Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Maibach, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Maibach, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 14:291-297, 2003
© 2003 European Society for Medical Oncology


Original Paper

A randomized double-blind trial to compare the clinical efficacy of granisetron with metoclopramide, both combined with dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis

M. S. Aapro1,+, B. Thuerlimann2, C. Sessa3, C. de Pree4, J. Bernhard5 and R. Maibach5

1 Institut Multidisciplinaire d’Oncologie, Clinique de Genolier, Vaud; 2 Department of Medicine C, Kantonsspital, Sankt Gallen; 3 Istituto Oncologico Cantonale, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona; 4 Division d’Oncologie, Hôpital Cantonal Universitaire, Genève; 5 Swiss Institute for Applied Cancer Research Coordinating Centre, Bern, Switzerland

Received 4 March 2002; revised 20 September 2002; accepted 22 October 2002

Background:

The prophylactic use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons), after the first 24 h (acute phase) of exposure to emetic chemotherapy, to decrease the incidence of ‘delayed phase’ emesis increases costs. We designed a study to evaluate the efficacy of a setron (granisetron) in the delayed phase, compared with metoclopramide, each combined with a corticosteroid.

Patients and methods:

Patients on their first course of single-day emetic chemotherapy (cisplatin, carboplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and others) received granisetron 2 mg p.o. and dexamethasone 8 mg p.o. on day 1, followed for 5 days by dexamethasone 4 mg p.o. od combined with either metoclopramide 20 mg p.o. tds or granisetron 1 mg bd in a double-blinded double-dummy protocol. Patients evaluated the results using a diary card. Randomization was stratified by institution, sex, emetic chemotherapy naïve versus previous, alcohol consumption and platinum versus non-platinum regimen.

Results:

131 evaluable patients received granisetron in the delayed phase, and 127 received metoclopramide. Control of acute emesis in both arms was similar (86% granisetron; 85% metoclopramide). The 35 patients experiencing acute emesis had poor control in the delayed phase, with only four granisetron and three metoclopramide patients having no or mild nausea and no vomiting.

Conclusions:

In daily practice, a combination of oral dexamethasone and oral granisetron achieves an extremely high control of acute emesis (86% protection). Our data suggest that routine prescription of setrons for delayed phase control is not advisable as it increases costs without any benefit for the majority of patients. Delayed emesis in the rare patients with acute phase emesis remains an unsolved problem.

Key words: acute, delayed, dexamethasone, granisetron, nausea, vomiting


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Yonemura, N. Katsumata, H. Hashimoto, S. Satake, M. Kaneko, Y. Kobayashi, A. Takashima, Y. Kato, M. Takeuchi, Y. Fujiwara, et al.
Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Two Doses of Intravenous Granisetron (1 and 3 mg) for Acute Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting in Cancer Patients: A Non-inferiority Trial
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2009; 39(7): 443 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
A. Chan, V. Shih, and L. Chew
Evolving roles of oncology pharmacists in Singapore: A survey on prescribing patterns of antiemetics for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) at a cancer centre{dagger}
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. T Holdsworth and T. Vo-Nguyen
Employment of Substandard Antiemetic Prophylaxis in Recent Trials of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2005; 39(11): 1903 - 1910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. Aapro
Granisetron: An Update on its Clinical Use in the Management of Nausea and Vomiting
Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(6): 673 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Eisenberg, F. R. MacKintosh, P. Ritch, P. A. Cornett, and A. Macciocchi
Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of palonosetron in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a dose-ranging clinical study
Ann. Onc., February 1, 2004; 15(2): 330 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
R. Gralla, M. Lichinitser, S. Van der Vegt, H. Sleeboom, J. Mezger, C. Peschel, G. Tonini, R. Labianca, A. Macciocchi, and M. Aapro
Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 1570 - 1577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.