Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on August 5, 2005
Annals of Oncology 2005 16(11):1755-1761; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi364
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/11/1755    most recent
mdi364v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Christiaens, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Christiaens, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 European Society for Medical Oncology

Hormone receptors do not predict the HER2/neu status in all age groups of women with an operable breast cancer

H. J. Huang1,2, P. Neven1,3,*, M. Drijkoningen3,4, R. Paridaens3,5, H. Wildiers3,5, E. Van Limbergen3,6, P. Berteloot1, F. Amant1,3, I. Vergote1 and M. R. Christiaens3,7

1 Division of Gynecologic Oncology in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Levven University Hospital, Levven, Belgium; 2 Division of Gynecologic Oncology in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 3 Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, 4 Department of Pathology, 5 Department of Medical Oncology, 6 Department of Radiooncology and 7 Department of Surgery, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium

* Correspondence to: Dr P. Neven, Leuven University Hospital, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium. Tel: +32-16-344634; Fax: +32-16-344629; E-mail: Patrick.Neven{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be

Background: In breast cancer, there is an inverse relationship between HER2/neu overexpression and receptors for estrogen (ER) or progesterone (PR). Some clinical observations such as the age-related association between hormone receptors and tumour grade, which predicts HER2/neu overexpression, suggest an age-related relationship.

Patients and methods: Our study population consisted of 1362 consecutive women receiving primary surgery for non-metastatic invasive breast cancer. We compared the relationship between both hormone receptors and HER2/neu overexpression in different age groups taking other tumour characteristics into account.

Results: In a multivariate model, considering the overall group, a negative ER, a negative PR and a high tumour grade were predictive for HER2/neu overexpression (P <0.001). Considering 246 women aged ≤45 years, the only predictor for HER2/neu overexpression in this age category was a high tumour grade (P = 0.003). Considering the 1116 women aged >45 years, ER (P = 0.001), PR (P = 0.001) and tumour grade (P <0.001) were associated with HER2/neu (P <0.001).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the association between ER, PR and HER2/neu overexpression varies with age. The hormone receptors are not an independent predictor for the HER2/neu status in young women while they are in elder patients.

Key words: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2/neu, breast tumours


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
G. D Francis, M. Dimech, L. Giles, and A. Hopkins
Frequency and reliability of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 in breast carcinoma determined by immunohistochemistry in Australasia: results of the RCPA Quality Assurance Program
J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1277 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.