Annals of Oncology 14:441-448, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology
Original Paper |
Doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cisplatin in endometrial carcinoma: definitive results of a randomised study (55872) by the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group
1 Division dOncologie, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Genève, Switzerland; 2 EORTC Data Center, Brussels, Belgium; 3 Istituto L. Mangiagalli, Milan, Italy; 4 Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; 5 Daniel den Hoed Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 6 Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain; 7 Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; 8 Azienda Ospedaliera San Maria Degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy; 9 Ospedale Generale Provinciale San Camillo de Lellis, Riete, Italy; 10 Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; 11 Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese; 12 Instituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy; 13 Hospital General de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; 14 Instituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano; 15 Universita di Brescia, Brescia; 16 Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Torino, Italy; 17 Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; 18 Ospedale San Martino, Genova, Italy; 19 Innsbruck Universitaetsklinik, Innsbruck, Austria; 20 Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; 21 Ospedale Civile, Voghera, Italy; 22 Erasmus University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 23 Maria Sklodowska-Curie Cancer CenterInstitute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; 24 University Medical Centre, Nijmegen; 25 Antoni van Leeuwenhoekhuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 26 University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; 27 Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma, Parma, Italy; 28 Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK; 29 Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France; 30 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid; 31 Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 32 Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; 33 Guys Hospital, London, UK; 34 Institut dOncologia Corachan, Barcelona, Spain; 35 Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; 36 Atrium Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands; 37 University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium; 38 Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Received 5 August 2002; accepted 11 October 2002
Background:
Combination chemotherapy yields better response rates which do not always lead to a survival advantage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the reported differences in the efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with doxorubicin (DOX) versus combination therapy with cisplatin (CDDP) in endometrial adenocarcinoma lead to significant advantage in favour of the combination.
Patients and methods:
Eligible patients had histologically-proven advanced and/or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and were chemo-naïve. Treatment consisted of either DOX 60 mg/m2 alone or CDDP 50 mg/m2 added to DOX 60 mg/m2, every 4 weeks.
Results:
A total of 177 patients were entered and median follow-up is 7.1 years. The combination DOXCDDP was more toxic than DOX alone. Haematological toxicity consisted mainly of white blood cell toxicity grade 3 and 4 (55% versus 30%). Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 3 and 4 alopecia (72% versus 65%) and nausea/vomiting (36 % versus 12%). The combination DOXCDDP provided a significantly higher response rate than single agent DOX (P <0.001). Thirty-nine patients (43%) responded on DOXCDDP [13 complete responses (CRs) and 26 partial responses (PRs)], versus 15 patients (17%) on DOX alone (8 CR and 7 PR). The median overall survival (OS) was 9 months in the DOXCDDP arm versus 7 months in the DOX alone arm (Wilcoxon P = 0.0654). Regression analysis showed that WHO performance status was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for survival, and stratifying for this factor, treatment effect reaches significance (hazard ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.052.03, P = 0.024).
Conclusions:
In comparison to single agent DOX, the combination of DOXCDDP results in higher but acceptable toxicity. The response rate produced is significantly higher, and a modest survival benefit is achieved with this combination regimen, especially in patients with a good performance status.
Key words: chemotherapy, cisplatin, doxorubicin, endometrial carcinoma, randomised clinical trial, phase III
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Ang, R. N. Shah, M. Everard, C. Keyzor, I. Coombes, A. Jenkins, K. Thomas, R. A'Hern, R. L. Jones, P. Blake, et al. A feasibility study of sequential doublet chemotherapy comprising carboplatin-doxorubicin and carboplatin-paclitaxel for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1787 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. McMeekin Where is the future of endometrial cancer therapy? Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1757 - 1761. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Baekelandt, M. Castiglione, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group Endometrial carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(suppl_4): iv29 - iv31. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Bakkum-Gamez, J. Gonzalez-Bosquet, N. N. Laack, A. Mariani, and S. C. Dowdy Current Issues in the Management of Endometrial Cancer Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2008; 83(1): 97 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kong, I. Simera, M. Collingwood, C. Williams, H. Kitchener, and On behalf of Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis Ann. Onc., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 1595 - 1604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Fleming Systemic Chemotherapy for Uterine Carcinoma: Metastatic and Adjuvant J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2983 - 2990. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Humber, J. Tierney, R. Symonds, M Collingwood, J Kirwan, C Williams, and J. Green Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a systematic review of Cochrane collaboration Ann. Onc., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 409 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Tam, T. Y. Ng, P. C. K. Tsang, C. F. Li, and Y. S. Ngan Potential Use of the Adenosine Triphosphate Cell Viability Assay in Endometrial Cancer Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2006; 13(7): 518 - 522. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Lee, A. Szabo, D. C. Shrieve, O. K. Macdonald, and D. K. Gaffney Frequency and Effect of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Adenocarcinoma JAMA, January 25, 2006; 295(4): 389 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Randall, V. L. Filiaci, H. Muss, N. M. Spirtos, R. S. Mannel, J. Fowler, J. T. Thigpen, and J. A. Benda Randomized Phase III Trial of Whole-Abdominal Irradiation Versus Doxorubicin and Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 36 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Aebi Endometrial cancer: a frequent orphan disease Ann. Onc., August 1, 2004; 15(8): 1149 - 1150. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Fleming, V. L. Filiaci, R. C. Bentley, T. Herzog, J. Sorosky, L. Vaccarello, and H. Gallion Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin + cisplatin versus doxorubicin + 24-h paclitaxel + filgrastim in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study Ann. Onc., August 1, 2004; 15(8): 1173 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Creutzberg, W. L.J. van Putten, C. C. Warlam-Rodenhuis, A. C.M. van den Bergh, K. A.J. De Winter, P. C.M. Koper, M. L.M. Lybeert, A. Slot, L. C.H.W. Lutgens, M. C. Stenfert Kroese, et al. Outcome of High-Risk Stage IC, Grade 3, Compared With Stage I Endometrial Carcinoma Patients: The Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2004; 22(7): 1234 - 1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Gallion, V. L. Brunetto, M. Cibull, S. S. Lentz, G. Reid, J. T. Soper, R. A. Burger, and W. Andersen Randomized Phase III Trial of Standard Timed Doxorubicin Plus Cisplatin Versus Circadian Timed Doxorubicin Plus Cisplatin in Stage III and IV or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3808 - 3813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




