Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (62)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ventafridda, V.
Right arrow Articles by Tamburini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ventafridda, V.
Right arrow Articles by Tamburini, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 1:415-420, 1990
© 1990 European Society for Medical Oncology


research-article

Original article: Quality-of-life assessment during a palliative care programme

V. Ventafridda, F. De Conno, C. Ripamonti, A. Gamba and M. Tamburini

Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Division, National Cancer Institute Milan, Italy

Correspondence to: Vittorio Ventafridda, M.D., Pain Therapy and Palliaive Care Division, National Cancer Institute, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy

By means of a cross-sectional study, 115 terminal cancer patients (53 males, 62 females) who were no longer responsive to anticancer treatment, were investigated. The sample included all patients who had been undergoing palliative care (PC) during a single week (at the out-patient clinic, in hospital or at home). From the start of PC, the quality of the patients' lives was assessed by a weekly self-descriptive record comprising 32 items at four levels of intensity. The responses given on the questionnaire during the sample week were compared to those given by the same patients at the beginning of PC (T0). From T0 to time during treatment, figures show a significant increase in the percentage of patients who reported drowsiness, and a significant decrease in pain, weakness, functional impairment and psychological distress. The global judgment of not feeling well was reduced from 49% of the patients at TO to 31% during the period of treatment (p < 0.01). This result shows that, although the disease progressively develops, PC can enhance the quality of the lives of patients during the terminal stages of illness. The subjective judgment of not feeling well was much more closely correlated with physical, functional and psychological symptoms. Of the physical symptoms, pain has the closest correlation with feeling bad. However, pain has a low number of statistically significant correlations with respect to the other items, in marked contrast to the high number of statistically significant correlations with respect to the other items,in marked contrast to the high number of correlations regarding psychological and functional items. This suggests that even though pain can be considered the physical symptom which most often affects the patients' perception of suffering, its assessment is less representative of the quality-of-life than other items relating to functional and psychological conditions.

palliative care, quality-of-life assessment, terminal cancer patient


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. Mandelblatt, C. Armetta, K. R. Yabroff, W. Liang, and W. Lawrence
Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 8 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
A. Trentham-Dietz, P.L. Remington, C.M. Moinpour, J.M. Hampton, A.L. Sapp, and P.A. Newcomb
Health-Related Quality of Life in Female Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors
Oncologist, August 1, 2003; 8(4): 342 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. K. Portenoy
Cancer-Related Fatigue: An Immense Problem
Oncologist, October 1, 2000; 5(5): 350 - 352.
[Full Text]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S Mercadante, L Calderone, P Villari, R Serretta, M Sapio, A Casuccio, and F Fulfaro
The use of pilocarpine in opioid-induced xerostomia
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2000; 14(6): 529 - 531.
[PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. K. Portenoy and L. M. Itri
Cancer-Related Fatigue: Guidelines for Evaluation and Management
Oncologist, February 1, 1999; 4(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C Salisbury, N Bosanquet, E K Wilkinson, P J Franks, S Kite, M Lorentzon, and A Naysmith
The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature review
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 1999; 13(1): 3 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
A. N Davies, C. Daniels, R. Pugh, and K. Sharma
A comparison of artificial saliva and pilocarpine in the management of xerostomia in patients with advanced cancer
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 1998; 12(2): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S. Robin Cohen, B. M Mount, E. Bruera, M. Provost, J. Rowe, and K. Tong
Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 1997; 11(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S. Donnelly and D. Walsh
Quality of life assessment in advanced cancer
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 1996; 10(4): 275 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S R. Cohen, B. M Mount, M. G Strobel, and F. Bui
The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: a measure of quality of life appropriate for people with advanced disease. A preliminary study of validity and acceptability
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 1995; 9(3): 207 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.