Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Finke, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertz, H.
Right arrow Articles by Finke, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 13:135-139, 2002
© 2002 European Society for Medical Oncology

Allogeneic hematopoetic stem-cell transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas: comparison of high-dose conventional conditioning versus fludarabine-based reduced-intensity regimens

H. Bertz, G. Illerhaus, , H. Veelken and J. Finke,+

Albert Ludwigs University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Haematology and Oncology, Freiburg, Germany

Received 23 November 2000; revised 2 July 2001; accepted 14 August 2001.

Background

Allogeneic hematopoetic stem-cell transplantation (alloHSCT) has curative potential for poor risk lymphoma patients due to the graft-versus-lymphoma effect. High non-relapse mortality with conventional high-dose conditioning indicates the necessity for less toxic transplant strategies.

Patients and methods

Between 1992 and 1999, 25 patients [median age 37 (20–60) years] with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL, n = 20) or Hodgkin’s disease (HD, n = 5) received an alloHSCT in our institution. Patients were grafted from HLA matched (17) or mismatched (2) related, or matched unrelated donors (MUD) (6). NHL histological subtypes were lymphoblastic (6), high grade B/T-cell lymphomas (5), follicular (3), mantle cell (2) and CLL, immunocytic, composite lymphoma and panniculitic T-NHL in one patient each. Patients had received a median of four (range three to six) different therapies before alloHSCT, and 10 patients had relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous (9) or allogeneic (1) HSCT. Remission status prior to allogeneic SCT was CR1 (1), CR2 (1), relapse (11), partial remission (5) or primary refractory induction failure (7). Conventional myeloablative conditioning (cc) regimens contained total body irradiation 12 Gy (5), busulfan 16 mg/kg (7) or BCNU/VP16 (1). Twelve patients received reduced-intensity conditioning (ric) regimens with fludarabine (FLU) plus alkylating agents. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporin A ± prednisone or methotrexate. Six patients also received anti-T-lymphocyte globulin.

Results

Twenty-four patients engrafted. Best response after alloHSCT was complete remission in 16 of all patients [64%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 44% to 84%] and in 16 of 22 evaluable patients (73%; 95% CI 53% to 93%), partial remission in three of 25 (12%), and no change in three of 25 (12%) patients. Early death prevented response evaluation in three of 25 patients. Non-relapse mortality was 54% (95% CI 15% to 78%) in patients after cc and 17% (95% CI 0% to 41%) after FLU-based ric (P = 0.03). Six patients died due to progressive disease or relapse. Four patients with HD died, three in complete remission due to non-relapse mortality and one with progressive disease. Eleven of 25 patients are alive with a median follow up of 618 days (range 383–2815), with an overall survival of 44% (95% CI 23% to 65%) at 1 year for all patients, while eight of 12 (67%; 95% CI 35% to 98%) patients are alive after ric compared with three of 13 (23%; 95% CI 0% to 50%) after cc (P <0.02).

Conclusions

AlloHSCT induces high rates of complete remission in advanced lymphoma patients, even when the tumor had relapsed after autologous HSCT. It should be considered earlier as part of the therapeutic options in poor risk patients to avoid non-relapse mortality associated with extensive pretreatment. Our novel reduced conditioning regimens show promising results, especially in heavily pretreated patients, and improve survival after allogeneic transplantation.

Key words: allogeneic HSCT, Hodgkin’s disease, MUD transplantation, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Kornacker, J. Stumm, C. Pott, S. Dietrich, S. Sussmilch, M. Hensel, M. Nickelsen, M. Witzens-Harig, M. Kneba, N. Schmitz, et al.
Characteristics of relapse after autologous stem-cell transplantation for follicular lymphoma: a long-term follow-up
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 722 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
Z. Lee, J. E. Dennis, and S. L. Gerson
Imaging Stem Cell Implant for Cellular-Based Therapies
Experimental Biology and Medicine, August 1, 2008; 233(8): 930 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
H Veelken, S Vik Dannheim, J Schulte Moenting, U. Martens, J Finke, and A Schmitt-Graeff
Immunophenotype as prognostic factor for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients undergoing clinical risk-adapted therapy
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2007; 18(5): 931 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. Dreger
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with resistant high-grade lymphoma: what is the potential of reduced-intensity conditioning?
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2002; 13(9): 1507 - 1507.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.