Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elomaa, I.
Right arrow Articles by Blomqvist, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elomaa, I.
Right arrow Articles by Blomqvist, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 14:699-703, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Vinorelbine, methotrexate and fluorouracil (VMF) as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial

I. Elomaa1,+, H. Joensuu1 and C. Blomqvist2

1 Cancer Center, University Hospital of Helsinki, Finland; 2 Department of Oncology, University of Uppsala, Sweden

Received 27 June 2002; revised 5 December 2002; accepted 19 December 2002

Background:

The purpose of this study was to determine the best tolerated and efficacious dose of vinorelbine given once or twice in 3-week cycles in combination with methotrexate and fluorouracil (VMF).

Patients and methods:

Vinorelbine 40 mg/m2 was given as follows: 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (group 1); 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and 10 mg/m2 on day 8 (group 2); or 40 mg/m2 on day 1 (not exeeding 60 mg/m2) (group 3). The methotrexate dose was 40 mg/m2 on day 1 and the fluorouracil dose 600 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8. Thirty patients with evaluable metastases were randomly allocated to the groups (first step). The second step was to exclude the worst tolerated regimen and then to expand the study to 60 patients. Thus, group 1 had 26 patients, group 2 had 24 patients and group 3 had 10 patients.

Results:

World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 hematological toxicity occurred in 23%, 36% and 50% of patients and grade 4 in 39%, 32% and 50% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; grade 3 infections were observed in 15%, 9% and 10% of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, and grade 4 infections in 5% and 10% of patients in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Nonhematological toxicity included a mild to moderate neurotoxicity manifesting as constipation, abdominal colics and myalgia in the majority of patients. One patient in group 3 had serious convulsions after vinorelbine administration; she also developed neutropenic sepsis; all symptoms were reversible. No patient died from side-effects. The objective response rates were 50%, 55% and 44% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Median time to progression was 7, 10 and 8 months and median survival time was 26, 23 and 16 months in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Conclusion:

VMF regimens where the vinorelbine dose (40 mg/m2) is divided (20 + 20 mg/m2 and 30 + 10 mg/m2) between days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle are equally well tolerated and the efficacy is comparable to other modern first line regimens used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Key words: fluorouracil, metastatic breast cancer, methotrexate, vinorelbine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
B. Isik and K. Altundag
Vinorelbine, methotrexate and fluorouracil (VMF) as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer: significance of the time between initiation of adjuvant therapy and of therapy for metastatic breast cancer
Ann. Onc., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 175 - 175.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.