© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology
Original Article |
Phase III trial of liposomal doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide compared with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer
1 City Hospital, Nottingham; 2 North Middlesex Hospital, London, UK; 3 Kaunas Medical Academy, Kaunas, Lithuania; 4 Maasland Hospital, Sittard, the Netherlands; 5 Lodz Chemotherapy Clinic, Lodz, Poland; 6 Elan Pharmaceuticals, Princeton, NJ, USA
* Correspondence to: Dr Stephen Chan, Department of Clinical Oncology, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK. Tel: +44-115-969-1169; Fax: +44-163-683-0070; Email: ytschan{at}innotts.co.uk
Objective: To ascertain the efficacy and tolerability of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (MyocetTM) and epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Methods: One hundred and sixty anthracycline-naïve metastatic breast cancer patients were randomised to receive Myocet (M; 75 mg/m2) or epirubicin (E; 75 mg/m2) in combination with cyclophosphamide (C; 600 mg/m2), every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles.
Outcome measures: Response (overall response = complete + partial response rates), time to disease progression, overall survival and cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction).
Results: Overall response rates were 46% and 39% for MC and EC treatment, respectively (P=0.42). MC was superior to EC with respect to median time to treatment failure (5.7 versus 4.4 months; P=0.01) and median time to disease progression (7.7 versus 5.6 months; P=0.02). Median survival times were 18.3 and 16.0 months for MC and EC, respectively (P=0.504). Unsurprisingly, given an equimolar comparison, neutropenia and stomatitis/mucositis were significantly more common in patients who received MC. However, there was less injection site toxicity with MC. Both treatments showed a low incidence of cardiotoxicity.
Conclusion: Myocet appears to be an acceptable alternative to epirubicin as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer because it combines the doseeffect reliability of doxorubicin with the level of safety provided by epirubicin.
Key words: cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, liposomal doxorubicin, metastatic breast cancer, MyocetTM, phase III study
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J. Barrett-Lee, J. M. Dixon, C. Farrell, A. Jones, R. Leonard, N. Murray, C. Palmieri, C. J. Plummer, A. Stanley, and M. W. Verrill Expert opinion on the use of anthracyclines in patients with advanced breast cancer at cardiac risk Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 816 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schmid, J. Krocker, C. Jehn, K. Michniewicz, S. Lehenbauer-Dehm, H. Eggemann, V. Heilmann, S. Kummel, C. O. Schulz, A. Dieing, et al. Primary chemotherapy with gemcitabine as prolonged infusion, non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and docetaxel in patients with early breast cancer: final results of a phase II trial Ann. Onc., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 1624 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
