Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on November 6, 2007
Annals of Oncology 2008 19(5):835-846; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm513
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
reviews |
Ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: an intriguing model for antigen-driven lymphomagenesis and microbial-targeted therapy
1 Unit of Lymphoid Malignancies
2 Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan
3 Cancer Bio-Immunotherapy Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy
4 Division of Molecular Histopathology, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
5 Pathology Unit
6 Ophthalmology Unit
7 Neuroradiology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan
8 Ophthalmology Unit, Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milan, Italy
9 Cancer Research UK, Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
10 Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
* Correspondence to: A. J. M. Ferreri MD, Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy. Tel: 0039-02-26437649; Fax: 0039-02-26437625; E-mail: andres.ferreri{at}hsr.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas constitute one half of malignancies arising in the orbit and the ocular adnexae. Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type lymphoma is the most common histological category in this anatomic region. The incidence of ocular adnexal lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-type (OAML) is increasing and recent studies offered new relevant insights in molecular, pathogenetic and therapeutic issues on these neoplasms. A pathogenetic model of antigen-driven lymphoproliferation similar to that reported for Helicobacter pylori-related gastric MALT lymphomas has been hypothesized for OAML. This notion is supported by the association between OAML and Chlamydophila psittaci infection, an association that is of likely pathogenetic relevance and may influence both the biological behavior and the therapeutic management of these neoplasms. However, this association displays evident geographical variability indicating that other etiopathogenic agents could be involved. These recent acquisitions coupled with the occurrence of chromosomal translocations and other genetic alterations, as well as additional risk factors like autoimmune disorders have contributed to render OAML an exciting challenge for a broad group of physicians and scientists. OAML is an indolent and rarely lethal malignancy that, in selected patients, can be managed with observation alone. Lymphomatous lesions are frequently responsible for symptoms affecting patient's quality of life, requiring, therefore, immediate treatment. Several therapeutic strategies are available, often associated with relevant side-effects. However, the therapeutic choice in OAML is not supported by consolidated evidence due to the lack of prospective trials. In this review, we analyze the most relevant biological, molecular, pathological and clinical features of OAML and propose some therapeutic guidelines for patients affected by this malignancy.
Key words: chlamydia, extranodal lymphomas, interferon, MALT, ocular adnexae, rituximab
| introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas constitute one half of all orbital malignancies [1]. Five to fifteen per cent of all extranodal lymphomas arise in the ocular adnexae, such as the conjunctiva, the lachrymal gland, the orbital fat, the eyelid and the lachrymal sac [2]. Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type (OAML, ocular adnexal lymphoma of MALT-type) is the most common lymphoma category arising in these anatomical structures, varying from 50–78% of all ocular adnexal lymphomas in Western countries to 80–90% in Japan and Korea [3]. The incidence of OAML is rapidly increasing, with annual rates >6%, and no evidence of peaking [4]. These epidemiologic features are not correlated to changes in classification schemes considering that a comparable increase has not been observed at other extranodal organs displaying similar overall percentages of MALT lymphomas [4].
The distinctive epidemiologic patterns of OAML call for further studies to identify environmental and genetic risk factors and pathogenetic mechanisms, including the potential role of infectious agents [4]. The recently reported association between chlamydial infection and OAML [5] offered new pathogenetic insights that have led to the development of innovative antimicrobial therapies. However, the optimal treatment of OAML is closely related to several clinical and biological variables, and the characterization of genetic alterations may be potentially useful to predict therapeutic response and identify the best candidates for the different treatments.
In this review, we summarize current knowledge on pathogenesis, molecular, pathological, radiological and clinical features as well as available therapeutic strategies for OAML. Moreover, we discuss new therapeutic strategies that, by exploiting targets and mechanisms different from those of conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy, may avoid the undesirable side-effects frequently associated with these approaches.
| pathological features |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The orbital region lacks both resident lymphoid tissue and lymphatic drainage, and it is controversial whether MALT is present in normal conjunctiva. OAML may derive from the MALT tissue acquired following chronic inflammatory or autoimmune disorders [6]. Many ocular adnexal neoplasms previously classified as pseudolymphomas or benign lymphoid hyperplasia may actually contain clonal B-cell expansions [7] and are, presumably, B-cell lymphomas. In different studies, a variable number of cases were diagnosed as lymphoma, not further specified, mostly because of the scarcity of diagnostic tissue; the majority of the entities hereby described, however, fall into the low-grade lymphoma category.
OAML displays the well-known classical histopathology and immunophenotype profile of most MALT lymphomas. Classically, the histopathology of MALT lymphomas encompasses either neoplastic or non-neoplastic cells. Lymphomatous cells may be heterogeneous in appearance, since centrocytic-like cells, monocytoid cells or small-sized lymphocytes may coexist in the same tissue, albeit with different proportions varying from case to case. In some cases, a striking plasma cell differentiation is present. In those sites provided by epithelium, i.e. conjunctiva and lachrymal gland, tumor cells may infiltrate either glandular or superficial epithelium determining the formation of the so-called lymphoepithelial lesions. Sometimes, neoplastic lymphocytes may selectively grow within germinal centers (follicular colonization), and a few scattered large cells (blasts) are usually encountered throughout the section. Tumor population is accompanied by non-neoplastic cells, including reactive germinal centers, a moderate to high amount of reactive T cells and histiocytes.
The classical immunophenotype of MALT lymphoma comprises CD20+, CD79a+, usually IgM+ with light-chain restriction, PAX5+, bcl-2+, TCL1+, CD11c+/–, CD43+/–, CD21+/–, CD35+/–, and IgD–, CD3–, CD5–, CD10–, CD23–, cyclin D1–, bcl-6–, MUM1– cells. OAML displays some histopathologic and immunophenotypic peculiarities with respect to other MALT lymphomas, mostly regarding marked plasmacellular differentiation and altered expression of molecules regulating the cell cycle and apoptosis (Table 1). The main histopathological differential diagnoses of OAML are mantle cell lymphoma (CD5+, CD23–, cyclin D1+), small lymphocytic B-cell lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CD5+, CD23+) and follicular lymphoma (CD10+, bcl-6+). A few cases of OAML display CD5 immunoreactivity (Tables 1 and 2), increasing differential diagnostic difficulties; in this setting, morphology coupled to cyclin D1 assessment as well as FISH analysis (i.e. absence of chromosome abnormalities frequently observed either in chronic lymphocytic leukemia or in mantle cell lymphoma) can be helpful for a correct diagnosis. Some histopathological and immunophenotypic parameters useful as predictors of outcome have been reported, although mostly in small series (Table 2).
|
|
| molecular features and cytogenetics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similarly to other MALT lymphomas, PCR analysis of immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene rearrangement showed a clonal B-cell population in 55% of OAML [3] and somatic hypermutations in two-thirds of these cases [16]. In particular, the VH3 family is expressed in nearly half of the cases, followed by VH4 in 23% of cases, showing thus a biased usage in comparison to adult peripheral blood B lymphocytes [16]. The most frequently involved germline genes (DP-8, DP-10, DP-53, DP-63, DP-49, DP-54, DP-47) [3, 16] are those commonly implicated in the assembly of autoantibodies. Ongoing mutations have been described in OAML; their frequency is lower than that reported in gastrointestinal MALT lymphomas, but it is higher in cases with follicular dendritic cell networks, supporting a potential role of microenvironmental stimuli [9]. Taken together, these features support the view that OAML represent a clonal expansion of post-germinal-center memory B cells, where, in two-thirds of the cases, antigen selection may have occurred [16].
Some chromosomal translocations, including t(11;18)(q21;q21)/API2-MALT1, t(1;14)(p22;q32)/IGH-BCL10, t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-MALT1 and t(3;14)(p14;q32)/IGH-FOXP1, are associated with MALT lymphomas, but their frequency markedly varies among different mucosal sites (Table 3). t(11;18), t(1;14) and t(14;18)/IGH-MALT1 are nearly exclusively found in MALT lymphoma and their oncogenic products share the ability to enhance the activation of NF
B, a master transcriptional factor for a number of genes relevant for lymphocyte activation, proliferation and survival [26]. The t(3;14) has been detected both in MALT and in other B-cell lymphomas [22, 25], although the molecular mechanism of FOXP1-mediated lymphomagenesis remains to be investigated. The overall frequency of MALT-associated chromosomal translocations in OAML is reported in Table 3; their clinical significance in these malignancies remains to be defined.
|
There are only limited cytogenetic data in OAML (Table 3). Both conventional karyotyping and interphase FISH-based cytogenetic analyses demonstrated that aneuploidy, particularly trisomy 3 and 18, occurs frequently in t(11;18)-negative OAML [17–19, 23]. Trisomy 3 and 18 and t(14;18)(q32;q21) deserve to be further investigated as possible predictors of multifocal disease [27]. OAML with trisomy 18 seems to have distinct clinical features: it involves the conjunctiva, occurs in young females and shows a high recurrence rate [19]. On the other hand, trisomy 3 is significantly less common in conjunctival MALT lymphomas with respect to orbit lymphomas (12% versus 81%) [11]. Comparison of European [18] and American [11] series seems to indicate the existence of geographic variability in the incidence of recurring cytogenetic abnormalities in OAML. Variables influencing these features should be further investigated.
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) carried out in 10 OAML cases showed recurrent chromosomal gains at 6p21 and 9q33-qter, in addition to trisomy 3, 12 and 18 [28]. It will be noteworthy to survey the genomic gains and losses of OAML using array CGH to explore whether these MALT lymphomas are also characterized by a conserved pattern of chromosomal gains, as reported for other MALT lymphomas [29], and how these genomic alterations correlate with chlamydial infection and treatment response.
| pathogenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
OAML shares several clinicopathologic features with other MALT lymphomas. In fact, OAML arises in tissues normally devoid of innate immune system [6], often develops on a background of preexisting chronic inflammation (i.e. conjunctivitis) [9] and usually shows an indolent clinical course. The presence of a preexisting inflammatory background seems to be of pathogenetic relevance for MALT lymphomas, underlying the possible role of exogenous triggers (infections) and autoimmune reactions. Somatic immunoglobulin ongoing mutations detected in OAML (see above) are consistent with a process driven by chronic antigenic stimulation. Moreover, the biased usage of VH genes, frequently rearranged in autoantibodies production [30] and often overrepresented in B-cell malignancies [31], further supports the occurrence of an antigen selection process during OAML development. As paradigmatic example, Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection triggers a chronic antigenic stimulus that would drive the development of overt gastric MALT lymphoma along a continuum pathway (Figure 1). A similar pathogenetic model of antigen-driven lymphoproliferation may be hypothesized for OAML. In fact, the DNA of Chlamydophila psittaci (Cp), an obligate intracellular pathogen, has been detected in 80% of OAML patients and immunohistochemical data identified cells of the monocyte/macrophage system as likely carriers of the infection [5]. Chlamydiae are responsible for a wide spectrum of human diseases [32]; these bacteria have a tendency to cause persistent infections, inhibit apoptosis of infected cells and have complex immunomodulatory effects that may play a role in tumorigenesis [32–34]. Cp is the etiologic agent of psittacosis, a human infection caused by exposure to infected birds, cats and other household animals [32]. Notably, half of OAML patients reported close contacts with household animals [5]. Moreover, Chlamydiae are also etiologically linked to chronic infections of the conjunctiva, which may display features of follicular or inclusion conjunctivitis [35]. In OAML patients, Cp establishes a systemic infection, as demonstrated by the detection of the DNA of the bacterium in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 40% of these patients [5]. Such a systemic infection persists over time in a high proportion of cases, even >5 years, further supporting the possible involvement of Cp in sustaining lymphoma cell growth [5]. Microbial persistence may be favored by molecular mimicry, a phenomenon by which antigens derived from microorganisms are able to induce immune reactions cross-reacting with host self-antigens [36]. In fact, the expression of antigenic motifs shared with the host allows the long-lasting persistence of microbial pathogens since the immune system is usually tolerant towards autoantigens. It remains to be defined whether, similarly to Hp [37], Chlamydiae may also provide antigens, like heat-shock proteins [38], which may act as molecular mimickers. For instance, heat-shock proteins produced by Chlamydiae may trigger both humoral- and cell-mediated immune responses that at least partially cross-react against the human protein counterpart and other related self-antigens [39]. This phenomenon may contribute to break local tolerance, leading to a chronic stimulation by antigens that cannot be successfully eliminated by the host and that may ultimately favor the onset of OAML [40].
|
The prevalence of Cp infection in OAML patients varies among the different reported studies (Table 4), and a geographical variability in this association has been indicated [44]. However, these variations could also be explained by methodological pitfalls as well as by the effect of some confounding factors like the use of wide-spectrum antibiotics and the involvement of other microbial agents. Most studies used a multiplex touchdown enzyme time release-PCR [5], while, sometimes, these primers were used in monoplex PCR, and direct sequencing to confirm the specificity of the amplified DNA was not always carried out. This is a relevant issue considering that taxonomic classification of chlamydiaceae is evolving and that the target DNA fragment may contain sequences largely overlapping although belonging to unrelated chlamydiaceae. Heterogeneity in tissue specimens, experimental conditions, DNA extraction protocol, PCR sensitivity and amount of DNA template could have contributed to results variability. From a clinical point of view, most patients with conjunctival or orbital lesions are firstly considered as affected by inflammatory or infectious processes instead of lymphomas, and are usually treated with topic or systemic wide-spectrum antibiotics, a common practice in OAML patients that could further reduce the local chlamydial population, resulting in PCR false negatives. Finally, the potential involvement of other microbial agents in the development and maintaining of OAML should be taken into account. This is indicated by the intriguingly tumor regression observed in one-third of Chlamydia-negative OAML after doxycycline treatment [46] (see Treatment). Available evidence seems to rule out the possible involvement of other infectious agents commonly associated with chronic eye diseases, such as Chlamydia trachomatis, herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 and adenovirus 8 and 19 [5, 55], whereas Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA was detected sporadically in a few cases of OAML [56, 57] (R. Dolcetti, unpublished data). Like for other B-cell lymphomas, hepatitis C virus (HCV) could play a role in the development of OAML. HCV seropositivity has been detected in 13% of OAML patients, and seems to be associated with more disseminated and aggressive lymphomas [58].
|
The study of putative mechanisms regulating lymphocytes homing to the ocular adnexa constitutes an interesting issue in the genesis and development of these neoplasms. Available data are preliminary and limited to the reported absence of expression of the
4β7 integrin, a crucial regulator of lymphocyte trafficking, and its ligand MAdCAM-1 [59], and to the expression of the chemoattractant cytokine CXCL13 on neoplastic lymphocytes [55]. | clinical features |
|---|
|
|
|---|
clinical presentation
Lymphomas can infiltrate any orbital and ocular adnexal tissue. The clinical picture of OAML depends greatly on the structures compromised. Twenty-five percent of OAML displays conjunctival involvement, while intraorbital masses are present in 75% of cases and bilateral involvement is observed in 10–15% of cases, mostly in conjunctival forms [51,60–63]. It is difficult to differentiate clinically OAML from other orbital diseases due to the lack of pathognomonic signs or symptoms. Every lymphoma histotype can arise in the ocular adnexae, although with similar presenting symptoms and requiring surgical biopsy for histopathological diagnosis considering that treatment and prognosis remarkably vary among different lymphoma categories.
OAML usually arises after the fourth decade of age (median 65 years), with a higher prevalence among females [51,60–63]. The interval period between clinical onset and diagnosis is variable (median 6–7 months; range 1–135 months). Clinical presentation of conjunctival lymphoma consists of a classic salmon red patch appearance with swollen conjunctiva (Figure 2). Patients with intraorbital lymphoma variably present with exophthalmos (27% of cases), palpable mass (19%), eyelid ptosis (6%), diplopia (2%), eyelid nodule, orbital edema, epiphora and a variable degree of impaired ocular motility [51,60–63]. Extraocular muscle imbalance and limitation of the excursion of the eye are usually indicators of expansive effect of the lesion rather than of muscle damage. Clinical manifestations usually consist of a slowly growing, painless mass that displaces the normal structures, but sometimes are acute, with inflammatory-like signs and symptoms. Only in rare cases of rapidly growing tumors, visual acuity and field defects or choroidal folds are observed, and a few cases of OAML infiltrating the eye with devastating consequences have been reported [64].
|
staging procedures
More than 75% of OAML presents with a single lesion (stage IE). With conventional lymphoma staging procedures, regional lymphadenopathies are detected in <5% of cases (stage IIE), and extraorbital disease, mostly in extranodal organs, is observed in 10–15% of cases (stage IVE), rarely in patients with conjunctival lymphoma [5, 51,61–63]. Conversely, the use of more extensive and invasive staging showed that 38% of OAML patients have at least one concomitant, extraorbital site of disease at diagnosis [27]. The usefulness of extended staging in OAML remains a matter of debate. On one hand, the definition of stage I disease is important because these patients are usually treated with radiotherapy alone. On the other hand, even if patients with stage I disease have significantly better relapse-free survival in comparison to those with advanced disease, no difference in cause-specific survival between these subgroups has been reported [63]. Comprehensively, OAML patients should be assessed with conventional lymphoma staging procedures, whereas an extensive gastrointestinal workup in the absence of clinical symptoms suggestive of lymphoma does not seem necessary [27].
Some OAML patients have a history of autoimmune disorders, mostly thyrotoxicosis (5% of cases) or Sjögren syndrome [65], the concomitance of which should be assessed at diagnosis since their negative impact on therapeutic outcome in extraorbital MALT lymphomas [66].
neuroimaging
Neuroimaging techniques are fundamental for distinguishing OAML from other orbital masses and for accurate staging and therapeutic response definition since they allow precise volumetric measurements. At neuroimaging examination, OAML usually present as well-defined lesions, mostly placed in the superior-lateral quadrant of the orbit, often surrounding and displacing extraocular muscles, without signs of ocular infiltration. On basal computed tomography images, OAML appears homogeneously iso- or slightly hyperdense compared with extraocular muscles. OAML contrast enhancement is homogeneous and its intensity is comparable to that of lachrymal glands and extraocular muscles. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a great potential in differentiating OAML from other orbital expansive lesions. Location, margins and the distinctive T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) signal intensities allow OAML identification and characterization (Figure 3). Similarly to what was observed in lymphomas of other districts, OAML presents high DWI signal and low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values due to the high cellularity and high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio. Preliminary data indicate that ADC of OAML is lower than that of all orbital normal structures and expansive lesions, being thus useful for differential diagnosis. Furthermore, DWI is helpful in establishing involvement or persistence of disease in the lachrymal gland, where both signal intensity and contrast enhancement do not allow unambiguous differentiation between normal and pathologic tissue. A- and B-scan orbital ultrasonography provides additional information to MRI for distinguishing OAML from other orbital masses (Figure 4).
|
|
clinical behavior and prognosis
OAML shows a better prognosis in comparison to other lymphoma categories arising in the ocular adnexae [63]. Most OAML patients display good prognostic indicators like limited disease, good performance status and absence of systemic symptoms, and, if adequately treated, these patients exhibit a favorable outcome [51, 67]. Some anecdotal cases of spontaneous tumor remission in OAML patients have been reported, mostly in Japanese patients with conjunctival MALT lymphoma [68]. However, the real rate of this phenomenon warrants further investigation since some of these patients have been treated with topical steroids or antibiotics, which could have affected results interpretation. Presenting symptoms are sometimes severe, requiring a proper and timely treatment. Local control rates vary according to the used therapy, with a 5-year relapse-free survival of
65%. Some patients experience multiple relapses, which usually involve the contralateral orbit and distant extranodal organs, particularly in patients treated with radiotherapy. Systemic dissemination occurs in 5–10% of cases, being rare in patients with conjunctival lymphoma. Less than 5% of OAML patients die of lymphoma, with a 5-year cause-specific and overall survival of 100% and >90%, respectively [62, 63]. Reliable prognostic factors remain to be defined. A few studies conducting multivariate analysis indicated that nodal involvement (<5% of cases), systemic symptoms (1%), increased lactate dehydrogenase serum levels (1%) and non-conjunctival sites are negative predictors of outcome [51, 61, 62]. Some of these aggressiveness parameters predict high-grade transformation, which has been reported in 1–3% of cases [67, 69]. | treatment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Current therapeutic knowledge in OAML results from a limited number of small, and variably treated, retrospective series, which included different lymphoma categories, diagnosed before the World Health Organization classification era and a single prospective trial [46]. Thus, universally accepted therapeutic guidelines for OAML do not exist. Therapeutic decision is usually driven from appraisal of several variables related to the patient (age, performance status, co-morbidity—i.e. autoimmune disorders—concomitant infections useful as therapeutic targets), to the lymphoma (stage, site of disease—i.e. surgical accessibility—symptoms due to infiltration, histological and molecular indicators of aggressiveness and response) and to the risk of severe treatment-related toxicity and sequelae. Efficacy and kinetic of response are two important parameters for therapeutic choice, mostly in less-indolent lymphomas that could determine a fast impairment of ocular function.
surgical resection
Surgical resection is a necessary diagnostic step and, in selected cases, a part of therapeutic approach to OAML (Figure 5). Complete excision can be carried out in many conjunctival and lachrymal gland MALT lymphomas, especially in pseudoencapsulated lesions. However, additional efforts to completely resect lymphomatous lesions should be avoided in OAML patients since an aggressive approach could be associated with a high risk of complications, especially in the area of the lachrymal gland and in the deeper orbit, and considering that the extent of surgical resection does not influence survival [67]. Wait and watch strategy after surgical resection or biopsy in patients with stage I disease produces similar results, in terms of time to progression, systemic dissemination, high-grade transformation and lymphoma-related deceases, to those reported with immediate radiotherapy, with a 10-year overall survival of 94% [67]. This strategy could be safely proposed to selected OAML patients, like elderly patients or patients with severe co-morbidity, completely resected lesions and/or indolent and asymptomatic disease.
|
radiotherapy
Radiotherapy is the most extensively studied treatment in OAML patients. However, only a few series have been focused on OAML treated exclusively with radiotherapy [62, 63, 70, 71]. An universally accepted radiation schedule for OAML patients does not exist. Recent studies indicate a radiation field including a gross tumor volume with 0.5- to 1-cm margin for a planning target volume and a dose of 25–30 Gy in 10–15 fractions (minimal target dose >25 Gy) [62, 70, 71]. Electron beams (4–12 MeV) and 4–9 MV photon beams are advisable in conjunctival and intraorbital lymphomas, respectively. A single anterior field or a wedge pair of anterior fields has been used in most series. In conjunctival lymphomas, the entire conjunctiva and eyelid should be irradiated, while preliminary data seem to indicate that the entire orbit should be irradiated in patients with intraorbital lymphoma [62]. Brachytherapy can provide local control in conjunctival lymphomas, but the risk of complications and marginal relapses is unacceptably high [72].
Most irradiated patients with stage I OAML achieve an objective response, which is slow and gradual [62, 70]. In-field relapses are rare and seem to be related to low-radiation doses [71] or to the use of lens shielding [62]. Relapse rate at 4 years is 20–25%; most relapses involve the contralateral orbit (half of relapses) and distant extranodal organs [63, 70, 71].
With the above-indicated schedule, radiotherapy is usually well tolerated [62, 70]. The most common toxic effects of grade
2 are cataract (38% of cases), retinal disorders (17%), xerophthalmia (17%) and glaucoma (2%) [70]. Toxicity is more common with doses >36 Gy [70]. Presently, the role of upfront radiotherapy is being reviewed due to its related toxicity, the development of new therapeutic strategies and the recent insights into the biology of OAML.
chemotherapy
Prospective trials assessing chemotherapy efficacy in OAML do not exist; in most retrospective OAML series, only a small proportion of patients has been treated with chemotherapy alone. The largest experience regards chlorambucil, an alkylating agent largely used in indolent lymphomas. This drug is an active and well-tolerated therapy for stage I OAML, with a 100% overall response rate, a 79% complete remission rate and a 5-year relapse-free survival of 60% [69]. Relapses after chlorambucil mostly involve extraorbital tissues, with rare cases (3%) of high-grade transformation [69]. Chlorambucil could be proposed especially to OAML patients who experience relapse in previously irradiated areas or with disseminated or bilateral disease and in the case of radiotherapy inaccessibility (Figure 5). The use of other drugs, like fludarabine [73], cladribine [74] and oxaliplatin [75], deserves more caution. Tolerability of these drugs is sometimes unsatisfactory [74], and evidence of their efficacy is limited to a few prospective trials on unselected MALT lymphomas including a small number of OAML patients. The use of upfront anthracycline-based chemotherapy did not show any clinical advantage in comparison with chlorambucil alone [2].
bacteria-eradicating therapy
In gastric MALT lymphoma, antibiotic therapy, aimed to eradicate the Hp infection, is followed by lymphoma regression in 60–70% of stage IE cases [26]. Although a role for Hp in sustaining the growth also of non-gastric MALT lymphomas was hypothesized, reported evidence shows that gastric Hp infection in OAML patients does not influence clinical presentation and course and that Hp-eradicating antibiotic therapy is not active against OAML [76]. Conversely, the eradication of Cp infection with doxycycline, a tetracycline derivative largely used in the treatment of psittacosis, has been proposed as a valid alternative for OAML patients. In a multicenter phase II trial [46], 11 patients with Cp-positive OAML and 16 with Cp-negative OAML have been treated with doxycycline, obtaining, after a median follow-up of 14 months, an overall response rate of 48%. Lymphoma regression was usually slow and gradual and has been observed in both Cp-positive and -negative patients (overall response rate = 64% versus 38%; P = 0.25), with a 2-year failure-free survival of 66%. This trial confirmed that doxycycline is a fast, cheap, safe and active therapy for Cp-positive OAML and that is a valid alternative even in patients with multiple failures, involving previously irradiated areas or regional lymphadenopathies [46]. This latter feature is distinctive from gastric MALT lymphomas, where the detection of perivisceral lymphadenopathies is rather considered as a negative response predictor [77].
One-third of patients with Chlamydia-negative OAML experienced tumor regression after doxycycline treatment [46], indicating that doxycycline could be used in most OAML patients, independently of the diagnosis of Cp infection. However, smaller studies where OAML patients received doxycycline without a previous molecular assessment for chlamydial infection led to conflicting results [78, 79]. Eradicating antibiotic therapy remains an experimental strategy that should be always preceded by chlamydial infection assessment, at least until ample, worldwide experience will be available (Figure 5).
immunotherapy
Rituximab, a chimeric mAb directed against the B-lymphocyte antigen CD20, has been largely used in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Even if active in MALT lymphomas [80], rituximab has been only anecdotally used in OAML patients [80–82]. Rituximab activity is high in patients with newly diagnosed OAML, but response duration is usually short and relapse rate is clearly higher than those reported for gastric MALT lymphoma [82]. Rituximab could be, however, used to obtain transient symptomatic benefit in OAML patients for whom other therapeutic strategies are contraindicated [81, 82].
Intralesional injection of interferon
is a relatively simple and quick procedure that has been successfully used for conjunctival lymphomas [83, 84] (Figure 5). Side-effects consist of local hemorrhage, chemosis and minor systemic effects [83, 84]. The efficacy of this approach remains, however, to be defined considering that follow-up of reported cases is short and that unsuccessfully treated patients may have not been reported.
| future perspectives |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Future studies will investigate whether Cp infection is responsible for the rapidly increasing incidence of OAML. The role of putative Cp-derived antigens in lymphomagenesis, the involvement of distinct Cp strains as well as the mechanisms of tolerance and antigenic chronic stimulation induced by this microorganism, that may ultimately favor the onset of OAML, should be addressed in well-designed studies. From a therapeutic point of view, and following the example of gastric MALT lymphoma [85], the analysis of pathologic and molecular predictors of response will play an important role in selecting the best candidates for Cp-eradicating antibiotic therapy. Well-designed prospective trials will lead to establish new therapeutic strategies that, exploiting novel mechanisms, could contribute to further improve the outcome of these patients. For instance, the efficacy of antiviral therapy with interferon and ribavirin [86] in HCV-positive patients or new antibiotic combinations should be investigated. In the years ahead, it is hoped that international, multidisciplinary efforts could address most of the fundamental, clinical and biological research questions for OAML.
Received for publication July 11, 2007. Revision received September 26, 2007. Accepted for publication October 5, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Margo CE, Mulla ZD. Malignant tumors of the orbit. Analysis of the Florida cancer registry. Ophthalmology (1998) 19(5):835–846.
2. Sasai K, Yamabe H, Dodo Y, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the ocular adnexa. Acta Oncol (2001) 40(4):485–490.[Web of Science][Medline]
3. Mannami T, Yoshino T, Oshima K, et al. Clinical, histopathological, and immunogenetic analysis of ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative disorders: characterization of malt lymphoma and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. Mod Pathol (2001) 14(7):641–649.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Moslehi R, Devesa SS, Schairer C, et al. Rapidly increasing incidence of ocular non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 98(13):936–939.
5. Ferreri AJ, Guidoboni M, Ponzoni M, et al. Evidence for an association between Chlamydia psittaci and ocular adnexal lymphomas. J Natl Cancer Inst (2004) 96(8):586–594.
6. Du MQ, Isaccson PG. Gastric MALT lymphoma: from aetiology to treatment. Lancet Oncol (2002) 3(2):97–104.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
7. Neri A, Jakobiec FA, Pelicci PG, et al. Immunoglobulin and T cell receptor beta chain gene rearrangement analysis of ocular adnexal lymphoid neoplasms: clinical and biologic implications. Blood (1987) 70(5):1519–1529.
8. Coupland SE, Krause L, Delecluse HJ, et al. Lymphoproliferative lesions of the ocular adnexa. Analysis of 112 cases. Ophthalmology (1998) 105(8):1430–1441.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
9. Hara Y, Nakamura N, Kuze T, et al. Immunoglobulin heavy chain gene analysis of ocular adnexal extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (2001) 42(11):2450–2457.
10. Coupland SE, Damato B. Lymphomas involving the eye and the ocular adnexa. Curr Opin Ophthalmol (2006) 17(6):523–531.[Web of Science][Medline]
11. Ruiz A, Reischl U, Swerdlow SH, et al. Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of the ocular adnexa: multiparameter analysis of 34 cases including interphase molecular cytogenetics and PCR for Chlamydia psittaci. Am J Surg Pathol (2007) 31(5):792–802.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
12. Coupland SE, Hellmich M, Auw-Haedrich C, et al. Prognostic value of cell-cycle markers in ocular adnexal lymphoma: an assessment of 230 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2004) 242(2):130–145.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
13. Franco R, Camacho FI, Caleo A, et al. Nuclear bcl10 expression characterizes a group of ocular adnexa MALT lymphomas with shorter failure-free survival. Mod Pathol (2006) 19(8):1055–1067.[Web of Science][Medline]
14. Adachi A, Tamaru JI, Kaneko K, et al. No evidence of a correlation between BCL10 expression and API2-MALT1 gene rearrangement in ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma. Pathol Int (2004) 54(1):16–25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
15. Nola M, Lukenda A, Bollmann M, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors in ocular adnexal lymphoma. Croat Med J (2004) 45(3):328–332.[Web of Science][Medline]
16. Coupland SE, Foss HD, Anagnostopoulos I, et al. Immunoglobulin VH gene expression among extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of the ocular adnexa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci (1999) 40(3):555–562.
17. Remstein ED, Kurtin PJ, James CD, et al. Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas with t(11;18)(q21;q21) and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas with aneuploidy develop along different pathogenetic pathways. Am J Pathol (2002) 161(1):63–71.
18. Streubel B, Simonitsch-Klupp I, Mullauer L, et al. Variable frequencies of MALT lymphoma-associated genetic aberrations in MALT lymphomas of different sites. Leukemia (2004) 18(10):1722–1726.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19. Tanimoto K, Sekiguchi N, Yokota Y, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of primary ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma. BMC Cancer (2006) 6:249.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Murga Penas EM, Hinz K, Roser K, et al. Translocations t(11;18)(q21;q21) and t(14;18)(q32;q21) are the main chromosomal abnormalities involving MLT/MALT1 in MALT lymphomas. Leukemia (2003) 17(11):2225–2229.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Ye H, Gong L, Liu H, et al. MALT lymphoma with t(14;18)(q32;q21)/IGH-MALT1 is characterized by strong cytoplasmic MALT1 and BCL10 expression. J Pathol (2005) 205(3):293–301.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Haralambieva E, Adam P, Ventura R, et al. Genetic rearrangement of FOXP1 is predominantly detected in a subset of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with extranodal presentation. Leukemia (2006) 20(7):1300–1303.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Ott G, Katzenberger T, Greiner A, et al. The t(11;18)(q21;q21) chromosome translocation is a frequent and specific aberration in low-grade but not high-grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT-) type. Cancer Res (1997) 57(18):3944–3948.
24. Streubel B, Lamprecht A, Dierlamm J, et al. T(14;18)(q32;q21) involving IGH and MALT1 is a frequent chromosomal aberration in MALT lymphoma. Blood (2003) 101(6):2335–2339.
25. Streubel B, Vinatzer U, Lamprecht A, et al. T(3;14)(p14.1;q32) involving IGH and FOXP1 is a novel recurrent chromosomal aberration in MALT lymphoma. Leukemia (2005) 19(4):652–658.[Web of Science][Medline]
26. Isaacson PG, Du MQ. MALT lymphoma: from morphology to molecules. Nat Rev Cancer (2004) 4(8):644–653.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
27. Raderer M, Wohrer S, Streubel B, et al. Assessment of disease dissemination in gastric compared with extragastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma using extensive staging: a single-center experience. J Clin Oncol (2006) 24(19):3136–3141.
28. Matteucci C, Galieni P, Leoncini L, et al. Typical genomic imbalances in primary MALT lymphoma of the orbit. J Pathol (2003) 200(5):656–660.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
29. Zhou Y, Ye H, Martin-Subero JI, et al. Distinct comparative genomic hybridisation profiles in gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas with and without t(11;18)(q21;q21). Br J Haematol (2006) 133(1):35–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
30. Pascual V, Capra JD. VH4-21, a human VH gene segment overrepresented in the autoimmune repertoire. Arthritis Rheum (1992) 35(1):11–18.[Web of Science][Medline]
31. Bahler DW, Campbell MJ, Hart S, et al. Ig VH gene expression among human follicular lymphomas. Blood (1991) 78(6):1561–1568.
32. Byrne GI, Ojcius DM. Chlamydia and apoptosis: life and death decisions of an intracellular pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol (2004) 2(10):802–808.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
33. Smith JS, Munoz N, Herrero R, et al. Evidence for Chlamydia trachomatis as a human papillomavirus cofactor in the etiology of invasive cervical cancer in Brazil and the Philippines. J Infect Dis (2002) 185(3):324–331.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
34. Miyairi I, Byrne GI. Chlamydia and programmed cell death. Curr Opin Microbiol (2006) 9(1):102–108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
35. Yeung L, Tsao YP, Chen PY, et al. Combination of adult inclusion conjunctivitis and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma in a young adult. Cornea (2004) 23(1):71–75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
36. Oldstone MB. Molecular mimicry and immune-mediated diseases. FASEB J (1998) 12(13):1255–1265.
37. Negrini R, Savio A, Poiesi C, et al. Antigenic mimicry between helicobacter pylori and gastric mucosa in the pathogenesis of body atrophic gastritis. Gastroenterology (1996) 111(3):655–665.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
38. Lamb DJ, El-Sankary W, Ferns GA. Molecular mimicry in atherosclerosis: a role for heat shock proteins in immunisation. Atherosclerosis (2003) 167(2):177–185.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
39. Pockley AG. Heat shock proteins as regulators of the immune response. Lancet (2003) 362(9382):469–476.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
40. Ishii E, Yokota K, Sugiyama T, et al. Immunoglobulin G1 antibody response to helicobacter pylori heat shock protein 60 is closely associated with low-grade gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol (2001) 8(6):1056–1059.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Aigelsreiter A, Stelzl E, Deutsch A, et al. Association between Chlamydia psittaci infection and extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-lymphomas. J Clin Oncol (2006) 24(18 Suppl). (Abstr 7568).
42. Gracia E, Froesch P, Mazzucchelli L, et al. Low prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci in ocular adnexal lymphomas from Cuban patients. Leuk Lymphoma (2007) 48(1):104–108.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
43. De Cremoux P, Subtil A, Ferreri AJ, et al. Low prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci infection in french patients with ocular adnexal lymphomas. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 98:365–366.
44. Chanudet E, Zhou Y, Bacon CM, et al. Chlamydia psittaci is variably associated with ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma in different geographical regions. J Pathol (2006) 209(3):344–351.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
45. Goebel N, Serr A, Mittelviefhaus H, et al. Chlamydia psittaci, Helicobacter pylori and ocular adnexal lymphoma-is there an association? The German experience. Leuk Res (2007) 31:1450–1452.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
46. Ferreri AJ, Ponzoni M, Guidoboni M, et al. Bacteria-eradicating therapy with doxycycline in ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma: a multicenter prospective trial. J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 98(19):1375–1382.
47. Daibata M, Nemoto Y, Togitani K, et al. Absence of Chlamydia psittaci in ocular adnexal lymphoma from Japanese patients. Br J Haematol (2006) 132(5):651–652.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
48. Liu YC, Ohyashiki JH, Ito Y, et al. Chlamydia psittaci in ocular adnexal lymphoma: Japanese experience. Leuk Res (2006) 30(12):1587–1589.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
49. Yoo C, Ryu MH, Huh J, et al. Chlamydia psittaci infection and clinico-pathologic analysis of ocular adnexal lymphomas in Korea. Am J Hematol (2007) 82:821–823.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
50. Mulder MM, Heddema ER, Pannekoek Y, et al. No evidence for an association of ocular adnexal lymphoma with Chlamydia psittaci in a cohort of patients from the Netherlands. Leuk Res (2006) 30(10):1305–1307.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Rosado MF, Byrne JG, Ding F, et al. Ocular adnexal lymphoma: a clinicopathological study of a large cohort of patients with no evidence for an association with Chlamydia psittaci. Blood (2005) 107(2):467–472.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
52. Vargas RL, Fallone E, Felgar RE, et al. Is there an association between ocular adnexal lymphoma and infection with Chlamydia psittaci? The University of Rochester experience. Leuk Res (2005) 33:547–551.
53. Zhang GS, Winter JN, Variakojis D, et al. Lack of an association between Chlamydia psittaci and ocular adnexal lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma (2007) 48(3):577–583.[Web of Science][Medline]
54. Zucca E, Bertoni F. Chlamydia or not Chlamydia, that is the question: which is the microorganism associated with MALT lymphomas of the ocular adnexa? J Natl Cancer Inst (2006) 98(19):1348–1349.
55. Falkenhagen KM, Braziel RM, Fraunfelder FW, et al. B-cells in ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative lesions express B-cell attracting chemokine 1 (CXCL13). Am J Ophthalmol (2005) 140(2):335–337.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
56. Shen D, Yuen HK, Galita DA, et al. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in a bilateral orbital mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Am J Ophthalmol (2006) 141(6):1162–1163.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
57. Chan CC, Shen D, Mochizuki M, et al. Detection of Helicobacter pylori and Chlamydia pneumoniae genes in primary orbital lymphoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc (2006) 104:62–70.[Medline]
58. Ferreri AJ, Viale E, Guidoboni M, et al. Clinical implications of hepatitis C virus infection in MALT-type lymphoma of the ocular adnexa. Ann Oncol (2006) 17(5):769–772.
59. Liu YX, Yoshino T, Ohara N, et al. Loss of expression of alpha4beta7 integrin and L-selectin is associated with high-grade progression of low-grade MALT lymphoma. Mod Pathol (2001) 14(8):798–805.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
60. Bhatia S, Paulino AC, Buatti JM, et al. Curative radiotherapy for primary orbital lymphoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2002) 54(3):818–823.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
61. Martinet S, Ozsahin M, Belkacemi Y, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors in orbital lymphoma: a rare cancer network study on 90 consecutive patients treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2003) 55(4):892–898.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
62. Uno T, Isobe K, Shikama N, et al. Radiotherapy for extranodal, marginal zone, B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue originating in the ocular adnexa: a multiinstitutional, retrospective review of 50 patients. Cancer (2003) 98(4):865–871.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
63. Fung CY, Tarbell NJ, Lucarelli MJ, et al. Ocular adnexal lymphoma: clinical behavior of distinct world health organization classification subtypes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (2003) 57(5):1382–1391.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
64. Sarraf D, Jain A, Dubovy S, et al. Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma with intraocular involvement. Retina (2005) 25(1):94–98.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
65. Nutting CM, Shah-Desai S, Rose GE, et al. Thyroid orbitopathy possibly predisposes to late-onset of periocular lymphoma. Eye (2006) 20(6):645–648.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
66. Raderer M, Osterreicher C, Machold K, et al. Impaired response of gastric MALT-lymphoma to helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with autoimmune disease. Ann Oncol (2001) 12(7):937–939.
67. Tanimoto K, Kaneko A, Suzuki S, et al. Long-term follow-up results of no initial therapy for ocular adnexal MALT lymphoma. Ann Oncol (2006) 17(1):135–140.
68. Matsuo T, Yoshino T. Long-term follow-up results of observation or radiation for conjunctival malignant lymphoma. Ophthalmology (2004) 111(6):1233–1237.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
69. Ben Simon GJ, Cheung N, McKelvie P, et al. Oral chlorambucil for extranodal, marginal zone, B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue of the orbit. Ophthalmology (2006) 113(7):1209–1213.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
70. Ejima Y, Sasaki R, Okamoto Y, et al. Ocular adnexal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol (2006) 78(1):6–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
71. Tsang RW, Gospodarowicz MK, Pintilie M, et al. Localized mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma treated with radiation therapy has excellent clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol (2003) 21(22):4157–4164.
72. Regueiro CA, Valcarcel FJ, Romero J, et al. Treatment of conjunctival lymphomas by beta-ray brachytherapy using a strontium-90-yttrium-90 applicator. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) (2002) 14(6):459–463.[Medline]
73. Zinzani PL, Stefoni V, Musuraca G, et al. Fludarabine-containing chemotherapy as frontline treatment of nongastrointestinal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Cancer (2004) 100(10):2190–2194.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
74. Jager G, Neumeister P, Quehenberger F, et al. Prolonged clinical remission in patients with extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type treated with cladribine: 6 year follow-up of a phase II trial. Ann Oncol (2006) 17(11):1722–1723.
75. Raderer M, Wohrer S, Bartsch R, et al. Phase II study of oxaliplatin for treatment of patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23(33):8442–8446.
76. Ferreri AJ, Ponzoni M, Viale E, et al. Association between helicobacter pylori infection and MALT-type lymphoma of the ocular adnexa: clinical and therapeutic implications. Hematol Oncol (2006) 24(1):33–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
77. Ruskone-Fourmestraux A, Lavergne A, Aegerter PH, et al. Predictive factors for regression of gastric MALT lymphoma after anti-helicobacter pylori treatment. Gut (2001) 48(3):297–303.
78. Abramson DH, Rollins I, Coleman M. Periocular mucosa-associated lymphoid/low grade lymphomas: treatment with antibiotics. Am J Ophthalmol (2005) 140(4):729–730.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
79. Grunberger B, Hauff W, Lukas J, et al. Blind antibiotic treatment targeting Chlamydia is not effective in patients with MALT lymphoma of the ocular adnexa. Ann Oncol (2006) 17(3):484–487.
80. Conconi A, Martinelli G, Thieblemont C, et al. Clinical activity of rituximab in extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT type. Blood (2003) 102(8):2741–2745.
81. Nuckel H, Meller D, Steuhl KP, et al. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy in relapsed MALT lymphoma of the conjunctiva. Eur J Haematol (2004) 73(4):258–262.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
82. Ferreri AJ, Ponzoni M, Martinelli G, et al. Rituximab in patients with mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue-type lymphoma of the ocular adnexa. Haematologica (2005) 90(11):1578–1579.
83. Lachapelle KR, Rathee R, Kratky V, et al. Treatment of conjunctival mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma with intralesional injection of interferon alfa-2b. Arch Ophthalmol (2000) 118(2):284–285.
84. Blasi MA, Gherlinzoni F, Calvisi G, et al. Local chemotherapy with interferon-alpha for conjunctival mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: a preliminary report. Ophthalmology (2001) 108(3):559–562.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
85. Liu H, Ye H, Ruskone-Fourmestraux A, et al. T(11;18) is a marker for all stage gastric MALT lymphomas that will not respond to H. pylori eradication. Gastroenterology (2002) 122(5):1286–1294.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
86. Vallisa D, Bernuzzi P, Arcaini L, et al. Role of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in HCV-related, low-grade, B-cell, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a multicenter Italian experience. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23(3):468–473.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Paulli, L. Arcaini, M. Lucioni, E. Boveri, D. Capello, F. Passamonti, M. Merli, S. Rattotti, D. Rossi, R. Riboni, et al. Subcutaneous 'lipoma-like' B-cell lymphoma associated with HCV infection: a new presentation of primary extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT Ann. Onc., October 25, 2009; (2009) mdp454v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



), the lateral rectus and the superior extraocular muscles (EOM). The left lachrymal gland is infiltrated. On T1-w image (A), the OAML signal is comparable to that of EOM. On the T2-w image (B), OAML presents the same signal intensity of cerebral gray matter and is slightly hyperintense to EOM. Usually, T1 and T2 signal intensities within the lesion are homogeneous. OAML contrast enhancement is uniform and its conspicuity is comparable to that observed in lachrymal glands and EOM. Using parallel imaging technique is now possible to obtain DWI images of the orbit with reasonable scan times and without occurrence of significant susceptibility artifacts (D, F). DWI is an MRI-based technique that evaluates the rate of microscopic water diffusion in tissues and represents a useful technique for characterizing lymphomas of the central nervous system, the neck and the orbits. On DWI images, OAML appears hyperintense compared with all other orbital structures. DWI is also helpful in establishing involvement of the lachrymal gland, where both signal intensity and contrast enhancement do not allow unambiguous differentiation between normal and pathologic tissue. Please compare the contrast enhancement and DWI signal intensity of affected left lachrymal gland and normal right one (*).

