This article appears in the following Annals of Oncology issue: ESMO Clinical Recommendations [View the issue table of contents]
ESMO clinical recommendations |
Non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
1 Onkologie Schaffhausen, Schaffausen, Switzerland
2 Medical Oncology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
* Correspondence to: ESMO Guidelines Working Group, ESMO Head Office, Via L. Taddei 4, CH-6962 Viganello-Lugano, Switzerland; E-mail: clinicalrecommendations{at}esmo.org
| incidence |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The crude incidence of lung cancer in the European Union is 52.5/100 000 per year, the mortality 48.7/100 000 per year. Among men the rates are 82.5 and 77.0/100 000 per year, among women 23.9 and 22.3/100 000 per year, respectively. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of all cases. About 90% of lung cancer mortality among men (and 80% among women) is attributable to smoking.
| diagnosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pathological diagnosis should be made according to the WHO classification. The main NSCLC tumor groups are adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large-cell carcinoma. Histological or cytological specimens can be obtained from the primary tumor, lymph node or distant metastases or malignant effusions. The least invasive procedure should be used.
| staging and risk assessment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- Complete history and physical examination, CT scan of the chest and upper abdomen.
- MRI of the brain if abnormal neurologic findings (to be substituted by CT scan if MRI not available).
- Bone scan in the presence of bone pain, elevated serum calcium, or elevated alkaline phosphatase levels.
patients with potentially curative treatment
- Whole-body FDG-PET scan if available. In case of pathological mediastinal lymph node uptake, biopsy of an abnormal node is recommended (required if positivity would affect curative treatment, i.e. N3 lymph node).
- If FDG-PET not available or result inconclusive: biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes
1 cm in short axis.
- Biopsy of mediastinal lymph nodes can be obtained by mediastinoscopy, transbronchial needle aspiration, ultrasound-guided bronchoscopy with fine needle aspiration, and /or endoscopic esophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.
- MRI of the brain for clinical stage III patients (to be substituted by CT scan if MRI not available) planned for definitive local treatment.
- Bone scan if FDG-PET not available for clinical stage III patients planned for definitive local treatment.
- In patients with a single metastatic lesion on imaging studies, biopsy should be attempted to prove metastatic disease if otherwise curatively treatable.
- Cytology of pleural / pericardial effusions in patients otherwise curatively treatable.
Patients with NSCLC shall be staged according to the UICC 6 system and be grouped into the risk categories shown in Table 1.
|
treatment of localized disease
- Surgical resection in functionally fit patients (lobectomy/pneumonectomy plus systematic mediastinal lymph node sampling or lymphadenectomy).
- Cisplatin-based adjuvant combination chemotherapy is recommended in stage II and IIIA [I, A], and can be considered in selected stage IB patients (T > 4 cm).
- Preoperative cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy can be considered in patients with stage IIIA–N2 disease [II, B].
- Postoperative radiotherapy may be considered in patients not radically resected.
- Postoperative radiotherapy is not recommended for patients with radically resected Stage I and II disease [I, A] and can be considered for patients with resected stage IIIA disease.
- Curative conformal radiotherapy as a single modality is to be considered in patients unfit for standard surgery.
- Platinum-based chemotherapy, preferably concurrent with thoracic radiotherapy, is the standard treatment for selected patients with locally advanced, unresectable stage III NSCLC and adequate pulmonary function.
treatment of stage IV disease
- First-line treatment with a two-drug, platinum-based chemotherapy combined with a new agent (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, taxanes, or pemetrexed in patients with predominantly non-squamous cell carcinoma histology) is considered the standard treatment in patients with good performance status [I, A]. Non-platinum based combination chemotherapy of new agents can be considered alternatively.
- In the first-line treatment of selected, advanced, non-squamous NSCLC patients, one randomized trial showed that the combination of bevacizumab with paclitaxel-carboplatin achieved longer progression-free survival and overall survival than chemotherapy alone. In another, randomized trial the gemcitabine-cisplatin-bevacizumab combination obtained longer progression-free survival than gemcitabine-cisplatin, without differences in median survival.
- In a randomized trial, the addition of cetuximab to cisplatin-vinorelbine as first-line therapy has shown a modest improvement in overall survival, but not in progression-free survival, in EGFR immunohistochemistry positive NSCLC patients.
- In the first-line treatment of patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutation, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered, pending results of ongoing randomized trials.
- In frail elderly patients and in patients with performance status 2, single-agent chemotherapy might be considered [II, B].
- Timing and duration of palliative first-line treatment: chemotherapy should be initiated while the patient is in good performance status. The role of chemotherapy beyond four to six cycles has to be established.
- Resection of single metastases can be considered in selected cases [III, B].
- For the palliative treatment of multiple brain metastases, whole brain radiotherapy is recommended.
| second-line therapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Second-line systemic treatment (docetaxel, erlotinib, or pemetrexed in patients with predominantly non-squamous histology) should be considered in appropriately selected patients [I, A].
| response evaluation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Response evaluation is recommended after two or three cycles of chemotherapy by repetition of the initial radiographic tests showing tumor lesions.
| follow-up |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The optimal approach to post-treatment management of patients with NSCLC, including the role of radiologic evaluations, is controversial. For patients receiving intent-to-cure treatment, history and physical examination should be performed every 3–6 months during the first 2 years, and every 6–12 months thereafter and radiologic evaluations should be considered at these time points.
| note |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Levels of evidence [I–V] and grades of recommendation [A–D] as used by the American Society of Clinical Oncology are given in square brackets. Statements without grading were considered justified standard clinical practice by the expert authors and the ESMO faculty.
| footnotes |
|---|
Approved by the ESMO Guidelines Working Group: February 2002, last update August 2008. This publication supercedes the previously published version–Ann Oncol 2008; 19 (Suppl 2): ii39–ii40.
Conflict of interest: The authors have reported no conflicts of interest
| references |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, et al. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart (2004) 4th edition. Geneva: WHO. p1.
2. Mountain CF. Revisions in the International System for staging lung cancer. Chest (1997) 111:1486–1487.
3. Silvestri GA, Tanoue LT, Margolis ML, et al. American College of Chest Physicians. The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines. Chest (2003 Jan) 123:147S–156S.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Stewart LA, Pignon JP. Chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomized clinical trials. Br Med J (1995) 311:899–909.
5. Depierre A, Milleron B, Moro-Sibilot D, et al. French Thoracic Cooperative Group. Preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with primary surgery in resectable stage I (except T1N0), II, and IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol (2002) 20:247–253.
6. The International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Collaborative Group Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med (2004) 350:351–360.
7. Winton T, Livingston R, Johnson D, et al. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group; National Cancer Institute of the United States Intergroup JBR.10 Trial Investigators. Vinorelbine plus cisplatin vs. observation in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. In: N Engl J Med (2005) 352:2589–2597.
8. Douillard JY, Rosell R, De Lena M, et al. Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus observation in patients with completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association [ANITA]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol (2006) 7:719–27. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2006 7:797.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
9. Burdett S. Stewart L on behalf of the PORT Meta-analysis Group. Postoperative radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: update of an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lung Cancer (2005) 47:81–83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
10. Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (2000) 18:2095–2103.
11. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (2004) 22:1589–1597.
12. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med (2005) 353:123–132.
13. Auperin A, Le Pechoux C, Pignon JP, et al. Meta-analysis of Cisplatin/carboplatin based Concomitant Chemotherapy in non-small cell Lung Cancer (MAC3-LC) Group. Concomitant radio-chemotherapy based on platin compounds in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a meta-analysis of individual data from 1764 patients. Ann Oncol (2006) 17:473–483.
14. Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, et al. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol (1999) 17:2692–2699.
15. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, et al. Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med (2006) 355:2542–2550.
16. Reck M, von Paul J, Zatloukal P, et al. Phase III study of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as firstline therapy for non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: AVAIL. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27:1227–1234.
17. Pirker R, Pereira JR, Szczesna A, et al. Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomized phase III trial. Lancet (2009) 373:1525–1531.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||