Annals of Oncology Advance Access published online on October 8, 2009
Annals of Oncology, doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp356
Preoperative weekly cisplatin, epirubicin, and paclitaxel (PET) improves prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer patients: an update of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) randomised trial 9908
1 Department of Senology, National Cancer Institute, Naples
2 Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Naples
3 Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Naples
4 Department of Radiology, National Cancer Institute, Naples
5 Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Naples
6 Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Naples
7 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Magna Grecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro
8 Department of Surgical and Anaesthesiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
9 Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
* Correspondence to: Dr G. Frasci, Department of Senology, Unit of Preoperative Treatments, National Cancer Institute, via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy. Tel: +39-081-5903347; Fax: +39-081-5903802; E-mail: giuseppe.frasci{at}libero.it
Background: The present article reports the updated survival outcome of the 200 patients enrolled in the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group 9908 trial, which compared 12 weekly cycles of cisplatin–epirubicin–paclitaxel (PET) with 4 triweekly (once every 3 weeks) cycles of epirubicin–paclitaxel (ET) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).
Methods: The effects of treatment, pathologically documented response (pathological response), pre- and post-treatment biomarkers on relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) are analysed.
Results: At a median follow-up of 74 (range 48–105 months) months, the 5-year RFS, DMFS, and OS were 64 % versus 53% (P = 0.11), 73% versus 55% (P = 0.04), and 82% versus 69% (P = 0.07) in PET and ET, respectively. At multivariate analysis, after adjusting treatment effect for pretreatment biomarkers, PET independently predicted better DMFS (P = 0.018) and OS (P = 0.03), whereas the impact on RFS was of borderline significance (0.057). PET treatment was significantly better than ET treatment only in high-grade or highly proliferating tumours. The better outcome in PET arm was the results of both the higher rate of patients with optimal pathological response and the lower rate of patients with biologically aggressive residual tumour.
Conclusions: The PET weekly regimen significantly improves both DMFS and OS in LABC patients, compared with the triweekly ET combination. The therapeutic advantage is limited to patients with highly aggressive tumours.
cisplatin, breast cancer, dose dense, locally advanced, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, weekly paclitaxel
Received for publication February 26, 2009. Revision received May 26, 2009. Accepted for publication June 16, 2009.