Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on February 23, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2006 17(8):1335; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl024
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology
letter to the editor |
Effects of new smoking regulations
The introduction of a comprehensive smoke-free law in all indoor workplaces (including bars and restaurants) is supported by a large majority of the population. In Italy, where such legislation was introduced in January 2005, more than 90% of the population are in favour of smoke-free areas or a total smoking ban in all public places [1
, 2]. Such legislation has also led to substantial reduction in exposure to second-hand tobacco and to respiratory symptoms of bar workers [3]. Moreover, if anything, it favourably affects the business of bars and restaurants (9.6% of the population in Italy reported to go more frequently, and 7.4% less frequently, to bars and restaurants after the tobacco ban) [1]. No such ban of smoking in indoor public places has yet been adopted in Switzerland. Thus, we considered data of a survey on smoking conducted in September 2005 by DOXA, a branch of the Gallup International Association, on a sample of 2000 subjects aged 15–74, representative of the Swiss adult population in terms of age, sex and geographic area. The data were collected by ad hoc trained interviewers using a structured computer-assisted telephone interview.
In the adult Swiss population, 22.3% were current cigarette smokers (23.6% of men, 21.1% of women) and 19.1% former smokers (22.3% of men, 16.2% of women). Overall, 76.8% of the Swiss population were in favour of a total ban of smoking in all indoor public places, 62.2% in all workplaces (including private ones), and 64.1% in bars and restaurants. Among smokers, corresponding proportions were 61.9%, 49.5% and 34.1%, and among ex-smokers 79.6%, 62.6% and 68.4%.
This survey confirms that support for smoke-free policies is widespread in the populations of both sexes of many European countries—both non-smokers and smokers—and stresses, therefore, the urgency for adequate political intervention in this vital public health issue [4].
1 Cancer Epidemiology Unit and Cancer Registries of Vaud and Neuchâtel, Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive, Bugnon 17, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland; 2 Istituto DOXA, Gallup International Association, 20144 Milano, Italy; 3 Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’ and Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milano, Italy
* (E-mail: fabio.levi{at}chuv.ch)
References
1. Gallus S, Zuccaro P, Colombo P et al. Effects of new smoking regulations in Italy. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 346–347.
2. La Vecchia C, Garattini S, Colombo P, Scarpino V. Attitudes towards smoking regulations in Italy. Lancet 2001; 358: 245.[ISI][Medline]
3. Allwright S, Paul G, Greiner B et al. Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study. BMJ 2005; 331: 1117–1120.
4. Gray N. National and international nicotine dependence. Ann Oncol 2005; 16: 681–682.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||