Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sekine, I.
Right arrow Articles by Saijo, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sekine, I.
Right arrow Articles by Saijo, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:1300-1306, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology

Relationship between objective responses in phase I trials and potential efficacy of non-specific cytotoxic investigational new drugs

I. Sekine+, N. Yamamoto, H. Kunitoh, Y. Ohe, T. Tamura, T. Kodama and N. Saijo

Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Received 24 September 2001; revised 7 December 2001; accepted 9 January 2002

Abstract

Background:

Although the evaluation of new investigational drugs in phase I, II and III trials requires considerable time and patient resources, only a few of these drugs are ultimately established as anticancer drugs.

Materials and methods:

We collected papers of phase I trials by a Medline search using the key words ‘Neoplasms/Drug Therapy in MeSH’ and ‘Phase I’ for the period from 1976 to 1993. A drug was defined as ‘effective’ if a regimen including the drug produced positive results in at least one phase III trial. We analyzed the relationship between objective (complete and partial) responses in phase I trials and the effectiveness of agents in phase III trials.

Results:

A total of 399 single-agent phase I trials of cytotoxic agents in adult patients with solid tumors were obtained. Further clinical investigation was not recommended in 36 trials (9%) because of severe toxicity. In the remaining 363 trials, 174 drugs were evaluated and the median number of trials for each drug was two (range one to nine). Objective responses were observed in 495 (4.1%) of 12 076 patients, 178 (49%) of 363 trials, and 115 (66%) of 174 drugs. Of the 174 drugs, 48 (28%) were considered to be effective. Percentages of effective drugs rose as the number of responders in phase I trials increased. Logistic regression analyses showed the number of responders to be significantly associated with drug effectiveness [odds ratio = 1.16 (1.06–1.27), P = 0.001 for 174 drugs; odds ratio = 1.16 (1.05–1.28), P = 0.0038 for 363 trials]. Although 10 active drugs failed to produce an objective response in phase I trials, seven of them produced a tumor regression of <50%, and three reportedly produced objective responses in phase I trials conducted before 1975. The numbers of responders among patients with lung, ovarian, breast or colorectal cancer, but not those among patients with lymphoma, melanoma, sarcoma or renal-cell carcinoma, were associated significantly with drug effectiveness against the respective tumors.

Conclusions:

Objective responses observed in phase I trials are important for determining the future development of an anticancer drug.

Key words: investigational new drugs, objective response, phase I trial, phase III trial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
D. P. Lee, J. M. Skolnik, and P. C. Adamson
Pediatric Phase I Trials in Oncology: An Analysis of Study Conduct Efficiency
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8431 - 8441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Goffin, S. Baral, D. Tu, D. Nomikos, and L. Seymour
Objective Responses in Patients with Malignant Melanoma or Renal Cell Cancer in Early Clinical Studies Do Not Predict Regulatory Approval
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 11(16): 5928 - 5934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. B. Rothschild, N. M.P. King, F. M. Muggia, I. Sekine, T. Tamura, M. J. Miller, E. Horstmann, E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. Kurzrock, et al.
Phase 1 Clinical Trials in Oncology
N. Engl. J. Med., June 9, 2005; 352(23): 2451 - 2453.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Horstmann, M. S. McCabe, L. Grochow, S. Yamamoto, L. Rubinstein, T. Budd, D. Shoemaker, E. J. Emanuel, and C. Grady
Risks and Benefits of Phase 1 Oncology Trials, 1991 through 2002
N. Engl. J. Med., March 3, 2005; 352(9): 895 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. Kurzrock and R. S. Benjamin
Risks and Benefits of Phase 1 Oncology Trials, Revisited
N. Engl. J. Med., March 3, 2005; 352(9): 930 - 932.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.