002, 132 patients were enrolled on the study. Patient and tumor characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. Patients with cerebral metastases were included. Patients received TMZ 200 mg/m2/day orally for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TMZ + CDDP 200 mg/m2 daily on days 1–5 and 75 mg/m2 of CDDP on day 1.

Results:: Tumor responses (complete and partial responses) were seen in 16 patients (26%) in arm A and 19 patients (29%) in arm B. The median time to progression (TTP) was 3.8 months in arm A and 5.8 months in arm B. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.5 months in arm A and 12 months in arm B. The difference between treatment arms regarding objective response rates, TTP and OS were not statistically significant. Toxicity was comparable between the two arms for anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, constipation and arthralgias/myalgias. There was significantly more grade 3 and 4 emesis in the combination arm.

Conclusions:: No clear benefit in terms of response rates, median TTP or OS was shown with the combination of TMZ + CDDP. Additionally, the combination was associated with higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 emesis.

Key words: cisplatin, metastatic melanoma, temozolomide


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
I. Quirt, S. Verma, T. Petrella, K. Bak, and M. Charette
Temozolomide for the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma: A Systematic Review
Oncologist, September 1, 2007; 12(9): 1114 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
H Gogas, A Polyzos, I Stavrinidis, K Frangia, D Tsoutsos, P Panagiotou, C Markopoulos, O Papadopoulos, D Pectasides, M Mantzourani, et al.
Temozolomide in combination with celecoxib in patients with advanced melanoma. A phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1835 - 1841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.