Annals of Oncology 7:837-842, 1996
© 1996 European Society for Medical Oncology
research-article |
Rationale for the dosage and schedule of CPT-11 (irinotecan) selected for phase II studies, as determined by European phase I studies
1Institut Gustave-Roussy Villejuif
2Hôpital St. Louis Paris
3Centre Léon Bérard Lyon, France
Correspondence to: Jean Pierre Armand, MD Institut Gustave-Roussy 39 rue Camille Desmoulins 94805 Villejuif Cedex France
BACKGROUND:: CPT-11 (irinotecan), a camptothecin-derived anticancer agent with DNA topoisomerase 1 inhibitory activity, has demonstrated a broad spectrum of in vitro and in vivo activity in solid tumour models including multidrug-resistant tumours. This review details the rationale for the dosage schedule of CPT-11 selected for phase II studies, based on the results of 3 European phase I dose-escalating trials in patients with solid tumours.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:: CPT-11 was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks (schedule 1), once daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks (schedule 2) or once weekly every 3 out of 4 weeks (schedule 3).
RESULTS:: Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the major doselimiting toxicities in all of the studies. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 115 and 145 mg/m2/day for schedules 2 and 3, respectively. With schedule 1, diarrhoea became dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2 but was manageable with highdose loperamide therapy.
CONCLUSIONS:: CPT-11 350 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks was chosen for further evaluation in early phase II studies, since this dosage regimen allowed the highest dose intensity with the least toxicity and was convenient for outpatient use. The place of higher doses (with intensive antidiarrhoeal support) and other administration schedules (e.g., protracted infusion) warrant further investigation.
chemotherapy, CPT-11, dosage schedules, irinotecan, DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, solid tumours
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Hyatt, L. Tsurkan, M. Wierdl, C. C. Edwards, M. K. Danks, and P. M. Potter Intracellular inhibition of carboxylesterases by benzil: modulation of CPT-11 cytotoxicity. Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2006; 5(9): 2281 - 2288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Borner, J. Bernhard, D. Dietrich, R. Popescu, M. Wernli, P. Saletti, D. Rauch, R. Herrmann, D. Koeberle, H. Honegger, et al. A randomized phase II trial of capecitabine and two different schedules of irinotecan in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: efficacy, quality-of-life and toxicity Ann. Onc., February 1, 2005; 16(2): 282 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. T. Batchelor, M. R. Gilbert, J. G. Supko, K. A. Carson, L. B. Nabors, S. A. Grossman, G. J. Lesser, T. Mikkelsen, S. Phuphanich, and for the NABTT CNS Consortium Phase 2 study of weekly irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma: Final report of NABTT 97-11 Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2004; 6(1): 21 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yalcin, B. Oksuzoglu, G. Tekuzman, H. Engin, I. Celik, A. Turker, I. Barista, I. Gullu, N. Guler, K. Altundag, et al. Biweekly Irinotecan Plus Bolus 5-Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid in Patients with Advanced Stage Colorectal Cancer Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 33(11): 580 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Vassal, F. Doz, D. Frappaz, K. Imadalou, E. Sicard, A. Santos, J. O'Quigley, C. Germa, M.-L. Risse, D. Mignard, et al. A Phase I Study of Irinotecan As a 3-Week Schedule in Children With Refractory or Recurrent Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., October 15, 2003; 21(20): 3844 - 3852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Raymond, M. Fabbro, V. Boige, O. Rixe, M. Frenay, G. Vassal, S. Faivre, E. Sicard, C. Germa, J. M. Rodier, et al. Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naive patients with glioblastoma Ann. Onc., April 1, 2003; 14(4): 603 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Hesketh Defining the Emetogenicity of Cancer Chemotherapy Regimens: Relevance to Clinical Practice Oncologist, June 1, 1999; 4(3): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||





