Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Ghosh, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cairo, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abu-Ghosh, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cairo, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:460-469, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology

Ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide in children with poor-risk relapsed Wilms’ tumor: a Children’s Cancer Group report

A. M. Abu-Ghosh1, M. D. Krailo2, S. C. Goldman3, R. S. Slack1, V. Davenport4, E. Morris4, J. H. Laver5, G. H. Reaman6 and M. S. Cairo4,+

1Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC; 2Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA and Children’s Oncology Group, Arcadia, CA; 3North Texas Hospital for Children, Dallas, TX; 4Children’s Hospital of New York, Columbia University, New York, NY; 5Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; 6Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA

Received 20 March 2001; revised and accepted 23 August 2001.

Background

The outcome of children with relapsed Wilms’ tumor is poor, especially with poor-risk factors such as unfavorable histology, early recurrence, previous three-drug therapy, relapse not confined to lungs and abdominal relapse following abdominal radiotherapy. We report the overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival of 11 children with relapsed and poor-risk Wilms’ tumor following ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

ICE therapy consisted of ifosfamide 1800 mg/m2/day (on day 0–4), carboplatin 400 mg/m2/day (on day 0–1) and etoposide 100 mg/m2/day (on day 0–4). The median age at diagnosis was 39 months (range from 13 months to 16 years) and the median time to relapse after initial diagnosis was 9 months (range 4–72 months). All but one patient had at least one poor prognostic feature, with eight patients showing three or four.

Results

After ICE chemotherapy the number of patients showing a complete response (CR) was three (27%) and a partial response (PR) was six (55%). The overall response rate (CR+PR) was 82%. Five of the six patients with a PR subsequently achieved a CR with further therapy. The 3-year event-free survival and overall survival were 63.6 ± 14.5%.

Conclusions

The response rate in children with relapsed and poor-risk Wilms’ tumor is >80% with ICE re-induction chemotherapy followed by post-ICE therapy. The optimal approach for post-ICE consolidation therapy has yet to be determined.

Key words: chemotherapy, childhood, recurrent, solid tumors, survival


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. L. Metzger and J. S. Dome
Current Therapy for Wilms' Tumor
Oncologist, November 1, 2005; 10(10): 815 - 826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. D. Campbell, S. L. Cohn, M. Reynolds, R. Seshadri, E. Morgan, G. Geissler, A. Rademaker, M. Marymount, J. Kalapurakal, P. R. Haut, et al.
Treatment of Relapsed Wilms' Tumor With High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Rescue: The Experience at Children's Memorial Hospital
J. Clin. Oncol., July 15, 2004; 22(14): 2885 - 2890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.