Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on June 21, 2006
Annals of Oncology 2006 17(12):1853; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl143
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/12/1853    most recent
mdl143v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pichelmayer, O
Right arrow Articles by Raderer, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pichelmayer, O
Right arrow Articles by Raderer, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 European Society for Medical Oncology

letters to the editor

Bevacizumab is active in malignant effusion

O Pichelmayer*, B Gruenberger, C Zielinski and M Raderer

University Clinic Internal Medicine I, Waehringer Guertel, Vienna, Austria

* (E-mail: oskar.pichelmayer{at}meduniwien.ac.at)

VEGF is supposed to play a major role in the pathogenesis of malignant and non-malignant effusions [1]. We recently reported on a patient with cardiac amyloidosis suffering from refractory pleural effusion [2]. He was successfully treated with a single dose (5 mg/kg) of the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab [3]. In contrast, no significant reduction of malignant effusions was seen in two cancer patients after treatment with bevacizumab using an identical dose. It is well known from the literature that malignant effusion is associated with high levels of VEGF in serum/plasma as well as in malignant effusions [4]. This and our observations led to the assumption that ‘conventional’ dosages of bevacizumab might be too low to treat malignant effusions successfully. This was based on our finding that one of the two patients in whom bevacizumab was not effective still had high VEGF plasma levels after administration of 10 mg bevacizumab per kg. The other patient (heavily pretreated for NSCLC) experienced a slight reduction of her pleural effusion after having received a second dose of bevacizumab which was associated with a decrease of the VEGF plasma level from 89 pg/ml (after the first dose of bevacizumab) to 23 pg/ml.

Therefore, a higher bevacizumab dose (15 mg/kg) was applied in two patients (one with pretreated metastatic colon cancer, the other with pretreated adenocarcinoma of unknown origin) with malignant ascites requiring centesis every 1 to 2 weeks. One patient had centesis prior to bevacizumab treatment, the other patient refused centesis. Pretreatment VEGF plasma levels were 347 and 178 pg/ml, respectively. Treatment with bevacizumab was successful in both patients. In the patient who needed weekly centesis prior to bevacizumab, ascites did not reappear during a follow-up of 6 weeks. In the second patient, a significant reduction of ascites was observed within two days. Of interest, both patients had a marked decrease of their VEGF plasma level after bevacizumab treatment (30 and 27 pg/ml from 347 and 178 pg/ml, respectively). In order to measure the total VEGF load including VEGF stored in platelets, we also determined VEGF serum levels and found that pretreatment VEGF levels in serum were considerably higher than pretreatment VEGF levels in plasma (1.957 versus 347 pg/ml; 3.148 versus 178 pg/ml). However, after therapy with bevacizumab, there was no difference between serum and plasma (25.9 versus 30; 33 versus 27). These data suggest that the total VEGF load was almost completely neutralized by bevacizumab.

We conclude from our preliminary experience that treatment of malignant effusion with bevacizumab might require higher dosages than treatment of the underlying cancer. Responding patients had higher bevacizumab dosages and lower VEGF levels as compared to non-responders.


    References
 Top
 References
 
1. Senger DR, Galli SJ, Dvorak AM, et al. (1983) Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of ascites fluid. Science 219:983–985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Pichelmayer O, Zielinski C, Raderer M. (2005) Response of a nonmalignant pleural effusion to bevacizumab. N Engl J Med 353:740–741.[Free Full Text]

3. Lyseng-Willamson KA and Robinson DM. (2006) Bevacizumab: A review of its use in advanced colorectal cancer, breast cancer and NSCLC. Am J Cancer 5:143–60.[CrossRef]

4. Sack U, Hoffmann M, Zhao XJ, et al. (2005) Vascular endothelial growth factor in pleural effusions of different origin. Eur Respir J 25:4600–604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. Kobold, S. Hegewisch-Becker, K. Oechsle, K. Jordan, C. Bokemeyer, and D. Atanackovic
Intraperitoneal VEGF Inhibition Using Bevacizumab: A Potential Approach for the Symptomatic Treatment of Malignant Ascites?
Oncologist, December 1, 2009; 14(12): 1242 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S-G. Wu, C-H. Gow, C-J. Yu, Y-L. Chang, C-H. Yang, Y-C. Hsu, J-Y. Shih, Y-C. Lee, and P-C. Yang
Frequent epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2008; 32(4): 924 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/12/1853    most recent
mdl143v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pichelmayer, O
Right arrow Articles by Raderer, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pichelmayer, O
Right arrow Articles by Raderer, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?