Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasper, B.
Right arrow Articles by Goldschmidt, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasper, B.
Right arrow Articles by Goldschmidt, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Annals of Oncology 15:176-177, 2004
© 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology

Combination therapy of Thalidomide and Peginterferon in patients with progressive multiple myeloma

B. Kasper1, T. Moehler1, K. Neben2, A. D. Ho1 and H. Goldschmidt1

1 Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Hospitalstrasse 3, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany and 2 German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (E-mail: Bernd_Kasper@med.uni-heidelberg.de)

The rationale of this study was to investigate the safety and therapeutic effect of a combination therapy of Thalidomide (Thal) and IFN-{alpha}. Both agents are known to exert immunomodulatory and anti-angiogenic effects and are used for therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) [1]. In a phase I/II study, Thal was started at a dose of 100 mg and increased daily, up to 400 mg. Peginterferon (PegIntron®) has to be injected subcutaneously once a week at a starting dose of 20 µg, which was increased to 50 µg. For both medications, the dose was escalated over a period of 4 weeks.

From March to October 2001, 15 heavily pretreated MM patients were included in the study [eight females, median age 60 years (range: 56–79), 12 patients stage III MM, median of 10 chemotherapy cycles (range: 5–27), at least one cycle of HDCT in 11 patients). One patient died because of progressive disease (PD) and one patient continued PD during an initial treatment period of only 1 month. After a treatment period of 3 months, 13 patients were evaluable: 1 patient developed partial remission (PR), 5 patients minimal response (MR), 6 patients stable disease (SD), and 1 patient developed PD. Five patients had to stop therapy of PegIntron® because of adverse effects, 1 patient had PD, so that 6 patients were evaluated after 6 months: 1 patient PR, 2 patients MR, and 3 patients SD. We found an overall response rate of 40%; another 6 patients showed SD (Table 1). Progression-free survival (PFS) during the evaluation period of 14 months was 8.23 months (range: 3–14). However, compared to Thal monotherapy data [2, 3] combination with PegIntron® was not able to increase overall response rate.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Decline in monoclonal protein levels (n = 15), evaluated on the basis of the percent changes from base line to the time of maximal response
 
WHO grade I/II adverse effects were observed: somnolence (54%), constipation (46%), dryness of mouth (69%), tingling or numbness (46%), fatigue or weakness (54%), tremor (39%), infection (0%), dizziness (23%), rash (8%) and mood changes (31%). We first reduced dosage of PegIntron® because Thal is more effective in relapsed MM than IFN-{alpha}. While therapy of PegIntron® had to be stopped in 7 patients between 3 and 9 months after start of treatment, dose reduction of Thal was sufficient to reduce adverse effects, so that therapy of Thal could be continued. However, in 8 of 13 evaluable patients the daily Thal dosage had to be reduced. No WHO III/IV adverse effects were observed. In comparison to Thal as single agent [2] in the therapy of patients with relapsing MM, it seems that combination of Thal and PegIntron® led to higher percentages of adverse effects concerning dryness of mouth (69% versus 36%), fatigue or weakness (54% versus 28%), tremor (39% versus 26%) and mood changes (31% versus 16%), while other adverse effects were similar using Thal as a single agent.

In summary, we present a new treatment option for MM patients relapsing after HDCT or after conventional chemotherapy using the combination of Thalidomide and Peginterferon.

B. Kasper1*, T. Moehler1, K. Neben2, A. D. Ho1, H. Goldschmidt1

Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Hospitalstrasse 3, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany and German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (*E-mail: Bernd_Kasper@med.uni-heidelberg.de)

REFERENCES

1. Barlogie B, Zangari M, Spencer T et al. Thalidomide in the management of multiple myeloma. Semin Hematol 2001; 38: 250–259.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

2. Neben K, Moehler TM, Egerer G et al. High plasma basic fibroblast growth factor concentration is associated with response to thalidomide in progressive multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 2675–2681.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. New Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1565–1571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
T. Yanagi, T. Shimizu, H. Ujiie, M. Ito, R. Abe, Y. Tsuji-Abe, S. Hige, and H. Shimizu
Peginterferon alfa-2b for mycosis fungoides.
Arch Dermatol, May 1, 2006; 142(5): 649 - 651.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. D. Schwartz, M. Sung, M. Schwartz, D. Lehrer, J. Mandeli, L. Liebes, A. Goldenberg, and M. Volm
Thalidomide in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Optional Low-Dose Interferon-{alpha}2a upon Progression
Oncologist, October 1, 2005; 10(9): 718 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasper, B.
Right arrow Articles by Goldschmidt, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasper, B.
Right arrow Articles by Goldschmidt, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?