Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marx, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marx, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harper, P. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow 2004 - Editors Choice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 15:291-295, 2004
© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Evaluation of the Cockroft–Gault, Jelliffe and Wright formulae in estimating renal function in elderly cancer patients

Received 17 March 2003; revised 15 October 2003; accepted 6 November 2003

Background:

More elderly patients are being treated with chemotherapy. Reliable and accurate measures of renal function are needed to obtain predictable, safe and effective exposure to renally excreted drugs. The Jelliffe, Cockroft–Gault and Wright formulae have been used to evaluate renal function, although they have not been validated in elderly oncology patients. We performed a retrospective evaluation of these formulae using the [51Cr]-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid ([51Cr]-EDTA) method of measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as the ‘gold standard’.

Patients and methods:

Inclusion criteria were age ≥70 years and serum creatinine <250 µmol/l, performed within 4 weeks of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockroft–Gault, Jelliffe and Wright formulae. The precision and accuracy of the three formulae were compared with the gold standard.

Results:

Two hundred and twenty-five patients were evaluated: median age, 74 years (range 70–89); males, 108; females, 117; median creatinine, 84 µmol/l (range 44–186). Correlation coefficients of the Jelliffe, Cockroft–Gault and Wright formulae were similar. In the specific GFR ranges of 50–70, 70–90 and 90–120 ml/min, the bias [mean percentage error (MPE)] was +8%, –4% and –13%, respectively. The degree of bias was greater with the Cockroft–Gault and Jelliffe formulae across the same range of GFR with the MPE being –15%, –25%, –32% and –12%, –19% and –23%, respectively. All three formulae have reduced precision and greater bias at the extremes of GFR.

Conclusions:

The Wright formula is the most accurate, precise and least biased formula for the calculation of GFR in elderly patients with a GFR >50 ml/min. These results allow the physician to make a decision regarding the use of the formula based on an expected degree of bias.

G. M. Marx*, G. M. Blake, E. Galani, C. B. Steer, S. E. Harper, K. L. Adamson, D. L. Bailey and P. G. Harper

Guys and St Thomas’ Hospitals, Medical Oncology Department, Guy’s Hospital, London SE19RT, UK

Key words: Cockroft and Gault, elderly, Jelliffe, renal function, Wright


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
V Launay-Vacher, E Chatelut, S. Lichtman, H Wildiers, C Steer, and M Aapro
Renal insufficiency in elderly cancer patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology clinical practice recommendations
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2007; 18(8): 1314 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
S. R. Walsh, T. Tang, U. Sadat, K. Varty, J. R. Boyle, and M. E. Gaunt
Preoperative Glomerular Filtration Rate and Outcome Following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 2007; 41(3): 225 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
S. Kaestner and G. Sewell
Dose-banding of carboplatin: rationale and proposed banding scheme
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 109 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. M. Lichtman, H. Wildiers, E. Chatelut, C. Steer, D. Budman, V. A. Morrison, B. Tranchand, I. Shapira, and M. Aapro
International Society of Geriatric Oncology Chemotherapy Taskforce: Evaluation of Chemotherapy in Older Patients--An Analysis of the Medical Literature
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2007; 25(14): 1832 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Bose, K. Leineweber, T. Konorza, A. Zahn, M. Brocker-Preuss, K. Mann, M. Haude, R. Erbel, and G. Heusch
Release of TNF-{alpha} during stent implantation into saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts and its relation to plaque extrusion and restenosis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2295 - H2299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
C. D Duong and J.-Y. Loh
Laboratory monitoring in oncology
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2006; 12(4): 223 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
O Mir, J Alexandre, S Ropert, and F Goldwasser
Oxaliplatin in inoperable or metastatic bladder cancer
Ann. Onc., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 1853 - 1854.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
T. Wasil and S. M. Lichtman
Clinical Pharmacology Issues Relevant to the Dosing and Toxicity of Chemotherapy Drugs in the Elderly
Oncologist, September 1, 2005; 10(8): 602 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. J. Dooley and S. G. Poole
Limitations of Wright formula estimates of renal function
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 989 - 990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. M. Marx, C. B. Steer, and P. G. Harper
Reply to the letter "Limitations of bedside estimates of renal function", by M. J. Dooley and S. G. Poole (doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi173)
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 990 - 990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. S. Aapro
The Frail Are Not Always Elderly
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 23(10): 2121 - 2122.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Monfardini
Evaluation of renal function in elderly cancer patients
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 183 - 184.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.