Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knox, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tattersall, M. H. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Knox, R.
Right arrow Articles by Tattersall, M. H. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:622-627, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology

Audiotapes of oncology consultations: only for the first consultation?

R. Knox1, P. N. Butow1,+, R. Devine1 and M. H. N. Tattersall2

1Medical Psychology Unit, 2Department of Cancer Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia

Received 5 April 2001; revised 3 September 2001; accepted 20 September 2001.

Background

Patients value audiotapes of their oncology consultations and letters summarising the discussion, and report improved recall and satisfaction when they receive them. However, studies to date have provided these interventions only after the initial or ‘bad news’ consultation. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of audiotaping routine follow-up oncology consultations.

Patients and methods

This was a prospective study following a cohort of consecutive patients attending routine follow-up at oncology outpatient appointments with one oncologist. Patients were approached when they attended their appointment and offered the opportunity to be audiotaped. Acceptance rates and reasons for refusal were documented. Two weeks after the consultation, patients were telephoned regarding their response to the tape and were sent a letter summarising the consultation. Two weeks later they received a further telephone call regarding the letter and their perceptions of the comparative value of the two interventions.

Results

Seventy-five per cent of patients were female and for 40% English was not their first language. The patients had attended a median of 14 previous oncology appointments; 52 patients were offered audiotaping, 43 accepted and 30 decided to take home a copy of the audiotape. One patient felt recording had limited the discussion. Patients refused the tape most commonly because they felt no need for this aid, and accepted it most commonly to aid recall or share with family. Twenty-six patients listened to the tape, 14 did so more than once. Twenty had shared it with another person and over 75% thought it was useful. The majority (57%) preferred to receive both the tape and letter, with three preferring the tape alone and seven the letter. Married patients and those receiving bad news were more likely to want the tape.

Conclusions

Audiotaping follow-up consultations is an inexpensive procedure that is appreciated by the majority of patients. Randomised controlled trials of their impact are warranted.

Key words: doctor–patient communication, patient communication aids, routine clinics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.