Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2009 20(Supplement 4):iv46-iv48; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp125
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckel, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Annals of Oncology issue: ESMO Clinical Recommendations [View the issue table of contents]

ESMO clinical recommendations

Biliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Recommendation for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

F. Eckel1, S. Jelic2 and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group*

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
2 Internal Medicine Service, Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Belgrade, Serbia

* Correspondence to: ESMO Guidelines Working Group, ESMO Head Office, Via L. Taddei 4, CH-6962 Viganello-Lugano, Switzerland; E-mail: clinicalrecommendations{at}esmo.org


    incidence
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
The crude incidence of gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary cancer (ICD-10:C23-C24) in the European Union is ~3.2 and ~5.4/100 000 per year for males and females, respectively. Age-adjusted mortality is 1.4 and 1.9/100 000 for males and females, respectively. Incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICD-10:C22.1) is increasing and may be estimated as ~0.9–1.3 and 0.4–0.7/100 000 for males and females, respectively, as 10–15% of primary liver cancer (ICD-10:C22). In high risk areas in Europe (south Italy) incidence is estimated up to ~4.9–7.4 and ~2.9–4.3/100 000 for males and females, respectively, and worldwide, e.g. in northeast Thailand up to 96/100 000.


    diagnosis
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
Diagnosis should be made on the basis of radiological investigations (magnetic resonance and CT are both useful) and pathomorphological assessment according to the World Health Organization classification from a biopsy, fine needle aspiration or biliary brush cytology. Final pathologic diagnosis has to be obtained before any chemotherapy, but is not critical for planning surgery in patients with characteristic findings of resectable biliary cancer.


    staging
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
Staging consists of complete history and physical examination, blood counts, liver function tests, chest X-ray, imaging of the abdomen by sonography and computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance, endoscopic retrograde or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, and possibly endoscopic ultrasonography, cholangioscopy and laparoscopy. Upper and lower endoscopy has to be performed in patients with an isolated intrahepatic mass. The staging is to be given according to the TNM 2002 system separately for gallbladder cancer, extrahepatic bile duct tumors, and liver cancer including intrahepatic bile duct cancer. TNM classification for gallbladder and bile duct tumors is presented in Tables 1 and 2. TNM classification for liver cholangiocarcinoma is the same as for hepatocellular liver cancer. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin's Tumor) is clinically staged depending on the involvement of the hepatic ducts according to the Bismuth-Corlette classification, which is presented in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. TNM staging of gallbladder cancer

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. TNM Staging of biliary canal cancer

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. The Bismuth-Corlette classification scheme of biliary structures cancer

 

    treatment after incidental finding of gallbladder cancer on pathologic review
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
A radical re-resection (after a complete staging including laparoscopy demonstrating resectability) is highly recommended for patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma stage T1b (tumor invades muscle layer) or greater. Patients with T1a tumors (tumor invades lamina propria) do not further benefit from re-resection if the gallbladder was removed intact and should be observed only [III, B].


    treatment after incidental finding of gallbladder cancer at surgery
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
After incidental finding of gallbladder cancer at surgery staging has to be performed intraoperatively and extended cholecystectomy including en bloc hepatic resection and lymphadenectomy with or without bile duct excision has to be considered depending on resectability and expertise of the surgeon.


    treatment of resectable tumors
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
Complete surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment available. Resection of gallbladder cancer consists of extended cholecystectomy including en bloc hepatic resection and lymphadenectomy (porta hepatis, gastrohepatic ligament, retroduodenal) with or without bile duct excision. Major hepatectomy including caudate lobectomy such as extended right lobe resection with portal vein resection increases resectability and radicality for stage 3 and 4 hilar cholangiocarcinomas and has been associated with higher 5-year survival rates [III, B]. Preoperative transartial or portal vein embolisation increases the remnant liver volume in patients with estimated postresection volumes of <25% and appears to reduce postoperative liver dysfunction. Indication of biliary drainage should be systematically discussed with specialized surgeons before surgery.

Even in patients undergoing aggressive surgery 5-year survival rates are 5–10% for gallbladder cancer and 10–40% for cholangiocarcinoma.

Additive fluorouracil-based chemotherapy has been associated with a small survival benefit after noncurative resection of gallbladder cancer [II, B]. Postoperative treatment after noncurative resection of cholangiocarcinoma remains controversial, and both supportive care and palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may be taken into consideration.

As both gallbladder and biliary tract neoplasms present a high incidence of local failure after surgical resection reaching 52%, a locoregional adjuvant treatment should be considered. Several retrospective reports on adjuvant radiotherapy suggest survival benefit both in gallbladder and biliary duct cancer and postoperative chemoirradiation could be considered as an option.


    treatment of unresectable tumors
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
Liver transplantation is indicated under strict research protocols at selected centers, for patients with early stage cholangiocarcinoma and anatomically unresectable lesions, but this approach is experimental and should not be offered outside the scope of clinical trials. Data on photodynamic therapy are slightly more advanced. In cholangiocarcinoma photodynamic therapy after decompression of the biliary tree has been proven to induce survival benefit in two small randomised trials [II, B]. In patients with a large mass visible on radiographic studies the effect of photodynamic therapy may be limited and combination with chemotherapy may be considered although appropriate trials are lacking. Palliative chemotherapy added to both quantity and quality of life in advanced biliary cancer in a single phase III study [II, B], but the survival benefit for chemotherapy in general is not yet clearly established. Lacking randomised controlled trials and an accepted standard, 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine are routinely used. Based on the results of a pooled analysis of predominantly phase II trials, gemcitabine combined with platinum compounds could also be an acceptable chemotherapy modality, since this combination offered the highest rates of objective response and tumor control in advanced biliary cancer [III, B]. Concurrent chemoirradiation is an additional therapeutic option and high radiation doses delivered by use of brachytherapy boost may improve local control of disease. Palliation of jaundice can be accomplished by endoscopic or percutaneous stenting of the biliary tree or by operative biliary-enteric bypass. Urgent biliary drainage and broad-spectrum antibiotics are crucial in patients with cholangitis due to obstructive jaundice.


    response evaluation
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
Response evaluation is recommended 3 months after photodynamic therapy by means of cholangiography during routine stent exchange and after two or three cycles (8–12 weeks) of chemotherapy by clinical evaluation, subjective symptom evaluation, blood tests and repeating the initially abnormal radiologic or ultrasound examinations.


    follow-up
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
There is no evidence that regular follow-up after initial therapy may influence the outcome. Follow-up visits after complete resection should be restricted to history and physical examination considering symptoms, nutrition and psychosocial problems.


    note
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
Levels of evidence [I–V] and grades of recommendation [A–D] as used by the American Society of Clinical Oncology are given in square brackets. Statements without grading were considered justified standard clinical practice by the experts and the ESMO faculty.


    footnotes
 
Approved by the ESMO Guidelines Working Group: August 2008

Conflict of interest: The authors have reported no conflicts of interest


    references
 Top
 incidence
 diagnosis
 staging
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment after incidental...
 treatment of resectable tumors
 treatment of unresectable tumors
 response evaluation
 follow-up
 note
 references
 
1. Khan SA, Thomas HC, Davidson BR, Taylor-Robinson SD. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet (2005) 366:1303–14.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2. Goetze TO, Paolucci V. Benefits of reoperation of T2 and more advanced incidental gallbladder carcinoma: analysis of the German registry. Ann Surg (2008) 247:104–108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

3. Goetze TO, Paolucci V. Immediate re-resection of T1 incidental gallbladder carcinomas: a survival analysis of the German Registry. Surg Endosc (2008) 22:2462–2465.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

4. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U, et al. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality. Langenbecks Arch Surg (2003) 388:194–200.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

5. Killeen RP, Harte S, Maguire D, Malone DE. Achievable outcomes in the management of proximal cholangiocarcinoma: an update prepared using ‘evidence-based practice’ techniques. Abdom Imaging (2008) 33:54–57.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

6. de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF, et al. Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med (1999) 341:1368–1378.[Free Full Text]

7. Takada T, Amano H, Yasuda H, et al. Is postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy useful for gallbladder carcinoma? A phase III multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with resected pancreaticobiliary carcinoma. Cancer (2002) 95:1685–1695.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

8. Castaldo ET, Wright Pinson C. Liver transplantation for non-hepatocellular carcinoma malignancy. HPB (Oxford) (2007) 9:98–103.[Medline]

9. Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, et al. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology (2003) 125:1355–1363.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

10. Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, et al. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol (2005) 100:2426–2430.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

11. Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjoden PO, et al. Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Ann Oncol (1996) 7:593–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Eckel F, Schmid RM. Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Br J Cancer (2007) 96:896–902.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckel, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Eckel, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?