Skip Navigation

Annals of Oncology 2006 17(3):355; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl040
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

in this issue

in this issue


    Survival in BRCA1-associated breast cancer
 Top
 Survival in BRCA1-associated...
 5-FU/leucovorin and 3H1 in...
 Chlamydia eradication in orbital...
 Three-weekly vs. weekly...
 Quote
 
Studies comparing survival in BRCA1-associated and sporadic breast cancer report inconsistent results and frequently concern small sample sizes. Moreover, the impact on survival of the classical prognostic factors, e.g. tumor size and nodal status, has not been investigated separately in BRCA1-associated tumors. However, there are indications that this impact might differ from that seen with sporadic cases. In this issue, Brekelmans et al. report a study that aimed to assess the survival of patients with BRCA1-related breast cancer while taking account patient and tumor characteristics and treatment factors that might influence this survival. These authors report that tumor size and nodal status are also prognostic factors for BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Further BRCA1-associated breast cancer is characterized by a high incidence of contralateral breast cancer and a trend towards worse survival for the ductal tumor type.


    5-FU/leucovorin and 3H1 in colorectal cancer
 Top
 Survival in BRCA1-associated...
 5-FU/leucovorin and 3H1 in...
 Chlamydia eradication in orbital...
 Three-weekly vs. weekly...
 Quote
 
According to the anti-idiotype network theory it should be possible to immunize a patient against a particular antigen by exposing that patient to an antibody which mimics the target antigen. The monoclonal antibody 3H1 mimics the external structure of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and, therefore, has the potential to stimulate immune responses to CEA that may benefit colorectal cancer patients. In this issue, Chong et al. report the results of a randomized phase III study of some 630 patients that aimed to compare the clinical efficacy, in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) plus 3H1 to that of 5FU/LV plus placebo. These authors report that 3H1 is safe and does effectively induce immune responses to CEA. Patients with a negative CEA response had a median survival of 8.3 months (95% CI: 7.5-11.0) compared with patients with a strong response: median survival not reached (P < 0.001).


    Chlamydia eradication in orbital lymphoma
 Top
 Survival in BRCA1-associated...
 5-FU/leucovorin and 3H1 in...
 Chlamydia eradication in orbital...
 Three-weekly vs. weekly...
 Quote
 
Chronic inflammation due to various persistent infections may play a crucial role in the development of malignancies. Recent results have implicated Chlamydia, especially Chlamydia psittaci, in the development of ocular adnexal lymphoma. It has been speculated that a high percentage of patients could benefit from antibiotic therapy without exhaustive testing for chlamydial infection. In this issue, Grünberger et al. present a report of their experience with ex-juvantibus antibiotic treatment in patients diagnosed with MALT lymphoma of the ocular adnexa. These authors report finding no effect of "blind" antibiotic treatment with doxycyclin in these patients. They suggest a potential geographic difference in the role of Chlamydia in ocular adnexal lymphoma, and they conclude that antibiotic therapy without prior testing for Chlamydia should be discouraged.


    Three-weekly vs. weekly docetaxel in advanced NSCLC
 Top
 Survival in BRCA1-associated...
 5-FU/leucovorin and 3H1 in...
 Chlamydia eradication in orbital...
 Three-weekly vs. weekly...
 Quote
 
The vast majority of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will progress after first-line chemotherapy; however, patients with a good performance status who had responded to first-line treatment are candidates for second-line chemotherapy. In this setting, docetaxel has demonstrated superiority in 1-year survival and quality of life compared to ifosfamide, vinorelbine, or best supportive care alone. However, using the recommended dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks febrile neutropenia is observed in 12-16% of patients, prompting a search for new dose schedules. In this issue, Camps et al. report the results of a second-line randomized phase III study in advanced NSCLC patients, comparing docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks to docetaxel 36 mg/m2 weekly for 6 consecutive weeks followed by two weeks of rest. These authors report that both weekly and 3-weekly docetaxel are effective and well-tolerated, with different toxicity profiles, but they conclude that in general, there is no indication to recommend the weekly schedule.


    Quote
 Top
 Survival in BRCA1-associated...
 5-FU/leucovorin and 3H1 in...
 Chlamydia eradication in orbital...
 Three-weekly vs. weekly...
 Quote
 
"‘And I think I may say with reasonable certainty that, in order to cure him complete, all that we need to do is a simple and easy surgical operation – namely, to remove these irritant bodies.’

‘And then he will be sane?’

‘Then he will be perfectly sane, and a quite admirable citizen.’

‘Thank Heaven for science!’ said old Yacob, and went forth at once to tell Nunez of his happy hopes."

The doctor proposes a blinding in The Country of the blind by H. G. Wells.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?