Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on November 28, 2007
Annals of Oncology 2008 19(3):443-447; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm540
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
urogenital tumors |
The long-term risks of adjuvant carboplatin treatment for stage I seminoma of the testis
1 Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London
2 Department of Medical Statistics, Thames Cancer Registry, London, UK
* Correspondence to: Dr T. Powles, Department of Medical Oncology, Barts and the London NHS Trust, St Bartholomews Hospital, 7th Floor Glouchester House, London EC1A 7BE, UK. Tel: +44-07932048109; Fax: +44-02087468533; E-mail: thomas.powles{at}bartsandthelondon.nhs.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background: The use of adjuvant carboplatin in the management of stage I seminoma of the testis has been limited by the lack of long-term data. In this study, we address this issue for the first time.
Patients and methods: Data on 199 patients treated with single-agent carboplatin for stage I seminoma of the testis were prospectively collected. Overall mortality, deaths from circulatory disease and the incidence of second cancers were compared with expected values derived from the UK general population.
Results: The median follow-up for the cohort was 9.0 years (range 0.1–20.1). There has been no excess in overall mortality [standardised mortality ratio (SMR) 0.89; 95% CI 0.36–1.83], death from circulatory diseases (SMR 1.44; 95% CI 0.39–3.69) or the incidence of second nontestis cancers (standardised incidence ratio 0.96; 95% CI 0.26–2.45) in this group of patients. These findings also applied to specific follow-up periods of >5 or 10 years. Specifically, neither haematological nor solid nontestis tumours occurred in excess. There was an increase in the long-term development of contralateral testis cancers.
Conclusions: This study addresses some of the concerns surrounding the long-term safety of single-agent carboplatin. It also helps in planning long-term follow-up for patients receiving this form of treatment.
Key words: adjuvant, carboplatin, mortality, testis cancer, second cancers, seminoma, stage 1
| introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Attempts have been made to reduce the proportion of patients who relapse with stage I seminomas. Radiotherapy has established itself as an adjuvant treatment, which significantly reduces the relapse rate [1–5]. Unfortunately, radiotherapy is associated with doubling in the risk of developing a second malignancy compared with the general population [6–10]. This risk only becomes apparent after 5 years and peaks between 10 and 20 years after treatment [7]. Radiotherapy is also associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in the long term [11, 12]. Indeed, patients treated with radiotherapy have a decreased survival compared with matched individuals from the general population [12].
For these reasons, alternatives have been sought. Single-agent carboplatin has been investigated in a randomised study and was shown to have a similar relapse rate and overall survival compared with radiotherapy in this setting [13]. Unfortunately, there are no long-term follow-up data for this form of treatment, and as combination chemotherapy for testis cancer is associated with increased mortality, cardiovascular disease and second cancers, there are justified concerns about the long-term side-effects associated with single-agent carboplatin [7, 9, 10, 14–18]. Consequently, the use of routine single-agent carboplatin has not been widely recommended [17]. In this study, we present the long-term risks of single-agent carboplatin treatment for stage I seminoma.
| patients and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From 1986 to January 2007, patients were offered single-agent adjuvant carboplatin for stage I seminoma of the testis at our institution. Data on these patients were recorded in a prospective database. This regimen was offered to all patients as part of consecutive phase I/II/III studies [13, 19]. A number of individuals did not want to enter into these studies and were offered surveillance (n = 86) or adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 29) instead.
The dose of carboplatin given changed with time as area under curve became widely used to calculate the dose during this study (Table 1) [20]. During the first 5 years of this approach, two cycles of carboplatin were given (n = 28), after which only one cycle was given (n = 171). The reasons for this are the results of the initial studies which indicated that one cycle was as effective [19]. Patients were followed up according to our in-house protocol. This included three monthly outpatient appointments for the first 2 years, followed by four monthly outpatients until 5 years. Patients had tumour markers measured. Routine radiological investigations stopped at 2-year follow-up. After 5 years of follow-up, patients were seen on an annual basis. Outcome data for these patients were recorded. These included date and cause of death, the development of a second tumour and the development of a second testis cancer.
|
The outcome of the cohort was assessed in January 2007. Seven patients had been lost to follow-up (last contact 3–9 years ago). All these patients moved within the UK or emigrated (three to Europe, one to Asia and one to Australia).
cardiovascular and overall mortality
Observed deaths were compared with the expected numbers derived from age–sex–cause-specific rates for England and Wales in 1999, as published by the Office for National Statistics [22]. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated with exact 95% Poisson confidence intervals (CIs). Cerebrovascular disease and ischaemic heart disease were assessed separately, along with all-cause mortality.
incidence of second cancers
The observed occurrences of cancers subsequent to treatment with carboplatin were compared with the expected numbers derived from age–sex—period-specific rates for South East England from the Thames Cancer Registry. Time at risk was calculated from the start of treatment to the date of last follow-up, death or diagnosis of second cancer. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated with 95% CIs. Occurrences of testis cancer and haematological cancers were assessed separately.
Subset analyses were carried out for patients with follow-up of >5 and 10 years.
| results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
patient characteristics
Overall, 199 patients with ongoing follow-up were identified from the database, with a total follow-up of 1841 person-years and median follow-up of 9.0 (range 0.1–20.1) years. Seventy-two per cent had a follow-up of >5 years, and 45% had >10 years of follow-up. The median age at the time of carboplatin treatment was 36 years (range 19–73), and the median age at the most recent follow-up was 45 years (range 25–87).
Data on the size of the primary tumour and rete testis involvement at initial diagnosis are available on 173 of the patients. These data are shown in Table 1.
mortality
There was no excess mortality in the carboplatin cohort compared with age- and sex-matched general UK population data (SMR for all-cause mortality 0.89; 95% CI 0.36–1.83) Table 2. No patient died from testis cancer, although there were five new contralateral testis cancers and four testis cancer relapses. The seven deaths which occurred were due to cancer (n = 2), cerebrovascular disease (n = 2), suicide (n = 1) and ischaemic heart disease (n = 2) (Table 3). There was no specific time period (e.g. >5 years or 10 years) associated with increased mortality.
|
|
There was no significant increase in circulatory diseases as a cause of death in this cohort (SMR 1.44; 95% CI 0.39–3.69). In particular, there was no significant excess mortality for circulatory disease during the later time periods (>5 or 10 years after treatment). There were no significant increases in mortality for subsets of circulatory diseases, such as ischaemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease (Table 2), although an SMR of 4.59 (95% CI 0.56–16.6) was observed for the latter, which requires further investigation. The deaths due to circulatory disease occurred 0.7–11.3 years after carboplatin treatment. The age of these patients at the time of death varied between 44 and 57 years.
incidence of second cancers
To date there has been no excess in the incidence of second cancers (other than testis cancer) (SIR 0.96; 95% CI 0.26–2.45) Table 4. Additionally, there was no increase in the incidence of second cancers during any specific follow-up period (>5 or 10 years). When haematological and solid tumours were assessed separately, neither was significantly increased, although the CIs were wide. An excess of contralateral testis cancers occurred compared with the general UK population (SIR 29.57; 95% CI 9.60–69.01). All these tumours occurred after >5 years of follow-up.
|
details of patients with second cancers
The four nontestis cancers included an extensive small-cell lung cancer, a meningioma, a nonmetastatic prostate cancer and a patient with Hodgkin's lymphoma. These tumours occurred 6.7–13.7 years after adjuvant treatment and all were histological confirmed. The patients with small-cell lung cancer and the patient with the meningioma received standard care, but both have died of their disease. The other two patients are alive and well, after a radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and standard chemotherapy for Hodgkins disease.
details of patients with recurrent contraleral testis cancer
Five patients developed a second primary testis cancer (5.8–11.4 years after the initial testis cancer and carboplatin therapy). All had seminoma at histology. Four of the patients had stage I disease and one had metastatic disease to the para-aortic lymph nodes. The patients with stage I disease were treated with orchidectomy and were not given adjuvant treatment for a second time. All these patients are alive and disease free, with a median follow-up of 6.1 years after second testis cancer.
details of patients with relapsed testis cancer
Four patients have relapsed with metastatic seminoma 2–6 years after the initial diagnosis and carboplatin therapy. Three of these patients had initially received one cycle of carboplatin, and the remaining patient had received two cycles. Two of these patients relapsed with disease confined to the para-aortic lymph nodes, one had additional lung metastasis and the remaining patient had extrapulmonary metastasis (liver). Consequently, three were IGCCCG (International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group) good-risk disease while the remaining patient had intermediate-risk disease. All were treated with standard cisplatin-based combination treatment (BEP) and are alive and cancer free (3–12 years follow-up after BEP).
| discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lack of long-term outcome data is one of the factors limiting the use of adjuvant carboplatin in stage I seminoma [17]. The data presented here address this issue for the first time. The results are cautiously reassuring, in that this treatment does not appear to be associated with an excess in overall mortality, cardiovascular mortality or second malignancies (other than testis cancer) in this observational period.
Previous work has shown that men treated with all types of chemotherapy for testis cancer have an increased risk of mortality from other causes when compared with the general population [15], although the increased risks they found were modest (SMR 1.34; 95% CI 1.15–1.55). Due to the comparatively small numbers involved, a small increase in mortality cannot be excluded in the current study. However, the mortality data presented here (SMR 0.89; 95% CI 0.36–1.83) are nevertheless reassuring and exclude any major increase in mortality associated with single-agent carboplatin.
Additionally, this work indicates that carboplatin is not associated with an increase in the development of second cancers during this observation period. Combination chemotherapy for testis cancer has been associated with the development of haematological cancers and solid tumours [7, 9, 10]. Indeed, the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy given together in testis cancer appears to increase this risk further [7]. The effect, however, appears to be drug specific, and platinum analogues have not been implicated previously in testis cancer, although they are associated with the development of malignancies in preclinical studies [23]. Additionally, data from patients treated with platinum analogues for ovarian cancer indicate a small increased risk is present [24].
Long-term follow-up shows radiotherapy treatment for testis cancer is associated with an increase risk of second tumours [6–10]. This peaks between 10 and 20 years of follow-up. The relative risk is approximately double compared with age-matched controls. Recently, there have been modifications of the dose and extent of radiotherapy field [25, 26]. The effect this has had on the long-term risk is unknown, although it is speculated that it may have already reduced the incidence of second cancers [7].
In view of the fact that the second cancers peak 10–15 years after treatment with radiotherapy and only 45% of the patients in this study presented here have follow-up beyond this point, it is possible that these results may have underestimated the true risk. Therefore, we went on to specifically look at those individuals with >10 years of follow-up after treatment, and although the numbers are smaller, no specific increased risk could be identified (Tables 2 and 4).
The long-term risk of developing a contralateral testis cancer after a previous seminoma is
2%–5%. This usually occurs within the first 6 years and decreases with time [27]. Previous data show that carboplatin is associated with a reduced risk of contralateral testis cancer in the first 4 years of follow-up, compared with radiotherapy (0.3% versus 1%) [13]. Our data, however, indicate that carboplatin is associated with a persistent long-term risk of contralateral testis cancer after 5 years of follow-up (4%). This finding is intriguing. The initial reduction in risk associated with carboplatin was thought to be because of the effects of carboplatin on carcinoma in situ in the remaining testis [13]. The data presented here indicate that carboplatin may be associated with a delay in the development of cancer in the contralateral testis rather than preventing it. This needs confirmation, but highlights the need for continued follow-up of these patients.
Only one (0.06% per annum) patient has relapsed with metastatic disease after 5 years of follow-up. Late relapses have been reported previously for patients with seminoma and this figure does not appear excessive compared with previous data [16]. This is reassuring and helpful in planning long-term follow-up for these patients. It is especially important as long-term cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography) is recommended beyond 5 years by some centres, if the risk of recurrence remains >0.3% per annum [16]. In our institution, we do not routinely carry out cross-sectional imaging beyond 2 years. Therefore, it is possible that we have missed some relapses which have resulted in an underestimation of the true relapse rate. If this was, however, the case, one would expect these patients to present eventually, with more advanced disease. This does not appear to be the case here. Nevertheless, this should be taken into consideration when interpreting this data.
Both radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy are associated with a long-term increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients treated for testis cancer [11, 12, 15]. The data presented here indicate that this may not be the case with single-agent carboplatin. The one area of concern is cerebrovascular disease, where a nonsignificant increase was observed after 5 years of follow-up. This requires further investigation and underlines the need for continued follow-up of these patients.
Although limited by its size, this study helps address some of the concerns surrounding the long-term safety of single-agent carboplatin treatment for stage I testis cancer. It also helps plan long-term follow-up for these patients, especially in view of the contralateral relapses observed after 5 years of follow-up.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We would like to thank the Orchid Cancer Appeal for supporting this work.
Received for publication September 5, 2007. Revision received October 22, 2007. Accepted for publication October 23, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Gurkaynak M, Akyol F, Zorlu F, et al. Stage I testicular seminoma: para-aortic and iliac irradiation with reduced dose after orchiectomy. Urol Int (2003) 71:385–388.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
2. Garcia-Serra AM, Zlotecki RA, Morris CG, et al. Long-term results of radiotherapy for early-stage testicular seminoma. Am J Clin Oncol (2005) 28:119–124.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Bosl GJ, Bajorin DF, Sheinfeld J, et al. Cancer of the testis. In: Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology—DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. (2005) 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1269–1293.
4. Chung P, Parker C, Panzarella T, et al. Surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma: risk of late relapse. Can J Urol (2002) 9:1637–1640.[Medline]
5. Warde P, Specht L, Horwich A, et al. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol (2002) 20:4448–4452.
6. Bokemeyer C, Schmoll HJ. Secondary neoplasms following treatment of malignant germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol (1993) 11:1703–1709.
7. Travis LB, Fossa SD, Schonfeld SJ, et al. Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: focus on long-term survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 97:1354–1365.
8. Travis LB, Curtis RE, Storm H, et al. Risk of second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (1997) 89:1429–1439.
9. Wanderas EH, Fossa SD, Tretli S. Risk of subsequent non-germ cell cancer after treatment of germ cell cancer in 2006 Norwegian male patients. Eur J Cancer (1997) 33:253–262.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. van Leeuwen FE, Stiggelbout AM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, et al. Second cancer risk following testicular cancer: a follow-up study of 1909 patients. J Clin Oncol (1993) 11:415–424.
11. Huddart RA, Norman A, Shahidi M, et al. Cardiovascular disease as a long-term complication of treatment for testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol (2003) 21(8):1513–1523.
12. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Lee AK, Strom SS. Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma. J Clin Oncol (2004) 22(4):640–647.
13. Oliver RT, Mason MD, Mead GM, et al. MRC TE19 collaborators and the EORTC 30982 collaborators. Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial. Lancet (2005) 366(9482):293–300.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Travis LB, Andersson M, Gospodarowicz M, et al. Treatment-associated leukemia following testicular cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2000) 92(14):1165–1171.
15. Fossa SD, Gilbert E, Dores GM, et al. Noncancer causes of death in survivors of testicular cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (2007) 99(7):533–544.
16. Martin JM, Panzarella T, Zwahlen DR, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for following stage 1 seminoma. Cancer (2007) 109(11):2248–2256.[Medline]
17. Loehrer PJ Sr, Bosl GJ. Carboplatin for stage I seminoma and the sword of Damocles. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23(34):8566–8569.
18. Meinardi MT, Gietma JA, van der Graaf WTA. Cardiovascular morbidity in long-term survivors of metastatic testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol (2000) 18:1725.
19. Oliver RT, Edmonds PM, Ong JY, et al. Pilot studies of 2 and 1 course carboplatin as adjuvant for stage I seminoma: should it be tested in a randomized trial against radiotherapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (1994) 29(1):3–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
20. Calvert AH, Newell DR, Gumbrell LA, et al. Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. J Clin Oncol (1989) 7(11):1748–1756.[Abstract]
21. Warde P, Specht L, Horwich A, et al. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol (2002) 20(22):4448–4452.
22. National Statistics. Mortality Statistics, Cause. Review of the Registrar General on Deaths by Cause, Sex and Age, in England and Wales, 1999 (2000) London: Stationery Office.
23. WHO. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans: Overall Evaluation of Carcinogenicity () Vol. 1–42. (Suppl 7) Lyon, France: WHO 1987.
24. Travis LB, Holowaty EJ, Bergfeldt K, et al. Risk of leukemia after platinum-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med (1999) 340(5):351–357.
25. Fossa SD, Horwich A, Russell JM, et al. Optimal planning target volume for stage I testicular seminoma: a Medical Research Council randomized trial. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumor Working Group. J Clin Oncol (1999) 17(4):1146.
26. Jones WG, Fossa SD, Mead GM, et al. Randomized trial of 30 versus 20 Gy in the adjuvant treatment of stage I testicular seminoma: a report on Medical Research Council Trial TE18, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial. J Clin Oncol (2005) 23(6):1200–1208.
27. Fossa SD, Chen J, Schonfeld SJ, et al. Risk of contralateral testicular cancer: a population-based study of 29,515 U.S. men. J Natl Cancer Inst (2005) 97(14):1056–1066.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-J. Schmoll, K. Jordan, R. Huddart, M. P. Laguna, A. Horwich, K. Fizazi, V. Kataja, and On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group Testicular seminoma: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann. Onc., May 1, 2009; 20(suppl_4): iv83 - iv88. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Gilbert, N. J. VanAs, S. Beesley, D. Bloomfield, J. Money-Kyrle, A. Norman, D. Dearnaley, A. Horwich, and R. A. Huddart Treating IIA/B Seminoma With Combination Carboplatin and Radiotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2009; 27(12): 2101 - 2102. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Horwich Stage I seminoma and carboplatin risks Ann. Onc., March 1, 2008; 19(3): 407 - 408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

