Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beretta, K.R.
Right arrow Articles by Cavalli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beretta, K.R.
Right arrow Articles by Cavalli, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 1:421-426, 1990
© 1990 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Original article: CGS 16949A, a new aromatase inhibitor in the treatment of breast cancer — A Phase I study

K.R. Beretta1, K. Hoeffken2, S. Kvinnsland3, P. Trunet4, A. Chaudri4, A.S. Bhatnagar4, A. Goldhirech1 and F. Cavalli1

1Servizio Oncologico Ticinese, Ospedale San Giovanni Bellinzona, Switzerland
2University Clinic, West Germany Tumor Center Essen. West Germany
3Regionsykehuset Trondheim, Norway
4CIBA-GEIGY Limited Basel, Switzerland

Correspondence to: F. Cavalli, M.D., Servizio Oncologico, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland

Forty-six postmenopausal women with either locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were treated with the aromatase inhibitor CGS 16949A in three different daily doses (0.3 mg, 0.6 mg and 0.9 mg total daily dose). 41 patients (89%) were pretreated by endocrine treatment for metastatic disease; 30 of these 41 were also pretreated with chemotherapy. Of the remaining 5 patients (11%) 3 were previously treated with chemotherapy alone and 2 were not pretreated. Evaluable sites of disease were: skin and soft tissue (including local recurrence) in 34, bone in 31, lung in 14 and viscera in 13 instances, respectively. 1 PR (3%) and 9 stable diseases (24%) were observed in the 37 patients assessable for response. All but two of these results were observed in the 0.9 mg group. Time to progression was 14 months for the patient showing a PR, and the median time to progression for those with stable disease was 6 months (range 6 to 23 months). Plasma estradiol and estrone levels were measured in patients receiving the daily dose of 0.6 mg (n = 4) and 0.9 mg (n = 15). The estrone levels decreased from a mean of 23.1 pg/mL (SD 17.1) to 10.5 pg/mL (SD 6.6) in the 0.6 mg-group and from 21.2 pg/mL (SD 18.9) to 9.1 pg/mL (SD 5.5) in the 0.9 mg-group within 4 days of drug administration (p < 0.0001 from baseline in both groups, with no significant difference between doses). Plasma estradiol levels decreased from 12 pg/mL (SD 12.6) to 6.0 pg/mL (SD 3.6) in the 0.6 mg-group and from 9.5 pg/mL (SD 6.5) to 6.1 pg/mL (SD 2.6) in the 0.9 mg-group (p < 0.01). The suppression of estradiol and estrone was maintained during the subsequent measurements on days 8 and 29 in the 0.9 mg group (n = 14). There was no significant change over time in cortisol levels, nor was there any significant difference between the three doses at any given time. Toxicity was mostly mild and consisted mainly of loss of appetite (7/46 = 15%), fatigue (5/46 = 11%) and nausea (4/46 = 9%) at all three dose levels.

We conclude that the aromatase inhibitor CGS 16949A is well tolerated within the ranges tested and does not affect the cortisol level. Although, as observed by others, suppression of plasma estrone might be enhanced by higher doses of CGS 16949A, some antitumor effect can already be seen with 0.9 mg daily.

CGS 16949A, aromatase inhibitor, advanced breast cancer, Phase I trial


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.