Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taal, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Rutgers, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taal, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Rutgers, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 11:1437-1443, 2000
© 2000 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Improved effect of 131I-MIBG treatment by predosing with non-radiolabeled MIBG in carcinoid patients, and studies in xenografted mice

B. G. Taal1,, C. Hoefnagel2, H. Boot1, R. Valdés Olmos2 and M. Rutgers3

1Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Experimental Therapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: B. G. Taal, MD, PhD Department of Gastroenterology Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoekhuis Plesmanlaan 121 1066 CX Amsterdam The Netherlands E-mail: b_taal{at}nki.nl

BACKGROUND: 131I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG)has been used with success for the palliation of metastatic carcinoid. To qualify more patients for this treatment, we evaluated the effect of predosing with non-radiolabeled MIBG on 131I-MIBG tumour targeting in carcinoid patients and in mice with BON human carcinoid xenografts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten carcinoid patients with a faint tumour imaging on a diagnostic 131I-MIBG scan (1 mCi = 37 MBq, 5 mg MIBG) received non-radiolabeled MIBG prior to a second scintigraphy. In case of improved tumour targeting patients were treated with 200 mCi (7.4 GBq) 131I-MIBG following a pharmacological predose of 20–40 mg/m2 MIBG.

RESULTS: In six patients, highly increased ‘tumour/non tumour’ ratios were seen due to reduced levels in normal tissues and increased tumour accumulation. The combined treatment applied in five patients, considerably improved symptoms in all (duration 6–12 months), accompanied by biochemical response in three. In BON carcinoid xenografted mice, MIBG was injected intraperitoneally followed by intravenous 125I-MIBG with similar findings: increased ‘tumour/non-tumour’ radioactivity ratios by 1.5–3-fold.

CONCLUSIONS: Predosing with non-radiolabeled MIBG resulted in improved 131I-MIBG tumour targeting, prolonged palliation and encouragingly often biochemical responses in carcinoid.

biodistribution, carcinoid tumours, MIBG, tumour targeting


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. M. Zuetenhorst and B. G. Taal
Metastatic Carcinoid Tumors: A Clinical Review
Oncologist, February 1, 2005; 10(2): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
J M Zuetenhorst, R A Valdes Olmos, M Muller, C A Hoefnagel, and B G Taal
Interferon and meta-iodobenzylguanidin combinations in the treatment of metastatic carcinoid tumours
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 553 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. A. Kaltsas, G. M. Besser, and A. B. Grossman
The Diagnosis and Medical Management of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 458 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.