Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on January 27, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(4):648-654; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi111
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/4/648    most recent
mdi111v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fratino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Haupt, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fratino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Haupt, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original articles

Central venous catheter-related complications in children with oncological/hematological diseases: an observational study of 418 devices

G. Fratino1, A. C. Molinari2, S. Parodi3, S. Longo4, P. Saracco4, E. Castagnola5,* and R. Haupt3

1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, 2 Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Thrombosis and Hemostasis Unit, 3 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Scientific Directorate, 5 Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Infectious Diseases Unit, G. Gaslini Children's Hospital, Genoa; 4 Department of Pediatrics, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy

* Correspondence to: Dr E. Castagnola, Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, G. Gaslini Children's Hospital, L. go G. Gaslini, 5-16147, Genova, Italy. Tel: +39-010-5636-301; Fax: +39-010-3777-133; Email: eliocastagnola{at}ospedale-gaslini.ge.it

Background: The use of indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) has become commonplace in the management of children undergoing anticancer treatment. Several types of CVC are available, while information on complications observed in children is scarce. We describe the experience of two tertiary care centers in Italy that prospectively followed up three types of CVC used at both institutions over a 30-month period.

Patients and methods: Between January 2000 and May 2002, double-lumen (DL) or single-lumen (SL) Hickman–Broviac (HB) catheters, and single-lumen pressure-activated safety valve (PASV) catheters were used and prospectively evaluated. Four types of possible complication were defined a priori: mechanical, thrombotic, malfunctioning and infectious.

Results: Four hundred and eighteen CVCs (180 SL-HB, 162 DL-HB and 76 PASV) were inserted in 368 children, for a total of 107 012 catheter days at risk of complication. At least one complication occurred while using 169 of the devices (40%): 46% of the DL-HB, 46% of the PASV and 33% of the SL-HB (P=0.02) catheters. Subjects with hematological malignancies or non-malignant diseases had significantly more complications than those with solid tumors (P <0.0001). Overall, 234 complications were documented: 93 infectious [complication rate per 1000 catheter days at risk (CR)=0.87], 84 malfunctioning (CR=0.78), 48 mechanical (CR=0.45) and nine thrombotic (CR=0.08). SL-HB had statistically fewer infectious complications, while PASV had more mechanical complications. In a multivariate regression model, the most significant risk factors for having a CVC complication were hematological disease [relative risk (RR)=3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8–4.8] and age <6 years at CVC insertion (RR=2.5; 95% CI 1.5–4.1). As for the type of CVC, compared with SL-HB, the DL-HB catheter had a statistically significant two-fold increased risk of any complication (RR=2.1; 95% CI 1.2–3.6), while the PASV catheter had a borderline RR of 1.8 (95% CI 1.0–3.6). Analysis by tumor type showed a higher risk of any kind of complication in patients with solid malignancies who had received a DL-HB catheter as compared with an SL-HB catheter (RR=7.2; 95% CI 2.8–18.7).

Conclusions: CVCs may cause complications in up to 40% of patients, with type of CVC, underlying disease and patient age being the three main factors that affect the incidence of CVC-related complications. SL-HB catheters have the best performance.

Key words: central venous catheters, infections, surgical complications, thrombosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Donnelly, J. Dickerson, and J. M. Racadio
Is Hand Injection of Central Venous Catheters for Contrast-Enhanced CT Safe in Children?
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1530 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M. G Coulthard and R. Skinner
Should paediatric central lines be aspirated before use?
Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 517 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Ferretti, E. Bria, A. Felici, P. Carlini, D. Giannarelli, M. Ciccarese, P. Papaldo, A. Fabi, A. Gelibter, and F. Cognetti
Catheter-associated thrombosis: thromboprophylaxis for cancer patients who carry factor V Leiden?
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2006; 17(3): 528 - 529.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.