Skip Navigation



Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on October 25, 2009

Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp421
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guethlin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rostock, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guethlin, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rostock, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Characteristics of cancer patients using homeopathy compared with those in conventional care: a cross-sectional study

C. Guethlin1,2,*, H. Walach3, J. Naumann2, H.-H. Bartsch4 and M. Rostock4,5

1 Institute for General Practice, Johann-Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main
2 Department of Evaluation Research in Complementary Medicine, University Hospital, Freiburg/Breisgau, Germany
3 School of Social Sciences and Samueli Institute, University of Northampton, European Office, Northampton, UK
4 Department of Rehabilitation, Tumour Biology Center at Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg/Breisgau, Germany
5 Institute of Complementary Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland

* Correspondence to: Dr C. Guethlin, Institute for General Practice, Johann-Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany. Tel: +49-69-6301-83882; Fax: +49-69-6301-6428; E-mail: guethlin{at}allgemeinmedizin.uni-frankfurt.de

Background: There are only few studies on cancer patients who are treated in complementary and alternative medicine clinics and comparing them with patients in conventional care. We will present the comparison of characteristics of two patient cohorts: one was treated in a homeopathic cancer care clinic and one was treated in a conventional oncology care (CC) outpatient clinic.

Patients and methods: Six-hundred and forty-seven patients were included in this cross-sectional cohort study and had to fill in questionnaires [health-related quality of life (QoL) (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—General Scale), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory) and expectancies toward treatment]. Clinical data were extracted from medical records. This study presents the comparison of both cohorts.

Results: Patients in the homeopathy cohort are younger, better educated and more often employed than patients in the CC cohort. The most pronounced differences indicate longer disease histories and different diagnostic and clinical pretreatment variables. Despite the clinical differences, QoL as well as anxiety, depression and fatigue was similar in both the groups.

Conclusions: Homeopathic treatment is sought by cancer patients at a different phase during the course of the disease, which has particular implications for research. However, expectancies toward the benefit of the treatment as well as QoL data are similar.

cohort study, complementary therapies, cross-sectional, homeopathy, medical oncology

Received for publication July 24, 2009. Accepted for publication July 28, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.