Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow A corrigendum has been published
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hölzel, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hölzel, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow 2003 - Editors Choice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 14:421-427, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology

Original Paper

Communication, quality of life and age: results of a 5-year prospective study in breast cancer patients

J. Kerr1, J. Engel1,+, A. Schlesinger-Raab1, H. Sauer2 and D. Hölzel1

1 Munich Cancer Registry, Munich; 2 Med Klinik III, Klinikum Großhadern, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany

Received 10 May 2002; revised 5 August 2002; accepted 19 September 2002

Background:

Previous studies have employed short follow-up periods or examined only certain aspects of quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to examine the effect of communication on breast cancer patients’ QoL and to investigate the role of age in this relationship.

Patients and methods:

In a prospective, observational study breast cancer patients were sent questionnaires, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, over 5 years.

Results:

Forty-five per cent of the sample reported that some aspect of the communication they received was unclear and 59% wanted to speak with medical staff more. Patients under 50 years rated social and psychological help as more important, they were more aware of such services, had greater contact with support groups but were less satisfied with the information they received. Seventeen of the 27 QoL variables were significantly worse (P <0.01), up to 4 years after diagnosis, for those patients reporting unclear information. For patients over 50 years, QoL was significantly (P <0.001) worse when communication was unsatisfactory. Operation method or arm problems did not mitigate the association between communication and QoL.

Conclusions:

Communication is clearly a vital clinical skill that may play a role in patient QoL.

Key words: breast cancer, communication, elderly patients, quality of life


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
E. A. Hahn, D. Cella, O. Chassany, D. L. Fairclough, G. Y. Wong, R. D. Hays, and Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group
Precision of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Data Compared With Other Clinical Measures
Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2007; 82(10): 1244 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
J. W. Mack, J. Wolfe, H. E. Grier, P. D. Cleary, and J. C. Weeks
Communication About Prognosis Between Parents and Physicians of Children With Cancer: Parent Preferences and the Impact of Prognostic Information
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2006; 24(33): 5265 - 5270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
N. E. Avis, S. Crawford, and J. Manuel
Quality of Life Among Younger Women With Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2005; 23(15): 3322 - 3330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.