Skip Navigation


Annals of Oncology Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2009
Annals of Oncology 2009 20(10):1714-1721; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp063
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/10/1714    most recent
mdp063v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, I.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aapro, M.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

quality of life supportive care

Modeling of treatment response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as a function of center- and patient-related variables: results from the Anemia Cancer Treatment (ACT) study

M. Aapro1, H. Ludwig2, C. Bokemeyer3, K. MacDonald4, P. Soubeyran5, M. Turner6, T. Albrecht4,7 and I. Abraham4,8,9,*

1 Multidisciplinary Institute of Oncology, Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland
2 Department of Medicine and Oncology, Wilhelminen Hospital, Wien, Austria
3 Department of Hematology–Oncology, Clinic University of Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
4 Matrix45, Earlysville, USA
5 Institut Bergonié and University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France
6 F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
7 University of Virginia, School of Nursing, Charlottesville
8 Division of Nursing Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson
9 Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science and Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, Tucson, USA

* Correspondence to: Dr I. Abraham, Matrix45, 620 Frays Ridge Road, Earlysville, VA 22936, USA. Tel: +1-303-997-2697; Fax: +1-978-945-8374; E-mail: iabraham{at}matrix45.com

Background: In anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), (i) to examine the proportion of variance in hemoglobin (Hb) outcomes attributable to patients versus center, country, and region and (ii) to develop predictive models of treatment response.

Methods: Retrospective study with a minimum of three visits at 1-month intervals. Three hundred and seven centers in 13 European countries contributed 2192 anemic ESA-treated cancer patients. Treatment response criteria included: Hb{uparrow}≥1 g/dl, Hb{uparrow}≥1 g/dl within 8 weeks, hematopoietic response (Hb{uparrow}≥2 g/dl or Hb ≥ 12 g/dl), Hb{uparrow}≥2 g/dl, and Hb between 12 and 13 g/dl.

Results: Hb increased from 9.54 ± 0.95 g/dl (baseline) to 10.88 ± 1.49 g/dl (visit 3). Hb change from visits 1 to 2 (index of relative immediacy of response to ESA) averaged 0.81 ± 1.17 g/dl. The proportion of variance in Hb outcomes attributable to center was 11.8%–34.3%, country 2.9%–20.7%, and region 0.0%–7.6%. Immediacy of response to ESA was the most prevalent predictor of treatment response, followed by diagnosis of hematological malignancy and age <70 years.

Conclusions:. Hb outcomes are determined significantly by the treating center and less so by country or region. The remaining majority variance was attributable to patient-related factors. Immediacy of response to ESA is the single most important predictor of treatment. When used according to guidelines, ESAs are effective in managing anemia in cancer patients and improving treatment outcomes.

Key words: anemia, erythropoietin, hemoglobin, modeling, outcomes, treatment response

Received for publication December 18, 2008. Revision received February 14, 2009. Accepted for publication February 19, 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.