Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vermorken, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vermorken, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 14:441-448, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

Doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cisplatin in endometrial carcinoma: definitive results of a randomised study (55872) by the EORTC Gynaecological Cancer Group

M. S. Aapro1,+, F. H. van Wijk2, G. Bolis3, B. Chevallier4, M. E. L. van der Burg5, A. Poveda6, C. F. de Oliveira7, S. Tumolo8, V. Scotto di Palumbo9, M. Piccart10, M. Franchi11, F. Zanaboni12, A. J. Lacave13, R. Fontanelli14, G. Favalli15, P. Zola16, J. P. Guastalla17, R. Rosso18, C. Marth19, M. Nooij20, M. Presti21, C. Scarabelli21, T. A. W. Splinter22, E. Ploch23, L. V. A. Beex24, W. ten Bokkel Huinink25, M. Forni26, M. Melpignano27, P. Blake28, P. Kerbrat29, C. Mendiola30, A. Cervantes31, A. Goupil32, P. G. Harper33, C. Madronal34, M. Namer35, G. Scarfone3, J. E. G. M. Stoot36, I. Teodorovic2, C. Coens2, I. Vergote37 and J. B. Vermorken On behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gynaecological Cancer Group38

1 Division d’Oncologie, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Genève, Switzerland; 2 EORTC Data Center, Brussels, Belgium; 3 Istituto L. Mangiagalli, Milan, Italy; 4 Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; 5 Daniel den Hoed Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 6 Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain; 7 Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal; 8 Azienda Ospedaliera ‘San Maria Degli Angeli’, Pordenone, Italy; 9 Ospedale Generale Provinciale San Camillo de Lellis, Riete, Italy; 10 Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium; 11 Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese; 12 Instituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy; 13 Hospital General de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; 14 Instituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano; 15 Universita di Brescia, Brescia; 16 Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Torino, Italy; 17 Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; 18 Ospedale San Martino, Genova, Italy; 19 Innsbruck Universitaetsklinik, Innsbruck, Austria; 20 Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; 21 Ospedale Civile, Voghera, Italy; 22 Erasmus University Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; 23 Maria Sklodowska-Curie Cancer Center–Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland; 24 University Medical Centre, Nijmegen; 25 Antoni van Leeuwenhoekhuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 26 University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; 27 Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma, Parma, Italy; 28 Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK; 29 Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France; 30 Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid; 31 Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 32 Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; 33 Guy’s Hospital, London, UK; 34 Institut d’Oncologia Corachan, Barcelona, Spain; 35 Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; 36 Atrium Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands; 37 University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium; 38 Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 5 August 2002; accepted 11 October 2002

Background:

Combination chemotherapy yields better response rates which do not always lead to a survival advantage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the reported differences in the efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with doxorubicin (DOX) versus combination therapy with cisplatin (CDDP) in endometrial adenocarcinoma lead to significant advantage in favour of the combination.

Patients and methods:

Eligible patients had histologically-proven advanced and/or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma and were chemo-naïve. Treatment consisted of either DOX 60 mg/m2 alone or CDDP 50 mg/m2 added to DOX 60 mg/m2, every 4 weeks.

Results:

A total of 177 patients were entered and median follow-up is 7.1 years. The combination DOX–CDDP was more toxic than DOX alone. Haematological toxicity consisted mainly of white blood cell toxicity grade 3 and 4 (55% versus 30%). Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 3 and 4 alopecia (72% versus 65%) and nausea/vomiting (36 % versus 12%). The combination DOX–CDDP provided a significantly higher response rate than single agent DOX (P <0.001). Thirty-nine patients (43%) responded on DOX–CDDP [13 complete responses (CRs) and 26 partial responses (PRs)], versus 15 patients (17%) on DOX alone (8 CR and 7 PR). The median overall survival (OS) was 9 months in the DOX–CDDP arm versus 7 months in the DOX alone arm (Wilcoxon P = 0.0654). Regression analysis showed that WHO performance status was statistically significant as a prognostic factor for survival, and stratifying for this factor, treatment effect reaches significance (hazard ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.05–2.03, P = 0.024).

Conclusions:

In comparison to single agent DOX, the combination of DOX–CDDP results in higher but acceptable toxicity. The response rate produced is significantly higher, and a modest survival benefit is achieved with this combination regimen, especially in patients with a good performance status.

Key words: chemotherapy, cisplatin, doxorubicin, endometrial carcinoma, randomised clinical trial, phase III


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. E. Ang, R. N. Shah, M. Everard, C. Keyzor, I. Coombes, A. Jenkins, K. Thomas, R. A'Hern, R. L. Jones, P. Blake, et al.
A feasibility study of sequential doublet chemotherapy comprising carboplatin-doxorubicin and carboplatin-paclitaxel for advanced endometrial adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1787 - 1793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
D. S. McMeekin
Where is the future of endometrial cancer therapy?
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2009; 20(11): 1757 - 1761.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. M. Baekelandt, M. Castiglione, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group
Endometrial carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(suppl_4): iv29 - iv31.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. N. Bakkum-Gamez, J. Gonzalez-Bosquet, N. N. Laack, A. Mariani, and S. C. Dowdy
Current Issues in the Management of Endometrial Cancer
Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2008; 83(1): 97 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
A. Kong, I. Simera, M. Collingwood, C. Williams, H. Kitchener, and On behalf of Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group
Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 1595 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. F. Fleming
Systemic Chemotherapy for Uterine Carcinoma: Metastatic and Adjuvant
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2007; 25(20): 2983 - 2990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Humber, J. Tierney, R. Symonds, M Collingwood, J Kirwan, C Williams, and J. Green
Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a systematic review of Cochrane collaboration
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2007; 18(3): 409 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
K. F. Tam, T. Y. Ng, P. C. K. Tsang, C. F. Li, and Y. S. Ngan
Potential Use of the Adenosine Triphosphate Cell Viability Assay in Endometrial Cancer
Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2006; 13(7): 518 - 522.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. M. Lee, A. Szabo, D. C. Shrieve, O. K. Macdonald, and D. K. Gaffney
Frequency and Effect of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Adenocarcinoma
JAMA, January 25, 2006; 295(4): 389 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. E. Randall, V. L. Filiaci, H. Muss, N. M. Spirtos, R. S. Mannel, J. Fowler, J. T. Thigpen, and J. A. Benda
Randomized Phase III Trial of Whole-Abdominal Irradiation Versus Doxorubicin and Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 36 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Aebi
Endometrial cancer: a frequent orphan disease
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2004; 15(8): 1149 - 1150.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. F. Fleming, V. L. Filiaci, R. C. Bentley, T. Herzog, J. Sorosky, L. Vaccarello, and H. Gallion
Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin + cisplatin versus doxorubicin + 24-h paclitaxel + filgrastim in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2004; 15(8): 1173 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. L. Creutzberg, W. L.J. van Putten, C. C. Warlam-Rodenhuis, A. C.M. van den Bergh, K. A.J. De Winter, P. C.M. Koper, M. L.M. Lybeert, A. Slot, L. C.H.W. Lutgens, M. C. Stenfert Kroese, et al.
Outcome of High-Risk Stage IC, Grade 3, Compared With Stage I Endometrial Carcinoma Patients: The Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2004; 22(7): 1234 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. H. Gallion, V. L. Brunetto, M. Cibull, S. S. Lentz, G. Reid, J. T. Soper, R. A. Burger, and W. Andersen
Randomized Phase III Trial of Standard Timed Doxorubicin Plus Cisplatin Versus Circadian Timed Doxorubicin Plus Cisplatin in Stage III and IV or Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3808 - 3813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.